Paper ID #33512Assessing the Pedagogical Needs to Couple Front-end Planning Tools withSustainable Infrastructure ProjectsDr. Mohamed Elzomor, Florida International University Dr. Mohamed ElZomor is an Assistant Professor at Florida International University (FIU), College of Engineering and Computing and teaches at the Moss School of Construction, Infrastructure and Sustain- ability. Dr. ElZomor completed his doctorate at Arizona State University (ASU), Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering. Prior to attending ASU, Dr. ElZomor received a master’s of science degree in Architecture from University of Arizona, a master’s degree
more intense curriculum, than enriching educational and socialexperiences [29]. These studies are indicative that engineering students would be expected toreport a lower mental health status as compared to their non-engineering peers. Since that wasnot the case, we need to uncover other factors playing a role in these differences, as well as re-evaluating the measurement approaches used here. By using the mean scores of the presentedscales we might be missing details about the distribution of the prevalence of serious issues, suchas those that have depression or anxiety scores above a threshold justifiable of professionalattention. Such modifications will be tackled next in the study of this database.Another potential explanation of the lack
engineering departments and institutions. Her work with FACE lab centered the influence of informal engineering learning experiences on diverse students’ attitudes, beliefs, perceptions of engineering In addition, this work investigates the relationship between students’ interests and the engagement with engineering to inform curriculum development and teaching strategies for K-12 STEM educators.Mrs. Kayla R. Maxey, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Kayla is a doctoral student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research interest includes the influence of informal engineering learning experiences on diverse students’ attitudes, beliefs, and perceptions of engineering, and the
taking courses in ademanding curriculum [23].Through interviews with women in STEM, Rhoton also finds that female scientists often denysexism and attempt to distance themselves from “feminine” behaviors. She describes how herrespondents distance themselves from women who show emotions or get “overly” sensitiveabout criticism or sexist practices. Rhoton finds that female scientists do this to gain acceptancein professions that prize objectivity and rationality [21]. As she explains, professionalsocialization into scientific cultures encourages and rewards certain gender practices. In anotherrecent study, Seron and colleagues analyzed how many female engineering students are notwilling to adopt a feminist perspective on policies designed to
you choose to do?My interest in interdisciplinarity stems from my experiences as an undergraduate engineeringstudent. My senior capstone project involved working on an interdisc iplinary design projectfocused on designing and developing a vertical takeoff and lift system (VTOL). The problem wasdefined in the context of a 2040 urban rescue. There were four different disciplines involved—industrial and systems engineering, mechanical engineering, electrical and computer engineering,and aerospace engineering. Tensions arose throughout the project among the mechanical andaerospace engineers, including instances where I was left unsure of how I fit besides sharing myknowledge about anthropometric dimensions when designing with ergonomics in mind
appointment in Integrative Systems and Design at the University of Michigan. She studies curriculum, teaching, and learning in postsecondary settings, most often in engineering and interdisciplinary undergraduate programs. She is particularly interested in how faculty attitudes, beliefs, and cultures influence their curricular and instructional practices and how these in turn affect students’ learning. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 The Value of Co-Curricular Experiences: Perspectives of Third Year Biomedical Engineering StudentsAbstract. Many studies have examined student engagement in university settings as a
power, electronics thermal management, and manufacturing. He has authored more than 140 technical publications. His honors include SAE’s Teetor Award, Rosten Award for Thermal Analysis of Electronic Equipment, ASME Curriculum Inno- vation Award, and Fischer Engineering Teacher of the Year Award. He is an ASME Fellow and on the Board of Directors of ASEE’s Engineering Research Council.Dr. Joseph J. Helble, Dartmouth College Joseph J. Helble is Professor of Engineering, and Dean of the Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth College, a position he has held since 2005. Prior to Dartmouth, Dr. Helble was the AAAS Revelle Fellow, spending a year on staff in the U.S. Senate with a focus on science policy. Previously, he
