Woodcock, University of Michigan Cassandra (Cassie) Woodcock is a PhD Candidate at the University of Michigan. She is pursuing a PhD in Biomedical Engineering (BME) with an Emphasis in Engineering Education. Her research interests involve experiential engineering out-of-class experiences and the professional, personal, and academic outcomes of students engaged in these experiences. She is also involved in student outcomes research in the BME Department and with the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education Office, College of Engineering at Michigan. Cassie received a B.A. in Engineering Sciences at Wartburg College (Waverly, IA) and a M.S. in BME from the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor).Dr. Aileen Huang-Saad
AC 2009-2324: VIDEO TECHNOLOGY FOR INTERUNIVERSITYCOLLABORATION IN A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORYJames Hanson, California Polytechnic State University Page 14.1347.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Video Technology for Inter-University Collaboration in a Geotechnical Engineering LaboratoryAbstractAdvanced video technology was used to incorporate multi-component (inter-university anduniversity-industry) collaborations in geotechnical engineering laboratory courses. The projectwas conducted between California Polytechnic State University (California), Auburn University(Alabama), and Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. (Japan). Synchronous
Paper ID #34463Visual Teaching Philosophy Empowering Inclusive Learning and ManagingExpectationsDr. Tawfik Elshehabi, University of Wyoming Dr. Tawfik Elshehabi is a Senior Academic Professional Lecturer at the University of Wyoming. He joined the College of Engineering and Applied Science in 2017 as an Associate Lecturer. Currently, he serves as the Program ABET Accreditation Coordinator. He also manages the simulation facility in the Engineering Education and Research Building. He is a registered Professional Engineer with the State of Wyoming. He received his Ph.D. degree in Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering from West
2006-1665: PREPARING YOUR TENURE DOSSIER FROM DAY ONEMicah Hale, University of Arkansas Dr. Hale is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering where he teaches courses in structural engineering.Findlay Edwards, University of Arkansas Dr. Edwards is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering where he teaches courses in environmental engineering.Norman Dennis, University of Arkansas Dr. Dennis is a Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering where he teaches courses in geotechnical engineering. Page 11.1021.1© American Society for Engineering Education
University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 1996.17. Chesler, N., and Chesler, M. “Gender-Informed Mentoring Strategies for Women Engineering Scholars: On Establishing a Caring Community.” Journal of Engineering Education January 2002.18. Limbert, C., “Chrysalis, A Peer Mentoring Program for Faculty and Staff Women,” NWSA Journal, vol. 7, 1995.19. Pololi, L., Knight, S., Dennis, K., and Frankel, R. “Helping Medical School Faculty Realize Their Dreams: An Innovative, Collaborative Mentoring Program.” Acad. Med. 2002;77:377–384. Page 15.768.9
. Page 10.110.1Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright© 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationThe Western Carolina University Teacher Support Program, through offering an array of directsupport services to all educators who serve students with disabilities, has led to the identificationof several special needs cases where a technical innovation could improve a student’s quality oflife in the classroom. Seeking help with the technical solutions, the Special Education Programfaculty approached the Department of Engineering and Technology and several collaborativeprojects were defined.Many of the projects involve modifying existing commercial equipment for classroom
, product analysis, and facility layout1. Ten to twelvefunctional teams are formed to provide a means for students who are responsible for the samefunctional area to work together. Each student is a member of two functional teams. Page 6.546.1 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationPortions of the required analyses in the DIS class are subcontracted to two other IE classes and aMechanical Engineering (ME) class, as shown in Table 1. Overviews of the collaborations followin sections IV through
Albayati American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Building Research Skills Through Being a Peer ReviewerAbstractThis paper describes a peer reviewer mentoring program called the Engineering EducationResearch Peer Review Training (EER PERT) project and serves as a pilot study on longitudinaleffects on researchers’ productivity and the impact of their work, differences in these factors forthose who review journal manuscripts and those who review grant proposals, and what aspects ofpeer review training (knowledge, resources, collaborations, etc.) participants actually carryforward in their own research. Overall, the project seeks to investigate how
for untenured engineering faculty throughout the TEES divisions, conducting workshops, guiding faculty through the proposal development process, with an overall goal to increase technical research capacity throughout the state. She has also worked with multi-institutional center-level efforts, such as proposals to the NSF CREST program. Page 25.682.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Grantsmanship and the Proposal Development Process: Lessons Learned from Several Years of Programs for Junior FacultyAbstractAlthough new engineering faculty members have an
writing proposals at Lockheed Martin as well as at HRL Labs. She has a B.S. degree in Materials Science from Rice University and an M.S. in Materials Science and Engineering, from Northwestern University. Page 14.1100.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Support for Faculty Writing Proposals to New Investigator ProgramsAbstractResearch grants aimed specifically at junior faculty and new investigators, such as the NationalScience Foundation Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program, Department ofDefense Young Investigator and Beckman Young Investigator grants
