rated how wellthey and each of their teammates fulfilled their team responsibilities, taking the ratings from aprescribed list of nine terms ranging from “excellent” to “no show.” The instructor assignednumerical values to each rating and computed a weighting factor for each student as thestudent’s individual average rating divided by the team average. The student’s final homeworkgrade was the product of the weighting factor and the team project grade. Correlations werecomputed between peer ratings and test grades, peer ratings and self-ratings, ratings given toteammates of the same sex and of the opposite sex, and ratings given to teammates of the sameethnic background and of different ethnic backgrounds.Peer ratings correlated significantly
iterative approaches related to experience and performance. An analysis of thesebehaviors in terms of problem scoping, solution revision, and comprehension monitoringactivities will be presented and discussed.I. IntroductionTo compete in an increasingly global economy, the education of tomorrow’s engineersemphasizes the solving of open-ended engineering design problems. This theme is evident inthe growing level of collaboration among accrediting agencies, industry, and federal fundingagencies to support research on the assessment of student learning, and to encourage excellencein curriculum and pedagogy that provide an exposure to engineering practice1-3. Also, theimplementation of the new ABET EC 2000 criteria4 makes it necessary for
making process regarding multi-stage project funding. Some real optionsproponents29,30 have suggested that sequential compound options is a preferred method overdecision tree analysis for determining the value of multi-stage projects.The majority of work and the latest criticism regarding real options have been focused on thesimple deferral (single stage) option. As with single stage analysis, an option value for amultiple stage project can be computed. However, there is significantly more complexity inevaluating a multi-stage project when compared to a single-stage project. Because of thiscomplexity, closed form (and thus straightforward) solutions are generally not possible. Also,due to the complexity, many questions about multi-stage analysis
CEOsprogram at less than 100 students in order to facilitate a strong sense of community andinteraction. Secondly, the needs and interests of underclassmen differ from those ofupperclassmen. Thirdly, while the Hinman CEOs program fosters business plan developmentand new venture creation, this new underclassmen program will focus on entrepreneurialopportunity discovery, creativity and innovation, and related foundational skills. It is importantto develop curriculum that is attuned to the psychological and sociological needs of theseyounger students. Lastly, Hinman CEOs occupancy of 88 beds already stretches the limits ofavailable campus housing for upperclassmen. For these reasons, a new entrepreneurship andinnovation program specifically created for
somewhat rigid engineeringprogram. If one does not get started in that program early on in college, one rapidly findsthat switching into the program will add one or more semesters to one’s collegeexperience. This can be a significant barrier to what Ohlund et al.6 call in-migration. Ineffect, we are looking for students who make the curricular design easy. Page 15.421.5This makes the data summarized by Ohlund et al. crucial. They present data on studentsmajoring in business, engineering, computer science and the liberal arts. The data for 8thsemester students shows that while only 10% of the 8th semester engineering students hadstarted in a different
Annual Engineering Student School Semesters Enrollment Emphasis Group Size Sponsor SupportUniversity of Wisconsin Platteville 1 70 Mechanical 4-5 Mentoring, Funding EncouragedRowan University 2 15 Civil 4-5 Project Idea and MentoringUniversity of Oklahoma 1 95 Elec. / Computer 4 Project Idea, Mentoring, and FundingUniversity of Kentucky 1 NR Civil 4-6 Project Idea and MentoringJackson State University 1 50 Industrial 1 Mentoring, Dept. FeedbackLake Superior State University
accomplished by students majoring in different fields. One of themajor goals of this project was training and education of engineering and technology students inrenewable energy applications. Students from different major and minors (Design andDevelopment, Electronics, Construction Management, Computer Science, IndustrialTechnology) participated in different phases of this research project and successfully completedtheir parts.Conversion of Engine to Electric MotorAn 18 ft-length Pursuit 2000 S2 boat with a V6 Envirude gasoline engine was donated to theIndustrial Technology program in spring 2010. The V6 engine was broken and badly rusted due Page
