, construction, experimentation,and data analysis skills. Student feedback collected for each course offering indicated thatstudents had a better visual and physical understanding of various steel LFRS systems byundergoing the complete cycle of design, fabrication, testing, and analysis. As a result, studentswere able to more fully comprehend consequences of their design decisions, lessons which theywill hopefully draw on in their future structural engineering career focusing on seismic design.IntroductionAn undergraduate course in structural steel design is typical in the civil (structures focus) andarchitectural engineering degree track. Common curriculum for this course is the analysis anddesign of: (i) steel and composite members subject to
Paper ID #33514Fostering Entrepreneurial Mindset through a Hands-on Design Project in aMechanism Design CourseDr. Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University Dr. Haolin Zhu earned her BEng in Engineering Mechanics from Shanghai Jiao Tong University and her Ph.D. in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics from Cornell University, with a focus on computational solid mechanics. Dr. Zhu is a Senior Lecturer of the freshman engineering education team in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University (ASU) and the recipient of the Fulton Outstanding Lecturer Award. In this role, she focuses on designing the curriculum
for Engineering Education, 2014 Implementing Mechatronics Design Methodology in Mechanical Engineering Technology Senior Design Projects at Old Dominion UniversityIn recent years, the nature of engineering design has changed due to advances in embedded systemdesign and computer technologies. It is rare to engineer a purely mechanical design that does notincorporate electrical and electronic components. Mechanical engineers and mechanicalengineering technologists must possess a multi-disciplinary knowledge with the understanding ofboth mechanical and electrical systems. For this purpose, undergraduate programs in engineeringtechnology have added mechatronics courses to their curriculum. Mechatronics is a design processthat is
scientific disciplines, sub-disciplines, and specialties), it isquite natural that the conceptual world varies from niche to niche, and that communicationacross niches (sub-disciplines and specialties) can be difficult. Straight translation across nichesis often not possible, and new niches need to develop their own distinctive lexicons. Tosuccessfully operate in and understand two niches, one has to become bilingual in the respectivelexicon of each niche. When direct and meaningful translation is not possible, the niches are saidto be incommensurable.This leads to the question of the potential incommensurability of the worldviews of engineeringscience (the patriarch) and engineering design (the adult child finding her voice). In relation
students responses to the Likert Scale questions are detailed inFigure 5. Figure 5: Survey Responses on Video Tool EffectivenessFigure 5 shows a significant percentage (50-56%) of students, agree or strongly agree with theeffectiveness of the 3D modeling video in helping them to implement the engineering designconcept, visually understand the readings, and keeping their attention. This indicates that a largeportion of the students have a better grasp of the engineering design process, which was one ofthe major goals of developing this video.The authors also wanted to see an improvement in the creativity that students used through theengineering design process, 3D modeling, and 3D printing. The 3D printing assignment in thecourse
programs should help engineering students achieve the“the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global,economic, environmental, and societal context.”3 Teaching these skills to engineering students isa challenging task, but one that is critical if engineers are to design for the benefit of the manycommunities for whom they work.Many hours of practice and experience are essential for gaining domain expertise.4, 5, 6, 7 Forengineers, the primary introductions to their disciplines are encountered through education, andas such it is important that engineering programs provide students with a realistic and expansiveunderstanding of the field. Leckie8 observed that undergraduates in general are often kept in
AC 2011-1513: TEACHING DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS USING THE MOUSEFACTORYDouglas H Timmer, University of Texas, Pan AmericanMiguel Gonzalez, University of Texas, Pan American Dr. Miguel A. Gonzalez serves as the Associate Dean and Director for the School of Engineering and Computer Science in the University of Texas Pan American’s College of Science and Engineering. He has a significant amount executive industry experience where he held managerial and executive positions including President and CEO of a large Citrus processor. Throughout his experience, Dr. Gonzalez’ pro- fessional and academic activities are focused on an overall mission to provide opportunities for student involvement by developing and maintaining a
