Society for Engineering Education 16(5), January 2007, accessed online at www.asee.org from 2007 - 2010.4. Kraines, A., et al., “The Virginia Middle School Engineering Education Initiative: Using a Senior Design Course to Develop Engineering Teaching Kits,” Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education Conference (2003), volume 2, pp. F3A_12 – F3A_21.5. Richards, L.G.; Hallock, A.K; and Schnittka, C.G., “Getting Them Early: Teaching Engineering Design In Middle Schools,” International Journal of Engineering Education 23(5), September-October 2007, pp. 874 - 883.6. Richards, L.G.; Laufer, G.; and Humphrey, J.A., “Teaching Engineering in the Middle Schools: The Virginia Middle Schools
of the DMUs are functioning at an optimality scale, Equation 4 could beconverted into a VRS model by including the constraint i i 0 to the set of technologicalconstraints. 6 © American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 2015 ASEE Northeast Section ConferenceThe result of Equation 4, is the relative efficiency score of each DMU. Inverse of the variable (1/ ) provides the technical efficiency value (TE) for each DMU. Here, given the technicalefficiency value is equal to one (TE = 1
and STEM (No. w23525). National Bureau of Economic Research. 2. Planning Committee for the National Summit on Developing a STEM Workforce Strategy, Board on Higher Education and Workforce, Policy and Global Affairs, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (PC). (2016). Developing a National STEM Workforce Strategy: A Workshop Summary. National Academies Press. 3. AAUW. (2018). The simple truth about the gender pay gap. American Association of University Women website research: Retrieved from https://www.aauw.org/resources/research/simple-truth/ 4. Thiry, H., Laursen, S. L., & Loshbaugh, H. G. (2015). “How do I get from here to there?” An examination of Ph.D. science
retention of peer mentors.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE 0622483.Bibliography1 Carlson, L.E., and J.F. Sullivan. 1999. Hands-on Engineering: Learning by doing in the integrated teaching andlearning program. International Journal of Engineering Education 15(1): 20-31.2 J.D. McCowan. 2002. An integrated and comprehensive approach to engineering curricula, Part two: Techniques.International Journal of Engineering Education 18(6): 638-643.3 Board of Engineering Education-National Research Council. 1992. Improving retention in undergraduateengineering education. Issues in Engineering Education: A Bulletin Addressing Culture Change in EngineeringEducation 1 (1).4
that Page 10.1056.11 Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.2 Samford Junior High School, Auburn, Alabama.3 Drake Middle School, Auburn Alabama. ASEE Southeast Section Conference 2004experience within the context of the classroom. I expect that I will be able to use CAVE within my own testimonywhen my class begins a unit on properties of matter.” Fickert states, “The interaction with the entire CAVE projectchallenged me in many ways, and I enjoyed learning how the project relates industry to education, at both thegraduate and junior
Education annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ã 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationWith a small amount of modifications on other parts the change notice should be easily madeusing the parametric assembly and associative drawings.Teaching PedagogyThe system in which the students performed their tasks was very facilitator driven where Ibecame more of a resource person than an instructor when groups were struggling with a designdecision. I think that most of the learning that took place was through one on one design reviewswith students after their presentations. The educational benefits incurred by the students taking aconcurrent engineering approach to this project enabled the students to work more
. She also previously served as Director for Communications and International Engagement at the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, Lecturer at the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University, and Assistant Professor at the Department of Integrated Engineering at Minnesota State University, Mankato. She holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech.Dr. Benjamin Daniel Chambers, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Ben Chambers is an Assistant Collegiate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, and Director of the Frith First Year Makers program. His research focuses include the interactions of non-humans with the built
Paper ID #37680WIP - 360 Coaching to Support Whole-Student Advising inthe First-YearStacy Tantum (Associate Professor of the Practice)Sophia T Santillan (Associate Professor of the Practice) (Duke University)Lupita Temiquel-McMillian (Assistant Dean) (Duke University)Jennifer Ganley © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work in Progress: 360 Coaching to Support Whole-Student Advising in the First-YearThis Work in Progress paper will describe efforts to integrate wellness and career advising intothe academic advising model for first-year
participants is collaborative and utilizes a speciallydesigned wiki that encourages collaboration, transparency and synergy. The process isexperiential, intense and fast paced— the program is usually seven to nine days in length and tento twelve hours per day. The program has been running for six years, at the United Nations, theUN International School in New York and Chestnut Hill College in Philadelphia. Other formatsof the Lab have been developed that fit within a more traditional academic framework ofsemester long courses that meet two to three times per week and which could be used byengineering schools and departments. For more information these formats, contact author.viThe primary contribution of this educational modality to engineering
