diverse public and private schools in Nigeria.Data were collected using validated instruments: the Mental Rotation Test (MRT) and SpatialOrientation Test (SOT) to measure spatial reasoning; a Physics Achievement Test Survey (PATS)(based on WASSCE papers) to assess physics performance; and the Students' Attitudes TowardPhysics Questionnaire (SATPQ) to measure personal, teacher, and self-efficacy factors related tophysics learning.The penalized regression analyses revealed several significant predictors of spatial reasoning.School type emerged as the strongest predictor, with private school students demonstratingsignificantly higher spatial reasoning scores than their public school counterparts. Physicsperformance also showed a robust positive
includes the following components: 1) in-lecture discussionsof specific healthcare disparities and inequities that exist that relate to the organ system beingdiscussed, 2) discussion questions designed to help students learn to socially contextualizetechnical problems in BME, 3) three equity and ethics assignments, and 4) two team projects: a)one asking teams to design a brain computer interface and address any potential disparities orsocietal impacts that may results and b) one asking teams to develop and engaging andinformative infographic about a specific healthcare disparity. A sequential mixed-methods pre-and post-semester approach employing quantitative and qualitative methods was used to assess teeffectiveness of this curriculum. Results
encouraged to propose their ideas, use the design process to Engineering Design suggest a solution pathway, engage in implementing their research design, and present their findings/prototype to the class and broader audience. The actual teaming exercise is used not only to engage the students and help them with self-assessment but also to plant the seeds of workforce development as they see a wider set of opportunities. Internship for The Internship Program provides students with opportunities to: (1) explore career Workforce interests and work environments; (2) receive on-the-job training and utilize Development and technologies in the workplace (3) gain
Educational Policy, with a concentration in Research, Measurement, and Statistics, from Georgia State University.Dr. Sunni Haag Newton, Georgia Institute of Technology Sunni Newton is currently a Senior Research Scientist at the Georgia Institute of Technology in the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on assessing the implementation and outcomes of educatiDr. Abeera P. Rehmat, Georgia Institute of Technology Abeera P. Rehmat is a Research Scientist II, at Georgia Institute of Technology’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC). She has experience conducting research in engineering education that spans pre-college up to
that thesefeatures may result in student persistence being driven in different ways than in traditionalengineering. Further, most studies of persistence look at drop-out rates [3], [5], [7], [9] wherepersistence is the expectation. Since there are currently few degree programs in ML/AI, there are aplethora of ways a student may end up working in ML/AI, and we know little about these pathways.Statistics show that the field of ML/AI lacks diversity; currently only 32% of AI professionals arewomen [23], and though field-specific assessments of racial demographics are still underway, only7% of professionals in broader computer occupations are Black [24]. This lack of diversity may havedirect impacts on the outputs of the ML/AI field, where
thecollective growth of a community, providing opportunities for collective input andacknowledgment. This mentorship approach allows an individual to take on the role of bothmentor and mentee.A year-long omnidirectional mentorship program was developed and piloted at a Mid-Atlanticuniversity. This pilot program included ten faculty members, each at various stages of theircareer, from various departments: engineering, computer science, technology, biology,education, and graduate psychology. Assessment of this omnidirectional mentorship programoccurred through focus groups. The data from two mid-point focus groups provided insight intothe developed relationships among participants through their interactions in structuredgatherings. We qualitatively
the provider’s “gold standard” elements of PBL. These elements include Designing & Planning,Aligning to the Standards, Building the Culture, Assessing Student Learning, etc. While the trainings wereengaging and stimulated collaboration and ideas, the components were not readily transferable to a newhigh school environment still grappling with its own unique STEM identity and the responsibilities ofdeveloping new curricula, creating culture, and aligning to the state’s standards for testing andgraduation. 4Title: The STEM Innovation Academy’s Approach to the Senior Capstone Project: Promoting a Culture of Excellence Further heightening the challenges of PBL implementationwere
