Page 8.269.1programs. Further, almost none of the students had taken courses in business beyondProceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright© 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationintroductory economics. While our graduate program has always been research oriented, nearlyall of the M.S. students who do not continue tothe Ph.D. degree go to work in industry orgovernment. A recent survey of fifty M.S.graduates from our program from 1994 to2002 showed that 50% went to work in PhD programsindustry for their first job after graduation, and 26
Paper ID #19993Integration and Evaluation of Peer Grading in a Graduate-level EngineeringDesign CourseElissa Morris, Texas A&M University Elissa Morris is a PhD student at Texas A&M University under the advising of Dr. Daniel A. McAdams. Her research interests include bioinspired design, origami-inspired design, and engineering education.Dr. Daniel A. McAdams, Texas A&M University Dr. McAdams is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering in the Department of Mechanical En- gineering and Graduate Program Director at Texas A&M University. He joined the department in January of 2008 after serving as an
Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections
questions like “Name all the uses for abrick.” Although focusing on the area of divergence is helpful, it is only one part of the 2-partdefinition of innovation, and therefore any claims that the TTCT or other creativity tests are validmeasures of innovation are inaccurate.Cropley’s (2000)2 more recent study examined a smaller number of creativity tests than thepreviously mentioned researchers. These tests were limited to paper-and-pencil tests - since those“are the most widely used in education and research” (p. 2). He also limited the number of testsdiscussed to those developed during the modern creativity era introduced by Guilford (1950)4.Cropley’s study organized creativity tests into four categories. These categories focused onproducts
, published in 2016 with SAGE. She has published numerous articles in journals including Journal of Curriculum Studies, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, and Educational Philosophy and Theory.Dr. Chongzheng Na, Texas Tech University Chongzheng Na is an associate professor at Texas Tech University. He graduated from Tsinghua Uni- versity (B.E.), Pennsylvania State University (M.S.), and University of Michigan (Ph.D.). Before joining Texas Tech, he was a postdoctoral fellow at Harvard University and an assistant professor at University of Notre Dame. His research and teaching interests include developing innovative water treatment technolo- gies and incorporating knowledge related to such efforts in
career matters, and monitor student’s progress to foster their success in Page 14.1080.2achieving program outcomes, thereby enabling them as graduates to attain program objectives1.Even though the ABET criteria is continuously evolving and depends on the type of program, theABET requirement for programs to document and improve the process by which students areadvised has remained unchanged in the last revision cycles. Furthermore, different aspects ofacademic advisement and their relation with student retention and academic success have beenreported in the literature2-5. These studies show evidence that student academic advisement is animportant
job applicants andcurrent employees in industry do not have the adequate specialized technical skills and adequateinterpersonal skills. There needs to be a strong collaboration and industrial engagement in orderto develop innovative solutions to educate and train engineers at all levels with sufficient skills tobe employable in industry. Although we see many challenges, we also have many opportunitiesto prepare engineering students for today’s workforce. Instructional strategies and methods canbe applied in the classroom to enhance critical skills needed by industry. Soft skills and hardskills should be integrated to create a well-rounded engineering graduate. Further research isneeded to study mechanisms to increase academic and industry
Paper ID #16872Staying In or Getting Out: The Relationship Between Undergraduate WorkExposure and Job Satisfaction After GraduationDr. Alexandra Vinson, Northwestern University Alexandra H. Vinson is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the School of Education and Social Policy at Northwest- ern University. She received her Ph.D. in Sociology & Science Studies from the University of California, San Diego. Her research interests include professional education and enculturation in medicine and STEM fields.Prof. Reed Stevens, Northwestern University Reed Stevens is a Professor of Learning Sciences at Northwestern University. He
