implementing a new system.This alos gave them opportunity to apply all of the knowledge and skills that they gatherduring the program. This study explained various problems currently faced by librarymanagement and the staff and proposed automation of the entire process. The studysuggested to seek an online portal to allow faculty members, students and staff to fill outmultimedia requests over the web to reduce submission and processing time; this portalcan also be used as a means to aid in the processing and management of these requests,this would eliminate the need for manual filing systems which will cause time, space,cost and other vital organizational resources. The same group of students was then askedto continue with the project to develop NULS
errors andpreventing the system from coming online. Additionally, occasional sensor readings wereerroneous due to hiccups in the communication between the components. These did not causeissues during startup or with the performance of the autonomy but did cause concern for thestudents when the readouts did not show reasonable readings.The students felt the smartphone interface worked well, with one exception. The students wererequired to run a few short terminal commands to start the applications on the Pi, which thestudents felt uncomfortable with. This also led to students occasionally starting components inthe wrong order, creating the communication errors. Future revisions will remove thisrequirement.One other major issue was the accuracy of
thestudents’ sponsors may review their work and proposals, the students’ final grade is determinedsolely by the faculty. Another issue is the confidential nature of some of the industry-sponsoredprojects. In some cases, teams will develop products or processes that may ultimately bepatented. The present study provided an opportunity to address this issue with students. Forexample, some teams were using unsecured cloud-based applications for collaborativeauthorship and communication about project activities. Some of these applications were free tothe students, but the hosting firm’s policies noted that all content uploaded by the students wasowned by the hosting firm. Teams, especially those working on innovative industry-sponsoredprojects, were
. Janet Liou-Mark is an Associate Professor of Mathematics at New York City College of Technology. She received her doctorate in mathematics education at New York University. Her research interest is in pedagogical issues in mathematics education. In addition to her teaching responsibilities, she is the Honors Scholars Program coordinator for the college. She is the faculty advisor for the mathematics club. She had also chartered the City Tech Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Club and the National Society for Collegiate Scholars chapter at the college - an honor society for freshmen and sophomores. Since one of her interest is in the methodology of
M.S. in Management of Technology from Murray State University, and a Ph.D. in Interdisciplinary Engineering from the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Dr. Webster is a certified GD&T-Technologist, SOLIDWORKS Expert, and Six Sigma Green Belt. For his teaching and mentoring of students he has been awarded the 2021 ASEE ET National Teaching Award, 2021 Purdue Teaching for Tomorrow Fellowship, 2021 Purdue Teaching Academy Pandemic Teaching Award, 2019 ASEE EDGD Rising Educator Award, and 2019 SME Distinguished Faculty Advisor Award. Dr Webster’s research interests include ET outreach (e.g., recruitment and retention) and design education with focus areas in CAD, instructional techniques (e.g., project-based learning
management, program assessment, university-industry partnerships, grant writing, and student development in the co-curricular learning environment with a special focus on recruiting, supporting, and graduating students from groups historically underrepresented in engineering.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David Knight is an Assistant Professor and Director of International Engagement in the Department of Engineering Education and affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program, Center for Human- Computer Interaction, and Human-Centered Design Program. His research tend to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering education can become more
evaluatewhether students’ collaboration with generative AI tools reflects their proficiency in the technicaldomain and provide further insights into how to best prepare students for the rapidly evolvingworkplace.Lastly, it is important to acknowledge the concerns and risks associated with using generative AI,which were a limitation in this study. Some issues were taken into consideration; for example,students were expected to critically examine the responses and refine them based on keyprinciples and concepts of the technical field to eliminate any inaccuracies or oversights.However, other aspects, such as ethical use, bias, and data privacy, were beyond the scope of thispaper. These elements should also be addressed as part of student training on
