, BAE Systems, and Celestica Corporation. He has 25 years of experience in these companies designing military and commercial power electronic circuits and as a systems engineer for airborne and land vehicle electrical systems. He is a license professional engineer.Mr. Koenraad E Gieskes, Binghamton University Page 23.231.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Attendance in Large Engineering Classes and Its Effect on Student PerformanceAbstract In large engineering classes one of the more practical methods of delivering the material
AC 2011-1863: BIG: UNITING THE UNIVERSITY INNOVATION ECOSYS-TEMDouglas E. Allen, Bucknell UniversitySteven B. Shooter, Bucknell University Steve Shooter, Ph.D., P.E. is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Bucknell University where he has taught for design, innovation and robotics for 16 years. He has published over 90 peer-reviewed papers and been PI or Co-PI on grants from NSF, ONR, NIST, ARDEC in addition to industry. As a registered professional engineer he also consults extensively with industry on design projects and formulation of innovation strategies. Page 22.287.1 c
avenues to learn about and exercise socialresponsibility, 4) exposure to the importance of life-long learning and licensure, 5)development of teamwork, communication, and leadership skills, and 6) service toprofession. This paper will provide examples of how the eight factors for a successfulchapter are implemented and how the student chapter supports departmental outcomes.IntroductionRegardless of the engineering discipline, active student professional societies have oftenbeen used to compliment academic programs. Typically, these activities have often beenviewed as opportunities to allow practitioners to interact with students and present real-world projects and experience to the students. However, successful student chaptersprovide much more
tasks (e.g. homework assignments, laboratory experiments, or design projects) underconditions that meet five criteria: positive interdependence, individual accountability, face-to-face interaction, appropriate use of collaborative skills, and regular self-assessment of teamfunctioning. Many studies have shown that when correctly implemented, cooperative learningimproves information acquisition and retention, higher-level thinking skills, interpersonal andcommunication skills, and self-confidence (Johnson, Johnson, and Smith, 1998).Holding each student individually accountable for work done in a team setting is a cornerstoneof cooperative learning. One way to meet this goal is to adjust team project grades for all teammembers according to how
controllers, and successfullypass the class. The observations made on this paper are based on our multiple years ofexperience in teaching the topics as well as several informal discussions with professors in otheruniversities. It appears that some students miss the basic understanding that a controller (whetheranalog or digital) represents a transfer function (in the S-Domain or the Z-Domain) or adifferential/difference equation so that, together with the dynamics of the plant and the rest of thesystem, it allows for desired closed loop behavior.This problem can be partially alleviated during laboratory experiments when students notice thata controller’s transfer function in the S-Domain can be practically implemented using hardware,which includes op
completeunderstanding.” This requires designing classroom experiences and formative assessments thathelp “make students’ thinking visible to themselves, their peers, and their teacher.”6In Physics and Engineering Problem Solving, this was accomplished through (1) a variety ofkinesthetic activities exploring dynamics concepts, (2) concept questions designed to revealcommon misconceptions, (3) questions requiring students to write or verbalize theirunderstanding of concepts in their own words, (4) laboratories that involved making predictionsabout physical behavior, and (5) the content-based assessments at the beginning and end of thecourse. In many of the kinesthetic activities students were able to discover and address theirmisconceptions themselves. For
supports the engineering degreeprogression program with students earning a BRCC associate of science in engineering andcompleting a bachelor’s of science engineering degree at LSU. Over three years, the program hasprovided scholarships and academic/ professional support to 24 students who demonstrateacademic talent and financial need. Another 11 students will be added during year four. Theprimary goals of the program are: to utilize scholarships to create and sustain a pathway forBRCC transfer students and to develop a successful model for transfer students from othercommunity colleges and 4-year institutions based on the experiences and outcomes of theproject.The Pathway Scholarship project in collaboration with the STEP 1B Engineering Grant