engineering design and led multi-institution teams in the development and testing of curriculum materials and assessments for engineering design learning. He is also the owner of Verity Design Learning LLC, a publisher of instructional materials for design reviews and teamwork development. He is a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education. Dr. Davis received his PhD in Agricultural Engineering at Cornell University.Ms. Sarah Winfree, The Ohio State University Sarah Winfree is an undergraduate research assistant in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She joined the University in August 2013 working towards a Bachelor of Science degree in Food Engineering. Her career includes
it’s something that requires a lot more, it’s just because maybe it requires a lot more time, it just, it’s a, it, you know, it becomes a bigger part of you than a major might for a non-engineering person. (Walt, University of Coleman, sophomore year) Eleanor: I think that engineering students are stressed. And they are, they have a lot of work to do they, I-, s-, [inaudible] myself and my roommate, like I’m a engineering student this last semester, this semester, and she’s a, a communications major, and she, I never see her do any work. And she’ll always ask me, “Why you have so much work to do?” She always see me, uh, do homework, sitting at the computer, and I always see her on the phone
curriculum is more effective than one intensive course, 2) amixture of required and elective service-learning is more effective than either one or the other,and 3) service-learning could result in less coursework time than traditional programs satisfyingABET 2000 criteria. In fact, most engineering work involves initial contact with clients (herecommunity partners) to ascertain needs and then design and analysis and manufacturing of adevice (or system or study) and then delivery of the device (or system or study) to the client. Inother academic areas, placements in the community agencies are common; however, inengineering placements as such are not typical and generally not appropriate. The program atUML is called SLICE (Service-Learning Integrated
) grant to form the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE), along with faculty at the University of Washington, Colorado School of Mines, and Howard University. She was co-principal investigator with Professor Larry Leifer on a multi-university NSF grant that was critically looking at engineering undergraduate curriculum (Synthesis), and from 1997-1999 served as co-director of Stanford's Learning Lab. Sheri is a fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineering (ASME), the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), and the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE). She was awarded the 2004 ASEE Chester F. Carlson Award in recognition
wish to think. On the other hand, engineers’ responsibilities are decreased in certain waysif it is recognized that other actors play important roles and share responsibility for certaindecisions and outcomes.Answering this call to incorporate social ethics, macroethics, or STS topics in the engineeringethics curriculum requires reform and innovation of both content and pedagogy. Clearly, thecontent needs to change when the questions posed are themselves new and different. Thepedagogy also needs to change because the type of thinking required is new and different fortraditional engineers. It is clear that with the more contained microethics problems, it has beenpossible for textbook authors to make analogies to ways of thinking in engineering
require anapplication and approval process. Project teams are composed primarily of junior & seniorundergraduate students across a range of majors (engineering, computer science, architecture,sciences, business, psychology, social sciences and humanities). During the fall semester of2007, over 375 students participated in 37 multidisciplinary teams (each with a minimum ofthree majors represented). IIT is a private university, with roughly 2,300 undergraduate and4,500 graduate students, with 18% minority and a substantial [34%+] international student body.IPRO was initiated in 1995 with NSF funding.Lehigh University has the Integrated Product Development (IPD) program within the College ofEngineering and Applied Science. Lehigh is a private
. Janna received a B.S. degree, an M.S.M.E. and a Ph.D. from the University of Toledo.John Hochstein, University of Memphis John I. Hochstein joined the faculty of The University of Memphis in 1991 and currently holds the position of Chair of the Department of Mechanical Engineering. In addition to engineering education, his research interests include simulation of micro gravity processes and computational modeling of fluid flows with free surfaces. He is a co-author of a textbook, Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics, with P. Gerhart and R. Gross and is an Associate Fellow of AIAA. Dr. Hochstein received a B.E. degree from the Stevens Institute of Technology (1973), an M.S.M.E. degree from The
ingraduate education to raise awareness on the importance of knowing and implementing activelearning strategies.Huet e Silva, Pacheco & Tavares10 found that both the curriculum organization of a course andthe teaching strategies positively correlate to students' failure and dropout rate in a first-yearundergraduate programming course at the University of Aveiro, Portugal. Another study6presented a systematic approach to active learning in the classroom that consists of fourdimensions: context setting, class preparation, class delivery and continuous improvement. Thatstudy6 emphasized that all dimensions are connected in the sense that one has impact on theothers, either positive or negative depending on whether the actions taken strengthen or
