AC 2012-4530: USING WRITING ASSIGNMENTS TO IMPROVE CON-CEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING IN STATICS: RESULTS FROM A PILOTSTUDYMr. Chris Venters, Virginia Tech Chris Venters is a Ph.D. candidate in engineering education at Virginia Tech. His primary research in- terests involve studying conceptual understanding among students in early undergraduate engineering courses. He received his B.S. in aerospace engineering from North Carolina State University and his M.S. in aerospace engineering from Virginia Tech.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa McNair is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Assistant Department Head for Graduate Education and co-directs the
Improving our approach towards teaching a content intensive subject in higher education - An on-line variantAbstract: The authors carried out a study and published the results on teaching a largely contentintensive course in an engineering school, where it is often a challenge to achieve studentlearning and retention of the course material. Methodologies involved encouraging studentnotetaking, a study guide sheet to follow along with the PowerPoint, homework built to serve asa study aid, weekly quiz, and a comprehensive final exam, as well as a research paper. Anadditional challenge in last year’s course was added when the course went on-line in the middleof the semester. To accommodate this on
more effective use of theirstudy time. In fact, many students will go through the list of objectives and make sure they canperform each task. This may result in better overall student learning and improved studentperformance on exams. Page 10.1363.1 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationFurthermore, learning objectives benefit course organization because they help focus materialand the allocation of class time to correspond with those topics that are considered importantenough to ha ve
Session 3557 Improving Student Understanding of Design of Experiments by Introducing Simulation and Analysis Marco E. Sanjuan, Tapas K. Das Universidad del Norte / University of South FloridaAbstractDesign and Analysis of Experiments should be more than a course for engineers. It shall becomea tool that will allow the future engineering practitioner to understand, model, predict, andoptimize his/her surrounding environment based on scientific procedures. In order to achieve thisgoal, it is important to move away from the theory-based course design towards a real-situationbased
continue to develop additional modules in alternative energy.The published modules are listed in Table 2.In order to effective in the classroom at any university, we have developed a uniformformat for all of these modules. Each module consists of a problem motivation,example problem statement, example problem solution, home problem statement, andhome problem solution. It is noted that the home problem solution is available toinstructors by emailing the first author on this paper. The modules also containadditional information that often lists the chapter of the most popular chemical Page 23.1314.4engineering textbook for that course, in order to aid
AC 2010-1609: IMPROVING INNOVATION BY ENHANCING CREATIVECAPABILITIES IN ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERINGTECHNOLOGY STUDENTSJeffrey Richardson, Purdue UniversityLeslie Reed, Reed Environmental Page 15.698.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Improving Innovation by Enhancing Creative Capabilities in Electrical and Computer Engineering TechnologyAbstractThis project evolved from an existing research effort in electrical and computer engineeringtechnology in which the gap between the creative capabilities students brought to bear whensolving technological problems, and the level of creativity demonstrated in a capstone designproject, was explored
mindset regarding improving their own knowledge and (b) guide students towards reliableresources (videos, slides, websites) to help them with their future studies. As a secondary effect,student grades are improved and students expressed gratitude for the ability to safeguard theirgrade from a potentially simple mistake.In a junior-level programming course at Wentworth Institute of Technology, students learningC++ and related concepts had to take a total of nine 10-15 minute quizzes over the course of a 14week lecture schedule. These quizzes were graded and returned, typically within 2-5 days. If astudent earned a grade below 80, they could meet with the instructor within a week and providenew answers for the quiz questions, which, if correct
should be able toidentify standards relevant to their work and apply the requirements set out in standards to real-world situations. Standards-based curriculum and the skills that result are key for preparingtomorrow’s graduates to lead and support infrastructure improvement efforts as the U.S. seeks toenhance its global competitiveness and resilience.Approaches for integration of standards in higher education curriculaStandards education can involve integrating standards in the curriculum by knitting the contentinto existing courses or integration at the program level by creating courses focused onstandards. Some classes focus entirely on the standards used in a specific discipline, while othersincorporate projects and modules that involve