cognitive capacity and mental stability.Ms. Steffi N. Crasto, Center for Advanced and Emerging Technologies (CARET) Ms. Steffi Crasto holds a Master’s degree in Management of Technology from New York University, and a Bachelor of Engineering degree in Information Technology from the University of Mumbai. She is an Educational Evaluation Consultant, specializing in Learning Management Systems (LMS) technology, educational assessment, and data-driven learning analytics. Previously, she worked at Technical Consult- ing & Research, Inc., Weston, CT, and New York University.Mr. Pui Lam (Raymond) Yu, Technical Consulting & Research, Inc. Pui Lam (Raymond) Yu is the Executive Vice President Engineering at Technical
paperwill describe the pilot-testing of novel open-ended and multiple-choice questions related tominoritized social identities in the context of the Great Lakes I-Corps Hub "Regional" and"Local" I-Corps courses. Our findings support frequent calls in the literature for "mixed-methods" combinations of quantitative and qualitative approaches to the assessment andcategorization of social identities, and point to types of such identities that are often excludedfrom quantitative multiple-choice measures. NSF Innovation-Corps ("I-Corps")The popularity of entrepreneurship education has led to growth in the variety of teaching models,approaches, and objectives (Hahn et al. 2017; Nabi et al. 2017; O’Connor 2013; Rideout andGray
meanfor ECD-related graduate engineering education. There are now more than seven graduateprograms of this type in the US alone (not counting graduate certificates which will make thenumber larger), a growing number of both ECD-type undergraduate and graduate programsworldwide, and an even larger number of EWB chapters in need of this type of reflection (see[25] for complete lists of these programs and initiatives). While it is not the purpose of this paperto assess how these programs educate their students or members, or whether they promotecritical reflection, research translation, or extension, this programmatic growth shows that theECD readership and institutional locations interested in the topics covered in this paper aregrowing
. She was selected as a National Academy of Education / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two- strand research program focused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Jill Marshall, University of Texas, Austin Jill A. Marshall is an associate professor of STEM Education. She studies how people come to understand and engineer the physical world and how teachers can facilitate that process, as well as equity issues in STEM
paper describes the embodiment of these goals byhighlighting several key features of the seminar. We conduct quantitative and qualitative analysisof several data sources (surveys, instructor reflections, field notes, and coursework) to assess theextent to which the embodiment of our values helped us meet our goals. Finally, we describechallenges and identify areas where we were not meeting our goals and describe some of theaspects of the seminar that we plan to revise in the next iteration.IntroductionEngineering education research has increasingly focused on the learning and teaching ofdesign,1-7 including design thinking and associated “soft” skills such as communication andteamwork. Another trend is the growing number of schools of
. Additionally, the scope of this study closely assessed the situation by takingadvantage of the opinions of relevant experts and utilizing similar experiences and a case studyfrom past projects implemented in Afghanistan in order to establish a comprehensive list ofpriorities and recommendations in order to make the current Afghan engineering educationsystem academically competent and to increase its relevancy to the country’s economicdevelopment.The new Afghan National Unity Government, with assistance from the international community,is committed to implementing basic reform programs in the country's governing institutions. Thehigher education sector in general and the engineering education system in particular are amongthe Afghan institutions that
interest among K-12 students to pursue STEMrelated fields as adults 2. With the proliferation of out-of-school STEM opportunities comes theneed for evaluating their effectiveness in developing and maintaining interest in STEM, as wellas establishing guidelines for future program development. To provide this practical guidance toprogram developers, it is particularly important to understand how the actual mechanism ofinterest development is supported by the learning environment of an effective out-of-schoolprogram. Several methodological approaches exist to assess interest and its development,including: self-report surveys, short and long term retrospective interviews, and in situobservation. However, interest researchers recommend a combination
Paper ID #11105Providing Authentic Experiences in the First Year: Designing EducationalSoftware in Support of Service Learning ActivitiesDr. John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University John K. Estell is a Professor of Computer Engineering and Computer Science at Ohio Northern Uni- versity. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in computer science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and his B.S.C.S.E. degree in computer science and engineering from The Univer- sity of Toledo. His areas of research include simplifying the outcomes assessment process through use of performance vectors and evaluation heuristics