Paper ID #18887Forget Diversity, Our Project is DueMr. Hector Enrique Rodriguez-Simmonds, Purdue University - Engineering Education Raised in South Florida, born in Mexico. Half Colombian and half Mexican; proud MexiColombian. H´ector earned his MS in Computer Engineering and is currently pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education, both from Purdue University. His research interests are in investigating the experiences of LGBTQ+ students in engineering, tapping into critical methodologies and methods for conducting and analyzing research, and exploring embodied cognition.Mr. Nelson S. Pearson, University of Nevada, Reno
gothrough a maze using the EV3 software and MATLAB. To close the first week, the studentslearned to create a 3D image on the computer using gaming software with the Geek Bus andpracticed their skills by designing their own video game. The second week of the camp involved meteorology, nutrition, music record, computerprogramming, and working with the EV3s. The students began the week by visiting ameteorology weather lab. Then, they studied the importance of healthy eating while makingwhole wheat dough for their chicken and vegetable pizzas. The students continued learning howto program and code using MATLAB and worked with their EV3s. They were put into teamsand had a sumo wrestling EV3 competition where the goal was to push the opponents EV3
the undergraduate engineering curriculum, including which programs tend todiscuss ethics, where it falls in the curriculum, and how much attention it receives [38]–[40].This inconsistency in quantity and quality of engineering ethics education across engineeringprograms is problematic given the importance of ethical conduct as professionals. It is alsopredictable, however, given the generality of the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) student learning outcome (outcome four) associated with ethics: studentsshould have “an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineeringsituations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineeringsolutions in global, economic
. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue. Prior to this she was Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue where she was responsible for developing curriculum and assessment tools and overseeing the research efforts within EPICS. Her academic and research interests include the profes- sional formation of engineers, diversity and inclusion in engineering, human-centered design, engineering ethics, leadership, service-learning, and accessibility and assistive-technology.Prof. Patrice Marie Buzzanell, University of South Florida Patrice M. Buzzanell is a Professor in the Brian Lamb School of Communication and the School of Engineering Education (courtesy) at Purdue University. Editor of three books and author of over
engineering decisions, but rather a morerealistic emphasis on the limits of rational reasoning and a more holistic picture of engineeringdecision-making as a synergistic combination of intuitive and rational reasoning. The secondtheme provides insight into the types of decisions or context where intuition is most apparent andnecessary. These include complex and real-world decisions where the decision maker wouldnever be able to get all the data needed to make the decision with strictly rational methods. Assuch, we recommend that engineering educators consider where in their curriculum students areprovided opportunities to engage in such decisions (e.g. cornerstone or capstone design) andpurposefully integrate intuitive reasoning into these spaces
aspart of the problem solving process. Parker [15] describes a liaising model of informationfluency instruction in which a librarian participates in teaching six class sessions, assessesstudent assignments, and assists with assignment and curriculum development. For a groupdesign project, Roberts and Bhatt [16] used a combination of online tutorials and a required one-on-one consultation with a librarian. In addition, students were provided with library hostedwebpages about engineering research. Instructors noted general improvement in the quality ofinformation sources. Students responded well to the presence of the library instruction with 75%of students responding that the online tutorial was helpful and 72% of students responding thatthe
, translational research is translatingresearch of ‘theoretical knowledge and experimental breakthroughs’ into practice. [11, 12]Translational research is essentially the bridge between basic research and applied research. Itdeveloped to address the transition from basic research to clinical research and as such is definedas ‘transforming research innovations into new health products’.12In 1998, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded curriculum development for over 50clinical research training programs to improve the quality of clinical research and establishdegree-granting programs. Since then, the NIH definitions of both basic and clinical researchhave been widely adopted, and the concept of translational research has emerged. The
