ETD Session 435 Engineering Technology Students: Factors Predicting Success Gretchen A. Mosher Iowa State UniversityIntroduction to the problemThe published literature regarding students who depart engineering has generally not examinedthose who stay in the “T” part of STEM by pursuing engineering technology (ET). Internal datafrom the authors’ department suggest that students who transfer into ET from engineering fieldsoften succeed in the more hands-on setting, but bring with them far lower early-semester GPAs.Internal data also show that these transfers may have
supporting thatdiscipline. The following questions can then be posed to the students.1. What is the technical society all about?2. Tell about a meeting/conference/or event that the society is holding that would be of interestto you.3. What are membership benefits?4. What is the cost to join as a student, and will you consider joining?As was previously stated, the students were provided with a list of potential subjects forengineering projects, and encouraged to suggest others. The subjects suggested have includedprojects connected to active student engineering clubs; involvement with member companies ofthe IAC, Industry Advisory Council; and other campus activities. The following Table 1contains a list of subjects chosen by students for their
supporting thatdiscipline. The following questions can then be posed to the students.1. What is the technical society all about?2. Tell about a meeting/conference/or event that the society is holding that would be of interestto you.3. What are membership benefits?4. What is the cost to join as a student, and will you consider joining?As was previously stated, the students were provided with a list of potential subjects forengineering projects, and encouraged to suggest others. The subjects suggested have includedprojects connected to active student engineering clubs; involvement with member companies ofthe IAC, Industry Advisory Council; and other campus activities. The following Table 1contains a list of subjects chosen by students for their
Mechanical Engineering 3 F-ME-4 F Mechanical Engineering 4 M-GE-4 M General Engineering 4 F-ME-3 F Mechanical Engineering 3Table 1. Student ParticipantsProcedureThe study participants were asked via e-mail if they would be willing to participate in a researchexperiment on engineering design. After giving consent, students were tested individually in asmall conference room on campus. A small audio-video camera was mounted on the ceiling torecord speech as well as students’ hands. Participants were told that the purpose of the study wasto investigate the design process of engineering students. A practice think-aloud project ofassembling a 24-piece puzzle
the survey were active instructors with direct knowledge of theirschool’s computer laboratory resources. The project objective was to gather information on a Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education/Pacific South West Conference Copyright © 2015, American Society for Engineering Education 484large variety of topics which affect the provisioning of computer science labs used in highereducation degree programs.This paper categorizes the survey responses into the following topical groups: Group Number Description 1 General
marketing. An early advocate for brainstorming was Osborn, who in 1957 generated a set ofideas commonly used in “brainstorming sessions” that includes the following concepts: • Generate ideas without discussion on the idea feasibility or merit. • Off the Wall ideas are welcome; there is no such thing as bad ideas. • Measure amount of ideas, the more the better. • Piggy-back on ideas of others to generate new ideas. According to Friedman, the world has become “flat”, where globalization has leveled theplaying field, allowing ideas to become a commodity. Someone in India might have an idea thatwill allow mankind to reach Mars by 2030, or a sugar-cane farmer in Brazil might figure out away to make bio
Calibrated Peer Review”, Proceedings of the 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2003, pp F3E-14-16.19. Wise, John C. and Seong Kim, “Better Understanding through Writing: Investigating Calibrated Peer Review”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Expositions, 2004, session 2531, pp 1-6.20. Saterbak, Ann and Tracy Volz, “Implementing Calibrated Peer Review to Enhance Technical Critiquing Skills in a Bioengineering Laboratory”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Expositions, 2008, paper AC 2008-117, pp 1-12.21. Nichols, Ann, “Enhancement of Written Communication on Structural Systems using Calibrated Peer Review”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Expositions, 2009