researcher at Aalto University Design Factory. Currently working on in- novation networks, creative ecosystems and community dynamics in relation to these. Holds a PhD in Industrial Design Engineering from TU Delft. Sine is also an architect.Dr. Tua A. Bj¨orklund, Aalto University Design Factory Tua Bj¨orklund is a professor of practice at Aalto University, and one of the co-founders of the Design Fac- tory, a multidisciplinary co-creation platform. She is particularly interested in how to support translating ideas into action in engineering design in organisations, whether it be in the context of teaching, product design or creating new strategy in technology companies.Prof. Niina Nurmi, Aalto University, School of Business
students,design and holistic integration of a building is primarily covered in a series of design studios (Solnosky etal. 2021). For architectural engineering (AE) students, this integrative thinking comes through in theirexposure to architectural studios (Iulo et al, 2017). In general, design studios are meant to provide students with knowledge necessary to produceinnovative, creative and competent design solutions (Ibrahima and Utaberta 2012). Historically,architectural design studio models have focused on learning by doing. Schön (1984; 1985) found that mostarchitecture studios utilize active learning that is ‘reflective’ and ‘conversational’ in which the students andinstructors gradually come to understand each other. While some
designprocesses there is enough diversity that no one clear process of design is center stage. This is notunlike what is found in industry where different design processes are associated with differentdisciplines, industry sectors and companies. This issue of varying design processes andterminology can compound challenges students face when trying to understand sponsorterminology/jargon found in a project proposal, particularly for those students who have noprevious industry related experience. Most ECU engineering students are full or part timeemployees and have been so since high school. These students often have taken jobs in retail inorder to get a job quickly as a way to finance their education. The language of retail is not thelanguage of engineers
11.249.2Guiding PrinciplesIdeally, achievement targets in capstone engineering design courses must be meaningful toclassroom researchers, to professional practitioners who evaluate engineering programs, and ofcourse to engineering students. Researchers depend on a clearly conceptualized cognitive modelthat reflects the latest understanding of how learners represent knowledge and develop expertisein the domain18. Researchers also expect alignment between the cognitive model and themethods used to observe performance as well as the protocol for interpreting results.Professional practitioners expect to see course outcomes that are responsive to the diverse rolesplayed by an engineering professional19. Prominent roles in capstone courses include those
prototype, that is the hallmark of 21st-century engineering practice._____ This course accomplished this goal.Part AThis course has provided me with:_____ An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering._____ An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze and interpret data._____ An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability._____ An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams._____ An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems._____ An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility._____ An ability to
technical skills wereassessed.Background and Description of the Design ProblemAlcoa CSI is recognized as a world leader in closure design and manufacture for the food,beverage, and automotive industries. The engineers and scientists at Alcoa CSI are continuallyexploring innovative methods for improving the seal between closures and bottle finishes. Therehave been many improvements made to the closure-bottle system by using innovative materials,original geometries, and improved manufacturing processes. There have been many attemptsmade to better understand the physics of the sealing areas, specifically, the friction forces of thesealing areas. In the literature, there has been much research and experimentation in the field ofTribology for
. 5ConclusionsWe have presented the development of an Engineering Connections Environment. Student feed-back indicates that the structure does provide connections between engineering content areas.Student feedback also indicated that the irregular integration of modules introduced significantscheduling complexity that students found detrimental to their understanding and performance;this has been addressed by developing a more regular schedule that still allows module topics tobe integrated together in the context of an overall project.Based on our initial experience, we believe that an engineering connections environment could alsobe beneficial at the junior and senior level when students participate in concentration specific andcapstone projects. We