concepts. The primary focus is on cross-disciplinary learning as relevant todesigning flight vehicle systems. Some development of analytical, computational andexperimental learning tools for discovery and skill-building is part of the effort. The theme is toenable development of advanced concepts. Objectives are:• Develop pedagogical resources that guide learning across disciplines for new concepts.• Acquire systematic, transferable experience on how engineers perform in such learning.Universities must look 10 to 40 years ahead and show what is possible to achieve. Recognizingthat graduates must start contributing immediately in the workforce, learners must also beenabled to build immediately-usable skills and confidence. Our project is set in the
. The National Academy of Engineering (NAE) citesfactors such as increased access to high performance computing, Internet connectivity and othertechnology by previously under-developed countries as some of the reasons for the increasednumber of firms globally that are now competing for engineering projects (1). In some cases,major projects require the contributions of virtual global teams made up of members located indifferent parts of the world. These teams often function across multiple time zones, multiplecultures, and sometimes multiple languages. They also can take place synchronously (live) orasynchronously (viewed at a later time). The challenge of working effectively with multiculturalteams will continue to grow in importance. NAE
graduate school’s professional development curriculum requiredsome investigation. Unlike having a program with courses within a department or college, TheGraduate School at UMBC wanted to develop seminars that would be in line with strategic Page 20.31.2directions of various STEM professional organizations. We know that globalization is not asingular concept, it involves economic integration, transmission of knowledge, cultural stability,the transference of policies across borders, among others. We decided that our programs shouldfocus on transmission and transfer of knowledge, and “transnational and transculturalintegration” of human activities
Technological University (MTU), thefirst year retention rate was 76% for the 1999-2000 academic year for women, minorities andoverall. However, women and minorities comprised only 23% and 6%, of the student body,respectively. The retention rates for women and minority engineering students from sophomorethrough senior year at MTU are lower than those for non-minority males, mirroring nationaltrends.3 Since women and minorities make up only a fraction of the students in the College ofEngineering, it is likely that they must deal with a myriad of social and personal issues such asisolation, campus climate, lack of role models, hesitation in seeking academic assistance, andinadequate financial resources in addition to the demands of a rigorous curriculum
students on the importance of diverseproblem solving styles and viewpoints when generating creative and successfulmechanical systems designs. Of interest in this study was measuring the success of theteams at completing the task assigned as well as the student’s assessment of teamperformance and relative satisfaction of working on their teams. Page 10.1420.2 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering Education”Course and Curriculum During their junior year, students of mechanical engineering at Cal Poly arerequired
little more would be beneficial to the group. Student B writing about Student C: Student C is a very smart person that brings many valuable topics up in team meetings. Student C is very good at computer jobs and displays very good organization skills. Student C relates well with others and is able to work well with the team to get the job done.The best summary excerpt comes from Student A and captures benefits of the evaluation processused in the environmental engineering capstone class. Student A: I have been working really hard on improving my weaknesses defined by my group. Page 10.724.10In
Understanding Student and Faculty Attitudes With Respect to Service Learning: Lessons from the Humanitarian Engineering Program E. Heidi Bauer, Barbara Moskal, Joan Gosink, Juan Lucena, David Muñoz Colorado School of Mines, Golden, ColoradoAbstractNow entering its second year, the Humanitarian Engineering Program, which is sponsored by theHewlett Foundation, at the Colorado School of Mines is creating curriculum that will supportengineering students in developing an understanding of their responsibility for solvinghumanitarian problems that exist throughout the world. As part of this effort, baseline data hasbeen collected on both the faculty and student
obtained using thelibrary’s resources. Page 10.361.2Today’s student population is largely composed of Generation Y, known for a high degree oftechnology and computer literacy, but often lacking in library and information literacy skills6. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationThis same generation of students often exhibits a preference for searching the Web over usinglibrary resources, not realizing that many of the library’s resources are available over the Webvia the library’s homepage. Also
