students made the initial contact to conduct interviewing leading to the websurvey on flood conditions and flood policy. In order for them to do their job well (that is to bepersuasive for getting consent on interviews), they need to be confident and erudite on thepurpose of the research. A typical resident might like to know, “What is in this for me or mycommunity?”Every interviewed student researcher was asked the question: “What in your own words is thepurpose of this project?” We selected one response to share. I described to the interviewees that people forget that Texas floods because we are in, I think we are technically in a desert, and so people forget that our soil is heavily clay and that in cities, it's a lot of
postdoctoral research at the Harvard Medical School. He has 7 years of industrial research experience in environmental consulting and is dedicated to training young professionals. Page 26.1243.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Preliminary Evaluation of a Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) Program: A Methodology for Examining Student OutcomesAbstractThe current study presented an initial evaluation, following Year 1, of a National ScienceFoundation (NSF) sponsored Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) program inchemical
knowledge sharing to facilitate achieving profoundchange in undergraduate education. They are to achieve this by understanding and enactingtenets of anti-racism and decolonization through the four recurring stages of Participatory ActionLearning and Action Research (PALAR), plan-act-observe-reflect.This paper assesses the lessons learned from an active community engagement project fromthe initial stages of grant development to the first year of a four-year government-funded grantfrom a faculty member and two students' perspectives. The lessons learned include investingtime at the beginning of each phase to outline roles and responsibilities and make spacefor all voices.Project SummaryBy design, this project is centered on the students involved
remains one of the highest among allundergraduate students (Science and engineering indicators, 2006 ; Tinto, 1993). This leads tolow ranking in terms of the supply of STEM professionals and threatens the nation's economicdominance in the global marketplace. As a result, a considerable amount of research has beengenerated to develop intervention and preventative initiatives, including mentorship programsthat address the primary causes of student attrition from STEM fields. Less than half of students who enroll in STEM undergraduate programs as first-yearstudents graduate with a STEM degree at the national level (Hayes et al., 2009). In part as aresult of these high attrition rates, the United States has a consistently low ranking in terms
) reductionand selection using the item-total correlation. A more stringent cutoff of 0.60 was used to selectthe items from all 94 ideas based on the rating. Most of the stakeholders found all items to beimportant and a cutoff of 0.60 ensured that items from all clusters were included. If there wereitems that had a correlation less than 0.60, but were regarded by stakeholders to be important,those items were retained. Qualitatively, items were added and deleted based on this criterion.As a result, the initial item pool was reduced from 94 to 48 items. The primary researcher andanother STEM education researcher reviewed the remaining 48 items for clarity as well as
research and education. Strategies employed by the E&O Team to achieve this mission include: Integrate initiatives into existing community and academic support systems; Fund and/or provide resources for hands-on learning of science and math within budget constraints; Develop and maintain activities that promote STEM disciplines to next generation; Develop and maintain partnerships with other institutions and organizations for present and future collaborations; Promote leading edge technology in the state; Locate additional supplemental and/or alternative funding for programs; and Disseminate programs on a regional and national level.Influencing Factors In order to
separate grant-funded programs or initiatives funded by the National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Education, U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of Agri- culture, National Institutes of Health, and The Kern Family Foundation. These projects have focused on the evaluation of student success, outreach impacts, innovative learning techniques, and STEM-related interventions and curricula.Dr. Carrie A. Obenland, Rice University Dr. Obenland is the Assistant Director for Outreach and Research at the Rice Office of STEM Engage- ment. She as her PhD in Chemistry from Rice University, as well as her Masters. Her graduate work was focused on chemical education. She earned her BS in Chemical Engineering from the
