the wake behind single cylinders, so this allowed us to benchmarkour device against data from the open literature. More specifically, the Reynolds (Re) andStrouhal (Sr) numbers were calculated for cylinders of different diameters and different flowrates, and the results were compared with data from other investigators. Our resultsgenerally captured the trends present in the prior work, but our data contained a significantamount of scatter, and deviations were present.The wakes behind multiple obstructions, both cylindrical and non-cylindrical, are not as wellunderstood. For this reason, additional experiments were performed, analyzing onetriangular obstruction and two cylindrical and triangular obstructions in differentorientations. Computer
Design for Learning (UDL) framework,” in 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Covington, KY, USA, Oct. 2019, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028693.[A5] C. C. Hain, W. C. Turek, A. E. Zaghi, and A. Hain, “Board # 156 : Experiences of Pre- College Teachers Working with Undergraduate Engineering Students with ADHD in Research Laboratories,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, Columbus, Ohio: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2017. doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 27786.[A6] M. Chrysochoou et al., “Redesigning Engineering Education for Neurodiversity: New Standards for Inclusive Courses,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, ASEE Conferences, Jul. 2021.[A7] A
processes and strategies involved in engineering design using solid modeling, spatial thinking, and conceptual and procedural knowledge interplay in novice engineering students.Christopher Green, Utah State University Christopher Green is a senior in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering program, with an Aerospace Emphasis and a minor in Computer Science. He plans to finish his undergrad in Dec. 2015, and continue to earn his MS in Aerospace Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering Education. In addition to school, he researches common misconceptions students struggle with in engineering and develops ways to overcome them. After graduation, his career goals include working in the industry of unmanned aerial vehicles and
Journal cover (2008). She is an ac- tive mentor of undergraduate researchers and served as co-PI on an NSF REU site. Research within her Medical micro-Device Engineering Research Laboratory (M.D. – ERL) also inspires the development of Desktop Experiment Modules (DEMos) for use in chemical engineering classrooms or as outreach activi- ties in area schools (see www.mderl.org). Adrienne has been an active member of ASEE’s WIED, ChED, and NEE leadership teams since 2003 and during this time has contributed to numerous ASEE conference proceedings articles and educational journal publications.Babs Carryer, National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance (NCIIA) Babs Carryer is director of faculty development and
been designed and embedded in various quizzes and tests throughoutthe semester. The students in the control section will be given traditional homework to offset thedifference in coursework. The results of this research will be analyzed and studied. Dependingon the success of this experience, the method might be modified and repeated in future semestersfor further studies.To be effective, chapter and book-section maps will require the use of an 11X17” format color Page 10.1418.4printer. Such printers are inexpensive and readily available in most labs. “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference
processes that financially and technically facilitate energy-efficient buildings. Her work also explores how principles of lean manufacturing facilitate energy-efficiency in the commercial building industry. Another research interest of Kristen’s is engineering education, where she explores how project- and experience-based learning foster better understanding of engineering and management principles. Prior to joining ASU, Kristen was at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) as a Postdoctoral Fellow (2009-11) and then a Scientific Engineering Associate (2011-2012) in the Building Technologies and Urban Systems Department. She worked in the Commercial Buildings group, developing energy effi- ciency programs and
Paper ID #29207Student Dispositions Toward STEM: Exploring an Engineering Summer Campfor Underrepresented Students (Work in Progress)Dr. Jeanna R. Wieselmann, Southern Methodist University Dr. Jeanna R. Wieselmann is a Research Assistant Professor at Southern Methodist University in Dal- las, TX. Her research focuses on gender equity in STEM and maintaining elementary girls’ interest in STEM through both in-school and out-of-school experiences. Dr. Wieselmann’s research has explored student participation patterns in small group STEM activities. She is interested in STEM schools, inte- grated STEM curriculum development