completion programs forall engineering degrees in the CoE assume students will begin their math course of study inCalculus I; however, many of our students are required to take remedial math courses before theycan begin the calculus sequence. Although there are variations to math placement each year, onaverage, approximately 40% of CoE students begin in Calculus 1 while 20% begin ahead (inCalculus 2 or higher), and 40% of CoE students begin one or two math class behind (inPrecalculus or College Algebra).The goal of this research was to look at the graduation rates of engineering students based ontheir initial math course taken at the university. The data analyzed spanned from 2007 to 2015.We found that starting math class is a significant factor in
appointments in the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs and the Office of Academic Affairs. In 1998-99 he was as an American Council on Education fellow. His research interests are in environmental biology. Page 12.1399.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 The Clarkson Common Experience Curriculum: Graduation Requirements Based on Student Learning OutcomesAbstractTraditional graduation requirements have been composed of required and elective courses in astudent's major together with courses selected to meet a "general education" requirement. Withthe growing emphasis on student learning
received his BS, MS, and PhD from Virginia Tech in 2006, 2010, and 2014, respectively. His research interests include the study of fatigue and fracture mechanics for structural steel applications, the behavior of steel and concrete structural systems, and infrastructure field testing and monitoring.Dr. Molly A. McVey, University of Kansas Dr. Molly A. McVey is a post-doctoral teaching fellow at the University of Kansas School of Engineering where she works with faculty to incorporate evidence-based and student-centered teaching methods, and to research the impacts of changes made to teaching on student learning and success. Dr. McVey earned her Ph.D in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Kansas in 2012
Bernard Van Wie has been teaching for 30 years, first as a graduate student at the University of Oklahoma, and then as a professor at Washington State University. Over the past 15 years, he has devoted himself to developing novel teaching approaches that include components of cooperative/collaborative, hands-on, active, and problem/project-based learning (CHAPL) environments.Dr. Gary Robert Brown, Portland State UniversityDr. Olusola O. Adesope, Washington State University, Pullman Olusola O. Adesope is an Assistant Professor of educational psychology at Washington State University, Pullman. His research is at the intersection of educational psychology, learning sciences, and instructional design and technology. His recent
”development of widely used approaches for the management of contaminated sediments”. His research is focused on the fate, transport, and management of contaminants in the environment and the sustainable management of water resources. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work in Progress: Assessment of Reflective Thinking in Graduate Engineering Students: Human and Machine MethodsAbstractEngineering education is increasingly looking to the liberal arts to broaden and diversifypreparation of students for professional careers. The present study involves an elective graduateenvironmental engineering course that incorporated the arts and humanities
, and b) purposefully seek to examine the research base underlying theapplication of the term “effective” to many of these practices. The later task is importantbecause it seems to us that many of the most commonly cited reports and studies of neededinnovations in engineering education have focused on making the case for "reform," not onpresenting evidence of effective practices.II. Uncovering Fundamental Student Learning OutcomesA. Determination of Fundamental Learning OutcomesWe identified 44 engineering student learning outcomes from a review of 47 published sources.Twelve of these outcomes were congruent with the ABET EAC criteria 3a-3k and 4 6. Beforeconsidering the remaining 32 outcomes, we set as a filter that any student learning
capable of engaging in interdisciplinary research and industry applications. Theproposed MS degree in Mechatronics and Associated Graduate Certificate at Michigan Techhave a flexible structure. The MS degree consists of five distinct pathways allowing studentsfrom technology, traditional engineering, community colleges, other institutions, and industryrepresentatives to pursue an advanced degree in this emerging field. Students enrolled in theprogram have three graduation options: coursework, research with thesis, and internship withindustry and report options. Existing graduate certificates (~15 credits) are designed aroundadvanced controls, digital electronics and mechatronics systems with little or no emphasis onautomation or industrial