Paper ID #12171Formative Classroom Observations for New FacultyDr. Laura D Hahn, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Laura Hahn is Director of the Academy for Excellence in Engineering Education at the University of Illi- nois at Urbana-Champaign. She is also an adjunct assistant professor in the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. She specializes in instructional development and intercultural communica- tion.Chris Migotsky, University of Illinois Chris Migotsky is the Coordinator of Faculty Teaching Programs within the College of Engineering at the University of Illinois. He also has
educational methodologies. While the change may be resisted by students andmay not succeed at first, it can work! As educators interested in increasing student learning, itseems we must be willing to take the time and energy needed to change those student behaviorsthat do not promote good learning.1. Felder, R.M., Speaking of Education - III. Chemical Engineering Education, 2002. 36(4): p. 282-283.2. Gandolfo, A., Motivating Students for Life-long Leaning: Developing Metacognition. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 2001. 127(3): p. 93-97.3. Johnson, R.T. and D.W. Johnson, eds. An Overview of Cooperative Learning. Creativity and Collaborative Learning, ed. J. Thousand, A. Villa, and
AC 2008-2089: MEETING THE MENTORING NEEDS OF NEW FACULTY: ANINTERDISCIPLINARY EXPERIENCEB. Elizabeth Jones, Tarleton State UniversityDenise Martinez, Tarleton State University Page 13.886.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Meeting the Mentoring Needs of New Faculty: An Interdisciplinary ExperienceAbstractEvery new job presents its challenges, especially when an employee has the feeling of beingisolated. This paper will describe how a campus-wide faculty mentoring and networkinginitiative evolved from a one-day new faculty orientation into a university-supported new facultycohort program utilizing web resources, brown
management practice. Page 12.188.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Advice for New Engineering Faculty: Insights Gained from Faculty Development ProgramsAbstractIt is not easy being a new engineering faculty member (either as a newly minted PhD or as a newfaculty member to the university) and harder still to find one’s bearings when faced with ademanding course load, the stress of demonstrating solid output from a new research agenda, andmultiple service commitments. It is even more challenging to get established when thedepartment (or university) lacks a formal faculty development program for
Wisconsin - Stout Jennifer Astwood is Assistant Professor of Art and Design at the University of Wisconsin-Stout. Her area of focus is industrial design. Page 22.945.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011Interdisciplinary Sustainability Design and Development Education: Research, Development and Discovery Jennifer Astwood Ronald Scozzari University of Wisconsin - Stout Page 22.945.2Abstract.The paper will describe our experience in solving
NOBCChE chapter. Her research is in medical microdevice diagnostics & dielectrophoresis. Page 15.1005.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Proposal Advice: Experiential Advice Focused for New FacultyAbstractAt the 2009 ASEE annual meeting, the New Engineering Educators Division and theEngineering Research Council jointly sponsored a session entitled, “2575: Funding Sources forEngineering Research.” The author was one of the panelists invited to participate as the tokenfaculty member just having earned tenure with both educational and research funding andpublications. The author / panelist gave a talk on
Willcox Inc.)Dr. Kamalesh Panthi, East Carolina UniversityDr. Tijjani Mohammed, East Carolina University Page 23.1162.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 TECS-TRAIN – A Faculty Mentoring Program for Enhancing Quality, Interaction, and Communication in Online and Blended Learning CoursesAbstract“TECS-TRAIN” is a faculty peer Mentoring program that was developed in the College ofTechnology and Computer Science (TECS) at East Carolina University (ECU). The purpose ofthe program is to advance standards
study reinforced the importance of collaborative learning outside-the-classroom through virtual interactive environments. This active learning environment was able toimprove the flipped classroom model and added to it a new learning dimension. The hybridapproach also helped cater to all the students’ learning styles including the visual and verballearners. However, one of the main challenges in implementing this approach is the students’resistance to change especially if this change is time demanding for the students’ outside-the-classroom.Bibliography[1] National Academy of Engineers (2005), “Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century”, National Academic of Engineering: Washington, D.C.[2] Prince
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Tricks of the Trade: Developing Research Funding AbstractBuilding a research group is an important determinant of career success. Maintaining acadre of students and assistants depends upon many factors, but perhaps none is soimportant as funding. Raising money takes time, a fact often bemoaned by professionalsacross the spectrum, from educators to politicians to missionaries. This paper presentsadvice from faculty who have been very successful in obtaining funding, including somewho have served for a time as NSF program officers. They advise that it’s important toserve on review panels to learn how the system works. Find out what each
the VTADVANCE Program and a doctoral student in the Science Technology Studies program at Virginia Tech. Page 13.287.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Changes in the Nature of Faculty Work in Engineering during the First Three YearsAbstractThe literature frames the socialization process of new faculty members as if they face anidentical set of challenges in each of their pre-tenure years, regardless of discipline. This researchuses a longitudinal research design and interview data to determine if there are differences byyear in the experiences of a cohort pre-tenure faculty in engineering at a research
