/learnlabview/ 3. www.arduino.cc/en/Tutorial/HomePage 4. BANZI, M. Getting Started with Arduino, 2nd ed. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA, 2011. 5. REHG, J. SARTORI, G. Instructional Algorithms Enhance Student Understanding of PLC Ladder Logic Programming. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. (2010) 6. SARIK, J. KYMISSIS, I. Lab Kits Using the Arduino Prototyping Platform, 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. (2010) Page 23.846.9Appendix A: Arduino Code Page 23.846.10Appendix B: i-TRiLOGI code Page 23.846.11Appendix C: RSLogix
.[16], [17] consists of 60 Likert-scale items. With input from professional engineers andengineering education stakeholders (i.e., leaders, faculty, students, etc.), the 30 technology and30 tinkering-related items identified what a person must be able to do in order to be successful inthe engineering field. Spearman-Brown reliability coefficients (0.8 for technical scale, 0.87 fortinkering scale) point toward acceptable reliability and internal consistency for the purposes ofthe study. To reduce confusion, all survey items were intentionally positively framed.Items scored using the following scale: 0 = not descriptive at all; 1 = somewhat not descriptive; 2= neutral; 3 = somewhat descriptive; 4 = very descriptive
always try to strengthen the connections I have with my friends and family, and spend any free time I can with them. The connections i have made in college are the most valuable parts of my life, because my friends and family have helped shape who I am, and they make me a better person every day. I owe my fortune of becoming an engineer and achieving my dream of helping people to all my friends and family for inspiring me to be me.Ms. Jessica Besnier, James Madison UniversityMs. Jordan Claire Capelle, James Madison University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Evidence-based Resources that Scaffold Students in Performing Bio-inspired
also serves as the Director of education and global initiatives at an interdisciplinary research institute called the Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science (ICTAS) at Virginia Tech. He is the founding director of an interdisciplinary lab called Learning Enhanced Watershed Assessment System (LEWAS) at VT. He received a Ph.D. in civil engineering from VT. His research interests are in the areas of computer-supported research and learning systems, hydrology, engineering education, and international collaboration. He has served as a PI or co-PI on 16 projects, funded by the National Science Foundation, with a $6.4 million research funding participation from external sources. He has been directing/co
work with the ME students • I like it Page 10.382.6 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”On the other hand, about half of the students found the experience to be difficult. Their concernswere mostly about communications problems and a perception of unequal work loads. Some ofthe communications concerns were: • It is good only when everyone is on the same page • It was hard to follow others work due to our lack of knowledge in
faculty perceptions of creativity. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Columbus, OH.Kazerounian, K. & Foley, S. Barriers to creativity in engineering education: A study of instructors and students perceptions. Journal of Mechanical Design. 129 (2007): 761-768.Litzinger, T. A., Zappe, S. E., Hunter, S., & Mena, I. (2015). Integration of the Creative Process across Engineering Curricula. International Journal of Engineering Education. 31(1B), 335-342.Mumford, M.D., Mobley, M.I. Uhlman, C.E. Reiter-Palmon, R. and Doares, L.M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91-122.National Academy of Engineering (2004
included as Appendix B in this paper. Four ofthe five students completed the survey and the results were analyzed. The fifth student isparticipating in the US Navy Nuclear Propulsion Officer Candidate (NUPOC) program and wasnot available for the survey.The students were instructed to use a 1-10 scale representing a spectrum of educational impactfor assessing impact of participation in Perseus II on the 11 criterion 3 outcomes with 1indicating no impact and 10 indicating a very significant impact. Additionally they wereprovided the following example:Outcome (a): How did you participation in Perseus II impact your “ability to apply knowledge ofmathematics, science, and engineering” i. In your chosen engineering discipline: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”This past year, 2002, marked a sharp downturn in the total number of PhDs awarded after aperiod of slow growth and marked the first year since 1998 in which the number of internationalPhDs awarded also declined. In fact, the number of international PhDs awarded now controls thetrend of the total number of PhDs awarded since the number of U.S. PhDs has been in steadydecline, with one exception, since 1996. Coincidentally, 1996 also marked the year in which thenumber of international students returning to their home countries with science and technologydegrees earned in the US began to increase2. With improved economic conditions andprofessional development opportunities now available to
Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education” 16. Hannon, K., “The Graduate: educators are struggling to prepare well-rounded engineers for today’s workplace”, ASEE Prism, May/June 2003. 17. Council on Member Affairs, Committee on Membership, ASME International http://www.asme.org/member/. 18. Creed, Suuberg, and Crawford, “Engineering Entrepreneurship: an example of a paradigm shift in engineering education”, ASEE Journal for Engineering Education, April 2002. 19. Ullman, D., “The Mechanical Design Process, 2nd edition”, McGraw-Hill, 1997. 20. Horenstein, M., “Design Concepts for Engineers, 2nd edition
. 2.11 3.33 - I feel like I "belong" in computer science. 3.11 3.50 - I consider myself a scientist, technologist, engineer, or mathematician. 3.30 3.33 - I take pride in my coding abilities. 3.11 - -This research paper aims to present efforts on supporting computing education withinIndigenous-serving schools in the Four Corners region through research-practice partnershipprofessional and curriculum learning. Analysis of teachers who engaged in 40 hours of learningalong with students who participated in the teachers’ classes revealed both strengths andlimitations. Our findings suggest that teachers
developed four microfabrication based courses where students use a clean room facility to fabricate transistors, solar cells or MEMS structures. Dr. Kaiser’s research group is currently creating radiation sensors for a radiation tolerant computer system for space flights on satellites and in the International Space Station.Liz Kovalchuk, Montana State University Elizabeth Kovalchuk received her BS in Industrial and Management Systems Engineering (IMSE) from Montana State University (MSU) in 2017. Her research interests include engineering education, engineer- ing management, and narrative training. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Improving the Teaching and Learning of
measuring learner engagement in MOOCs10included social engagement as factor, in addition to behavioral engagement, cognitive engagement,and emotional engagement. But for the issues raised in the present study, only two of the twelvequestions in the instrument were relevant: • I often responded to other learners’ questions. • I shared learning materials (e.g., notes, multimedia, links) with other classmates in the MOOC. Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX Copyright ã 2022, American Society for Engineering Education 4Consequently, this study
into the College Classroom”, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Vol. 32, No 3 p 528-535- 11 2020[10] N. Aruanand, A. RameshBabu, P.K. Rajesh, “Enriched Learning Experience using Augmented Reality Framework in Engineering Education”, Procedia Computer Science, 9 th World Engineering Education Forum 2019[11] M. Rhoads, R. Kirkland, C. Baker, J. Yeats, N. Grevstad, “Benefits of Movement-Integrated Learning Activities in Statistics and Research Methods Course”, Society for the Teaching of Psychology, 2020[12] J. McConnell, “Active learning and its use in Computer Science”, Integrating Tech. into C.S.E., June 1996[13] R. Lopez-Herrejon, M. Shulman, “Using Interactive
large boring bar vibration amplitudes inturning. Vibrations during internal turning operations; reduce the surface quality on the workpiece, reduce the tool life and generate acoustic noise, sometimes at unbearable levels. Page 10.1073.6 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education ✒ b
wide range of materials, and multi-material and remote printing capabilities.MethodologyWe developed a remote learning methodology using printable, flexible robots to cultivate a hands-on learning experience for robotics engineering students (Figure 4). We divide our methodologyKendre et al., ASEE (2022) 4 of 9 American Society of Engineering Education, April 22-23rd, 2022 – Wentworth Institute of Technologyinto four sections (i) design of printable robots, (ii) web-based interface for remote printing andmonitoring, (iii) inspection and delivery by teaching staff, and (iv) assembly and testing at home.A. Design of printable robotsStudents design pneumatically