network• Setup username and access privilege to the server• Setup the resource sharing on the networkAlthough the theory behind these topics does not change much, the skill-based knowledge variesamong different NOS packages as well as, in some times, among different version of the sameNOS package. The hands-on experience will help students to understand the concept andpractice what they learned on design and implementation of computer networks.However, in most case, students do not have the opportunity to practice by themselves. Due to Page 4.592.2the nature of these exercises, multiple computers will be needed to form a network. In addition,in
basic computer skills (e.g. Word, Excel and Access) and providing thestudents with first laboratory experience in engineering fields. Usually, about 20 to 30 percentsof the students in this course are from non-engineering fields with various majors (see Table 1).The other linked course Problem Solving for Engineers is a more specific MATLAB-basedprogramming course and requires an equivalent of 2 years of high school algebra as a pre-requisite. As a pilot learning community was initiated in fall 2009, the introductory course wasselected as the key course due to its no-prerequisite feature. Table 1: Students‟ information in the Introduction to Engineering course No. of No. ofSemester
. Thespeaking courses scored somewhat better than the writing courses (question 8 vs. 3) while theEET courses were lower for oral than for written (questions 9 and 10 vs. 4 and 5). This was notunexpected, as the required courses in the curriculum only had a requirement for presentationsduring senior design (some ECET electives have oral presentation requirements). Partly as aresponse to this, the Curriculum Committee combined two, 2-hr courses (trouble shooting, ECET276, and sophomore projects, ECET 296) into a new 4-hr sophomore project course (ECET 297),during the final semester of the A.S. degree program. It was decided that ECET 297 would havean oral communication requirement. The first group students that took 297 will graduate nextyear, so we
practiced as a structural engineer and building envelope engineer in Washington, D.C. and Pittsburgh. She previously served as a lecturer at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland. Sarah teaches courses in Structural Engineering, Materials, Soil Mechanics, and Design. Sarah is passionate about curricular re- design to prepare students to be successful in the changing field and developing new design and laboratory courses intended to improve critical thinking and problem solving skills through experiential learning. As a 2021-2022 Provost’s Inclusive Teaching Fellow, Sarah will be working to improve social-consciousness of engineering students through changes to the CEE capstone design course.Ms. Andrea Francioni Rooney
Biomedical Instrumentation Lab Activities for Remote and Hybrid Delivery Dirk R. Albrecht, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MAAbstract— Biomedical instrumentation applies fundamental physics, electrical circuits, andengineering principles to the detection, recording and control of biological and biomedicalsignals, including clinical biosensors for patient monitoring and laboratory measurements.Typically, bioinstrumentation courses are taught using in-person laboratories with commercialequipment. Recent advances in inexpensive hardware and sensors have allowed transformationof these costly, seat-limited labs into flexible hands-on experiences, scalable to over 100concurrent
Paper ID #15090Using Time More Efficiently: Converting an Interview Protocol to a SurveyDr. Paul B. Golter, Washington State University Paul B. Golter obtained an M.S. and Ph.D. from Washington State University and made the switch from Instructional Laboratory Supervisor to Post-Doctoral Research Associate on an engineering education project. His research area has been engineering education, specifically around the development and as- sessment of technologies to bring fluid mechanics and heat transfer laboratory experiences into the class- room.Dr. Olusola Adesope, Washington State University Dr. Olusola O. Adesope is
interests include electrokinetics, predominantly dielectrophoretic characterizations of cells, and the devel- opment of biomedical microdevices. Research within her Medical micro-Device Engineering Research Laboratory (M.D. – ERL) also inspires the development of Desktop Experiment Modules (DEMos) for use in chemical engineering classrooms or as outreach activities in area schools (see www.mderl.org). Adrienne is past Chair of ASEE’s Diversity Committee and past PIC I Chair; she has previously served on WIED, ChED, and NEE leadership teams and has contributed to over 40 ASEE conference proceedings articles.Dr. Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University Dr. Carpenter is Founding Dean of Engineering at Campbell University
laboratories [5, 6, 7, 8]. By building complete working devices in lab(often with a small amount of open-ended design), students more readily see the connectionbetween the theoretical work they are doing and its practical application in the “real world”.Course evaluation results, surveys of student interest in EE, statistics of final grades, andperformance in subsequent classes all indicate that this approach does in fact increase motivationfor non-majors and pique interest in those who might otherwise not pursue EE as a major.As we redesigned ENGR 40 to create a new course, ENGR 40M (‘M’ for “making”), we alsodrew heavy inspiration from CS 106A, the introductory computer science class at Stanford. Morethan 80% of undergraduates at Stanford take CS