Rethinking Electronics Industry Workforce Development: Case Studies on HighSchool and Middle School Students with Semiconductor Design and AdvancedElectronics PrototypingNathan EdwardsNathan Edwards is the Executive Director of U.S. Partnership for Assured Electronics and is committedto the next generation of STEM workforce through mentoring of high school students and early careerstaff. Mr. Edwards has over 15 years in science/technology with several patents and publications. He hasparticipated in national panels with National Academies of Sciences/Engineering/Medicine; US Dept ofHomeland Security; and National Association for Pupil Transportation. He currently serves on theLewis-Palmer School District CTE STEM advisory committee and
general undergraduate student body in Chemical Engineering.Students were asked:1. "On a scale of 1-5, how strongly do you value Personality Theory in your groupinteractions?" in the pre-program survey and "To what extent has your appreciation ofPersonality Theory, and its impact on group interaction, advanced as a result ofcompleting the summer program?" in the post-program survey.(1=very little, 3=somewhat, 5=very much)The average response to the pre-program question was 2.9 whereas the post-programaverage response was 3.7 indicating a significant increase in appreciation over thesummer.2. "Rate your capacity/skill level for each of the following skills:" in the pre-survey and"Please rate how your capacity/skill level for each of the following
sheet on the component and a formal technical report about the component you selected. Some of the issues you should consider are: 1. size of your sample(s) for the demonstration (not too big and not too small; consider a “hand-held” size) 2. best way to present visuals of your component in your report and take-away sheet 3. function of the component in general 4. function of your particular (sample) component (Where did yours actually come from or where could it be used?) Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering Education 5. specifications
semester2015. Course Schedule: Week 1 - General introduction to design process — review of course syllabus, deliverables and outcomes and Project 1: the design, Solidworks® modeling of BNC ‘dust cap’. Weeks 2 + 3 - Review of basic design process and principles and work on 3-D printing of BNC ‘dust cap’ - introduce presentation skills (3 D printing deliverable due). Week 4 – 6 - Review of detailed 7-step design process cycle including additional requirements of Project 2 – A Pod holder / storage / protection and use platform. Week 7 - Each team is assigned one function of the 5-week project: Solar PV lantern. Weeks 8 – 11 – Each team will work with in collaboration with other functional teams to
Session F1A1 Tapping Indigenous Resources to Enhance the Decision Making Process in Senior Projects Mohan Ketkar Department of Engineering Technology College of Engineering Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX AbstractCase studies are proven techniques to enhance the learning skills and the level of classparticipation in the project-oriented courses. Typical case study exercise involves reading theproblem, forming student teams, research
Session F1A1 Tapping Indigenous Resources to Enhance the Decision Making Process in Senior Projects Mohan Ketkar Department of Engineering Technology College of Engineering Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX AbstractCase studies are proven techniques to enhance the learning skills and the level of classparticipation in the project-oriented courses. Typical case study exercise involves reading theproblem, forming student teams, research
the factors in PBL program, which contribute to effective learning of ABETprofessional skills?Data Collection and AnalysesProject-Based Learning (PBL) The PBL program is adapted from the Aalborg Model of PBL (Figure 1). Students combinelearning of technical information with the execution of engineering design projects. Theprogram model is 100% project based and does not include traditional courses. Enteringstudents are community college graduates or transfer students from other universities who haveall completed lower division requirements for a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering.The model has four semester upper division portion of a student’s education. Graduates of theprogram earn a Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical
higher education to theuniversity classrooms; general public and to private individuals (The Institute for Higherhowever, the perspective Education Policy 1998).can be still useful when thinking of the numerous benefits such activities can provide.Here are just some of the benefits of engineering outreach for adults:1. Educational outreach programs for adults, particularly senior adults, may have social, medical, and economic benefits for individuals (Bibel 2018).2. A scientifically literate individual may make better-informed decisions regarding personal health, environmental stewardship, voting, and other areas that benefit society as a whole.3. Engineering engagement with adults, especially with those who already have a relationship