engineers. These societies are also beneficial to the career progression of their members byproviding networking and professional service opportunities.1 Typically, engineers are firstexposed to professional societies as college sophomores or juniors through pre-professionalstudent chapters of the society, where students are able to join at substantially reduced fees andparticipate in a variety of networking, project, and service experiences.2 Most often, studentscontinue their membership upon graduation from college and as a way to stay abreast of thechanges in their field and enhance their professional and technical capabilities.3At universities, active student pre-professional societies can greatly enhance the engineeringcurriculum. Reid and
lecture and directed problem solving session combination helped me prepare for exams. 4. The on-line lecture and directed problem solving session combination helped me prepare for the laboratory experiments. 5. I would choose the on-line lecture and directed problem solving session combination in another ECE course (if available). 6. I would prefer only a live (traditional) lecture over the on-line lecture and directed problem solving session combination for this course. 7. I enjoyed learning course material in the directed problem solving format. 8. Having a choice of course delivery options enhanced my ability to learn. 9. The directed problem solving sessions enhanced my learning experience.10. I
2006-33: PROBABILITY AND IMAGE ENHANCEMENTMaurice Aburdene, Bucknell University MAURICE F. ABURDENE is the T. Jefferson Miers Professor of Electrical Engineering and Professor of Computer Science at Bucknell University. He has taught at Swarthmore College, the State University of New York at Oswego, and the University of Connecticut. His research areas include, parallel algorithms, simulation of dynamic systems, distributed algorithms, computer communication networks, control systems, computer-assisted laboratories, and signal processing.Thomas Goodman, Bucknell University THOMAS J. GOODMAN earned his B.S. degree in electrical engineering from Bucknell University and is currently pursuing a
experience and are more likely to persist to graduation, to report fewer socialproblems, and to perform better academically. At Virginia Tech, there are currently two living-learning communities for freshman engineering students. Hypatia, now in its sixth year,currently houses 75 freshman women, and Galileo, in only its second year, houses 180 men. Ofour fall 2006 incoming class (186 women and 1040 men), these programs serve 40% of thewomen and about 17% of the men. This paper presents our experience with engineering studentswho choose this type of on-campus living arrangement, including our findings on residents’academic performance and persistence as compared to non-participating matching cohorts. Wewill also provide demographics of the residents
onhow we communicate within/across societies. Humanities and STEM education are currently siloed,limiting the connection between topics and fields. However, links between the humanities andSTEM can deepen students’ educational experiences. Exploring the links between STEM andhumanities, the Texas Tech University Honors College has developed an interdisciplinarycurriculum incorporating the arts and humanities and STEM. Unlike other iterations of thistechnique, namely STEAM, where arts are included to help promote more creative, innovativeproblem-solving, this approach uses the humanities as the foundation for STEM learning. We cointhis approach Humanities-Driven STEM (HDSTEM). HDSTEM education goes beyond creativethinking and problem-solving
links to internet sitescontaining further detail. This paper available online at http://www.asee.org/conferences/paper-search-form.cfm using the keywords MIND Links. To recommend links for inclusion pleasecontact please email petrie@fau.edu with the subject MIND Links.IntroductionThe myriad of programs designed to promote participation of minorities in engineering andtechnology disciplines often are underutilized because minority faculty and minority studentsmay not be aware of these opportunities, nor of how and where to apply. Opportunities rangefrom programs designed to promote student interest in these fields, to summer enrichmentprograms, scholarships, fellowships, research opportunities, awards, leadership programs, andcareer advancement
enhance the educational experiences of allstudents.Finally, it is important that K-12 partnerships such as Project PETE not be sustained onlythrough grant money but that they become the focus of ongoing research among theengineering and engineering technology communities. Administrators must design thesepartnerships so that an initial, one time investment, can produce long lasting results andso that the outcomes can be researched and shared with other stakeholders. In the case ofProject PETE, the initial $50,000 was used to pay secondary and post-secondary facultyto examine curriculum, labs and assessment tools and, whenever possible, create coursearticulations. Once these articulated courses are in place, they require little maintenanceand they
instrument measures how studentsstudying engineering experience their education, gain knowledge of what engineering is,and what their plans after graduation are12.Figure 1 shows a summary of the subscales measured by the LAESE instrument. Thequestions related to each subscale were designed to identify the supports and barriers thatengineering students’ encounter while pursuing an engineering degree, which ultimatelydetermines their engineering self-efficacy. LAESE Subscales 1. Engineering career success expectations (7 items, alpha = 0.84) 2. Engineering self-efficacy (8 items, alpha = 0.82) 3. Feeling of inclusion (4 items, alpha = 0.73) 4. Coping self-efficacy (6 items, alpha