teaching strategies based on the prior results of the Introduction to Nanotechnology course. Developing Faculty Expertise. The project will provide professional development for faculty of the collaborating community colleges and middle and high school teachers by organizing workshops during each year of the project, so that new teaching materials and strategies will be widely implemented. Implementing Educational Innovations. The results from this project will demonstrate the challenges to and opportunities for adapting innovations in diverse educational settings, such as community colleges and middle and high schools, including dissemination of the developed material through the workshops
to provide more direct feedback on this issue. Once we had this information, it wasdiscussed at a general faculty meeting with the use of literature on this subject 2,3 (most notablyfrom NJIT) 4 as a reference. At the end of several iterations, a syllabus was designed.Pre-AssessmentIn order to get a profile of a typical student who chooses chemical engineering, we gave thosestudents who attended the first session of ChE 1010 a pre-assessment. Thirty-two studentscompleted this survey and the questions with answer frequency are provided in Table 1. Notethat, because of space limitations, we have used an “others” heading which group all of thoseanswers that were mentioned only once by a student. Additionally, for some questions, responsesare
resources, each with finitecapacity. These resources are interconnected and highly dependent on each other’s operations inorder to produce results. The demand for these resources is often highly variable and the subjectof complex forecasting and scheduling efforts. It is possible to extend this production model ofeducation far beyond what is effective or appropriate; here the resources of concern will consistof faculty, labs, equipment and the like, while the demand of interest will be students movingthrough the system. For the purposes of capacity planning, an academic department can betreated as a service business like an airline or hotel. A challenge common to most serviceoperations is that it is difficult or impossible to stockpile inventory [5
Evolution of Online Learning and the Revolution in Higher Education.5. Jones, S., & Johnson, C. (2005). The Internet's impact on college faculty. Retrieved December 17, 2008, from Professors online: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue10_9/jones/index.html6. Olsen, F. (2000). Massachusetts May Require Public-College Students to Own Laptops. The Chronicle of Higher Education .7. Read, B. The upside and downside of laptops in education.8. Shirley, D. L., Pierson, C. L., Trytten, D. A., Rhoads, T. R., & Court, M. A. (2002). A laptop college of Page 14.621.7 engineering at the university of Oklahoma.Page 14.621.8
from Trinity University in 2002 and her MS in Science Education from the University of Texas at Austin in 2007. She has worked at the Austin Children’s Museum since 2006 and now serves as the Science Content Developer. She has taught ACM’s robotics after-school programs and currently coordinates the Museum’s outreach classes in local elementary schools. Christina’s other duties at the Museum include developing the science content for exhibits and programs, and assisting in the planning for the new Museum. Contact: csoontornvat@austinkids.orgKathy Schmidt, University of Texas, Austin KATHY J. SCHMIDT is the Director of the Faculty Innovation Center for the College of Engineering at
Paper ID #32979Participation and Learning in Labs Before and During a PandemicMs. Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow, University of New MexicoDr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and associate professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information and Learning Sciences program and in the Chemical and Biological En- gineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutionizing Engineering Departments project. She was
possibleresearch topics surrounding the MST population are discussed in detail. Program HistoryFollowing the adoption of New Jersey’s Department of Education (DOE) Core ContentStandards in 1996, the Department of Technological Studies was asked to convene chairsfrom the departments of elementary education, mathematics, biology, chemistry, physics andthe coordinator of “NJ Statewide Systemic Initiative to Improve Math, Science andTechnology Education in K-12” to consider designing a new multidisciplinary major to fulfilla recognized need for more K-5 teachers with strengthened STEM skills. There was concernover the trade-off between disciplinary “depth” and interdisciplinary “breadth.” However,this concern was overcome
area of the pro-cess and goals of the respective disciplines. This paper reports the concept, process, and results of a student and faculty universitycollaborative to explore the potential synergy of digital game design capstone projects and archi-tectural thesis projects. The research intent of the collaboration was two-fold: establishing aprocess that allowed interdepartmental student and faculty exchange and, more importantly, themanifestation and analysis of a new area where the two disciplines cross-pollinate - what the col-laborators referred to as “the overlap”. It was this interstitial piece between the two disciplines,the zone of intellectual inquiry and application, that added value to each discipline’s goals. Thecontributions
