strategies.I. IntroductionCommon approaches to the promotion of critical thinking involve the application of “activelearning” in the classroom and writing assignments outside the classroom.Schrivner1 has cited the difficulty in motivating students to participate, noting the importance ofsetting an expectation of participation in classroom dialog. Another common frustration is thedifficulty in finding time to move class room time beyond the first few levels of course materialintroduction and application while still fitting all the desired topics into the course.Writing assignments have gained popularity as a means of allowing students to practice theircritical thinking skills. This resurgence is due in part to the Writing-Across-the-Curriculum(WAC
which to draw new employees or train their existing workforce.Lastly, due to the difficulty of giving all students adequate time to practice programming realrobotic arms, there was a recognized need for lifelike and portable simulation software. Thus,Scott Kuhl and the Computer Science department at Michigan Tech was brought in to developsuch software. Titled RobotRun, this simulation software is now available through open sourcelicensing to assist students and industry personnel in learning the basics of roboticsprogramming.Initial Results of Academic ProgrammingAfter meeting with area employers to assess their needs, as well as pulling together an advisoryboard of local experts, curriculum was developed for a mechatronics certificate program
- netics. He has presented at numerous local, regional, and national conferences and also internationally on telecommunications and wireless topics and on the status of the education of electronics technicians at the two-year college level. His current interests are: the development of novel and innovative systems- level approaches to the education of technicians, applications of the emerging field of wired and wireless networked embedded controllers and sensor/actuator networks, and cyber-physical system applications in the context of the Internet of Things (IoT). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Smart, Connected, and Autonomous Automobiles – the impact on two-yearcollege
able’ to ‘very able.’ Students rated most course activities as “veryuseful”.IntroductionSystems thinking is a core ability for understanding complex ‘wicked’ challenges, which areintractable issues that we have not been able to solve with a single approach. Wicked challengesare complex, unclear, changing, and entangle [1]. In a time where global challenges are becomingwicked challenges and STEM-based systems, such as Food, Energy, Water (FEW) systems, arebecoming more complex, the need for systems thinking ability has grown. The criteria ofAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) include systems thinking conceptsas part of the education program [2]. ABET supports our call to include systems thinking as partof the NRT
an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering fos- ter or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning, to understand engineering stu- dents’ identity development. She has won
their firstopen-ended project [5] and learn structured design. Finally, in the Junior and SeniorEngineering Clinic, students work in multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary design teamson projects of greater complexity. The Engineering Clinic sequence offers students anopportunity to experience the art and science of design by applying the technical skillslearned in the classroom, from interacting with faculty, in collaboration with studentsfrom different grades and different disciplines. This just-in-time approach to engineeringdesign enables students to be involved in ambitious design projects as early as theirsophomore year.This paper presents collaborative efforts among the departments of MechanicalEngineering (ME), Electrical and Computer
student focus group, coursefeedback, and faculty leader reflections are used to assess the course’s shift to remote guidance.In addition, future directions for how this approach could be utilized are reviewed.Program structureBackgroundConsistent with the tendency for increased participation in short-term experiences, in 2019 PennState’s Center for Global Engineering Engagement launched a three-week-long program with astart date in the week subsequent to the conclusion of the spring semester. Beyond providingparticipants with a required technical presentation course, one of the program’s goals was todevelop global competencies through the development of and application of knowledge about theregion, its language, and culture. Participants in this
only to report on this experience but also to illustrate the approach in away that might be applied in similar circumstances but with different details. Student Enrollment EligibilityFirst, the new course was strategically placed to be available to the maximum number of students.EGR 4353 Image Formation and Processing is listed as an elective in ECE and is available, withadvisor approval, as a senior elective in the other engineering majors. It also carries graduate creditfor graduate students with approval of the instructor and student’s advisor, but with the requirementof a supplementary component beyond those required for undergraduates. The prerequisite forEGR 4353 is EGR 3335 Signals and Systems, a junior
