junior year. ME370 is a design methodology course focused on the new productdevelopment approach to design. Senior capstone projects are solicited from industrial sponsorsand faculty members to ensure a sufficient number of projects are available to allow the studentsto have a choice of projects. In addition, students are encouraged at the end of ME370 topropose project topics of interest. In all cases, a project Request For Proposal (RFP) form is 4 © American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 2015 ASEE Northeast Section Conferencecompleted in order to help initially define and select
expressed in fundamental properties, and with its applications viamathematical models. Its study is basic to science and engineering and is a core subject inmany engineering curricula. The above-discussed laboratory is an attempt to give studentshands-on experience with fundamental properties and concepts.The Thermodynamics laboratory has been offered for the first time in fall, 2005. Theintroduction of the lab took up class time and consequently, the designated syllabus couldnot be entirely covered. This situation was alleviated by a team-based approach to the lab.Teams (a group of 3-4 students) perform the necessary measurements together and preparea group report. Team members helped one another in understanding the materials andlearning the
of education and curriculum matters thanat other universities, particularly in undergraduate education. For example, new courses can becreated without any approvals from outside the home department.Decentralization means that there are few barriers to starting a new project, but little assistanceprovided to support the new effort, or to help a project through temporary difficulties. Funding isalso quite decentralized: In the Engineering School, departments receive a block budget basedprimarily on the level of research contracts and credit hours taught.Due to the selective excellence philosophy, Hopkins has achieved leadership in the fields ofmedicine and public health, but does not have a business school, law school, or education school.(It
Paper ID #14630Transforming the CREDLE (Capstone Research Experience for Distance Learn-ing Executives)Dr. Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University Dr. Malini Natarajarathinam is an Associate professor with Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution. She teaches classes on strategic relationships for industrial distribution, distribu- tion information systems and new directions in Industrial Distribution. She is also the founding faculty and advisor for the Society of Women in Industrial Distribution (SWID). She works on many service learning projects with her students where they work
©2005, American Society for Engineering Educationelectronic parts were purchased for labs that required the development of custom sensors as dis-cussed in Section 3.3. Hands-on Laboratory AssignmentsThe lab assignments provide an opportunity to directly interact with the technology, as well as anopportunity to design, implement, and experiment with the various concepts that they embrace.This approach to teaching creates an active learning environment in which students can explore asignificant design area, make hypotheses about how things work, and conduct experiments tovalidate their assumptions.9,12,13,16 Seymour Papert termed this style of learning “construction-ism”.16 For this course, the overall philosophy of the lab assignments is to
. Page 9.914.2 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ÆÉ 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationII. MethodologyCurriculum Materials and Units: The curriculum materials were taken from the Robolab CD3, abook13, and robot kits. The teachers took a one-week workshop in the summer of 2003. Therobotics instructors were engineering graduate students from the University of Nevada. After oneweek of training that consisted of 30 hours of instruction, the teachers had built, programmedand tested their robots. They learned how to use several different sensors, a variety of gears andup to two motors to move, stop and turn the robots. A physics
instructors of IMSE 564 have had more than four years of industrial experience. From theirpersonal experiences, the learner-centered approach in engineering education is an efficient wayto facilitate learning and simulate motivations for engineering students. In order to establish suchan environment, they have explored the following five areas: (1) Select suitable topic; (2) Encourage group activities of the students with the facilitations of the instructors; (3) Use multi-media technologies in teaching; (4) Involve industrial professionals in teaching; (5) Make the course project-based.2.1 Topic selection in engineering educationProceedings of the 2005 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering
Submission System.5.1 Observed SuccessesThe instructional team gains a better understanding of the general feeling within their classroomfrom the responses and can change behavior, or teaching approaches based upon studentresponse. Administratively, responses are read and used to assess course progress and overallstudent satisfaction.In the past, responses have been used to assess the use of technology in the classroom, andmeasure student satisfaction in instructional team, teaching styles, curriculum decisions, policies, Page 7.162.8 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
must execute each step on their own. By structuringthe solution path and rewarding the student (in most cases) with the comparatively rapid andsuccessful completion of an assignment, the software gradually develops the ability to approach andsolve problems systematically. Page 6.170.3 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education Figure 1 Problem Statement and Mathematical Solution of Kinematics Problem. The Mathcad Solve block finds horizontal distance traveled and travel time. Student Entries: Data and Parameters in
approach toteaching mechatronics fundamentals, providing inherent flexibility in difficulty level, scalabilityfor varying student enrollment and future development, and increased student appeal. Weevaluated 100 internet-sourced mechatronic mobile robot competitions using the defined criteria.Analyses using these criteria allowed the identification of underlying principles employed in theexploration and teaching of mechatronics. We identified desirable educational and mechatronicoutcomes for inclusion in the course. We then designed a new competition that meets all of thedefined criteria. The new competition allows flexibility in development time requirements(ranging from one semester to multiple semesters) and provides options for many levels
. labor force [3].The challenge for engineering educators, specifically those educators within this specificworkforce development program, is twofold. One challenge is ensuring that students learn andretain the unique technical and professional skills and abilities needed for the microelectronicsworkforce, which can be lost if not properly taught and reinforced [5]. The other challenge issetting students up for success as lifelong learners by instilling a sense of professionaldevelopment in the students who already have a full curriculum [6]. As workforce developmentprograms grow and expand in the engineering education space, there is a need to develop betterways of ensuring that students retain their technical and professional skills while
statistics, and analysis of force in calculus. This will prepare morestudents for what they will face both in college and in the real world. By taking a more project-based approach towards math courses early on, students will know that the mathematics theylearn can and will be useful in a variety of STEM-related fields.4. Other Applications for Mathematics in Engineering and ScienceThe information learned in a STEM education curriculum, such as determining the volume of acurve, can be used in a variety of applications. Some examples of STEM applications include thevolume determination of a flask or for a medical IV bottle used in a hospital. However, just likewhen the volume of a wine bottle was determined, specific assumptions for each case will
Presidential Fellowship duringthe preparation of this paper.References[1] AASHE. Academic Programs in Sustainability.http://www.aashe.org/resources/programs.php [Accessed on March 12, 2010][2] T. Wessels, The Myth of Progress: Toward a Sustainable Future. Lebanon, NH. UniversityPress of New England, 2006.[3] NPR. This I Believe. http://thisibelieve.org/about/ [accessed on 3/15/10][4] C. T. Hendrickson, L.B. Lave and S. Mathews, Environmental Life Cycle Assessment ofGoods and Services: An Input-Output Approach. Washington, DC. Resources for the Future,2006.BiographiesCharles Thomas, Ph.D.Dr. Thomas graduated from the University of Rochester with a B.S. in Physics (98), and an M.S.and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Boston University in 2004
Paper ID #13653Multi-method longitudinal assessment of transferrable intellectual learningoutcomesDr. Brian M Frank, Queen’s University Brian Frank is the DuPont Canada Chair in Engineering Education Research and Development, and the Director of Program Development in the Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science at Queen’s Uni- versity where he works on engineering curriculum development, program assessment, and developing educational technology. He is also an associate professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering.Dr. James A. Kaupp, Queen’s University Educational Researcher and Adjunct Professor (Msc ’06, PhD ’12
tinkering background with thedissection of machines and use of tools, students are now entering with computer, video games,and other “virtual” experiences. This focus has left a void in the ability to relate engineeringprinciples to real-world devices and applications. In this paper, we introduce a new approach forfilling this void in a mechanical engineering curriculum. In particular, we describe modificationsand extensions to machine design courses to include hands-on exercises. Through theapplication of “mechanical breadboards,” clear relationships between machine design principlesand the reality of machine components are established. These relationships reduce the number oftopics covered in the courses, but greatly increase the interest of the