, there has come into thespotlight a new benefit and corresponding problem. The Internet of Things (IOT), or simply theneed to have all devices connected in the name of convenience. Such items include “smart”thermostats, security systems, refrigerators, light bulbs, the list goes on and on. Almost daily anew item is being introduced to take an aspect of one’s life and integrate it to a smartphone.This may not seem like a problem but it is not the functionality of the device that is the issue, it isthe implementation. These devices have at least one thing in common-- they are small. It isexpected that all new devices to be small and have more functionality than their previousversions. This has only compounded problems with these IOT devices. With
of the NJIT Enterprise Development Center(EDC), which is the largest and oldest business incubator in the United States. Each of theincubator’s tenants benefits from university-related services supportive of new business growth.In particular, the EDC is a prime example of the recent trend among many American universitiesto facilitate the technology transfer of ideas originating not so much from its own faculty as fromscientists, engineers and researchers who are unaffiliated with the host university. To maximizethe potential for success of all tenants and to overcome growth gaps typical of start-ups, the EDCmanagement team provides tenants with an array of support services. These include: (1) trainingin state, federal, commercial and private
interventions. “Education is what survives when what has been learned has been forgotten”1 B. F. Skinner (1904 - 1990)1. Introduction: Outcomes-based education in engineering educationThe rapid societal and technological changes of the last decade have resulted in a sustainedtransformation of engineering work and the engineering profession. Engineering graduates todayare expected to be equipped with a whole set of new technical abilities as well as an awareness ofthe social and environmental implications of engineering work. In many countries thesepressures have led to reforms of the engineering education system in an attempt to better equipstudents for the changed and changing
Learning in EngineeringDr. Patti Wojahn, New Mexico State UniversityGermain Degardin, New Mexico State UniversityMuhammad Dawood, New Mexico State UniversityMelissa Guynn, New Mexico State UniversityRachel Boren, New Mexico State UniversityIntroduction Engineering programs often struggle to optimally support and retain promising students. Toattempt to address that issue at a Southwest HSI land-grant university, our interdisciplinary teamof researchers set out to study the impacts of putting learning and success more directly into thehands of students. We began exploring what we could learn from preparing first-yearengineering students to take more control of and responsibility for their learning and their growthas learners [1]. With faculty and
both civil engineering (ABET-EAC) and civil engineering technology(ABET-TAC) programs.It should be noted that the idea of starting a civil engineering program at our University is notnew. In 1996, the Civil Engineering Technology (CET) chair had conversations with membersof the Engineering College at our University. The Engineering College is a separateadministrative unit from the college in which the existing CET program is now housed. In 2001,two professors from the CET department approached administrators in the Engineering Collegewith a proposal to administer a new CE program in the mechanical engineering (ME)department, but teach essential civil engineering courses from the existing Civil EngineeringTechnology offerings. The
Mathematics and in Engineering Technology. He served as Chair of Mathematics, co-Head of Computer Science and President of the University of Houston Faculty Senate. He has held faculty positions at the University of California, San Diego and the University of Bordeaux I and the University of Bordeaux II as well as a research position at Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois. Page 14.308.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 CDIO-Based 2-Year Common Templates for ECE/ECET and for ME/METAbstractA new educational paradigm was recently proposed by the authors that effectively placesEngineering and
Recruitment into Engineering Technology ProgramAbstract:In order to capitalize on the technologists’ potential to enhance global competitiveness,new strategies must be devised to encourage high schools, community colleges, and someother nontraditional pools to seek engineering technology degrees. This type of proactivephilosophy will undoubtedly increase the number of much needed technologists in thiscountry. Community colleges have traditionally done an exceptional job of preparingtechnicians for industry. But, graduates of AAS programs experience more difficulties insecuring transfer credit than their Associate of Arts (AA) degree counterparts. From thehigh school point of view, they have been less than successful in