infrastructure of the United States is exceeding its design capacity and is aging, requiringmaintenance and renovation. In order to meet this challenge, a need exists to produce civil andenvironmental engineers who have a broad understanding of the pressing needs of the infrastruc-ture of the United States. With this in mind, the faculty of the Civil and Environmental Engi-neering (CEE) Department at [institution] reviewed the program curricula (for the first time in atleast 20 years) and decided to redesign the curricula with an infrastructure theme. A DepartmentLevel Reform planning grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF) was used to plan anoverhaul of the curriculum that infuses an infrastructure theme throughout.Once the curriculum planning
a year of classroom implementation and data collection at the institution where thecurriculum was developed, the project team recruited math and engineering faculty from threeother colleges to pilot the models starting Fall 2020. The goal of this expansion was to increasesample sizes and diversity for statistical analysis of classroom data and to learn about theexperiences of faculty as they integrated the curriculum materials into their own courses. Theoriginal vision was for faculty to use the models in face-to-face instruction, but the transition toonline modality in response to the COVID-19 pandemic forced a rapid pivot during thisexpansion that we reported on previously. Faculty participants who chose to continue with theproject worked
-based malware detection using machine learning. She has published over 45 papers and presentations in research conferences and journals. She received grants from NSF, US Air Force Research Lab, and RIT. Dr. Pan teaches graduate courses in digital forensics and security audits.Dr. Sumita Mishra, Rochester Institute of Technology Associate Professor Department of Computing SecurityDr. David I. Schwartz, Rochester Institute of Technology (GCCIS) David I. Schwartz, Ph.D., a 1999 graduate of the State University of New York at Buffalo, published two textbooks on introductory computing skills while completing his dissertation in civil engineering, which sparked Cornell University’s interest. So, in the summer of 1999
design and manufacturing acrosscampus. It was clear that industry and ABET were demanding that young engineers havesignificant design and manufacturing education in their engineering curricula and that they havemultidisciplinary teaming experience in their programs of study. There was a need for industrialassistance to industry in South Dakota, but it was difficult to find enough good, well-balancedprojects for senior design, especially if we were to impose a requirement that they bemultidisciplinary.SDSM&T chose to set up the Center of Excellence for Advanced Manufacturing and Production(CAMP) to integrate students, faculty and industry partners into a Center whose purpose is todevelop a unique approach to manufacturing engineering
methods and software, a similar approach was used to assess student understanding ofconcepts and relationships in a similar course unit on autonomous vehicles in a second-semester,first-year engineering course designed for students in electrical engineering, computerengineering, and computer science. Page 15.1349.15 As of the deployment of the online survey, the various software packages describedherein for processing of the survey data were still under development, so unfortunately that batchof students did not receive feedback in the form of student concept maps. In future semesters theauthors intend to collect and process data and return
, 2001.[13] Nikolic, V., “Pro/engineer and I-DEAS based courses favorite among mechanical engineering students,” ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, November 17- 22, 2002.[14] Ray, J. and J. Farris, “Integration of design and manufacturing processes in first-year engineering curriculums,” 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference – Building on a Century of Progress in Engineering Education, Kansas City, MO, October 18-21, 2000.[15] Jensen, G. C., J. D. Haslam, J. A. Hoech, and M. B. Thompson, “Project based Computer-Aided- Engineering Applications,” 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference – Building on a Century of Progress in
; Mekala, S. (2020). Fostering 21st century skills in the students of engineering in ESL classroom. IUP Journal of Soft Skills, 14(2), 59-69.10. Lee, S., Lee, J., & Ahn, Y. (2019). Sustainable BIM-based construction engineering education curriculum for practice-oriented training. Sustainability, 11(21), 6120.11. Seemakula, M., Liao, G., Ellis, D., 2010, “Closing the Competency Gap in Manufacturing Processes As It Applies To New Engineering Graduates”, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.12. Jiang, Z., Caicedo, J. M., & Petrulis, R. (2020, June). An NSF REU Site with Integrated Academia-Industry Research Experience–Development, Implementation, and Lessons Learned. 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access.13