objects dissected by the teachersare electrical and contain motors, electromagnets and speakers. Teachers express an increase inconfidence and an increase in their willingness to experiment with science teaching. Theworkshop is very popular amongst teachers who state initially they are unconfident with theirphysical science knowledge. Teacher feedback attributes the popularity of the course to 1) handson activities 2) instructors’ approachableness, and 3) use of minute papers.How Things Work WorkshopThe purpose of the California Science Project1 (CSP) is to serve as a provider of services tostrengthen the science programs and science instruction of California Schools in a mannerconsistent with the California Science Framework and California
atChristopher Newport University. Web-4M, which is now commercially available, was designed byCNU faculty to address the needs of science and engineering students in network-based learning.This software uniquely merges SLNs and ALNs by linking synchronous tools such as chats, whiteboards and slide shows with a common data repository that is also used by asynchronous tools suchas email, news groups and a file manager. These communication tools are used in a variety of waysincluding: simple file transfer, virtual office hours, student project logs, posting review material,collaboration with other institutions, and student to student collaboration. This paper discusses theunique features of Web-4M and faculty experience in the application of this tool set
are broad in scope to resolve issues that may be linked insome fashion. And it is helpful in reducing the cost of implementation in cases where therequired components for implementing the ideas can have multiple applications. This wasthe view taken in selecting the delivery system for the information, and the system thathas been decided on is the Broadband Powerline Communication (BPL). This specificapplication is new to Ghana hence it is necessary to consider capacity building. Thecooperation between Penn State Wilkes-Barre and KNUST is to assist in this endeavoramong others. For this purpose, laboratory work relating to BPL has been designed tosupport courses in Signals and Systems, and Electromagnetic Fields to enhance
Approaching Math as a Tool for Engineering: A Bridge into College EngineeringAngela BielefeldtDr. Bielefeldt, P.E., is a Professor at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU Boulder) in the Departmentof Civil, Environmental, & Architectural Engineering and the Director of the Integrated DesignEngineering program. She has taught at CU Boulder since 1996, including a variety of courses for first-semester students. Her primary research interests in engineering education include sustainability,community engagement, social responsibility, and ethics.Daniel GodrickDan Godrick, P.E., is a Teaching Assistant Professor with the Integrated Design Engineering program atthe University of Colorado, Boulder. He brings a wealth of experience to his
Department and the Secretary of the committee Ronald H. Robnett, professor of Engineering and Business Administration and a fiscal officer in the DIC (MIT’s sponsored research office) C. Richard Soderberg, a theoretically oriented mechanical engineer and head of that department Julius Stratton, physicist and director of Research Laboratory for Electronics, the postwar incarnation of the Radiation Lab Page 25.1322.3Among the other items the committee discussed was an unsolicited letter from the head of thePhysics Department, John Slater, expressing his unabashed preference for a curriculum moresolidly
traction. http://web.mit.edu/invent/www/inventorsA-H/bowermanknight.html Presence “Encyclopedia of Inventions” p.54 Figure 4: Examples for the Eight-Dimensional Methodology5b) Laboratory materialLaboratory activities have been developed for hands-on experience by individuals and teams. Weview team building and team work as extremely important, since communication skills, trust,sharing ideas, etc., are crucial in the workplace. In addition to demonstrating the strategies, thelaboratory material is intended to add a fun component to the learning experience, allow for self-paced, semi-guided exploration that improves self-esteem and encourages questioning anddaring. The material and activities are specific with clear
0.308outcomes apply to all courses in the ME department. 6 0.162 7 0.790 Table 13: The ME Student Program Outcomes. 1. Knowledge of and ability to apply engineering and science fundamentals to real problems. 2. Ability to solve open-ended problems. 3. Ability to design mechanical components, systems and processes. 4. Ability to setup, conduct and interpret experiments and to present the results in a professional manner. 5. Ability to use modern computer tools in mechanical engineering. 6. Ability to communicate in written, oral and graphical forms. 7. Ability to work in teams and apply