, skills in lifelong learning are becomingimperative for engineers to cope with the ever-changing demands in theworkplace during their professional career. The elements of undergraduateresearch and lifelong learning skills are presented in this paper and two coursesare suggested as mechanisms to foster this education in the engineeringcurriculum.IntroductionNumerous studies conducted on the undergraduate engineering programemphasized the importance of the basic elements of mathematics, naturalsciences, engineering sciences, and fundamental concepts of analysis anddesign [1-4]. These studies also called for emphasis on synthesis and design,depth and strength in the technical subjects, greater emphasis on deeper inquiryand open-ended problem solving
hit most of the state of Texas resultingin massive power outages due to historically low temperatures [1]. The electricity demandskyrocketed, and the state’s capacity to generate electricity could not match the sudden electricitydemand. This resulted in wide spread outages that ranged from a few hours to a few days dependingon the damage sustained in every local area. This research aims at evaluating and providing asolution to such incidents by offering a secondary, affordable, and reliable renewable source ofelectricity made from two 300-Watt solar panels tracking the sun along with the electrical hardwarenecessary to optimize electricity harnessed and stored. This system provides between 10 to 50%of the electricity demand for an average
program serve two purposes. In addition tobeing required for the security degree, they are offered as technical electives for a numberof other majors including Information Systems Technology, Electrical EngineeringTechnology, Computer Engineering, and Computer Science. The basic security courses(“Computer and Network Security” and “Security Methods and Practices”) have beenextremely popular and successful as electives for these other majors.A subset of the courses offered in this program are also going to serve as a cornerstonefor a Public Safety and Security degree that is to be offered through the College of Healthand Public Affairs. This will be a more generalized, interdisciplinary security degreewith focuses including computer security
Texas at Dallas Copyright © 2017, American Society for Engineering Education 2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual ConferenceThis paper discusses the development of hypothetical cases in engineering ethics. Such cases areuseful for classroom exercises or competition content. Guidelines are made for casecomposition and analysis. Three custom ethics cases are included as examples.Exercises and Competitions in Engineering EthicsEngineering codes of ethics generally have a statement of principles followed by a listing ofguidelines in which the principles are applied. For the Tau Beta Pi Code of Ethics of Engineersas shown in Table 1., these sections are labeled “The Fundamental Principles” and
engagement can maintain authenticity while navigating researcher positionality.Through autoethnographic methods, this study documents the conception and development of a10-week usability testing curriculum. Data sources include emails, memory traces, andconversation notes with the high school teacher. The analysis focuses on four themes: theproject's origins from personal experience, negotiations with the teacher, building a teachingteam, and the evolution from pure outreach to incorporating research reflection. Findings revealkey insights about authentic community engagement: (1) beginning with genuine curiosity ratherthan research objectives allowed for greater responsiveness to stakeholder needs; (2) pre-existingcommunity connections facilitated
, who provide curriculum input and support through donations of equipment [1, 2] CURRICULUM INNOVATIONS µE)Reformulation of the BS Program in Microelectronic Engineering (µA major institute wide initiative was undertaken and completed in the year 2005. This reformrequired restructuring the BS program in all engineering and science programs at RIT to create‘five electives’ in each program to enable students take courses in other disciplines.The new curriculum has 196 quarter credits that include 12 credits of free electives, 8 credits ofprofessional electives, 92 credits of general education and five quarters of co-op experience. Thecombination of 3 free
. Other professors can be implored tomention the videos during their lectures. More videos need to be created. The current videoscover the most common errors, but only a fraction of the errors cadets might encounter.Feedback in the form of direct video comments rather than by survey should also be encouraged.Bibliography[1] Martin, C.C., A.W. Terry, W.H. Jeffrey, and M.H. Steven, "RAPTOR: a visual programming environment for teaching algorithmic problem solving", Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, St. Louis, Missouri, USA: ACM, 2005.[2] Joe, M., F. William, and L. Henry, "Teaching applied computing without programming: a case-based introductory course for general education