– Implications for Engineering EducationIntroductionAn understanding of sustainable design will be essential for engineers to practice responsibly inthe future. What sustainable design means in practice is a contested issue, varying betweenengineering disciplines, industry sectors and even individual practitioners. How then can we, asengineering educators, encourage and teach both current professional engineers and engineeringstudents about sustainable design.This paper reports on the results of an empirical study investigating qualitatively different waysthat sustainable design has been experienced by practicing engineers. The different ways ofexperiencing sustainable design were found using a qualitative research method known asphenomenography. This
AC 2008-2424: DESIGN AND EXPERIMENTAL CAPSTONE: AN INTEGRATEDEXPERIENCEJeffrey Johnson, University of Cincinnati / EngineeringMary Beth Privitera, University of CincinnatiDaria Narmoneva, University of CincinnatiBalakrishna Haridas, University of Cincinnati Page 13.359.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Design and Exper imental Capstone: An Integr ated Exper ienceAbstr actWe report on student outcomes across three phases in the development of the BME seniorcapstone experience. The BME department provides a comprehensive capstone experience to itsseniors. All students enroll in a two-course, team-based, device design capstone sequence and aconcurrent
Paper ID #42881Cross-functional, Multi-organizational STEM Camp Partnership: TeachingTechnology and Human-Centered Design in a Project-Based Curriculum (Other,Diversity)Dr. Joshua D. Carl, Milwaukee School of Engineering Joshua Carl is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at the Milwaukee School of Engineering. He received a B.S. degree in Computer Engineering from Milwaukee School of Engineering in 2005, and attended graduate school at Vanderbilt University where he earned his PhD in Electrical Engineering in 2016. He primarily teaches courses in embedded systems, programming, and digital systems.Ms. Amii LaPointe
A Global Design Competition Lawrence Whitman, Zulma Toro-Ramos, Dan Allison, Colin Davidson, Martha Shawver, Shelly Belles and Chris Wilkinson Wichita State University Spirit AeroSystemsAbstractIndustry has made it clear that engineering graduates should be more prepared tointeract in an integrated product team with colleagues around the world. WichitaState University has initiated the Spirit Global Design Challenge mainly due toindustry and the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)and the College of Engineering’s Engineering 2020 program which have stressedthe need for engineering graduates to function on multi-disciplinary teams and ina
functions at varying levels of abstraction. Artificial intelligence for engineering design, analysis and manufacturing; 31(4): 535-549.[8] Akao, Y. (2004). QFD: Quality function deployment - integrating customer requirements into product design. Taylor & Francis.[9] Hernandez NV, Shah JJ, Smith SM. (2010). Understanding design ideation mechanisms through multilevel aligned empirical studies. Design studies; 31(4): 382-410.[10] Gonçalves M, Cardoso C, Badke-Schaub P. (2014). What inspires designers? preferences on inspirational approaches during idea generation. Design studies; 35(1): 29-53.[11] Andreasen MM. (2011). 45 years with design methodology. Journal of engineering design; 22(5): 293-332.[12] Dorst K
Paper ID #6503A Cross-course Design and Manufacturing ProjectDr. Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Indus- trial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He re- ceived his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dr. Johnson’s research focuses on design tools; specifically
goodunderstanding of basic principles to be able to meet the established design criteria; however,senior design projects should also give the students the opportunity to see first hand the differentphases of product development in a short period of time (i.e. one semester). In addition,engineering and engineering technology students should be able to: Page 13.375.2• Design and build mechanical systems within a limited budget• Integrate and use multiple engineering and science disciplines in a simple and organizedmanner• Understand the importance of design and see first hand the impact of each design decision• Select materials and components taking into
Paper ID #25433Design of an Automatic Class Attendance System as an Undergraduate Se-nior Design ProjectDr. Ali Eydgahi, Eastern Michigan University Ali Eydgahi started his career in higher education as a faculty member at the Rensselaer Polytechnic In- stitute in 1985. Since then, he has been with the State University of New York, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, and Eastern Michigan University. During 2006-2010, he was Chair of the Department of Engineering and Aviation Sciences, Founder and Director of the Center for 3-D Visualization and Virtual Reality Applications, and Technical Director of the NASA funded MIST