assessment of faculty work, tying research resourcesto teaching and learning, and influencing federal investment in undergraduate education andprofessional development for teaching.2 Yet, despite the equal importance among these forms ofscholarship, attempts to define or guide researchers to develop or evaluate scholarship ofintegration efforts have been limited.In contrast to the emphasis of the scholarship of discovery on what is yet to be known and found,the scholarship of integration emphasizes the connectedness, meanings, and interpretations ofscholarly byproducts. According to Boyer (p. 19), the scholarship of integration is “seriousdisciplined work that seeks to interpret, draw together, and bring new insight to bear on originalresearch
, Application of classroom concepts in industry12 How Important is the WOW Factor in Introduction of hands-on First Year Engineering Courses? work into classroom13 The Wright State Model for Engineering Improving math skills, Mathematics Education: A Longitudinal Introduction of hands-on Study of Student Perception Data. work into classroom14 Management and Assessment of a Mentorship program, Successful Peer Mentor Program for Interaction with industry Increasing Freshman Retention.15 Building a Summer Bridge Program to Improving math skills, Increase Retention and Academic Success
theintervention and its assessment. That is, student-parent dyads were formed, and the correlationsbetween parents and their children were studied.Second, some of the current research on STEM interventions fails to leverage modernmethodological practices as fully as possible. On the quantitative front, research must movebeyond simply reporting occurrences and displaying bar charts. Considerations of statisticalsignificance, knowledge of underlying distributional assumptions, dealing with low cell-countsin tables, and careful handling of the conversion of Likert scales to quantitative data are oftenoverlooked. This paper works to clean up such practices by establishing statistical significanceusing tests that rest on few distributional and minimum-cell
followingconsiderations: economic; environmental; sustainability; manufacturability; ethical; health andsafety; social; and political.” These “considerations” are the contextual aspects that form thephilosophical umbrella over the University of Virginia’s Engineering in Context initiative. Page 9.555.1 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2004, American Society for Engineering EducationThis paper describes the evolution of the new EIC course sequence from concept throughdevelopment, implementation, and assessment. Further, the paper
Session 1661 Co-op and ABET 2000: The Added Learning Dimension! Richard Canale, Cheryl Cates, Ellen Duwart Northeastern University / University of Cincinnati / Northeastern UniversityAbstractStudent perceptions are only one method to assess learning. However, student perceptions oflearning are an important factor that the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) review teams take into consideration as they make their decisions. This paper seeks toexamine student perceptions as to the impact of cooperative education in the development of thespecific attributes
contributor to consultations, policy papers and op-eds on AI and Society, and a consultant on AI application assessments and sustainable industrial processes. She volunteers with Women in AI. She’s an alumna of McGill University, Universit´e de Laval, and MILA, the Montreal Institute for Learning Algorithms’s program for Human Rights and Responsible AI. Her principal methodology is participatory research for impact.Leslie Salgado, University of Calgary Leslie Salgado is a PhD Candidate and Sessional Instructor at the University of Calgary. She is an experienced professional with a strong background in science communication and in working with international organizations, including UNESCO, OXFAM and PAHO. As a doctoral
approach combines the two for examsby giving the students two portions of an exam. The first is an individual assignment and thesecond is done in groups. Better performance was observed from the students using a combinationof individual and group components for exams [20]. Another approach requires students to achievea minimum individual assessment score before they are allowed to continue to the participate in ateam-based assessment [21]. This was to ensure that individuals prepare themselves ahead ofgroup work. The present study will require students to complete both group and individualassignments. Another concept important to this study is structuring teamwork and assigning roles.Previous works have highlighted the importance of
onengineering students’ engagement appears to have emerged in the early 2000s, as suggested byan article on assessment in engineering education [33]. A couple of major projects seem to havefacilitated this movement within engineering education communities. One was the developmentof the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey (APPLES) instrument [34] aspart of the Academic Pathways Study undertaken by the Center for the Advancement ofEngineering Education at the University of Washington. Another was the study “MeasuringStudent and Faculty Engagement in Engineering Education” [35] undertaken by the Center forthe Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education of the National Academy ofEngineering. A third one was the “Engineering