doctoralstudents were enrolled in the institution’s engineering departments. Seventeen differentengineering disciplines are options for doctoral study (ASEE, 2020).Program Description As part of the effort of the Materials Genome Initiative (MGI), Data-Enabled Discoveryand Design of Energy Materials (D3EM), an interdisciplinary graduate program funded by anNSF Research Traineeship grant, aims to train the next generation scientists and engineers andspeed up the process of materials discovery and development (Chang, Semma, Fowler, &Arroyave, 2017; Lavadia, Chang, & Fowler, 2018). To create an innovative training model,D3EM recruited experts from materials science, informatics, engineering design, and STEMgraduate education to develop and run
classrooms.Dr. Arlene Ann RussellDr. Warren N. Waggenspack Jr., Louisiana State University Warren N. Waggenspack, Jr. is currently the Associate Dean for Academic Programs in the College of Engineering and holder of the Ned Adler Professorship in mechanical engineering at Louisiana State University. He obtained both his bachelor’s and master’s degrees from LSU M.E. and his doctorate from Purdue University’s School of Mechanical Engineering. He has been actively engaged in teaching, research, and curricula development since joining the LSU faculty in 1988. As Associate Dean, he has acquired funding from NSF to support the development of several initiatives aimed at improving student retention and graduation rates as well as
AC 2012-3981: IMPROVING STUDENT LEARNING USING FINITE ELE-MENT LEARNING MODULES: AN UPDATE IN RESEARCH FINDINGSDr. Ashland O. Brown P.E., University of the Pacific Ashland O. Brown, Ph.D., P.E. is currently a professor of mechanical engineering at the University of the Pacific School of Engineering and Computer Science. He served as a Program Director in the Mechani- cal/Civil Engineering Section of the National Science Foundation from 1998 to 1999. He served as Dean of Engineering at the University of the Pacific from 1991 to 1998 and Dean of Engineering Technology at South Carolina State University from 1989 to 1991. He served as an Engineering Group Manager for the Body Structures Design Group at General Motor
Table 2: Initial subject plan for the first required course,research standpoint, multiphase Fundamentals of Multiphase Environmental Researchenvironmental research problems. No. of weeks Subject 1 Introduction to the Center for MultiphaseThey gain an appreciation of each Environmental Research at WSUof the components in this process, 3 Conservation principlesand they begin to understand why - Conservation of mass and the control volumeresearchers in each discipline view - Conservation of energy; the first law ofsimilar problems in different ways
cutting lab. • Participating in an online virtual conference (one participant also participated in a second online conference that was directly relevant to his research topic). • Online video games and puzzles, identified by participants. • Online virtual tours using Google Maps and other websites, identified by participants. • Playing the Black Hills Information Security’s Backdoors and Breaches game using a document camera through Microsoft Teams. • Remote presentation from a researcher at NASA JPLLike in previous years, participant-initiated and participant-planned activities were incorporated.Several of the forgoing were participant-led or planned during year three and did not appeal tothe group (the year three
. The lab manual would includecomponents like grading policy, teamwork expectations, communication methods, and policy,emphasis on initiative, professionalism, quality work, and positive attitude, domain knowledgerequirements, technology needs and tutorials, the relationship between graduate andundergraduate researchers, and expectations around progress check-ins. Furthermore, Weldonand Reyna [5] recommended assigning concrete laboratory tasks to students – the more specific,the better. Examples of concrete educational tasks include running specific data analyses (e.g.,run a correlation between sensation-seeking score and proportion of risky choices) or finding acertain number of recent articles on a certain topic (e.g., create a spreadsheet
literature to better represent the magnitude of eachvariable. In both the Python and NetLogo models, we utilized the “random” function to maximizethe variability of each student-agent’s experience. This means that students’ interactions with eachvariable was randomly assigned instead of us as researchers assigning experiences to each agent.Randomizing the variables allows researchers to easily customize the number of agents and createsmore opportunities for a variety of experiences to be represented. The model initiates with each student-agent beginning their first academic year with arandomly prescribed motivation value between 10 and 25 that indicates their desire to go tograduate school. This is used to represent observed varying levels of
in their families. These studentsworked on nine HPC-related projects prepared for this REU site. The conducted researchprojects, along with names and affiliations of the mentors, are listed in Table II.To capitalize on students’ initial excitement on being selected to benefit research, we asked ourfaculty mentors to send an email to the students shortly after the students are selected towelcome them into their lab. The notes usually include attachments or links to papers relatedto the student’s future research project. This helps the students develop a sense of belonging tothe program even before they started the program. Before starting the summer REU program,TABLE I: The 2021 Virtual REU Site Master Schedule (CC: Crash Course on HPC
