the college experience of first-generation students who participate in the First-Generation Program and those who do not. Theauthors would like to incorporate some of the activities from the First-Generation Program intoother programs to help other first-generation students.IntroductionWest Virginia University Institute of Technology (WVU Tech) is a school with approximately1600 students that heavily recruits from the local area (historically Montgomery, WV andcurrently Beckley, WV) [1]. Approximately 35% of the student population of WVU Tech arefirst-generation and 66% are either first-generation or low income. Of the students admitted inFall 2017, only 19.38% had a general ACT score above 23 [1]. The goal of this research is toidentify and
Paper ID #38921Board 228: Building Partnerships for Advanced Manufacturing ProgramsDr. Karen Wosczyna-Birch, National Center for Next Generation Manufacturing Dr. Karen Wosczyna-Birch has been a champion of engineering and technology education for over 30 years. Since 1995, she has been the state director of the CT College of Technology (COT) where her lead- ership has been instrumental in creating nationally recognized seamless pathway programs in engineering and technology between all 12 public community colleges in CT with 10 universities and technical and comprehensive high schools. She is also the Executive Director
Paper ID #39018Board 340: Mentoring to Support Community Colleges through the NSFATEProposal Submission ProcessDr. Karen Wosczyna-Birch, National Center for Next Generation Manufacturing Dr. Karen Wosczyna-Birch has been a champion of engineering and technology education for the past 30 years. Since 1995, she has been the state director of the CT College of Technology (COT) where her leadership has been instrumental in creating nationally recognized seamless pathway programs in engineering and technology between all 12 public community colleges in CT with 10 universities and high schools. She is also the Executive
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024A Hands-On, Dual-Credit Mechatronics Pathway Overview for Secondary & Post-Secondary EducatorsAccording to a study by Deloitte and the Manufacturing Institute [1], “Over the next decade, 4million manufacturing jobs will likely be needed, and 2.1 million are expected to go unfilled ifwe do not inspire more people to pursue modern manufacturing careers.” The mission of theNational Science Foundation Advanced Technological Education (NSF ATE) funded NationalCenter for Next Generation Manufacturing (NCNGM) is to cultivate and nurture partnershipswith advanced manufacturing stakeholders, creating a national network throughout the UnitedStates to further develop a diverse technical
: • Generating datasets that contain desired statistical patterns and relationships as specified in a high-level series of commands. • Randomizing the datasets so that each student can receive unique datasets for assessment purposes. • Integrating with a commercial grading platform to manage the distribution, collection, and automatic grading of individualized assessments.For purposes of this discussion, we use the matrix notation of James, et. al. to describe ourdatasets [1] with 𝑛 observations and 𝑝 predictor variables: • An 𝑛 × 𝑝 “predictor matrix” 𝑿 where each column is an 𝑛 × 1 individual predictor vector 𝑿𝟏, 𝑿𝟐, …, 𝑿𝒑, where 𝑿𝒊 = [𝑥1𝑖 , 𝑥2𝑖 , … , 𝑥𝑛𝑖 ]𝑇 with 𝑥𝑖𝑗 representing the
skills intoaccreditation criteria. Over two decades ago, ABET Engineering Criteria (i.e., EC2000) for thefirst time included professional skills, intended to address the demands for interpersonal skillsand global awareness among 21st Century engineers (Shuman, Besterfield‐Sacre, & McGourty,2005). In fact, a greater number of EC2000 a-k Student Outcomes pertain to professional skillsthan technical skills. This is even more the case in the current (1-7) Student Outcomes Criteria(ABET, n.d.). ABET’s reasoning behind including professional skills in Student Criteria inEC2000 is equally applicable to ABET’s current proposed inclusion of DEI elements into theGeneral Criteria: [To promote undergraduate engineering students’] ability to
suspect that liberal arts institutions inparticular focus on teaching non-technical knowledge and skills, which are also valued byindustry [1]. A more balanced educational experience might be particularly relevant given thelarge number of folks with engineering degrees who work outside of engineering occupations;the NAE estimated that as of 2013 there were 65% of all degreed engineers who worked inoccupations not considered engineering [41]. The ABET EAC program criteria add additionalcurricular constraints on specialty degrees, with the majority of the identified aspects relating totechnical issues; programs accredited under the general criteria do not face these additionalrestrictions [42]. Previous research quantified the amount of required
Paper ID #34925Engineering Graduate Education: An Overwhelming Journey ofFirst-Generation ImmigrantsDr. Hoda Ehsan, Georgia Institute of Technology Hoda is a postdoctoral fellow at Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics & Computing at Georgia Institute of Technology. She received her Ph.D. from the School of Engineering Education, Purdue. She received her B.S. in mechanical engineering in Iran, and obtained her M.S. in Childhood Education and New York teaching certification from City College of New York (CUNY-CCNY). She is now a graduate research assistant on STEM+C project. Her research interests