textbook as the maindifference between classes (a class is a particular offering of a course). Other coursefeatures remained mostly the same, including the teacher; differences are noted in eachcase study. The analyses of the student grade performance in each case study, and acombined analysis, show significant grade improvements after introducing the interactivetextbook.BackgroundInteractive learning materials have been shown to improve student learning outcomes incomputer science[4] and other STEM fields[2][9][26]. Edgcomb[4] conducted a controlledstudy with 136 participants comparing the lesson effectiveness of electronic textbookshaving static web content versus interactive web-native content. Lesson effectiveness wasmeasured with a pre- and
concepts, and organization of theconcept map for assessing the quality of the concept map. After completing the presentations,students participated in the post-course survey. The post-course survey included similarquestions related to improvement in skills level in technical communication skills,interdisciplinary communication skills, and systems thinking ability and confidence to providefeedback, receive criticism, and communicate effectively about the circular economy.Additionally, the post-course survey included open-ended questions related to their perception ofthe combination learning module (i.e., problem-based learning activity and concept mapdevelopment activity) and how it has helped them to learn about circular economy. A WilcoxonSigned
pretest and posttestresults show there is a significant improvement in students’ spatial cognition when the proposedtool is used to assist the course.Introduction The development of technology has led to the high demand in engineering design careersthat undergo required training involved with innovative technology. Computer-Aided Design(CAD) have become an essential tool for engineers and other STEM-related fields, which requiresan adequate spatial cognition skill (Sorby et al. 2013). Strong spatial skills are necessary to notonly complete the engineering course but also to succeed in professional practice after finishingthe curriculum (Hsi et al., 1997). Improving students’ interpretation, analysis, and visualization ofmodels, as well as
, the improvements are presented to all constituentsduring the Annual Retreat for discussion and approval. Program revisions implemented based onrecommendations from the 2000 and 2001 Annual Retreats include the following:Revisions made in response to alumni input • Laboratory courses on Programmable Logic Controllers (EE 425) and Programmable Logic Devices (EE 447) were added to the curriculum.Revisions made in response to employers input • Introduced contract law as a topic in EE 301 (Professionalism and Ethics in ECE). • Modified courses to include Internet use. • Introduced several new courses to cover state-of-the-art topics, including VHDL, VLSI, Verilog, Neural Networks, and Optical Networks.In addition, more emphasis
. At this point in the degree, many students have not fullydeveloped their problem solving and programming skills, and most of their coding feedback hascome from the instructor. In some situations, students taking a traditional face-to-face coursehave the opportunity to do collaborative work. This can come in the form of pair programming,code sharing or some small group assignments. However, the majority of their work is individualassignments.Evidence supports code-review, collaboration, pair programming and student-to-studentinteraction as valuable tools to improve learning and retention. These strategies are especiallybeneficial for under-represented populations [3,4]. The effectiveness of these activities variesdepending on the course
macro-scale, standard materialcharacterization following ASTM standards is conducted to obtain the macroscopic behavior.Digital image correlation technology is employed to obtain the two-dimensional strain field duringthe macro-scale testing. An evaluation of student learning of solid mechanics and materialsbehavior concepts is carried out to establish as baseline before further interventions are introduced.The established multi-scale mechanics and materials testing dataset will be also used in a broadrange of undergraduate courses, such as Solid Mechanics, Design of Mechanical Components, andManufacturing Processes, to inform curricular improvement. The successful implementation ofthis multi-scale approach for education is likely to enhance
unstructured group work doeslittle to improve the outcomes of at-risk students. Common one-on-one tutoring has been shownto both help retention and do little to improve student performance. Some literature indicates thatgroup problem solving sessions are effective at retaining at-risk students while others do not.Treisman (1992) reported that an intensive “work shop course” as an adjunct to the regularcourse helped at-risk students outperform all other students in the class. Fullilove (1990)implemented a similar intervention in which group sessions were formed involving at-risk andnot at-risk students. Attendance in the session was voluntary. Fullilove (1990) found thatparticipating students were 2-3x more likely to succeed than students who didn’t