). A comprehensive research institute, the NationalResearch Centre for Biotechnology (GBF) in Braunschweig, is ideally suited to partner. TheGBF is an organization of 600 employees (200 scientists) with extensive involvement in both thescience and the technology of biotechnology. 1 The GBF’s annual budget is roughly $82M DM($40M dollars, $44M Euro), with approximately 68 percent derived from national, 7 percentfrom state governments and 25 percent from industry and other sources. The GBF hosts andpartially supports TU Braunschweig’s Department of Biochemistry. GBF’s infrastructureincludes central library and computing facilities, a small-business biotechnology incubator withmore than 40,000 ft 2 floor space, and a new conference center (August
on his/her schedule and with limitedresources to handle the intrusion. In other words, a situation that is the prefect model ofwhat the student will experience after graduation when there are no visible red flags thatwarn of impending danger.INTRODUCTIONTeaching the “art’ of mechanical design is considered by some to be a very difficult,almost ephemeral exercise. As difficult as it may be, it does not compare by an order ofmagnitude to trying to teach engineering ethics to the overworked and (typically) theunder 21, engineering student. In fact, the instruction on engineering ethics can be andoften is encapsulated into its own course within the engineering curriculum. In that eventthe student is already “standing guard”, waiting for the
evaluate them for tenure and promotion.This is a very weak position for any department.Substantial departmental resources are expended in developing a tenure-track faculty member.Besides the regular salary and benefits, typical start-up costs include equipment support,graduate assistants, release time to prepare for new courses and pursue funded research, etc.Based on my experience at a comprehensive public university, I would estimate the start -up costto be around $100,000: conference attendances ($18,000 for 12 conferences in six years), releasetime ($60,000 in 20 % release time for the first three years), and computer and/or other researchequipment ($10,000). At top-tier universities, the start-up cost can be as much as $250,0004.Needless to
relationshipswhere the client is the end user. The assumption is more questionable when the designteam is developing a product for a mass market, e.g., a car or personal computer. In thesecases, the client is a combination of product managers and marketing who convey the enduser’s needs to the design team. Page 7.1330.4 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationIn the case of client-sponsored capstone design projects, the student design team isunlikely to contact the actual end-users. For capstone projects use of the
Computer 21.4 None 5.3 Highways & Transportation 23.7 Junior - Senior Surveying 18.4 Steel & Concrete 18.4 Hydrology & Hydraulics 13.2 Soils 10.5 CE Materials 5.3In the summer following their freshman year, about one-third of students felt that their basicscience courses (chemistry, physics, calculus) helped them perform their job duties
for DevelopingCommunities is open to students of all majors, majors represented by interviewees includebioengineering, biosystems engineering, civil engineering, computer engineering, computerscience, environmental engineering, environmental natural resource management, andmechanical engineering. Previous participation in CEDC varied from two to nine semesters. Twoparticipants are Hispanic, seven are White, and one is both Hispanic and White. Six participantsare women, four are men. All demographic characteristics were shared at the beginning of theinterview and were free response. Participants are presented in Figure 3 with their self-selectedpseudonyms and self-designed icons. Icons developed based on guidelines described by Boyd etal
Brianna is the Teaching and Learning librarian at the Colorado School of Mines. She collaborates with faculty to design and implement information literacy throughout the curriculum. Prior to her work at the School of Mines, she was the Engineering and Computer Science Librarian at the US Naval Academy and a contract Reference Librarian assigned to the National Defense University. She earned her MLIS at the University of Denver in 2011.Ms. Jamie Marie Regan, Colorado School of Mines Jamie Regan is an undergraduate student in Electrical Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines. Her academic journey is intertwined with a personal and passionate dedication to advancing accessibility within STEM fields. Inspired by her