present our University’s efforts to contribute to this need by way of a hands-onactivity designed for high school students. The workshop was devised to achieve three primarygoals: 1) Encourage consideration of a career in electrical and computer engineering 2) Buildexcitement about the Internet-of-Things and provide students with a future technical focus and 3)Introduce students to the fundamental building blocks that make up the Internet-of-Things. Duringthis activity, students complete a project in which they first construct a circuit to read data from atemperature sensor using a microcontroller platform. The students then write software to transmitthat data over a short-range wireless network and then eventually to an Internet-connected
college students (FGCS) face considerable obstacles to college success,including a lack of role models in the family, a lack of familial mentoring and support, a lack offamiliarity with the college climate, and, generally, lower socioeconomic status [1-6]. They tendto be less academically prepared for college, and English is not their native language for a higherproportion than of continuing-generation college students (CGCS) [3]. However, in many ways,recent research suggests that FGCS are very similar to CGCS. They respond to the same factorsencouraging college persistence and success [7-8], and often demonstrate considerable “grit” inpursuing their undergraduate careers (9), a factor instrumental in undergraduate achievement.Indeed, Boone and
was converted to a flipped classroom environment for half of the course material. The mainobjective of this research pilot project is to investigate the impact of video length and videoactivities on the retention and understanding of Gen-Z engineering students for a software-basedsimulation course. Results show that students are more likely to watch medium-length videos thanshort-length videos, but those who do watch short-length videos have better learning outcomes.KeywordsGeneration Z, flipped classroom, engineering education, video length1. IntroductionThe engineering students today are from Generation Z, the cohort of individuals born from 1996-2010 [1]. They are high-efficiency multi-taskers with 8-second attention spans, typically
evaluator on numerous, large-scale, federally funded programs. She has played a pivotal role in the development and successful funding of various programs, as recognized in comments from review panels.Randi Mendes, University of Connecticut c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Entrepreneurial Engineering Education – A Research Experience for Undergraduates focused on Entrepreneurship and Technical InnovationBackground and Motivation:In the summer of 2013, a report in The Bridge, published by the National Academy ofEngineering, stated that entrepreneurship or entrepreneurial thinking are some of the mostcritical skills to be taught to engineering undergraduates [1]. While there has been
aretechnical standards, the important role they have for the global economy and what benefitsstudents could have by using standards. To reach these goals, it was necessary that the workshopprovide a general introduction to standards and provide a forum to allow interaction betweenfaculty, students, staff and standards personnel. In order to represent the extensive impact thattechnical standards have on a wide range of industries, it was necessary that a variety of differentstandards bodies and faculty from various disciplines be represented. This wide representationwas necessary to maximize the reach to students of different engineering disciplines.Consequently, the workshop was organized as two panels sessions, each including time forquestions and
create students that will be able to solve relevant problems using the engineering designprocess. Figure 1 - Exploratory model of engagement in engineering activities According to Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc (ABET),engineering design “involves identifying opportunities, developing requirements, performinganalysis and synthesis, generating multiple solutions, evaluating solutions against requirements,considering risks, and making trade-offs, for the purpose of obtaining a high-quality solutionunder the given circumstances.” [10] Engineering design is a process of generating multiplecreative solutions for an identified need, analyzing these solutions, and implementing the mostappropriate one
deliverables of the KickStarter program include: 1. Sustainable proposal development technical assistance infrastructure at Science Foundation Arizona (SFAz) tailored to the needs of CC-HSIs, which will increase the submission of competitive NSF proposals; 2. Robust collection of mutually-beneficial, widely-informative, STEM-focused, online networks and professional learning communities (PLCs) that support critical partnerships needed to be competitive at NSF; 3. Data-capture capabilities that support CC-HSIs’ ability to improve their NSF competitiveness and effectively implement projects; and 4. Roadmap that other Hispanic-serving institutions can adapt to accomplish similar goals.As a result of the CC-HSIs
