disciplines, and in which students will respond via role-play. We consider the role-play format particularly important because of its potential use as adiagnostic as students prepare for and return from their cross-cultural experiences. Since role-plays have not been used to assess international student experiences, this format may revealimportant needs for further research in this area. Finally, we hope to contribute to studies inglobal competency by describing how we are creating and implementing the instrument at eachpoint of its development.To help develop the scenarios, and ensure they are as comprehensive and authentic as possible,we utilized the expertise of a broad sample of faculty and undergraduate students at MIT withvaried international
2000-01.• Excellent SE faculty and Program: This almost always meant that most of the faculty had substantial industry experience, as well as academic credentials.• Industrial Advisory Board: Virtually every department had a very active board. In one instance (Murdoch University in Perth, Western Australia), the host arranged to meet with board members off-campus. This also drew participants from other local universities.• Infrastructure: This was the most likely gap of any university department. Such components include a development incentive, e.g., release time or money, development support, such as staff, tools, and processes, and course resources. The operations side also has requirements
program from scratch, a partnership with Olin College of Engineering was formed. Ourinstitutions’ and faculties’ shared values and objectives have helped us navigate the pitfallsinherent in the development of new discipline. This paper seeks to share our lessons learned andspecific strategies for successful program development and implementation. These lessonslearned range from issues of program culture to crafting student experiences in the classroom.Introduction: the case for a new engineering disciplineThere is a growing demand for engineers and a need to embed professional, leadership andentrepreneurial skills into an engineering education. The national demand for engineers is welldocumented as attested by the National Academy of Engineering
expenditure of some organizational energy, the focus of TECH-4 EducationalConsortium was on the creation of a technical educational structure that would be compatiblewith the existing community college and university system. This effort lead to a multiyearmillion dollar proposal with industry match to NSF's Advanced Technology Education Division,ATE. Grant partners are Brevard (Melbourne), Hillsborough (Tampa), Seminole (Sanford), andValencia (Orlando) Community Colleges; along with the University of South Florida (Tampa)and the University of Central Florida (Orlando) and Cirent Semiconductor (Orlando). Theawarded grant crossed the boundaries of three ATE areas (Curriculum and InstructionalMaterials; Teacher and Faculty Development; and Laboratory
, emergency management, and hazardous materials management encompass awide range of activities and are a multi-disciplinary endeavor. Faculty and programscollaboration is becoming increasingly necessary in the preparation of the future workforce. Tofurther enhance programs, the Department of Technology at JSU made efforts to collaborate withother academic disciplines. The project is operated in cooperation with faculty from theBiological Sciences Department at Alcorn State University (ASU) and Environmental HealthDepartment at Mississippi Valley State University (MVSU). The partnership among these threeuniversities can improve and increase nuclear related education in Mississippi.We are developing three new courses (“Introduction to Nuclear
assistantprofessor power faculty also declined to only 12 percent in 2006.Developing the power engineering and energy workforce for the next millennium has become anational and global challenge. Not only is the industry workforce approaching retirement, so isthe educational backbone of electric power engineering2. It is estimated that approximately 30 to40 percent of the national electric power workforce will reach retirement or move into otherindustries by 20133. Universities need to revamp and invigorate their electrical engineeringprograms to entice new faculty as well as new students. The projection for the 2013 workforcelooks somewhat bleak.In order for the United States to provide an adequately skilled labor force for the electric utilityindustry
result, the graduate programs would includeAWE focus areas such as, air-system engineering, structures specialization, and etc.… Thiswould provide graduates with skills and knowledge that will enable him or her to join industryairworthiness departments in specific disciplines with minimal supervision from practicingairworthiness professionals.One of the most important factors of developing these guidelines is ensuring the qualifications ofthe faculty and instructors. As the need for airworthiness engineers is great, utilizingairworthiness professionals for education is not practical in the near term. In addition, themajority of faculty currently in practice do not have industry experience in airworthiness. It willbe the recommendation of the