Student Team Leaders and SocialLoafers in a First-Year Engineering Cornerstone Robotics Design Project,” In 2019 IEEEFrontiers in Education Conference, Covington, KY, USA 2019, pp. 1-5.https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028610[7] A. D. Lantada, P. L. Morgado, J. M. Munoz-Guinosa, J. L. M. Sanz, J. E. Otero, J. M. Garcia,E. C. Tanarno, E. D. L. G. Ochoa, “Towards successful project-based teaching-learningexperiences in engineering education,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2),476-490, 2013.[8] N. Jalinus, S. Syahril, R. A. Nabawi, Y. Arbi, “How Project-Based Learning and DirectTeaching Models Affect Teamwork and Welding Skills Among Students,” International Journalof Innovation, Creativity, and Change., 11(11), 85-111, 2020
]: • Inadequate planning Insufficient capital Page 10.463.1 • • Management failures Proceeding s of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education • Poor marketing plans & strategies • Legal issues • Lack of vision and missionVirtual globalization of marketplace has reduced even more the chance of success for newstart-up companies, since most of these new companies have few resources available toestablish a strong foundation to compete in the global
ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[10] N. M. Trellinger, B. Sattler, and J. Turns, "“I realized that I myself am on the path to being a pioneer”: Characterizing the experiences of graduate students in an innovative interviewing experience.," in 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA., 2015.[11] L. Stone, "Kuhnian science and education research: Analytics of practice and training," in Educational Research: Why ‘What Works’ Doesn't Work: Springer, 2006, pp. 127-142.[12] C. Henderson, A. Beach, and N. Finkelstein, "Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature," Journal of
Investigating Student Learning (ISL) Program was funded by the University of Michigan Office of theProvost, the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching, and the College of Engineering.1. Borrego, M., Karlin, J., McNair, L. D., & Beddoes, K. (2013). Team effectiveness theory from Industrial and Organizational Psychology applied to engineering student project teams: A research review. Journal of Engineering Education, 102, 472-512.2. Davis, D., Trevisan, M., Gerlick, R., Davis, H., McCormack, J., Beyerlein, S., … Brackin, P. (2010). Assessing team member citizenship in capstone engineering design courses. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4), 771-783.3. Schultz, T. (1998). Practical problems in organizing students
Stanford University that helped them create acompany.4.3.1 Practical Application Proposition 3.1: Practical application and PBL are the most valuable teaching approaches for future entrepreneurs.The first finding is not directly related to any specific learning but the teaching approach inengineering education. Some 16 out of 19 ME218 alumni put significant emphasis on practicallearning, hands-on learning approaches, and real-world experience. I08M states: “[…] the partthat lit me up, that made me the most exciting was always the shop class, the hands-onexperience of engineering, any project-based class.” (I08M, Pos. 38) and I03M adds: “I wouldsay that those hands-on skills were absolutely crucial; the hands-on design skills and the classesI took
Technology of Purdue Schoolof Engineering and Technology at IUPUI. He earned his B.S. degree in Civil Engineering from Middle EastTechnical University and M.S. Degree in Civil Engineering from Michigan State University. He has over twelveyears of international industrial experience in design and construction in architectural and civil construction.Professor Sener has been in engineering and technology education for more than thirteen years. He is a memberof American Society of Civil Engineers, American Society for Engineering Education, and American ConcreteInstitute and is a registered Professional Engineer in Indiana. Professor Sener was awarded the IndianaUniversity President’s Award for Distinguished Teaching in 1993 and the IUPUI Chancellor’s
Central Ohio. Patrick is also involved in curriculum development efforts to offer courses in Sustainable Development Engineering. He was named a 2020 Engineering for Change Fellow.Dr. Michael J. Hagenberger, Ohio State University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Engagement in Practice: Developing, Assessing, Evaluating and Enhancing a Global EngineeringCapstone CourseIntroductionAs society becomes more globalized, engineers will need the knowledge, skills, and attitudes to workeffectively across cultural and societal differences. The Civil Engineering Global Capstone (GlobalCapstone) course sequence at The Ohio State University (OSU) is a culminating
FY 2016 – $30.00 M (Estimate)• Designed to foster entrepreneurship that will lead to the commercialization of NSF-funded research – Uses customer discovery and business model development to validate commercialization opportunities – Successful I-Corps projects will be prepared for business formation• Distinct components of I-Corps program – Teams – Principal Investigator (PI), Entrepreneurial Lead (EL), Mentor (M) – Nodes – Hubs for education, infrastructure, and research that engage academic scientists and engineers in innovation – Sites – Academic institutions that catalyze the engagement of local teams in technology transition and strengthen local innovation 8