participants is collaborative and utilizes a speciallydesigned wiki that encourages collaboration, transparency and synergy. The process isexperiential, intense and fast paced— the program is usually seven to nine days in length and tento twelve hours per day. The program has been running for six years, at the United Nations, theUN International School in New York and Chestnut Hill College in Philadelphia. Other formatsof the Lab have been developed that fit within a more traditional academic framework ofsemester long courses that meet two to three times per week and which could be used byengineering schools and departments. For more information these formats, contact author.viThe primary contribution of this educational modality to engineering
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education CE 444 Civil Infrastructure Systems Management Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Lafayette College Fall 2004 Course Activity Survey I am interested in understanding how elements of the class contributed to your learning of the subject matter and interest in the topic. Your responses will be used to improve the course. For each course activity described, indicate your level of agreement or disagreement with the following statements. Please include comments, if you have any. Homework 1 asked you to research the extent and
Paper ID #41960Board 243: Development and Validation of Learning Through Making Instrument(LMI) Project OverviewMr. Leonardo Pollettini Marcos, Purdue University Leonardo Pollettini Marcos is a 3rd-year PhD student at Purdue University’s engineering education program. He completed a bachelor’s and a master’s degree in Materials Engineering at the Federal University of Sao Carlos, Brazil. His research interests are in assessment instruments and engineering accreditation processes.Dr. Julie S Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Julie S. Linsey is a Professor in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering
Page 8.297.5readers.Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2003, American Society for Engineering Education. • I think a majority of the students are frustrated with Rational Rose. The “Introduction to Rational Rose” lecture should have been done hands-on with each person on their laptop. [Note: This comment was received in SE-281 in Spring 2001 and used in Spring 2002] • Present material with the consideration that most students have never worked on a large software product or in a business team setting. • More interaction in the class. Focus each lecture on the student, instead of just the book
Education Collaboration Copyright ©2022, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 325 Table I. Motion summary. X-axis Left Right Y-axis Rear Middle Forward Z-axis Up Down End- Rotation Close/open effector (CW, CCW) motion for 180 degSafety FeaturesIndustrial robots contain several features designed to protect operator safety on the factory floor.Some
: Page 7.1108.9 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education1. “The lecture was too fast.” “Slow down.” Close to a half of the attendants wrote these types of comments. The instructor well realizes that the lecture is fast. However, since the instructor wants to cover each subject in detail, he cannot slow down the lecture speed. An encouraging aspect is that many of the attendants who wrote such comments also accepted the speed and wrote that they would rather take the current style of lecture than less course material with slower lecture speed.2. “I wanted to have more time for the hands-on
. ’Pete’ White Chair for Inno- vation in Engineering Education. He is the founding director of an interdisciplinary lab called Learning Enhanced Watershed Assessment System (LEWAS) at VT. He received a Ph.D. in civil engineering from VT. His research interests are in the areas of computer-supported research and learning systems, hydrol- ogy, engineering education, and international collaboration. He has served as a PI or co-PI on 18 projects, funded by the National Science Foundation, with a $8.4 million research funding participation from exter- nal sources. He has been directing/co-directing an NSF/Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Site on interdisciplinary water sciences and engineering at VT since 2007
. American Society for Engineering Education Page 7.108.5We shall neglect the effects of gravity and assume the velocity of the fluid at point 1 asnegligible compared to that of point 2. Using Bernoulli’s equation, we have8 P1 = P2 + 12 ρV22 (1)where Pi is the pressure at point i, Vi is the velocity of the fluid and ρ its density. If we considerthat the opening surface at point 2 is A then the relation between the flow rate Q and the pressuredifference at points 1 and 2 can be written as Q = A ρ2 P1 − P2
development of the individual is discussed.Practice and Games Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2010, American Society for Engineering Education 212In basketball, preparation occurs during practice and the results are seen during the game. In PBLinstruction, preparation takes place during team meetings, individual task accomplishments, and classlecture, while the client presentation is considered the culminating activity. The reason for practice orpreparation time is to develop skills to a point where they become automatic and internalized so
power shape reform efforts.Dr. Yan Chen, University of New Mexico Yan Chen is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering at the University of New Mexico. Her research interests focus on computer supported collaborative learning, learning sciences, online learning and teaching, and educational equity for multicultural/multiethnic edu- cation.Dr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and associate professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information and Learning Sciences program and in the Chemical and Biological En- gineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is
uncover negative forms of hidden curriculum. … I do believe that there are other ways for students to demonstrate them knowledge without necessarily giving an exam or a metric that may be riddled with biases and assumptions of who the student is and what they know. – Participant 4 I challenge concepts of meritocracy and make sure acknowledging our privilege are part of my hidden curriculum. – Participant 5Discussion:Faculty professional development research that includes engineering faculty is scant (CosoStrong, Kendall, & Henderson, 2023; Villanueva Alarcón & Muñoz, 2023). Furthermore, atinstitutions of higher education where Latiné/x faculty are the