Paper ID #37179Fostering Community at the Graduate Level: One University’s Student-ledApproachHaroula M. Tzamaras, Pennsylvania State University Haroula is a 3rd year PhD candidate studying human factors at Penn State and is the current president of GradWIE.Sierra HicksGabriella M. Sallai, Pennsylvania State University Gaby Sallai is currently a graduate student in the Mechanical Engineering department at Penn State. She is working under Dr. Catherine Berdanier in the Engineering Cognitive Research Laboratory (ECRL) studying the experiences of engineering graduate students. She received her Bachelor’s degree from
held from the first or second week of the semester so students may benefit from the sessions before they experience difficulty, and in the best case, prevent the difficulties from occurring. • They are not traditional review sessions. Review sessions typically are held just prior to exams and consist of a leader working problems in front of the attendees. In contrast, SI sessions are held regularly throughout the semester and do not focus specifically on exam preparation, but rather on in-depth learning of all course materials. • Attendees are active participants in the sessions. Leaders are trained to design active learning experiences around the content of
and Residential Experience program at Michigan State University. He earned his M.S. degree in pavement Page 14.848.1 engineering in 1988 from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor and his Ph.D. in pavement and materials engineering from Texas A&M University, College Station, in 1995. Dr. Buch began his academic career at Michigan State University in 1996. Dr. Buch teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in concrete materials and pavement engineering. He is also involved in teaching© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 short courses on pavement design and
the ECS Scholars Learning Community The ECS scholars LC has been in existence since 2006. Students participate in thisprogram only during the fall and spring semesters of their first year; they are not providedintervention after their first year at CSUF. The program is currently sponsoring its third cohort.The ECS Scholars LC is designed for FTF majoring in engineering or computer science aimed atreversing the unacceptably large attrition during the first year. ECS Scholars experience asmooth transition to college life by maximizing campus resources, opportunities for individualand community development, and on-going interaction with faculty, student affairsprofessionals, and peers from the College of ECS. The ECS Scholars LC offers
currently serves as the Chair of the ASEE Rocky Mountain Section. He holds B.S. and Ph.D.degrees in Chemical Engineering from Oregon State University and Brigham Young University, respectively.KURT SANDHOLTZKurt Sandholtz is a partner in the Provo, Utah, office of the Novations Group, a strategic change managementconsulting firm. He has helped design and implement career development systems based on the Four Stages modelat DuPont, Dow Chemical, Sandia National Laboratories, Hewlett-Packard, and similar organizations. He holds aMaster of Organizational Behavior degree from Brigham Young University. Page 4.228.7
recently in engineering curriculaacross the world as today’s globalized market presents the students with great technicalleadership challenges (Khattak, Ku, and Goh, 2012). Interestingly, leadership class examplesfound in the literature varies in both scope and learning framework. Some programs are designedas a certificate in leadership by offering multiple courses whereas others are associated withlaboratory projects, senior design projects, machine safety, or similar environment wherestudents have to deal with multiple aspects including team work, human-machine interactions,etc. For example, Wu (2008) presents a case study of teaching safety leadership at Taiwaneseuniversities. A prior study shows that universities in the Europe and Australia
elementary,middle and high school levels. Thanks to strong support from the industrial sector, Texas A&MUniversity at Qatar has been successful in executing an array of outreach initiatives for studentsin grades 5–12. In particular, programs for students in grades 7–12 highlight the role ofengineering toward Qatar’s grand challenges, and integrated, problem-based learning is at thecenter of projects and activities designed to educate, enrich and stimulate young minds towardSTEM studies and careers, especially in areas of Qatar’s greatest need and demand.Literature ReviewRecent research indicates that an experience with STEM learning on a university campus can bea “decision point” for prospective STEM students. A study conducted in Norway found
, November 1996, Salt Lake City, Utah Page 2.156.6Micheal E. Parten is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Texas Tech University. Dr. Partenhas conducted research and published in the areas of education, instrumentation, control, modeling andsimulation of a variety of systems, including semiconductor processing. Since returning to Texas Tech in1984, Dr. Parten has served as the Director of the Undergraduate Laboratories in Electrical Engineering.Mary C. Baker is an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering at Texas Tech University. She has 10years of teaching experience and has done extensive work in the semiconductor, plasma