Section (2007), the John A. Curtis Lecture Award from the Computers in Education Division of ASEE (1998, 2005, and 2010), and the Brigadier General Roland E. Thomas Award for outstanding contribution to cadet education (both 1992 and 1993) at the U.S. Air Force Academy. He is an active ABET evaluator and an NCEES PE exam committee member. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Using Veteran’s Technical Skills in an Engineering LaboratoryAbstractAfter years of dissatisfaction with student knowledge and ability to use electrical test andmeasurement equipment (T&ME), a veteran with significant expertise using this equipment wasplaced in a Circuit Analysis Lab. This paper reports on
further study.Keywords: Undergraduate, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, EngineeringIntroductionIn an effort to address this issue of persistence for undergraduate students majoring inengineering and taking general chemistry, typically one of the pre-requisite courses taken duringthe first two-years on campus, we have developed a career-forward laboratory curriculum that isdesigned to support persistence. A career-forward curriculum targets the long-term goal ofpersistence—the personal capacity of students to continue towards an academic goal—byframing experiences with the content, context and specific skills of working in the target careerfield. Created as an extension of an earlier reform of the recitation component of chemistrycourses [1], this
[13], [14].The millennials (Gen Y), span the years 1981 through 1996. They follow the veterans, babyboomers, and Gen Xers. Gen Z is discussed as the most recent generational cohort on whomthere is sufficient early information. Veterans (Traditionalist) 1922-1945; 52 million people; born before and during WW II Baby Boomers 1946-1964; 78.8 million people; after WW II Reared during a period of optimism, opportunity, and progress. Began turning 65 on January 1, 2011; aging to 65 years old at 10,000/day, through December 31, 2029. Generation X (Gen X) 1965-1980; 44 million people Came of age in the shadow of the boomers Children of veterans, older boomers, or younger siblings of younger
. 4 For simple domains, i.e., homogeneous properties and simple boundary conditions, thegoverning equation can be solved analytically. In general, an analytical solution does not existand the governing equation must be solved numerically.Contaminant Transport by Advection-Dispersion A model that includes only advection and dispersion can be solved numerically and maybe solved analytically for certain domains and properties. The contaminant will flowdownstream with the groundwater and the front will spread out through dispersion. Thegoverning equation is C x, t 2C x, t C x, t D v (1) t x 2
1ELCIR Program – Engineering Learning Community Introduction to Research: A research andglobal experience program supporting first generation, low-income, and underrepresentedminority students.INTRODUCTION:The College of Engineering at Texas A&M University has set some ambitious goals: to increasediversity in engineering and to better prepare the engineers who are joining today’s global anddynamic workforce. Some of the issues that need to be addressed at our college are: 1) increasethe retention of underrepresented minority (URM) and first generation students in engineering,2) enhance the participation of those students in engineering research and study abroadprograms, and 3) pave the way for those students to enroll in graduate programs in
classrooms.However, it is expected that these engineering students will be able to manipulate materials,energy, and information in their professional roles. However, students must have aknowledge that goes beyond mere theory. Fundamental knowledge, traditionally gained ineducational laboratories, provide a better base that is long lasting and easy to recall in futurebased on their experience and sensory memory. Learning styles vary person to person asdiscussed in many publications [1-5]. Since routine class lectures normally do not promoteactive learning and not every student can easily absorb and understand theoretical knowledgepresented in this kind of class setting, hands-on laboratory based assignments usually aremore effective in generating a greater
interact with industry professionals. One of theparticipants, who is a first-generation aviator in his family, said his involvement in students’organizations gave him an opportunity to meet people who are currently doing what heanticipates he will do throughout his career.Discussions and Limitations To date, numerous studies have explored the lack of all forms of diversity in the aviationand aerospace industry [1][2][7]. However, there has been limited research on exploring thecommon factors that attract both men and women to aviation careers and unique factors thatdraw women into the industry. There is also limited research that concurrently addresses morethan one aviation discipline as part of the same investigation. In this study