Proceedings of the 2024 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2024, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 315controls, safety valves, and other fluid power components across the globe. Donald Engineeringdistributes top quality fluid power and motion control products, accessories, and providesengineering solutions for their customer needs. The company president from Donald Engineeringand the global vp of safety business development from Ross Controls both provided guestlectures, training materials and equipment stations with safety sensors and with integrated safetylogic devices to help develop the course
Transportation Engineers, and Transportation Research Board. His research focuses on transportation safety utilizing geographic and spatial analysis methods. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Student Response System Best Practices for Engineering as Implemented in PlickersAbstractSRSs facilitate engagement in contingent teaching, knowledge scaffolding, formativeassessment, and collaborative learning strategies, but in ways that encourage student motivation,interaction, and engagement in learning. Plickers, an innovative Student Response System (SRS)consisting of student response cards and an instructor website and instructor
Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning, to understand engineering students’ identity devel- opment. She is the recipient of a 2014
is a member of ASEE, ASEM, and IIE.Dr. Gillian M. Nicholls, Southeast Missouri State University Dr. Gillian M. Nicholls is an Assistant Professor of Quantitative Methods at Southeast Missouri State University. Her research interests are in applying statistical analysis and optimization to supply chain management, transportation management, and engineering education. She holds the B.S. in Industrial Engineering (Lehigh University), Masters in Business Administration (Penn State University), M.S. in Industrial Engineering (University of Pittsburgh.), and Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering (University of Pittsburgh). Prior to entering academia, Dr. Nicholls was a practicing industrial engineer in the freight
combining medicine and en- gineering and also has led multiple curricular initiative in Bioengineering and the College of Engineering on several NSF funded projects. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A case study of early performance prediction and intervention in a computer science courseAbstractThis study presents the results of a course intervention performed in a large upper-divisionundergraduate computer science class designed to offer additional resources to students that wereidentified as at-risk of low performance after completing graded assessments during the first twoweeks of the semester. The course uses Python as the required programming language
multidisciplinary projects. Page 11.1086.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Research in the Undergraduate EnvironmentAbstractThe benefits of research experiences for undergraduates are significant. For many faculty, thesewere the experiences that convinced us to pursue further education and a career in academia.However, performing research at an undergraduate institution carries with it certain challenges.In traditional research institutions, doctoral students perform most of the research activities, ledby the faculty. These students have completed at least their undergraduate courses and can beexpected to remain
Paper ID #19333Using a Course Learning Management System to Promote Academic HonestyDr. Gillian M. Nicholls, Southeast Missouri State University Dr. Gillian M. Nicholls is an Assistant Professor of Quantitative Methods at Southeast Missouri State University. Her research interests are in applying statistical analysis and optimization to supply chain management, transportation management, and engineering education. She holds the B.S. in Industrial Engineering (Lehigh University), Masters in Business Administration (Penn State University), M.S. in Industrial Engineering (University of Pittsburgh.), and Ph.D. in Industrial
Paper ID #34802Tools for Detecting Plagiarism in Online ExamsDr. Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Dr. Gehringer is a professor in the Departments of Computer Science, and Electrical & Computer Engi- neering. His research interests include computerized assessment systems, and the use of machine-learning techniques to improve the quality of reviewing. He teaches courses in the area of software engineering and computer architecture.Ashwini MenonMs. Guoyi Wang American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Tools
. Page 13.968.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Pedagogy: Review of Best PracticesThe purpose of this paper is to identify and describe teaching tools and techniques thatwill help new faculty as well as experienced faculty become more effective teachers.Based on a review of the literature related to “teaching excellence”, the followingexcerpts have been divided into two major sections. The focus of the first section is thelearning process, and the second section discusses innovative methods of teaching.Topics included in the “Learning” section include: 1) Focusing on Learning and NotTeaching; 2) Problem Based Learning; 3) Facilitating Group Learning (PromotingAccountability, Linking Assignments, and
2006-1168: EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT PEDAGOGICAL TECHNIQUESJohn Marshall, University of Southern MaineJune Marshall, St. Joseph's College JUNE MARSHALL received her doctorate from North Carolina State University and is Director of Education at St. Joseph’s College in Maine. Her specialization is learning strategies focusing specifically in cooperative leaning and character education. Page 11.514.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Effective and Efficient Pedagogical TechniquesThe purpose of this paper is to identify and describe teaching tools and techniques thatwill help new faculty