important?7 What would you change to improve this deliverable? Project Evaluation QuestionnaireQuestions1 What was the most challenging aspect of the project (programming, electronics, mechanical design, mechanical assembly, integration, etc)? Explain.2 Did the project make you think about your engineering field in a more holistic manner? Explain.3 Do you feel that by completing this project you gained a better understanding of non-mechatronics topics within mechanical engineering? Explain.4 Rank the deliverables (executive summary, mechanical prototype, and code functionality) in the order of most to least
). Page 14.245.42.1 Capabilities and Requirements RubricThe Capabilities and Requirements grading rubric is used to assess a student’s understanding ofthe project he or she is starting to design. Requirements Engineering is the disciplinedapplication of scientific principles and techniques for developing, communicating, and managingrequirements. Requirements will serve as the rubric by which anyone can verify that the enddevice has all the functionality the customer desires.The rubric measures each of these components of the document: • Capabilities: These represent the functionality of the end product, but are not necessarily bounds on what the product should do. These are not requirements, constraints, or specifications
2006-197: COST EFFECTIVE MECHANICAL DESIGN IN RELATION TOMATERIAL AND STRUCTURAL RIGIDITY AND DESIGN ALTERNATIVESGary Drigel, Miami University Page 11.363.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Cost Effective Mechanical Design in Relation to Material and Structural Rigidity and Design AlternativesAbstractThe integration of cost effective design techniques into Engineering and EngineeringTechnology programs is necessary in order to provide graduating Engineers the necessary skillsto become more immediate contributors to the goals and profits of their chosen companies.Example teaching and analysis techniques are discussed which will allow faculty
Ewert is Director and Professor in Iron Range Engineering, Virginia, MN – a program offered by Minnesota State University – Mankato.Bart M Johnson, Itasca Community College Bart Johnson is an instructor of engineering and program coordinator at Itasca Community College in northern Minnesota. For the past 7 years he has taught physics, statics, dynamics, and solid modeling. Prior to Itasca, he was a design engineer in John Deere’s Construction and Forestry Division. Page 22.78.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 A New Model of Project Based
student reflective learning outcomes during a final Leadership/Mentorshipcourse, after their participation in significant, experiential design projects in the University ofMichigan’s Multidisciplinary Design Program in the College of Engineering. Throughout thecourse, class discussions and assignments prompted students to reflect and examine theirpersonal experiences in engineering design projects, their learning (both technical andprofessional), leadership, and team styles as well as understand group development anddynamics.A feature of the projects was the integration of students from diverse disciplines in engineeringwith other programs such as: Art, Architecture, Primary Sciences, Kinesiology, and Business.The diverse teams provided a rich
AC 2011-1928: FACILITATING SOCIAL PARTICIPATION THROUGH DE-SIGNBarbara A. Karanian, Stanford University; Wentworth Institute of Technology Barbara A. Karanian, Ph.D. is a Professor of Social Sciences and Psychology; and a Lecturer in Grad- uate Design Methods. She uses stories and storytelling to facilitate student progress from the idea and prototyping phases to reality. Involved in creating collaborative research teams that include members from the areas of engineering, design, psychology, and communication, she has people painting stories of entrepreneuring success. Barbara continues to work with changing organizations and entrepreneurial leaders.Gregory Kress, Stanford University
design course, there have beennumerous enhancements to the process, including an NIH-funded Clinical Immersion summerprogram to provide bioengineering students an opportunity to better understand clinical needsand inclusion of medical students on teams to improve clinical feedback throughout thedevelopment process. This paper discusses the course structure, evolution, and rationale for thecourse.I. INTRODUCTIONTeam-based design is an essential component of the American engineering undergraduatecurriculum, particularly in senior design capstone courses. In the traditional senior designcourse at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) a problem is presented as a technicalchallenge for which the teams must navigate and design a solution. The
AC 2011-2562: INTERACTIVE DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH:Farrokh Attarzadeh, University of Houston FARROKH ATTARZADEH earned his PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of Houston in 1983. He is an associate professor in the Engineering Technology Department, College of Technology at the University of Houston. He teaches software programming and is in charge of the senior project course in the Computer Engineering Technology Program. He is a member of ASEE and has been with the University of Houston since 1983. Dr. Attarzadeh may be reached at FAttarzadeh@central.uh.edu Page 22.938.1