Civil Engineering from the University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, in 2003, 2005, and 2008 respectively. He is currently with Computer Science, Physics, and Engineering Department, Benedict College, Columbia, SC. He is interested in exploring different approaches for engineering education and research to reach students more efficiently. He has collaborated with researchers and students in NSF HBCU UP targeted infusion, broadening participation and excellence in research projects. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Assessing Student Impacts from an Interdisciplinary Summer Research Program
www.slayte.com Assessing Awareness and Competency of Engineering Freshmen on Ethical and Responsible Research and PracticesAbstractThis paper presents the initial work of a recently funded NSF project on ethical and responsibleresearch and practices in science and engineering. The objective of this research is to improveinstructor training, interventions, and student outcomes in high schools and universities to improveawareness and commitment to ethical practices in STEM coursework. The project will generate arobust snapshot of the ethical knowledge, reasoning skills, attitudes, and practices of severalthousand undergraduate engineering students. This snapshot will inform the development of athree-week enrichment opportunity for high
Paper ID #37113Developing Deeper Student Mentoring Relationships: BlackEngineering Faculty Translating their Mentee Experiences toStudents (Research)Sylvia L. Mendez (Professor/Chair) Dr. Sylvia Mendez is a Professor and Chair of the Department of Leadership, Research, and Foundations at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs. She is engaged in several National Science Foundation-sponsored collaborative research projects focused on broadening participation in STEM academia. Dr. Mendez’s research centers on the creation of optimal higher education policies and practices that advance faculty careers and student
Paper ID #38964Research on Governance of Higher Engineering Education Quality in Chinaafter Accessing the Washington AccordDr. Ming Li, Beijing Foreign Studies University Dr. Ming Li is an assistant professor at the Graduate School of Education, Beijing Foreign Studies Univer- sity, Beijing, China. He received his PhD in Administration at the Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics. From March 2013 to June 2013, he visited the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University as a visiting scholar. He ever worked as a post-doctor at the Institute of Education, Tsinghua University from 2016 to 2018. His research
presented at ASEE increased from 2006-2020. Insome ways, the topics of research stayed consistent over time while some concepts were presentfor only a particular period of time. For example, in each segment of five years, there was a focuson pedagogy (e.g., education, learning, engagement, motivation) and designing games forlearning ( e.g., evaluation, strategies, projects). These concepts were a uniform thread over time.Conversely, special topics of interest appeared and disappeared. Initially, the gaming studies wereprimarily in computing fields and this expanded into other STEM areas over time. From2016-2020, interdisciplinary work increased and gaming research in mathematicsdecreased.With the advancement of VR and AR technology, many games are
Paper ID #32632Program Encryption Toolkit: A Tool for Digital Logic Education andUndergraduate ResearchDr. Jeffrey Todd McDonald, University of South Alabama Dr. Jeffrey ”Todd” McDonald is a Professor of Computer Science in the School of Computing at the University of South Alabama. He received his Ph.D. in Computer Science from Florida State University in 2006, his Master of Science degree in Computer Engineering from the Air Force Institute of Technology in 2000, and his Bachelor of Science degree in Computer Science from the U. S. Air Force Academy in 1990. His research interests include program protection and
Engineering from U-M. Dr. Finelli is responsible for advising the U-M College of Engineering on educational endeavors, conducting research in engineering education, planning and facilitating workshops for faculty and graduate student instructors, and generating a community of researchers in engineering education. She is also a member of the U-M Steering Committee for the President’s Ethics in Public Life Initiative and the College of Engineering’s Diversity and Outreach Council. Dr. Finelli is a member of the Executive Board of the ERM Division of ASEE and was program co-chair for the 33rd Frontiers in Education Conference and for the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. She participated