experiences are experiential learning: cooperativeeducation and internships, and engagement with faculty through research and mentoring. GVSUhas a strong history of experiential learning with 45-48% of juniors and seniors typically enrolledin credit bearing experiential learning in any given year. Since introducing the blueprint forsuccess that clearly identifies experiential learning as a significant educational landmark,participation jumped to 52-56% with impressive corresponding jumps in graduation rates.In addition to their involvement in experiential learning programs, for the last four years theauthors have also been the team leaders in an NSF funded S-STEM project. This programprovides mentoring and scholarship support for students with high
Paper ID #33770A Graduate-level Engineering Ethics Course: An Initial Attempt toProvoke Moral ImaginationMr. Yousef Jalali, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Yousef Jalali is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He re- ceived a B.S. and M.S. in Chemical Engineering and M.Eng. in Energy Systems Engineering. His research interests include interaction between critical thinking, imagination, and ethical reasoning, interpersonal and interinstitutional collaboration, diversity, equity, and inclusion, systems thinking, and chemical en- gineering learning systems. Yousef
AC 2009-265: MASTER OF ENGINEERING PROGRAM AS A MECHANISM TOPROVIDE RELEVANT GRADUATE EDUCATION TO WORKINGPROFESSIONALSEugene Rutz, University of Cincinnati Eugene Rutz is an Academic Director in the College of Engineering at the University of Cincinnati. He manages the College's accelerated bachelor's / master's programs, coordinates distance learning activities, manages the Master of Engineering Program, and works with local high schools on collaborative pre-engineering programs. Eugene is a licensed professional engineer and also teaches as an adjunct instructor.Timothy Keener, University of Cincinnati Tim Keener is a Professor of Environmental Engineering and the Associate Dean for Research
engineering graduate students at The University of Texas XXXX. Tomeasure the student's understanding and ability to translate the concept learning to real-worldapplications, student teams were tasked to use CanSat 2021-22 competition as a case study.2.0 Course Structure and Learning ObjectivesThis course intends to increase awareness of Systems Engineering (SE), its concepts, and systemsengineering as a profession among the graduate students of manufacturing and industrialengineering, with no prior exposure or knowledge of what systems engineering is, at TheUniversity of Texas Rio Grande Valley. All the course-enrolled students needed to satisfy theprerequisites of Engineering Economics and Engineering Statistics with calculus with a grade ofat least
management problems. Faculty members and graduate students have been able to assistcompanies by providing expertise and time to deal with problems and needs more effectively. Asexamples, faculty and graduate students have assisted several companies with QFD studies andwith organizational restructuring. These opportunities allow faculty members to advance theirunderstanding and competency in management theory and practices. The final element is the Page 4.11.2information provided by the Advisory Committee to the Program. As shown in Figure 1, thisadvice takes three forms. Perhaps most important is the input to the curriculum to ensure thattopics
Paper ID #45889Minding the Gap: Methods for Understanding Teacher Capacity when DevelopingHigh School Computer Science Graduation RequirementsRebecca Zarch, SageFox Consulting Group Rebecca Zarch is an evaluator and a director of SageFox Consulting Group. She has spent 20 years evaluating and researching STEM education projects from K-12 through graduate programs.Dr. Jacqueline McCune, University of Texas at Austin Dr. Jaci McCune brings over 15 years of experience in education, serving as an educator, professional learning facilitator, researcher, and Nevada state computer science supervisor. Joining TACC at the University
requirements of all projects across a wider scope of technologies and responsibilities. Theprogram quickly expanded to include the following degree concentrations; 1. Applied Math, 2. Computational Electromagnetics, 3. Operations Research, 4. Manufacturing Engineering, 5. Engineering Technology, 6. Physics, 7. Chemistry, 8. Textile engineering.Another key elemental change to the new graduate professional development program structure, thathas been one of the most successful advancements in the program, is the inclusion of non-traditionalparticipants. Non -traditional in that most rotational programs hire only new graduates fresh out ofschool; after the standard four or five years of study with limited work experience