(AAAS) Science and Technology Policy Fellowship in 2012-2013, with a placement at the National Science Foundation.Dr. Renata A Revelo , University of Illinois at Chicago Renata A. Revelo is a Clinical Assistant Professor in the department of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at the University of Illinois at Chicago.Ms. Shannon Kristine Stefl, Clemson University Shannon Stefl is a doctoral research assistant in the Engineering & Science Education department at Clemson University. She received her B.S. degree in physics from Kent State University and her M.S. degree in physics from Clemson University. sstefl@clemson.eduMiss Stacey D Garrett, Clemson University Stacey D. Garrett is a PhD student in the School of
endedness; sustainability; life-cycle costing; balancing challenge and fun; Objectives 80 balancing process and results faculty experience in industry; faculty experience in research; adequate Resources 71 facilities; institutional support; location in major metropolitan area student accountability; student engagement; connection to project; Investment 50 commitment Course multidisciplinary; systems engineering approach; flexible; two semester Framework 39 duration; prerequisite curriculum; supportive environment to fail safely iteration and design process; design reviews; emphasis on
degree, to which international experiences areintegrated into curriculum, the degree of engineering-specificity of international programs, aswell as commitment by the institution and/or administration to international experiences, noneof which were included in Engle and Engle’s defining program components. The program typesand varying components outlined above were used to inform the development of thebackground instrument given to this study participants.Assessment results from international experiences: In an effort to understand the impact ofinternational experiences on students, several previous studies have attempted to examinelearning outcomes involving cross-cultural competency, global-mindedness, and interculturalcompetency. In the field
Professor with Washington State University in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. His research interests are in plasma-assisted materials processing, including the deposition and evaluation of thin plasma-polymerized films deposited at atmospheric pressure using weakly ionized plasma. Dr. Pedrow is a member of the American Physical Society, IEEE, ASEE, Tau Beta Pi and he is a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Wisconsin. Page 24.1349.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Using the Engineering Professional Skills Assessment Rubric to
indicate the relative similarity of each of the terms. English spellings of words are usedwhen issues concerning the University of Glasgow are described while American spellings areused in the discussions about the UESTC educational system. American terms for terminologyused at the University of Glasgow are placed in parenthesis immediately after the UoG term. II. Programme Specification = Curriculum = Educational Plan (a) University of GlasgowThe Electronics and Electrical Engineering, abbreviated as EEE, undergraduate engineeringdegree offered by UoG, as is typical for Scottish universities, is four-year programme of studywhereas similar degrees offered in England are usually three-year courses of study. However, thelength of study for
Paper ID #13696Ethics in Engineering Students’ Design Considerations: Case Studies of Elec-tric Power Systems for the ”Developing World”Mr. Ryan C. Campbell, University of Washington Ryan is a Ph.D. candidate in the University of Washington’s interdisciplinary Individual Ph.D. Program. His research interests include: engineering education, ethics, humanitarian engineering, and computer modeling of electric power and renewable energy systems.Dr. Ken Yasuhara, Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching, University of WashingtonDr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical engineering
instruction. She is involved in the University of Manitoba Faculty of Engineering’s curriculum improve- ment process.Dr. Marcia R Friesen P.Eng., University of ManitobaProf. Sandra Ingram, University of Manitoba Sandra Ingram, Ph.D., is a SSHRC award-winning scholar and Associate professor in Design Engineer- ing, Associate Chair (NSERC Design Engineering) and adjunct professor in Biosystems Engineering at the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg, Canada. Dr. Ingram is responsible for teaching the technical communication course in the faculty as well as an integrated approach to communications in the Biosys- tems Engineering department. Her research interests include professional skills in engineering, interna- tionally
Greater Cincinnati. She graduated from Thomas More College with a bachelor’s degree in English and Secondary Education. Page 26.1427.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Student Understanding of the Engineering Design Process Using Challenge Based Learning (RTP – Strand 1) AbstractIn this study conducted in a large metropolitan city, teachers introduced and implemented CBLin the curriculum. One research objective of the study was to teach middle and high