them, especially when engaged in teamwork activities.Utilizing conative theory in team formation is an area that is still relatively new to engineeringeducation. However, recent studies show it to be an effective means of productive teamdevelopment 5, 6. A 2001 study found that teams of engineering students formed to maximizeconative synergy as predicted by the Kolbe A™ index performed better than a group of teamsformed randomly after controlling for previous academic achievement 7. A two year studyanalyzing team projects in a computer science course showed a statistically significantcorrelation between conatively synergistic teams and team project grades 6. The studyacknowledged the Kolbe index as a positive technique for raising students
use the new mobile instrumentation andpedagogy to work on new laboratory experiments and advanced projects. If successful, thisapproach can serve as a model of efficient and cost-effective collaboration between engineeringschools in the USA and Africa that can be used to improve ECE education in developingcountries.Introduction Although several approaches have been used during the past 20 years to reverse the braindrain, the current state of higher education in Africa still shows that there is a significant Page 23.713.3shortage of qualified scientists and educators with advanced degrees. A recent report from theInternational
Improving Spatial Visualization Skills in Engineering FreshmenAbstractBeing able to spatially visualize and mentally rotate is a key skill necessary to succeed ingraphics and subsequent engineering courses. Recent research has focused on methods todevelop Spatial Visualization (SV) skills in engineering students, as it is a key skill to succeed inmost of the STEM fields. However, in most of the engineering schools, the instructors find itvery difficult to develop keen SV skills in students. The major factors contributing to thischallenge include, but not limited to the huge class sizes, limited time to teach the material, lackof effective demonstrations and the unavailability of feasible hands-on activities. With thefunding from the
assessment2.In this paper, we describe a curriculum assessment process used at Arizona State University(ASU) to provide feedback about the Bachelor of Science in Engineering (BSE) program inComputer Systems Engineering (CSE). Specifically, the process was designed to measure thegaps between stakeholder (e.g., student, employer, and faculty) desired knowledge and currentcurricula. The assessment process is part of the overarching continuous improvement process.In particular, the products produced by the assessment process are being used to redesign BSEcurriculum and program requirements.In the Spring Semester of 2004, the authors served on a Gap Analysis team whose primary taskwas to determine the effectiveness of a Motorola and Intel funded
Success program funded by the National Science Foundation, Grant # DUE-1217285. She teaches undergraduate Computer Science courses and serves as department chair . She is currently involved in developing effective retention strategies for computer science and engineering students in the first two years. Her research interests include mobile and web technologies.Ms. Maureen Walsh Sakakeeny PE P.E., Merrimack College Ms. Sakakeeny is an experienced civil engineer and higher education administrator. Her engineering expertise spans transportation infrastructure design, construction management, environmental planning, and sustainability consulting. She supports the Dean of Science and Engineering with student recruitment
Program – CurriculumThe Engineering Bridge Program is designed to provide participating students with both theacademic skills and the “survival” skills necessary to succeed as a student in an engineeringprogram. Therefore, it includes traditional coursework as well as courses and activities targetedat developing students’ comfort with the university environment and services.Research at other universities have identified key factors in improving the success of students inundergraduate engineering programs, beyond initial academic preparation. These include peermentoring,4 emphasis on basic academic skills,8 and the establishment of a learning community.For many years, the Department of Mathematics at Wayne State has provided problem
AC 2011-2584: LEARNING IMPROVEMENT IN LEADERSHIP, TEAM-WORK, AND CONTEMPORARY ISSUES THROUGH A GLOBAL SUP-PLY CHAIN PROJECTK. Jo Min, Iowa State University K. Jo Min is Associate Professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies in Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering Department at Iowa State University. He teaches courses on production systems, closed-loop supply chains, and market-based allocation mechanisms. His education research interests in- clude outcome assessment and objective evaluation, and has been serving as an ABET program evaluator for EAC and TAC and as a reviewer for various NSF engineering education panels.Wenbo Shi, Iowa State University Wenbo Shi received his Bachelor of Science degree
Society for Engineering Education, 2015 The Effect of Additional Statics Class Time on At-Risk Student Performance ABSTRACT The academic performance of at-risk engineering students in the core classes statics anddynamics was studied to determine if an additional hour of class time in statics improvedoutcomes. This was possible because two version of the same statics course was offered. Astandard version of the statics course met three hours per week over the course of a fifteen-weeksemester while a second version met four hours per week. Students identified as at-risk using aninformal screening procedure populated the four-hour statics course. For
Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Supplementing theoretical modeling with empirical data for improved designIntroductionOur first semester course in biomedical engineering includes a semester-long project thatintroduces students to the design process and allows them to practice working in teams. Thestudents work for a fictional company with a hypothetical hospital as a customer to design, build,and test a portable air filtration system. While the experience for the students has overall beenpositive, they struggle in a specific section of the course and fail to make a connection betweencourse content and application to the project. We are looking to address this short-coming withan
keyobjectives throughout the primary module content. The pre-survey includes technical questionsand basic demographic questions including GPA and number of Internet courses taken andquestions designed to better understand student self-efficacy toward computer and VR use. Theassessment and evaluation methods based on the objectives are summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1: Summary of assessment & evaluation methods and of their effectiveness Objectives Assessment and evaluation Indication of effectiveness of methods the assessment/evaluation 1. Development of a series of Monthly collaborative Functioning VR modules; VR modules for AM process
student immersion and growth in mind, the programhas developed to include an engineering cornerstone project in which students work in teams todesign, build, and program autonomous robots to complete tasks on an interactive roboticscourse. In support of the project, a variety of technologies were designed and polished as theprogram grew. Classroom methodologies were also evaluated and improved with time inresponse to student feedback and research on best practices.This paper provides a historical review of practice for the program with an emphasis on thetechnologies and methodologies that have been most effective in the program as it hasdeveloped.IntroductionFor 23 years researchers in autonomous robot design have worked on the advancement of
education. However, most higher education environments are contrary to thisexpectation. For students acquainted with technologies, the following question should be raised:“How can we improve student learning as well as the effectiveness of teaching in CEMeducation?”To address this question, it is necessary to identify an alternative pedagogical approach todelivering CEM courses efficiently. A surge of online educational sites provides instant accessto huge resources of information, which easily lead to the extension of students’ learningexperience.5 Web technology has a large influence on alternative teaching paradigms.6 Moststudents, as long as they are motivated, can be self-directed and active learners with the supportof technology in their
in department.4. Educational ImpactBased on the result of the QFD analysis, the Manufacturing Engineering curriculum wasimproved and implemented in the Midwest private institution. With the voice ofcustomers built into the curriculum, the following outcomes have been obtained The improved curriculum is well received by students. Students enjoy the learning environment as the curriculum is becoming more student-centered. In particular, project-based courses give students a balanced education by integrating theory and application. The improved curriculum is positively commented by industry advisory board. The job placement rate achieves 100% upon graduation.Such a result is a reflection of effectiveness of QFD
have better understanding on the topics in 2015 and 2016. In addition, the teachingevaluations have improved over the past three years.I. IntroductionAs educators, we strongly agree that the primary mission of education is to prepare students forfuture leadership roles of the profession as well as to develop their abilities to remaincompetency through a lifelong learning experience. Effective teaching and active learning is themost important element to accomplish the above goals. The aim of teaching is not only to deliverknowledge to students, but also to transform students from passive recipients into active learnerswho are capable of constructing their own knowledge [1].Two primary challenges were identified in teaching engineering courses
Arlington, Arlington, TX Copyright 2025, American Society for Engineering Education 2introducing a one-hour problem solving course to prepare students for Engineering Statics 1. Thisintervention led to modest increase in the passing rate of Engineering Statics in the first semester, buta study on the long-term effect of this intervention has not been conducted.PLTL is a pedagogical approach that emerged in the 1990s as an active learning approach to enhancestudent learning, especially in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Researchhave shown that PLTL improves student performance, retention, and commitment to engineering 2,3.Contrary to traditional