video links and sharedcomputer applications that together significantly enhance the teams’ collaboration on the project. The VIP Program benefits from a multi-methodological and longitudinal evaluation ofprogress toward goals and VIP outcomes. The evaluation blends rich interview-based qualitativedata with a detailed social network analysis of student-level collaborative interaction andoutcomes. The approach draws from studies of scientific collaboration, student learningoutcomes, and social network analysis. This paper presents baseline evaluation data on earlylearning outcomes, student expectations, and the structure and resources of the student VIPnetworks. The lessons learned from this initial round of assessments will be used to
relevance, and advising effectiveness. While engineering education has long beenurged to reform, transformation is possible. In this paper, we share the story of launching WakeForest Engineering and the student-centered practices and strategies that enabled us to rethinkacademic and career advising. Wake Forest Engineering presents a comprehensive model andapproach to integrating academic and career advising towards student success. The model isinformed by three theoretical frameworks - self-determination theory, identity theory, and socialcognitive career theory - to support holistic student development. Starting with entrance surveysto understand student aspirations, continuing with annual assessments, and embedding advisingwithin the curriculum
females' participation in the program for four years. Even though the number offemale participants decreased from 2019 to 2022, the participating females reported they wereconfident, satisfied, and gained knowledge by the end of the program. The assessment results,however, make it clear that additional focus is required on women's experiences in the programto increase their sense of belonging in the engineering sector. The SCR2 program's transitionfrom an on-site to a hybrid serves as an example of how innovation in engineering educationmay address the problems and give insights into the tools and technologies needed for efficientcross-site communication, faculty advisor/mentor involvement, participant engagement, andmaking the most of the strong
Manifesto and sponsored projects across thecurriculum including engineering that would prepare students for life and work. Someexcellent projects were designed and implemented to achieve the manifesto’s goals (exhibit8) [27]. Unfortunately it did not spread and did not become a feature of higher education.Similarly with the Enterprise in Higher Education Initiative (EHEI) although it left somelegacies including the idea of core skills. Again the result of complaints by industry togovernment it invited universities to develop skills of enterprise learning among all thesubjects of the curriculum. Its objectives were expressed in its Notes for Guidance (Exhibit 9)[28]. Its ideas about assessment were circulated to participating universities in 1991
Creativity 4. Commitment 8. Social Intelligence 11. Ability & Eagerness to (Social Learn Perceptiveness) 12. Self-AwarenessThe future skills framework also aligns with recent literature on the importance of lifelonglearning. For example, work assessing the lifelong learning priorities of engineering programalumni prioritized skills that align with future readiness, including general curiosity and desire tolearn; learning from others who have expertise in domains other than your own; innovation todevelop creative and effective products, processes and services; and solving novel scientific
thecurriculum-specific Top Hat textbook, while the other group (n = 109) used a traditional textbook,which was an abridged version of “Statics and Mechanics of Materials: An Integrated Approach”by W. Riley, L. Sturges and D. Morris [5], and “Mechanics of Materials” by W. Riley, L. Sturgesand D. Morris [6]. Student performance was quantified through graded assessments, namelymidterms and a final exam, and as well as their overall course grade. The effect of the assignedtextbook on student performance was then compared using t-tests. Student perceptions of theirrespective textbooks were also collected through surveys and analyzed using qualitative methods.There was no statistically significant difference in student performance considering the use of
not like. Finally,each faculty member was asked to assess which of the guiding principles were reflected in theseplans and on which ones were we falling short. The meeting minutes recorded these responses toprovide continuity for the spring quarter discussion.Some key suggestions and issues that resulted from the six independent plans were: • Most of the ARCE courses in the current quarter-based curriculum are 3 units offered over a ten-week quarter. If the same course and content is offered in the fifteen-week semester system, it would need to be 2 units to be equivalent. Using this conversion, faculty members will have an incredible number of preparations and the work load would certainly be increased -- potentially