SESSION 3153 Pr oject Planning & Development for Engineer ing Fr eshman Bouzid Aliane, Michael A. Collur a, Samuel Daniels, J ean Nocito-Gobel School of Engineer ing & Applied Science, Univer sity of New HavenAbstr actThe nature and background of students seeking an engineering education has changeddrastically in the last decade, as has the expectations of industrial employers. Manystudents lack the organizational skills needed for academic success. Similarorganizational skills, although more advanced, are required for managing engineeringprojects. A new course was developed by the faculty at the School of Engineering andApplied Science
Education”biodiversity and ecosystem management. Engineering and science are key in each of theseareas – and an indigenous capacity in these technical fields must be developed to assurethat foreign aid funding is used effectively and efficiently.Education is key to capacity building. While aid to developing countries must includesignificant funding for K-12 education, university level education, and continuingeducation in the fields of engineering and science are most urgently need. It isrecommended that support for indigenous technical capacity building be included in eachaid project in a developing country. Universities and other educational agencies need tobe built, re-equipped, and sustained, along with their faculties; graduates need
more time for facultycollaboration, it is suggested that full-time instructors teach the course. In addition, it would bedesirable to have tenured faculty teach this course because cross-functional collaborativeteaching is difficult to implement.VII. ConclusionsThe goal of LMU's "New Product Design and Development" course was to design products,build prototypes, and analyze the marketing/business aspects of launching new commercialproducts. MIT's product design and development course was used as model for our integratedproduct teams. However, our course was distinctly different in terms of lower course credit (3semester hours), different course expectations, different product and team selection process,having the project teams co-located, and
, transportation, environmental, surveyingand project/construction management. While as many as one third of graduating civil engineersgo to work in the land development industry (University placement statistics, 2001-2005), fewcivil engineering programs in the country have any course or emphasis in land developmentwithin their curriculum. This paper describes an ongoing initiative that brings togetherundergraduate CEE students and faculty with industry professionals in an effort to improve landdevelopment design education.Prior to this initiative, the CEE Department had one course titled “Land Development Design”,taught once per year and it was available for more than 10 years. Historically, this course wasalways taught by an adjunct instructor, usually
take an introductory course in thefundamentals of engineering. In this course, students learn the fundamentals of engineering thatthey will use for years to come. Beyond helpful tools such as CAD and other computer software,the course offers students a chance to explore other topics relevant to engineering. This includes,disciplinary boundaries of engineering, engineering ethics, and the design process. While thesetopics can be given a cursory lecture, there exists opportunities to expand on these themes andtopics. Given practices of inclusive classrooms, a faculty member can create engaging ways tohave students explore these topics and encourage the development of good research skills andcritical thinking. Inclusive practices can include
engineers, engineering faculty, graduate students, and fellow undergraduate students 2. Understand the focus of each (selected) engineering major and then be able to make an informed choice. 3. Begin building professional relationships with faculty members within the student’s department of interest.Once these learning objectives were developed, it became evident that a traditional lecture-basedcourse would be difficult to effectively implement and meet the stated objectives while creating aunique and rigorous course. Thus, a creative approach was necessary. In order to fully engagestudents in discipline-specific activities, they must be divided into discipline-specific groups;however, it becomes complicated when a large
areoptional and all the timings (given in diamonds) are indicative. The workshop faculty modifiescontents and timings based on time availability and group profile. The introductory sessionelicits expectations from participants, tries to assess if we can meet the expectations and informsparticipants accordingly. We also form diverse groups in the session. The group size is typically4 to 7 depending on the total number of participants. We ask the groups to announce their names,unique methods of salutation, unique tunes and introduce their peer members on a dais. Thishelps in developing networking and presentation skills.We then cover the 3H model as a requirement for any developmental activity i.e. ―head‖ to think,―heart‖ to relate and ―hands‖ to