7 Biotransport 4 Bioinformatics 42.4 Ethics component Page 13.128.5 Since ethics is a crucial component of undergraduate engineering education – and playsan especially important role in research, medicine, and health – we took advantage of the REUprogram to provide our students with a rich initial grounding in bioethics, both professionallyand in a broader sense. A substantial ethics component was critical for at least three reasons.First, students who will be researchers or engineers should be aware of the ethical obligations,hazards, and
AC 2008-970: RESEARCH ON THE EVOLUTION OF COLLEGE INSTRUCTORS'PERSPECTIVES OF TEACHING AND LEARNINGBugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University Bugrahan Yalvac is an assistant professor of Science Education at Texas A&M University. He worked as a post-doctorate research fellow at VaNTH Engineering Research Center in Northwestern University. He holds a Ph.D. degree in Science Education from the Pennsylvania State University and an M.S. degree from the Middle East Technical University. He specializes in design and assessment of learning environments pertaining to science and engineering subjects in K-12 and postsecondary levels. Address: Texas A&M University; Teaching, Learning, and
theAccelerated STEM Pathways through Internships, Research, Engagement, and Support(ASPIRES) project, a collaborative initiative that addresses identified barriers to student successusing high-impact educational practices that have been shown to enhance interest, increaseparticipation, and improve outcomes for underrepresented minority students in STEM. One ofthe main components of this project is a three-tiered internship program that that is suitable forcommunity college students and provides multiple exposures to undergraduate researchopportunities. This paper focuses on the first tier of this initiative, the development andimplementation of the ASPIRES Scholars Research Program: a two-week introduction to researchinternship experience. Held during
Paper ID #18274Impact of a Biomedical Engineering Undergraduate Research Program onStudent and Faculty Perceptions of CreativityMegan Huffstickler, Pennsylvania State University Megan Huffstickler is an Educational Psychology graduate student at Penn State who is interested in student learning in STEM fields.Dr. Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Sarah Zappe is Senior Research Associate and Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. She holds a doctoral degree in educational psychology emphasizing applied
: Initially, I thought creativity had to do with art majors and I thought that I wasn't creative at all but I think creativity is being able to—with research being able to come up with new parameters if something in your protocol fails, so yeah it helps you realize that creativity is not just about the arts, it's about being able to solve this and change this, yeah.Relatedly, multiple students felt that the experience helped them to understand the linkbetween research and creativity. I've been taught that [research is] supposed to be far more creative. There's a definite creative process that's supposed to be involved in research. They emphasize that several times throughout several workshops, so I've been
Paper ID #26450Creating a Successful Pathway to Graduate Studies: The Student IntegratedIntern Research Experience (SIIRE)Dr. Carol S. Gattis, University of Arkansas Dr. Carol Gattis is the Associate Dean Emeritus of the Honors College and an adjunct Associate Pro- fessor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas. Her academic research focuses on STEM education, developing programs for the recruitment, retention and graduation of a diverse population of students. Carol also serves as a consultant specializing in new program development and grants. She earned her bachelor’s, master’s and Ph.D. degrees in
Paper ID #15524Disciplinary Specificity in Engineering Communication: Rhetorical Instruc-tion in an Undergraduate Engineering Research ClassDr. Jessie Stickgold-Sarah, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Jessie Stickgold-Sarah received a joint B.S. degree in electrical engineering and computer science, and the Science, Technology & Society program, in 1997 from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and the Ph.D. degree in English and American literature in 2011 from Brandeis University. She is a lecturer in Writing, Rhetoric, and Professional Communication in CMS/W at MIT.Dr. Rebecca Thorndike-Breeze
Page 26.669.8 the project from initial stage to end. The student's practical ability is exercised, research interest is motivated, and creation thought is stimulated by employing self-determination design and development mode in this project. Figure 1 Simulation result of a mobile robot trajectory generated by Fuzzy Logic modelThe interactive self-assessments are beneficial to discover the strength and weakness of teachingand learning cycles with research components. The self-assessment was acquired from students inthis ELEE4400/5400 as follows corresponding to ABET outcomes [6]. 1. Question 1 - “I can understand structures of artificial neural networks and perform training for neural networks and profoundly