a business point ofview and usable from a managing complexity point of view. Technological depth and non-technical breadth are essential for innovation to happen, as engineers need to grow professionallydaily.The two courses described in this paper – Electromechanical Engineering Systems (2nd-year) andMultidisciplinary Engineering Systems (3rd-year) – are required courses in the mechanicalengineering curriculum and have been developed and taught over the past two years. They eachconsist of two hours of class time and two hours of small-group (12 students per session) hands-on, hardware and software, studio sessions each week. They are each taught in the context ofmodern engineering practice and real-world problem solving following the
, ‘Session 18-3 Technology in Engineering Education: Using FLUENT Software to Evaluate and Solve Computational Fluid Dynamics Problems’, 2008.[4] P. A. López, J. J. Mora, F. J. Martínez, and J. Izquierdo, ‘Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) models in the learning process of Hydraulic Engineering’, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 252–260, Jun. 2010.[5] H. K. Navaz, B. S. Henderson, R. M. Berg, and S. M. A. Nekcoei, ‘A New Approach to Teaching Undergraduate Thermal/Fluid Sciences - Courses in Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics and Compressible Flow’, Mechanical Engineering Publications. 157, 2002.[6] W. Jeong and J. Seong, ‘Comparison of effects on technical variances of
technical project presentation and submit their source code along with a final report. Thefinal report documents the project in a reflective capacity. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2018, American Society for Engineering Education Session ETD 5225Success of the paring depends on finding a good match in personality, energy and technicalability. When mismatches occur this can negatively impact the five (CIKEH) dimensionsmeasured by CATME. Where mismatches occur we have seen instances of free riding 1, takingover 15 or interpersonal conflict. From a grading perspective many of
study. A schematic of our undergraduate engineering curriculum is shown in Figure 1, • The ability to design, analyze and simulate which includes a general science and math core, a core nanostructures, nanocomponents, and nanodevices engineering curriculum, a humanities thread, and our eight- for various applications; semester Engineering Design Spine, with courses in gray • The ability to excel in an interdisciplinary denoting the discipline-specific engineering courses. The environment, to critically/creatively think, and to flexibility provided by this revised curriculum
Hassan Science (Chemistry) General Chemistry (UGE) Jung Oh English Technical Writing Judy Collins UGE refers Kansas State University undergraduate general education courses. UGE Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Midwest Section Conference courses are to incorporate an active learning environment, an experiential context for whatever is studied, and an opportunity for students to connect ideas (http://www.k-state.edu/catl/uge/).Developing Online TutorialsResearch has shown that faculty and students prefer the use of online materials when available16.To satisfy this
Session 17-1 NanoUndergraduate Education Techniques at the University of New Mexico Marwan Al-Haik, Zayd Leseman, Claudia Luhrs Mechanical Engineering Department University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131 Mahmoud Reda Taha Civil Engineering Department University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131 AbstractThis paper describes an approach that
. Of particular interest in this regardare educational systems that are significantly different from our own.The German higher education system has a strongly different structureand approach.Short descriptions of the educational progress of the German engineer-ing student and of the structure of the German technical universityare presented first. Some advantages and disadvantages from the au-thor1s point of view are enumerated. Specific courses, laboratories,projects, examinations, etc., that are listed in this paper as exampleshave been comoleted by the author at the University of Karlsruhe,Karlsruhe, Germany, for a degree in Mechanical Engineering.The CurriculumTable 1 is an attempt to contrast the educational progress of a typicalAmerican
Session 6-1 The Evolution of a Senior Capstone Course in the Context of a Research-Based University Quality Enhancement Plan Farrokh Attarzadeh, Enrique Barbieri, Miguel Ramos Engineering Technology Department College of Technology University of Houston AbstractThe process of reaffirming accreditation at the University of Houston has identifiedresearch-based instruction as a critical component of the campus learning environmentfor the foreseeable future. This assertion is consistent with broader trends in