Educational Quality Support Fund, Contract# LEQSF(94-95)-ENH-UG-23. Page 1.148.1 $!fii’ } 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings ‘a.,yTCxl’;: .integration of these building blocks with software to build computing systems. This laboratory would alsoprovide students with facilities to experiment, develop, and run real-time soflware support for a physical system. As the project began to develop and space in which to locate the laboratory became difllcult to find, thesecond author joined the faculty
Session 2325 TOGA PARTY - Developing a Tradition George Staab, Scott Evans / Sue Godez / Eric Engdahl The Ohio State University / Grandview Heights High School / American Electric PowerFIRST is a national competition intended to stimulate high school students to become interestedand involved with science and technology. Each year the process begins when teams obtainboxes of components, and a description of the objectives for the competition. Once the materialsare received, each team has six weeks to construct a robot which is capable of playing a sport.The components which can be used and the sport which to be
, 1994. Award of funding was announced in early 1995.APPROACH TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MECHATRONIC ENGINEERING (ME)LABORATORYProiect Development Team In order to most efficiently carry out the development effort, we subdivided the faculty team consistingof the authors into two teams to focus on course and laborato~ content for ME 105 and ME 190 respectively Page 1.291.2 $iii’ ) 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings ‘.. 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings ‘..p!m
Page 11.1418.3course a Full Adder problem is given as a topic for discussion. One group discussed design ofthe Full Adder and other group discussed about the applications of Full Adder.Quiz Tool: This tool was extensively used in both Civil and Electronics EngineeringTechnology courses. This tool creates test from a data bank of questions and automaticallygrades the test.The aforementioned tools served as the backbone for outcome assessment and continuousimprovement plan for the courses in both the programs.The following paragraphs will describe the hybrid WebCT learning and assessment methoddeveloped by Savannah State University faculty and Advanced Systems Engineering.Hybrid WebCT Learning ModelNumerous approaches can be used to develop and
, Armenia, and Honduras) to give students opportunities to participatein projects in the developing world16. The concern of engineers participating in these projects isthat they often do not involve application of engineering skills; however, the positive benefit isthat students are exposed to real needs outside of the academic environment.Baylor has a Center for International Education,17 which seeks to ensure the most positiveexperiences possible for international students and faculty, and to emphasize to the largerUniversity community the contributions of internationals to the diversity and richness of thestudent body. The Center seeks to encourage the growth of tolerance, understanding, respect,and compassion by managing study abroad and
1 Agricultural Engineering Education in Developing Countries S. Fernando, S. Bhushan and M. Naveen AbstractAgricultural Engineering or Biological (Systems) Engineering is still considered a fairly newprofession not only in developing countries but also in many of the developed countries. Althoughcivil, mechanical, chemical, electrical and industrial engineering are well established asengineering subdivisions, Agricultural and Biological Engineering is still not considered as adirect engineering discipline in many of the 162 developing countries in Asia
time, AAMU’s students will have accessto a 2,500-sq. ft. class 10,000 clean room where these experiences will be obtained.Although Faculty members at AAMU have the necessary experience and expertise to offer Page 7.424.3courses in the option area of VLSI and Microelectronics, laboratories and other practicalinfrastructure components of the program have not yet been developed. During the summer of1999, the Department of Electrical Engineering of AAMU entered into an agreement with theUMass - Lowell to provide laboratory experiences for students in the VLSI andMicroelectronics option.During the summer of 2000, students in this option were allowed to
"organic"may nonetheless be time-consuming and awkward to develop into full-fledged teaching materialsand methods. If he/she is not an ethics "expert," how does an engineering instructor create anduse course-specific materials on ethics and professional responsibility?At the University of Texas at Austin, the College of Engineering is attempting to answer thisquestion by sponsoring a faculty team to develop a series o f Web-based teaching modules ontopics ranging from research ethics to professional liability. Each module is designed to provideall materials necessary to assess what students already know about the topic, to prepare them forin-class discussion, to offer additional readings and resources, and to engage in follow-upactivities. The