also describe the evolution of this ethics lesson from an earlier classroom activityinvolving precision and accuracy in data measurement, which has been used in high school,college and continuing education settings for more than two decades. This paper describes thedevelopment of the curriculum; lessons learned from the classroom; and an analysis of studentartifacts from the most recent offering as part of an engineering undergraduate research programat Michigan State University. The lesson materials are provided in appendices, in order to allowother educators to adapt these materials for their own classrooms.Background: Ethical Practices in ResearchKenneth D. Pimple summarized the responsible conduct of research (RCR) as the search for“truth
businesscase, as well as presenting engineering work in scholarly forums.As students move through the educational process, they interact with many support services andpeople. It is important that they receive the “continuity of care” that is required. Thus, the SIIREprogram takes a team-based approach to monitoring student progress, led by their facultymentor. Mentors and meaningful engagement with faculty advisors have been shown to beimportant factors in student retention13. The mentoring process will follow the guidelines andprocedures described in Brainard et al.14 A support team monitors each student within the SIIREprogram. The team consists of the student’s faculty advisor, an industry mentor (when thestudent participates in industry
Paper ID #17865Establishing the Impact that Gamified Homework Portals Can Have on Stu-dents’ Academic MotivationBrittany Lynn ButlerDr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learn- ing techniques in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on student perception of the classroom
and integrate the circuit and code together, which is electronicallyprovided, include a working demonstration, and then allow the students an opportunity toperform the activity themselves. These “observational and hands-on activities will have moreeducational value if they are planned so as to be integrated with overall course objectives andactively connected to what is happening in class.”3Incorporating the Robot SystemIn many engineering, math and science courses, teachers take a very active approach to assist thestudents in learning. Mainly, in-class exercises or daily work problems help achieve this goal.With computer science, practice in writing code with various structures are demonstrated andexecuted. With robotics, especially a small
waveguide simulation tools. Prior to joining the University of Dayton, Dr. Sarangan was a research faculty at the University of New Mexico, and also at the Air Force Research Laboratory, where he made several con- tributions to the area of grating-coupled high-brightness diode lasers. He was also a Research Scientist at Nortel Networks developing a novel architecture for multiwavelength laser diodes. Dr. Sarangan received his B.A.Sc and Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Waterloo in Canada in 1991 and 1997, respectively.Dr. Joseph W Haus, University of Dayton Dr. Haus received a Ph.D. in Theoretical Physics from Catholic University of America in 1975. He was director of the Elcetro
, waste disposal, munitions storage,organizational shops, roads, and so on. The process involves the translation of concepts andrequirements into an actual plan with specific facility, utility, and labor force requirements. Agood base camp design plan minimizes the construction necessary by making the maximum useof existing facilities and utilities.The purpose of this paper is to describe an embedded assessment technique used in CE450during the fall semester of Academic Year 2004-2005. CE450 serves as the final andculminating course in the civil engineering three-course sequence taken by students who are notmajoring in engineering. It is one of seven different three-course sequences, which constitute aportion of the Academy’s core curriculum, and
construction process administration and online and active teaching methods. Page 26.768.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Faculty Perspectives on Benefits and Challenges of Hybrid LearningAbstract: Hybrid learning is an educational approach that combines traditional face-to-faceeducation with online learning. Hybrid courses have gained popularity among faculty, students,and institutions, so it is important to understand why faculty members choose to convert theirtraditional face-to-face courses to hybrid format. This study, conducted in a major Midwesternuniversity, presents the