experience in the Manufacturing Engineering program at UW-Stout is a two-semester course sequence. Design projects are managed by teams of students, industry contactsand faculty advisors. In the first course, Capstone I, students experience the engineering designprocess by designing realistic products for manufacture. The final detailed design is used inCapstone II, where students design and build an automated manufacturing system to produce theproduct. Page 8.29.3Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright©2003, American Society for Engineering EducationThe overall learning
Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationII. Assessment of the Current Level of AchievementWhile preparing for EC2000 during the 1996-98 time frame, we assessed our progress on abimonthly basis by completing ABET’s “Level of Implementation Form.” This form, along withABET’s “Matrix for Implementation Assessment” are reproduced in Appendix I and Appendix IIof this paper, respectively. This form and matrix still provide a useful guide as we assessprogress made since the 1998-99 accreditation cycle, and the latest version of these forms can bedownloaded from ABET web site 3. What follows is a self-assessment of the current level ofachievement measured against the
., and McCord, R, 2018 (June). Engage Engineering Students in Homework: Attribution of Low Completion and Suggestions for Interventions. American Journal of Engineering Education, 9(1), 23-38.[11] Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of engineering education, 93(3), 223-231.[12] Thomas, J. W. (2000). A Review of Research on Project-based Learning, San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.[13] Dunkel, P., & Davy, S. (1989) The Hueristic of Lecture Notetaking: Perceptions of American & International Students Regarding the Value & Practice of Notetaking. English for Specific Purposes. 8. Pp 33-50.
. Studentsinvestigate fewer processes but in greater depth. Those processes that are treated in thelaboratory courses were removed from the MET 270 syllabus and processes relevant to Maineindustries were added.The new program evaluation criteria established by the Technology Accreditation Commission(TAC) of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) and the graduatecompetency gaps cited in the Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME) ManufacturingEducation Plan Phase I Report were addressed in the new course design.1, 2 Students mustpractice and demonstrate teamwork, communication, and lifelong learning skills. Team-based Page 5.375.1projects
Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference University of New Mexico, Albuquerque Copyright ã 2020, American Society for Engineering Education 2international research activities with FH JOANNEUM (FHJ) in Graz, Austria creating a focus onaeronautics within the undergraduate mechanical engineering and graduate engineering programs atWTAMU. This international collaboration between the Mechanical Engineering program atWTAMU and the Aviation Institute at FHJ will strengthen the curriculum and research efforts inboth undergraduate and graduate programs at WTAMU and FHJ by providing resources foradvancing learning, understanding, discovery in the fields of
2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright Ó 2001, American Society for Engineering Education”II. HistoryOur work has been with an introductory course in chemical engineering. Typically, this isthe first chemical engineering course taken by the majors and it usually comes in thesecond year of their studies. It might be called Chemical Engineering Fundamentals,Principals and Practices of Chemical Engineering or some similar title. It is thefoundation upon which many other advanced chemical engineering courses are based. Itis usually the students’ first taste of our discipline and often their first time todifferentiate the studies of chemical engineering from chemistry.In the Fall of 1999 we
than any others I have had. This is the only class where I got to apply my theories to a real company.”Proceedings of the 2005 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 7 Fig. 4. An example of Lean Manufacturing projects by IMSE 564 students. • “This project was a real good opportunity to go and recognize the theory we learn in class.” • “You will be able to apply Lean in a real world situation.” • “I felt like the majority of this course was directly applicable to my future career endeavors.” • “I feel that this class has adequately prepared me (through