Paper ID #12865A Toolkit to Facilitate the Development and Use of Educational Online Lab-oratories in Secondary SchoolsProf. Michael E. Auer, CTI Villach Dr. (mult.) Michael E. Auer is Professor of Electrical Engineering at the Faculty of Engineering and IT of the Carinthia University of Applied Sciences Villach, Austria and has also a teaching position at the Uni- versity of Klagenfurt. He is a senior member of IEEE and member of ASEE, IGIP, etc., author or co-author of more than 170 publications and leading member of numerous national and international organizations in the field of Online Technologies. His current
Mechanical Engineering. He has been actively engaged in teaching, research and curricula development since joining the LSU faculty in 1988. As Associate Dean in the College of Engineering (2004-2014), he acquired sig- nificant funding from NSF to support the development of several initiatives aimed at improving student retention and graduation rates as well as supporting faculty with development of effective learning and teaching pedagogies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 BRCC to LSU Engineering Pathways to SuccessABSTRACTThe National Science Foundation (NSF) S-STEM scholarship program, Engineering Pathway toSuccess, is a joint effort of the College of
ideas and authenticdemand into the educational context and the courses and training offered can be more practicalto meet the evolving industry needs. As a result, the shortage of qualified professionals can beaddressed by introducing a refined curriculum framework. However, developing a new courseis time-consuming and resource-intensive due to several considerations, for example, theaccreditation issues. Therefore, delivering short courses and micro-credentials becomes a moreefficient way to upskill both students and engineers who wish to acquire knowledge and skillswithin a limited time frame. The paper tends to address the following research questions: • RQ1: Is university-industry collaboration an effective strategy to initiate a short
Paper ID #44364Work-in-Progress: Updated Progress Towards Understanding Perspectivesamong Neurodiverse Undergraduate Researchers in STEMProf. Jeffrey Halpern, University of New Hampshire Jeffrey M. Halpern is an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of New Hampshire. He earned his B.S.E. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering at Case Western Reserve University. He takes a personalized approach with my students to give individualized training. He integrates inclusive mentoring into a rigorous undergraduate research experience to optimize the success of each individual. His mentoring work
areas in attracting the jobs of the future. Page 15.127.3As University faculty and people who live in Appalachia, we have known anecdotally for yearsthat most young people in our region, and particularly first generation college girls, are reticentto move away for college, for a new job, or even to go to an engineering summer camp. We callthis the "invisible fence" theory, as if there is an invisible barrier to leaving their home. Somehave said "Morgantown is too big of a city for my parents to visit." Students, more girls thanboys, have actually asked if after college, they can go back and work in their tiny hometown, andeven live near
priority. At recent engineering educationconferences (e.g. Best Assessment Processes in Engineering Education Symposiums, ASEE, FIE)the number of evolving approaches for evaluating engineering programs, as well asmethodologies for measuring various student outcomes is growing more rich. Yet, severaltroublesome issues still remain. First, most of these “assessment” methods had not been fullyevaluated. Second, many focus on final products via performance appraisals particular to theoutcome(s) using rubrics as the assessment tool. Third, many engineering administrators stillvoiced concerns about the costs associated with organizing, implementing and maintaining aneffective assessment program, given limited resources of time, people (i.e. raters), and
-especially by students in their first measurement course.To reduce this possibility, another set with a higher K-value was attempted. The concern in thiscase may be the need for a larger set of loads which in turn may pose issues related to injury.More importantly, the major difficulty surfacing with the choice of the Extension Springs is thecomplexity involved in conducting the required measurements for the establishment of the K-value of each spring. It is important to note that for each spring, there should be about 4 to 6measurements to get a reliable result. Although, in the current laboratories of the mechanicalengineering program at TCNJ, there is access to an apparatus capable of facilitating suchrequired measurements (with sufficient
structure. At some time during the industrial revolution, when Portland Page 23.1235.2Cement and Structural Steel were still in their infancy, architects began to relegate componentdesign to engineers. Whether the decision was a conscious effort by instructors from schoolssuch as L’Ecole Beaux Arts or out of the necessity to transfer responsibility of design to theengineers who developed and worked with new materials, the result was a gradual shift in thedefinition of architectural design from a practical or applied expression of form to the purelyaesthetic expression that many architecture faculty embrace through design studio pedagogytoday