Information Disclosure Incidents and Computing Education Stefan A. Robila Department of Computer Science, Montclair State UniversityAbstractWe present an introduction to security incident encountered by academic institutions and follow up withour approach to user education by infusing information disclosure incidents in two courses laying at theextremes of the computer science curriculum: a General Education Introduction to Computing and anAdvanced Topics Information Security course. The choice of the two courses is such that, while in theIntro to Computing course the students view the incidents from the user’s point of view (and are eithervictims of larger incidents or the
Session 2553 A Freshman Module to Teach Instrumentation Methods Jagdish Gajjar Union CollegeAbstractEvolution of modern electronic devices has reached a level where a black-box approachto designing and building systems is within the capabilities of beginning laboratoryexperiments. This facilitates the introduction of modern instrumentation methods tofreshmen in an engineering curriculum. The paper describes a freshmen moduledesigned to provide an exposure to transducers, signal conditioning, computerinterfacing and signal processing. The module consists of a coordinated set of
conference on Foundations of Digital Games, New York, USA, pp. 191–198.Thune, T. 2007. “University–industry collaboration: the network embeddedness approach,” Science and Public Policy (34:3), pp. 158–168.Thune, T. 2011. “Success Factors in Higher Education–Industry Collaboration: A case study of collaboration in the engineering field,” Tertiary Education and Management (17:1), pp. 31–50.Yen, D. C., Chen, H.-G., Lee, S., and Koh, S. 2003. “Differences in perception of IS knowledge and skills between academia and industry: findings from Taiwan,” International Journal of Information Management (23:6), pp. 507–522.
slowly, it does change. Shortcomings in the previous accreditationmethods became apparent, and this, coupled with an industry interest in continuousimprovement, precipitated changes in engineering and technology accreditation to the currentoutcomes based assessment. The now familiar TAC/ABET a-k criteria2 will not be repeated here,but they, as part of the new accreditation method require a paradigm shift – a complete change inhow educators view the presentation and management of a curriculum. Finding and teachingmaterial to satisfy externally imposed student outcomes requires substantial adjustment for mosteducators. Even more difficult to cope with is the requirement to demonstrate (prove) to aTAC/ABET program evaluator that students have
isespecially true for new general education courses and unique freshmen and senior level courses. As aresult, the instructors often come from different disciplines. This team instruction approach has bothstrengths and weaknesses depending upon the course needs and the style of team teaching that is employed. In recent years, a renewal of general education has resulted in an increase in both the quantity andquality of the general education programs.’ Two specific areas of interest to engineering educators are an 2increase in courses that integrate ideas from a variety of fields and engineering-focused courses that non-majors take for general education credit.3’4’5 Engineering
the methodology since the approach putstudents immediately in a "real world" type of problems and they have, obviously, anopen-ended solution.V. Concluding Remarks Page 4.281.4In this contribution, we have introduced a teaching methodology for fluid mechanics inChemical Engineering courses that uses group-projects as the final exam. The approachuses the fundamental concepts learned in classroom work and connect them withapplications and devices some of them related to the lab sessions. One of the keydifferences with other courses with projects is that students are responsible for thematerial of all the projects in the class and that an evaluation
associated with suboptimal group-work while still encouraging thedevelopment of strong collaboration and peer learning skills, my study looks to the use ofinformal collaborations (IC)—where students are encouraged to seek help from and work withtheir classmates on an assignment, but are ultimately responsible for their own submission.While this mechanism is not intended as a replacement for formal group-work throughout theengineering curriculum, it may offer a safer alternative for faculty with little formal experiencein facilitating group work looking for a low-risk way to nurture collaboration skills and improvestudent outcomes in engineering fundamentals courses.The rest of this paper is organized as follows. First, I discuss some of the
the new technologies and improvements by following media. Prior to the in-classexperience students agreed (4.06) that engineers can keep up with the new technologies viamedia resources, and the post-experience outcome showed an increase (4.29) in students’responses supporting the question. Table 1.Outcomes Comparison of Pre and Post Experience SurveysThe outcomes of these three questions, as provided in Table 1, show a positive trend in students’understanding and approach to the self-directed learning concept. It also validates students’capabilities to follow and learn technological advancements by following media resources ontheir own.Prior to the self-directed learning experience, students were asked the following survey