the specific populations most at risk becauseof their socioeconomic status, household composition, minority status, and language, or housing andtransportation. Information on social vulnerability should be combined with information on aneighborhood’s exposure to risk factors to identify areas that may need additional assistance before,during, and after a disaster. For example, a neighborhood along the Mississippi Gulf Coast with a largeelderly population would be at greater risk of devastation from hurricanes than a similar neighborhoodfurther inland (Bakkensen, et. al., 2017).To provide an example, research and experience have demonstrated that underserved populations sufferdisproportionality during disasters. A study of 1,089 people
the Accuplacer. Out of those students who took theAccuplacer, 49 (65%) placed into a higher math course. The placement was based solely on thescores from the Accuplacer.Discussion and ConclusionsThe RAMP program was developed to address an issue many engineering schools contend with:engineering programs are designed with the expectation that students take Calculus I and CalculusII in their freshman year. Unfortunately, at Tennessee Tech University, historical trends show thatabout 50% of the incoming first-time freshman students are placed in College Algebra or Pre-Calculus. Additionally, about 50% of the students placed in Calculus I do not pass the course. Thisleads to an adversarial effect of lower first-year retention in the program at 63
MINI-SESSION COMPARED TO NORMAL-LENGTH COURSES IN THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AT SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY Aiman Said. Kuzmar, Ph. D., P. E. Associate Professor of Construction Management and Engineering Technology ask008@shsu.edu Sam Houston State University Box 2088, Huntsville, Texas 77342 Abstract: Several drafting and design courses are being offered in the Construction Management Program at Sam Houston State University using an intense two week format. The classes meet every day for four hours on each day
abstract field, due to difficulty ofintegrating tangible and realistic experiments into electrical engineering curriculum. Sometimessetting up a laboratory for these experiments could be very expensive. Therefore, a lot of timeusing simulation tools is a good alternative to examine and visualize the realistic problems.However, the available simulation software may require vast technical proficiency, whichsometime impedes the inclination of students towards this area of study.In this paper we introduce a ray-tracing simulation tool that can be beneficial in teaching wavepropagation and wireless communication. Wireless InSite®, from Remcom®, is a site-specificwireless channel simulation tool based on ray-tracing method. This paper introduces
company andembracing change would be seen as positive attributes. Being flexible and ready for changewould help with career progression. At Baylor University, business models have beenincorporated into capstone design projects and elective projects involving teams [26]. Operatingteams as companies and exposing students to industry procedures gives them a setting in whichto experience the work environment before graduation. Wisler of GE Aircraft Enginesrecognized this weakness and wrote about it in a paper “Engineering – What You Don’tNecessarily Learn in School [27].” He has 12 suggestions to be a successful engineer whichincludes business understanding as number one: 1. Learn to be business oriented 2. Expect
curriculum give students valuable and marketable engineering skillsafter only two years in the program. Our students, with some faculty guidance, are running anengineering consulting practice and working on a myriad of interesting and educational projects.Appropriate projects for student consultants are generally of the following types: diagnostic,development, or design. Diagnostic problems address questions such as “What is the oilymaterial that is contaminating this filter?” or “Why is the flooring material in our factoryfailing?” or “Why does our fiberglass preform process produce scrap during the summer monthsbut not during the winter?” Almost any phenomenon that needs an explanation fits thisChemEngine project profile. Development projects
Paper ID #45621Active Learning and Specifications Grading for Undergraduate Algorithmsand Data Structures coursesDr. Mahima Agumbe Suresh, San Jose State University Mahima Agumbe Suresh is an Assistant Professor at San Jose State University. She received her Ph.D. from the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at Texas A&M University in December 2015. After her Ph.D., she was a postdoctoral researcher at Xerox Research Labs, India, where she worked on crime analytics and process mining. Her research interests include edge computing, machine learning, modeling and system design for cyber-physical systems and the