, block scheduling, and learningcommunities can have an impact. The present study aims to present the structure of the first yearprogram and also aspects of the curriculum that may or may not contribute positively to the firstyear retention. In studying the effect of cohorts on student retention in engineering, a study atSJSU, the oldest campus in the California State University system, had students in Fall 2015from the College of Business, College of Engineering, and Child and Adolescent DevelopmentDepartment (CHAD) assigned schedules that included at least two shared classes with otherstudents (i.e., “block scheduling”) in their declared majors [5]. This study indicated that it had apositive impact on one-year retention of first-year
Engineering curriculum and not enough resourcesavailable such as having a dedicated research space, few opportunities exist at smallerteaching-focused institutions for an undergraduate student to experience technical research in anarea of their interest. An independent study is an option for undergraduate students at YorkCollege of Pennsylvania (YCP) to gain and apply a deeper understanding of a content area that isnot covered in-depth in any courses. It provides a student with the opportunity to apply theirlearning to a well-defined research project, to work closely with a faculty member within theirdiscipline, and to gain academic credit for their work. The project is usually carried outindependently without formal class meetings. An effective
performance. Our intention is to initiate a dialogue on the dilemma ofdeclining achievement. BackgroundCoursesThe two courses focused on in this study have been in the aerospace engineering curriculum atPenn State University (PSU) for a number of years and offer fundamental content. One is arequired junior-level course, Introduction to Aeronautics, with a required prerequisite of the firstaerodynamics class and an aerospace analysis class. The other is a senior-level technicalelective, Theoretical Aerodynamics, and its prerequisite is the Introduction to Aeronauticscourse. The junior-level course introduces students to the basic concepts of aeronautics bycovering the estimation of the forces of flight and
however is that considerable experience in parallel programming has taken place over the last more than 4 decades and a rich body of knowledge is available. The bad news is parallel programming looks very complex to most sequential programmers. There has been recognition of the fact that it is urgently needed to offer training in parallel programming to students in general and pro developers as well. Most of them however, have hardly looked at a bridging approach where a sequential programmer is gradually moved to the world of Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Regional Conference
Paper ID #17000A Student Outcomes Assessment Methodology for Technology-Based and Hands-On Intensive CurriculaDr. David I. Spang, Rowan College at Burlington County Dr. David Spang is the Sr. Vice President & Provost at Rowan College at Burlington County in Mt. Laurel, NJ. Prior to being named Sr. Vice President & Provost, Dr. Spang served as Interim President, Provost, Vice President of Academic Programs and as Dean of the Science, Mathematics, and Technology division. Dr. Spang holds a PhD degree in Materials Science and Engineering and a MBA degree, with a concentration in Innovation and Technology Management
Page 5.128.6prior work in cataloging and disseminating courseware. This evolution emphasizes interactivityand learning with the goal to connect like-minded users in engineering and the sciences, in orderto encourage user-to-user communication and community building. In this new approach, userswill have a wealth of services available to them in addition to a collection of educationalsoftware and learning resources. Ultimately, services will allow all users to search and retrieve aset of resources based on particular pedagogical methods and content-based concepts withinengineering and the sciences, e.g., teaching “teamwork” or “freshman design”, in contrast to onlyretrieving specialized pieces of software for a particular application, such as a
University. She focused on integrated STEM curriculum development as part of an NSF STEM+C grant as a Postdoctoral Research Assistant through INSPIRE in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University Her current research interests focus on early P-12 engineering education and identity development.Jacqueline Gartner, Campbell University Jacqueline Gartner is an Assistant Professor at Campbell University in the School of Engineering, which offers a broad BS in engineering with concentrations in chemical and mechanical.Dr. Michele Miller, Campbell University Dr. Michele Miller is a Professor and Associate Dean at Campbell University. Prior to joining Campbell in 2017, she was a professor of mechanical engineering
Company, Making the Right Choices. Portland: Society of Manufacturing Engineers.23. Kohnen, J.B. “What is Six Sigma Process Management?,” Quality Management Journal, Volume 13, Issue 1, (2006), pp. 6024. Kubiszyn, T. & Borich, G., (2003), Educational Testing and Measurement. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.25. Larson, A. (2003). Demystifying Six Sigma. A Company-Wide Approach to continuous Improvement. New York: AMACON.26. Liker, J.K. (1998). Becoming Lean. Portland: Productivity Press.27. Pande, P.S., Neuman, R.P., Cavanagh, R.R. (2000), The Six Sigma Way, How GE Motorola, and Other Top Companies are Honing Their Performance. New York: Mc Graw Hill.28. Pavnaskar, S. J., Gershenson, J. K. & Jambekar, A. B