AC 2012-4210: THE FOUR PILLARS OF MANUFACTURING ENGINEER-ING: WHAT ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY GRADUATES SHOULDKNOW ABOUT MANUFACTURINGProf. Robert L. Mott, University of Dayton Robert L. Mott is Professor Emeritus of engineering technology at the University of Dayton, member of the Steering Committee of the SME Manufacturing Education & Research Community, Senior Staff of the NSF-sponsored National Center for Manufacturing Education, author of four textbooks in the mechanical engineering technology field, and a Fellow of ASEE.Prof. Ronald J. Bennett Ph.D., Univeristy of Saint Thomas Ronald J. Bennett holds the Honeywell Chair in Global Technology Management in the School of Engi- neering at the University of St
administered the MBTI to all freshman engineering students since 1990. Page 13.314.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Comparison of Traditional and Integrated First Year Curricula – Graduation Success and MBTI DistributionSummaryAs engineering educators have struggled with how to increase retention, interestnontraditional students into the profession, and incorporate an expanding knowledge baseinto the curriculum, the systematic study of how students learn technical material hasbecome increasingly important. It has become accepted that students have differentlearning styles and that alternate teaching styles
A Distance Education partnership between Villanova and IT Sligo in Graduate Biochemical Engineering William J. Kelly Department of Chemical Engineering Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19473Recently, Ireland has become a hotbed of research and manufacturing in the PharmaceuticalIndustry. A unique partnership was created betweenVillanova and IT Sligo (Ireland), wherebyIrish graduate students pursuing an MS in Biopharmaceutical science and Villanova graduatestudents pursuing an advance engineering degree can take two Villanova classes together viaDistance Education (DE) technology. These two classes focus on upstream and
Paper ID #25861Board 69: Project-based Teaching Approach of a Combined Undergraduateand Graduate Course in Power ElectronicsDr. Radian G Belu, Southern University and A&M College Dr. Radian Belu is Associate Professor within Electrical Engineering Department, Southern University, Baton, Rouge, USA. He is holding one PHD in power engineering and other one in physics. Before joining to Southern University Dr. Belu hold faculty, research and industry positions at universities and research institutes in Romania, Canada and United States. He also worked for several years in industry as project manager, senior engineer and
guidance that allows flexibility and adaptationof methods. One of the strengths of qualitative research is that methodologies and methodscan be revised and adapted to fit a particular study, and even modified during a study wheninitial analysis shows that the methods chosen are not congruent with the collected dataand research questions (for an example see Sochacka, Walther, Wilson, and Brewer, 2014).Historically, interpretivist approaches were developed in contrast to positivist quantitativeanalyses. The intent was to understand the contextual factors that underlie phenomena andto understand how people make meaning from their experiences. While initially the“paradigm wars” placed interpretive qualitative analysis and positivist
Paper ID #46571Identifying the potential gap between graduates’ preparation and the ProfessionalCivil Engineering Consultant’s needsDr. Juan M Cruz, Rowan University Juan M. Cruz is an assistant professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. He has a B.S. in Electronic Engineering and a Masters in Education from Universidad Javeriana in Colombia and a PhD in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. His research uses a systems perspective to understand the dynamics of the academic system and how it influences faculty motivation to change, undergraduate students’ motivation to learn
to judging their overall successes, as well as validating program continuations. Asindividual initiatives mature and researchers reflect upon their university/school district modelsand accomplishments, analyses of long-term program effects are expected to surface in theliterature.The TEAMS (Tomorrow’s Engineers… creAte. iMagine. Succeed.) Program2 is one such K-12engineering initiative that has been underway for nine years — long enough to permit analysis ofsignificant patterns of impact on graduate student participants. Evaluation of the TEAMSProgram includes the effects of the K-12 engineering program on graduate student development(their evolving attitudes and skills), as well as the long-term residual impact on students’ post-graduation
Session 2647 How Are The Engineering Technology Graduates Doing? A Rochester Institute of Technology 25 Year Survey John Stratton Rochester Institute of TechnologyAbstract: A study of the long term progress of the baccalaureate engineering technology (ET) graduates from the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) was undertaken during 1997. Approximately 550 of RIT’s 3,000 graduates and 250 of their direct supervisors replied to the survey. The results and analysis show that RIT’s ET alumni are performing effectively in a