innovative strategies educatorsemploy to foster inclusive, effective, and culturally enriching learning experiences. The studyreviews issues related to language proficiency, academic writing, cultural differences, differenteducation backgrounds, unique learning habits, course delivery, teaching methodology, academicdiscipline, acculturation, pedagogical adaptations, and support services, shedding light on theevolving role of American universities in shaping the global education landscape. Addressing thesechallenges and leveraging the diverse perspectives international students bring to the classroomcan enrich the educational experience for all students and prepare them for a globallyinterconnected world.IntroductionAs the globalization of higher
to the current members ofWomen in Technology. Of the 81 students involved in the group, 51 responded to the survey, fora 63% response rate.The survey questions were modified from the WEPAN Pilot Climate Survey, designed to assessengineering students’ perceptions of the educational climate at their universities 26. One studyidentified those factors as isolation, the perceived irrelevance of theoretical preparatory courses,negative experiences in laboratory courses, classroom climate, and lack of role models 27. Otherstudies have suggested that the different learning styles of women may influence their desire toenter engineering or technology fields. Finally, Santovec contends that the problem is the imagethat engineering and technology is not
has a MEd in Higher Education Leadership from Iowa State University, a BA Degree from Buena Vista University and an AA and AAS Degree in Electronics from IHCC. Greg is past President of the Iowa ACTE and IITEA and serves on the ACTE Region III Policy Committee and is a member of the ACTE IAED (Inclusion, Access, Equity, and Diversity) Advisory Group. He is a journeyman electrician with an FCC license and industry experience in semiconductor manufacturing. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com National Science Foundation Advanced Technological Education Program
qualitative interviews with industrypractitioners’ and college students. The list of skill indicators were then validated with literaturereviews and grouped into 4 factors: Soft skills, Technical skills, and Experience and Managerialskills. The skills and groupings were presented for industry practitioner feedback at a researchsymposium prior to conducting the quantitative approach of this study. A survey was developedand tested with a pilot group of industry practitioners. The survey was improved in alignmentwith the feedback received during the pilot study and deployed for data collection. Eachidentified skill indicator was presented with a Likert scale, for industry feedback on theperceived importance in STEM related industries. The mean value was
(Any 2) Completed (Any 2) Completed (Any 2) Completed (Any 2) (Mechanical) (Materials Science) (Civil) (Electrical) Heat Transfer MSE Laboratory Engr. Properties of Signals & Systems Construction Materials Applied Mechanics Mech. Behavior of Transportation Engr. System Modeling of Materials Materials Fundamentals and Control Kinematics and Thermodynamics of Reinforced Concrete Microelectronic Machine Dynamics Materials Design Circuits
Ex- cellences’ Ned Ray McWherter Leadership Award. Under his leadership, BTES has been awarded the prestigious TNCPE Level 4 Excellence Award both in 1993 and 2012.Dr. Andrew J. Czuchry, East Tennessee State University Andrew Czuchry received his Ph.D. from the University of Connecticut in 1969 with a concentration in guidance and control systems engineering. He has more than twenty years experience as a professional manager in technical innovation and the electronics manufacturing industry. Dr. Czuchry has been the holder of the AFG Industries Chair of Excellence in Business and Technology since joining East Ten- nessee State University in 1992. He has published extensively in refereed journals and proceedings of
ofengineering courses, the work by Schlemr and Vanasupa [5] is a prime example. Mastery gradingcan also be adapted to benefit hybrid courses [2]. In our work, we were inspired by previousstudy designs, but the implementation details were inspired by examples in Nilson [3].Course ContextIn Spring 2022, Rojas was the instructor of record for two sections of Software Engineering Iusing mastery grading (specifications grading). The sections had 83 students (34 and 49,respectively). The class was mostly Computer Engineers (CE) and Software Engineers (SE) withnon-majors making up 10% and 30% in each section. The course took place Tuesday andThursday for seventy-five minutes each session in the semester. This is one of the first upperdivision courses that
b, d, i, k HW, project assess the effects of climate change processes on earth systems To enable students to understand the current global policies as related to HW, h, j climate change discussion To prepare students to present their work professionally g project *(a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering; (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data; (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams; (e) an ability to identify