Paper ID #16541Is Protecting the Environment All There Is to Sustainability?Sam Kelly-Quattrocchi, University of Washington Sam Kelly-Quattrocchi is a graduate student at the University of Washington in the Evans School of Public Policy and Governance. There he is studying policy analysis and evaluation with a focus on environmental policy and social policy.Dr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and other non- cognitive
for Engineering Education Session 1313“It's great to know that the REU program will continue there, it was a wonderful experience. Ialways encourage the undergraduates that I come into contact with to become involved in suchwonderful programs as the REU.” Donna Haworth (2003 Program) Dept. of Chemical Engineering Youngstown State University“Again, thank you for providing me the opportunity to participate in the REU program lastsummer. I have benefited a lot from it. Without the
.“Does active learning work? A review of the research” in Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3):223-231. 2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2004.tb00809.x.[10] M.J. León Guerrero & Crisol Moya, E. “Questionnaire design (OPPUMAUGR y OPEUMAUGR): The views and perceptions of teachers and students on the use of actives methodologies at the university” in Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 15(2), 271-298. 2011. ISSN: 1138-414X. (in Spanish).[11] R. D. Jasso, F. J. García-Prieto & al.. “Active methodologies in the university: international bibliometric analysis (2003-2023)” in Formación universitaria, vol. 17, no 4, p. 151-162. 2024. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718
engineering. Dr. Assadollahi completed his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from The University of Memphis with a concentration in geo- structures in 2013. Dr. Assadollahi is the Department Chair and an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Christian Brothers University. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work in Progress Paper: The CAD ConundrumIntroductionThis research discusses the incorporation and possible transition from Bentley software toAutodesk software in a first-year civil engineering course. The topic of which software packageis “best” has long been debated. Ultimately, the choice of which
. (3rd Edition). San Francisco, CA: Pearson/Addison-Wesley Publishers. 5. Yalvac, B., Ehlig-Economides, C., Brooks, L. A., & Smith, D., (2009). An international, interdisciplinary, and dynamic approach to teaching energy utilization and sustainability, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering Education and Educational Technologies (EEET), July, 2009, Orlando, FL. 6. Yalvac, B., Brooks, L. A., & Ehlig-Economides, C., (2008). Research on the evolution of college instructors’ perspectives of teaching and learning, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, June, 2008, Pittsburgh, PA. 7. Brooks, L. A., Yalvac, B., Economides
/article/A_Project_Management_Glossary/20/15355/) 2. Stanfill, R. K., Wiens, G. J., Lear, W. E., Whitney, E. D., “Institutionalized University and Industry Partnership in Multidisciplinary Design and Build: Product and Process Realization,” Proceedings of the 2001 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, November 11-16, 2001, New York, NY, 11 pp. (CD-ROM, Book No. I00517). 3. Stanfill, R. K., Wiens, G. J., Eisenstadt, W. R., Crisalle, O. D., “Lessons Learned in Integrated Product and Process Design Education,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Southeastern Section 2002 Annual Meeting, Gainesville, FL, April 7-9, 2002, 14 pp. (CD-ROM). 4. Fitz-Coy
. Bovtruk, I. Slipukhina, S. Mieniailov, P. Chernega, and N. Kurylenko, "Development of an electronic multimedia interactive textbook for physics study at technical universities," 16th International Conference on ICT in Education, Research and Industrial Applications, October 2020.[5] K.M. Kecskemety, K.A. Parris, "Exploring the impact of a Matlab programming interactive e-textbook in a first-year engineering course," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2019.[6] Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2016). Investigating learner attitudes toward e-books as learning tools: based on the activity theory approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 625-643.[7] R. McFall, H. Dershem, and D
Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education KEY NAME CREDITS EE443 Applied Digital Signal Processing 3 AD101 Fine Arts 3 ENGL10 Basic Composition 3 CAPS390 Capstone Seminar 3 ENGL20 Technical Writing for Comp. Sci. 1 CHEM10 General Chemistry I 4 ENGLC1 Composition and Rhetoric I 3 CPE210 Digital Design I 3 ENGR11 Introduction to Engineering I 3 CPE286 Introduction to Microprocessors 3 ENGR30
assigned to a larger space © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conferenceto accommodate the enrollment demands. However, the lecture hall where the class met wasdesigned for large-scale courses and auditorium presentation purposes. After a few lectures, werealized the classroom was not an ideal place for “print reading” lectures and student practice asthe students needed a space to open printed drawings on a large table so that they could followthe instruction. After a few weeks of lecturing in the Lecture Hall, the instructor and teachingassistant (TA) both observed that many students were getting less interested in lecturepresentations and became
categories of change:dissemination, reflective, policy and shared vision [12]. The implementation of Scrum intodepartmental operations, encourages engineering department to engage in each of these changestrategies (Table 1) Table 1. Elements of Scrum associated with change strategies (adapted from Henderson, Beach, & Finkelstein, [11]) I. Dissemination Tactic: II. Reflective Tactic: • Scrum training • Daily Scrum • Instructional training • Sprint planning • Internal dissemination of knowledge • Sprint review • Scrum artifacts data share • Sprint retrospective III. Policy Tactic: IV. Shared Vision