arerequired to take the course for their degree, while a handful of students take the course as anelective (3 Chemistry, 1 Electrical Engineering/Physics.)The format of the course is a flipped learning model, in which the students are given 4 to 6 5-minute instructor-generated videos on the lecture content before class. Although alignedtextbook readings are also noted for those that prefer that method of preparation, the vastmajority of students self-report that they only watch the videos to prepare for lecture. For thefirst 5-10 min of each 65 min class period, the students are quizzed, first, individually and, then,in groups on their ability to remember and understand of the content of the videos. This is meantto test the lowest levels of Bloom’s
Paper ID #37302Lessons learned - Conducting an External Evaluation of aSTEM Teaching and Learning Center (Lessons LearnedPaper #1 of 2)Stephanie Cutler (Assessment and Instructional Support Specialist) Dr. Stephanie Cutler has degrees in Mechanical Engineering, Industrial and Systems Engineering, and a PhD in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. She is an Associate Research Professor and the Assessment and Instructional Support Specialist in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. Her primary research interest include faculty development, the peer review process, the
Paper ID #33082An After-action Review: Creating a Matrix Organizational Design Modelfor Online Education at a Tier-1 Research UniversityDr. Mitchell L. Springer, Purdue University at West Lafayette Dr. Mitchell L. Springer PMP, SPHR, SHRM-SCP Dr. Springer currently serves as an Executive Director for Purdue University’s Polytechnic Institute lo- cated in West Lafayette, Indiana. He has over thirty-five years of theoretical and defense industry-based practical experience from four disciplines: software engineering, systems engineering, program manage- ment and human resources. Dr. Springer possesses a significant
meaning of each substantive word isimportant for understanding the intent of each SO. Examining the wording of the transition ofSOs a – k to SOs 1 – 7, several general observations are evident: (1) SOs 1 – 7 now all begin with the student requirement “an ability to”, which is found atotal of 8 times within SOs 1 – 7. Previously, SOs a – k included four different studentrequirements: “understand” (2 times), “knowledge” (1 time), “recognition” (1 time), and“ability” (7 times). (2) The number of student actions (or verbs) increased from 18 in SOs a – k to 26 in SOs1 – 7, which is an increase of ~44%. (3) The number of concepts the students must execute increased from 35 in SOs a – k to38 in SOs 1 – 7, which is an increase of ~9
Paper ID #36483The Green Escape Room: Part 1 – A Race to Solve anEnvironmental Engineering Problem by ApplyingEngineering Principles and Deciphering Clues and PuzzlesMichael A. Butkus (Professor of Environmental Engineering) Michael A. Butkus is a Professor of Environmental Engineering at the U.S. Military Academy (USMA). He earned a B.S. in Marine Engineering Systems from the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy (1989), a M.S. (1995) and Ph.D. (1997) in Environmental Engineering from the University of Connecticut. He is a licensed professional engineer in the state of Connecticut, a Board Certified Environmental Engineer, and
Session 1639 Automated Problem Generator for Asynchronous Learning Thomas Lacksonen, University of Wisconsin-StoutAbstractAn Engineering Economy course was taught in an asynchronous learning environment. Sincethe course is primarily mathematical story problem-based material, a technique was required toreplace the traditional ‘instructor solves problems at the chalkboard’ portion of a lecture-basedcourse.The Dynamic Engineering Economy Problem (DEEP) generators were designed on aspreadsheet. Each of the 29 generators could create quasi-random problem sets and solutionsfor one class of engineering economy problems
the necessary pre-requisites for engineering, which waslinked to a higher percentage of FGS students choosing to major in business, vocational fields,social sciences, and health sciences rather than engineering18. The literature shows FGS haveunique experiences in college and are more likely to be unprepared for the engineering rigorneeded. Despite these claims, many FGS in engineering often succeed to graduation, yet littlework has examined the experiences and attitudes that aided in their success. The researchquestions that are directing this study are the following:RQ 1: How do first generation college students’ experiences within engineering influenceengineering belongingness?RQ 2: How is engineering belongingness and engineering identity
/tuna-guide- 2015/. [Accessed: April 4, 2018].[4] Rainforest Alliance, “Certified sustainable coffee grows rapidly as more companies commit to sourcing”. [Press Release], April 11, 2013. [Online]. https://www.rainforest-alliance.org/press- releases/sustainable-coffee-grows [Accessed: April 4, 2018].[5] United Nations, Our Common Future. World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987. [Online]. http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf. [Accessed: April 4, 2018].[6] United Nations, “Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development,” A/RES/70/1. General Assembly, September 25, 2015, [Online]. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E. [Accessed: April 4, 2018].[7