in industry and is now a standard engineering tool for both analysis and design.When FEM first appeared in the 1960’s it was introduced into the engineering curriculum at thegraduate level. As the method and computer technology matured, FEM was introduced at theundergraduate level in engineering and engineering technology programs, even in some two-yearengineering technology programs. Today, FEM is primarily offered as an elective undergraduatecourse in mechanical, civil, and aeronautical engineering programs. Fatigue analysis that in the past was carried out by hand and/or in-house computer programsis now done using commercial FEM software. Fatigue design modules have recently beenintegrated into commercial FEM codes that include ABAQUS
includes vision-based self-drive algorithms for driving in full sun[2],software engineering for ROS-based robots[3], lane detection and steering algorithms using DeepLearning[4,5,6], mobile app control of autonomous unmanned vehicles with the US Army’sRobotic Technology Kernel[7], and controlling vehicles with gestures.[8,9]MSU offers mobility research programs, including Connected and Autonomous NetworkedVehicles for Active Safety (CANVAS), graduate-, undergraduate, and post-graduate automatedvehicle competition teams, undergraduate and graduate curriculum related to self-driving, and aportion of campus usable for evaluating connected and automated vehicle technologies. Studentsand faculty have access to extensive simulation capabilities and
technicalknowledge necessary but are not designed for practicing engineers who are primarily focused onwork responsibilities. However, there are also nonformal educational opportunities which areoffered outside of the formal framework. In this category, programs are organized and systematicand target specific groups and their unique learning needs [3]. It is within this nonformal spacethat universities can expand outside of the strict formal structures of the institution and engagepracticing engineer with specific technical knowledge that is required to adapt to the rapidlyevolving engineering workplace. This article presents a case study of a new interaction between a University and anindustrial company, which approached the first author for
that would allow students to thrive in a rigorous STEM coursesonce they attend college; and (6) to focus these efforts on populations that are historicallyunderrepresented in STEM academic programs and careers. The core technical components of the curriculum are adapted from an intensive, hands-onfirst year curriculum in the Mechanical Engineering program at Portland State University [4],[5]. The camp is an immersive experience exposing participants to engineering skills, human-centered design, teamwork, fabrication, all in the context of working on a college campus andbeing supported by college students. Conceiving and building a prototype invention in fourweeks is a big challenge, especially given that the participants are
variety of disciplines, including computer science, mechanicalengineering, and sustainability-focused programs, and they create opportunities forinterdisciplinary problem solving.IntroductionEnergy education can be found in many disciplines throughout a college curriculum. The basiclaws of the conservation of energy and an introduction to its many forms is integral to first-yearphysics coursework. Early environmental science courses emphasize the impacts of energyextraction and conversion on natural systems. Later courses in environmental studies explorenatural resources used to harvest energy. Business schools offer courses in the areas of energyand environmental economics. Traditional engineering disciplines study energy transformation,and
careers has been well-documented1,2. These experiencesshould emphasize the application of the technical skills in the classroom as well as the "softer"skills such as communication, working as a team and customer interaction3-5. The need for suchexperiences has spawned many innovative approaches to senior capstone design courses6,7 aswell as design courses for underclassmen8-11. The most common model for these courses hasbeen a one semester experience intended to give the students an intense exposure to the designprocess. Page 8.540.1 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
have been experimental offerings of a first-year engineering coursethat incorporated a very extensive design-build-test-compete (DBTC) pedagogy. This course wasspecifically positioned to exercise core-engineering competencies, communication skills, andcreativity. The course is intense in that it involves two Aerospace Engineering team projects,integrated technical communications and technical content, teamwork, and individual scientificand fabrication laboratories. The projects involve design, build, test, and compete cycles withballoons and then with radio-controlled blimps. The students entering this DBTC course andother first-year courses were studied with respect to typical admissions criteria including highschool grades and test scores