mixed methods but it does support recommendationsThe ProblemThe 2021 National Science Foundation (NSF) Women, Minorities and Persons withDisabilities in Science & Engineering report (data from 2019) [1] shows that whileunderrepresented minorities (URMs) comprise more than a third of the U.S. population,only 11% of the total doctorate degrees in Science & Engineering were awarded to AfricanAmerican, Latinx, and Native American students. At the Research 1 institution only 5.4%of the doctoral degrees in Engineering, Agriculture & Natural Resources, and Computer,Mathematics, and Natural Sciences (CMNS) were awarded to minorities. In order to makea significant change in the number of URMs earning graduate degrees in STEM, topuniversities
VirginiaAbstractNontechnical engineering skills are integral to the successful practice of the engineeringprofession. However, the dominant image of engineering rarely evokes ideas of typing pages ofprose. A field that has been adopted into the engineering curriculum to help engage engineeringstudents in higher education is Science, Technology, and Society (STS). As an interdisciplinaryfield, STS offers an active-learning environment to refine nontechnical engineering skills likeproblem-solving and communication. One recent question amongst STS scholars for engineersis: what role will generative AI play in the learning process for written communication? Perhapsone question that has not received as much attention is how this kind of AI could be beneficial inuniversity
strong foundation in thermal-fluid disciplines.Table 1: Sample laboratory sequence for the Internal Combustion Engine course offered atWMU as part of the Mechanical Engineering curriculum. CFR: collaborative fuel research. Lab Title Topics Hardware Technical writing, report structure, Laboratory Safety and Report 0 data processing and visualization Preparation Instructions techniques Analysis of Brake Performance Torque-work-power relationships Chassis 1 Parameters Friction and
0.876on-line resourcesQ12: I prefer to use computers to research topics 4.192 ± 0.801 4.077 ± 0.744 -0.115 0.523 Table 2. ABET Survey Questions for the Use of Cases to increase student learning MeanN = 27 PRE POST Difference p value Mean Mean (Post - Pre)ABET Q4: Ability to write a technical lab report 3.741 ± 0.9027 4.407 ± 0.6939 0.666 0.001(ABET Criteria B)ABET Q5
representative and diverse segment of the overall American population1.In this work we define retention the customary way, that is, by the number of first-time, full-timestudents that graduate from the institution within 6 years. Much past research on retention hasfocused on students who leave engineering (so-called “non-persisters”) and what caused theirdeparture. For example, Marra et al.2 shows students of both genders tend to drop out ofengineering primarily for two reasons: 1) the curriculum is too challenging and the quality ofteaching too poor, and 2) students don’t believe they belong. Page 24.997.2Ohland et al.3 present an extensive analysis of
curriculum and the way it is taught canalso impact students self-efficacy; well-structured collaborative experiences and hands-onactivities have been shown to have positive implications for self-efficacy across majority andminority students enrolled in an engineering major [12, 13].Despite the awareness of the importance of self-efficacy, this concept has been studied in alimited sense among community college students [14]. The literature does not address what typesof experiences can improve or enhance self-efficacy among college students as it relates toresearch, and among community college students specifically. This study addresses the gap inthe literature by examining what experiences in the Transfer-to-Excellence Summer ResearchProgram can
presented in this paper are those of theauthors and do not necessarily represent those of the NSF.References[1] Lovell, M. D., Brophy, S. P., and Li, S. (2013). “Challenge-Based Instruction for a Civil Engineering DynamicsCourse,” Proceedings, 2013 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, June 23-26, 2013.[2] CTGV, Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1997). The Jasper project: Lessons in curriculum, Page 24.1273.10instruction, assessment, and professional development, Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum[3] R. J. Roselli and S. P. Brophy, “Effectiveness of challenge-based instruction in biomechanics,” J. Eng. Educ.,vol. 93, no. 4, pp
; 23-‐26 Oct., 2013; Oklahoma City, OK, USA. 11. Pappas E. A New Systems Approach to Sustainability: University Responsiblity for Teaching Sustainability in Contexts. Journal of Sustainability Education. 2012;3(March). 12. ABET Inc. ABET: Accrediting College Programs in Applied Science, Computing, Engineering and Technology. 2010; http://www.abet.org/. Accessed 2011, Jan. 5. 13. Engineers NSoP. Code of Ethics for Engineers. Alexandria, VA: National Society of Professional Page