maintenance of curriculum,maintenance equipment and other related infrastructure shall be assumed by annual fund of IETat Southeast, including funding professional development activities to keep faculty certificationsand expertise current.The major expense associated with the implementation of this project was in equipping thelaboratories with appropriate hardware/software to supplement classroom lectures with “hands-on” activities. This was a one-time non-recurring cost and is good through the useful life of theequipment. All costs associated with equipment installation (plumbing and electric) andmaintenance of equipment shall be the responsibility of IET.We expect all certification based training modules will have at least a 3 year “shelf-life
the engineering curriculum, as well asextensive evidence of attrition from engineering majors to other programs.”4 Examining barriersto innovation and creativity within structural engineering curricula, another team of researchersargued that “focusing predominately on developing analytical skills at the expense of variablesolution approaches limits the development of the divergent thinking skills needed forinnovation.”5 In surveying students and faculty perceptions, Kazerounian and Foley found thatwhile engineering instructors report that they value creativity in their students, those studentsreported the opposite.12 Zappe and Tise found that while “students perceptions of themselves ascreative individuals and their confidence in their
integrated leadership, ethics, and globalization curriculum at BYU and was recently appointed Weidman Professor in Leadership.Dr. Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University Gregg M. Warnick is the Director of the Weidman Center for Global Leadership and Associate Teaching Professor of Engineering Leadership within the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University (BYU). The center provides oversight for leadership development and inter- national activities within the college and he works actively with students, faculty and staff to promote and develop increased capabilities in global competence and leadership. His research and teaching interests include developing global agility
AC 2009-964: DEVELOPING A FEEL FOR STRUCTURAL BEHAVIORCole McDaniel, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoGraham Archer, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Page 14.441.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Developing a ‘Feel’ for Structural BehaviorCurrent approaches to engineering education have failed to prepare students to use computers inengineering applications. Upon graduation, engineering students are often not able to create asufficiently accurate computational model of the systems they design and analyze.Unfortunately this is the very task that many young engineers are asked to
2006-2147: DESIGNING TECHNOLOGY FOR DEVELOPING NATIONSWillie Ofosu, Pennsylvania State University-Wilkes-Barre Dr. Willie K. Ofosu is an Associate Professor and Head of Telecommunications Engineering Technology program at Penn State Wilkes-Barre, where he teaches telecommunications, wireless systems, networking, optoelectronics and analog and digital electronics. He is a member of IEEE, IEE (England), and a Chartered Engineer (CEng) of England. He is also a member of the National Association of Radio and Telecommunications Engineers (NARTE) and contributes to their Education Committee. His research interests are in RF components and antennas. He is currently involved in
Session 2563 Developing Competencies For Engineering Foundations Courses Nadia A. Basaly, Ph.D. The university of Texas at Brownsville College of Science, Math and Technology Brownsville, TX 78520Abstract Pre-college Minority Engineering Program has been designed to motivate and prepareminority middle and high school students for careers in science and engineering. The Program, called“Tex-PREP,” is an aggressive, pro active outreach system that introduces a joint curriculum betweenscience, math and technology to
Paper ID #36951Empathy Development in Community-Engagement CourseNusaybah Abu-Mulaweh Nusaybah Abu-Mulaweh is a Lecturer in the EPICS Program at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. She received her BS in Computer Engineering from Purdue University Fort Wayne, and received her MS in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. After working as a software engineer in industry, she returned to academia as a lecturer and she is currently pursuing her PhD in Engineering Education at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana.William C. Oakes (Director and
AC 2010-2283: DEVELOPING NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE FORCLASSROOM TECHNOLOGIESJoseph Tront, Virginia TechDavid Bailey, Virginia Polytechnic and State UniversityThomas Walker, Virginia TechSteven Lee, Virginia Tech Page 15.387.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 DEVELOPING NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE FOR CLASSROOM TECHNOLOGIESAbstractIn order for classroom technologies to be useful in engineering education, appropriateinfrastructures must be planned, implemented and tested so that they are sufficiently robust toserve the needs of the target usage. Usage will vary depending on size of the class, complexityof the teaching technology being used, and