. someway losingtrack of the representation of the former “women” group). It also provides for an easierinterpretation.MethodologyEach academic year, the Swanson School of Engineering (SSOE) at the University of Pittsburghorganizes the “Design Expo”, a public event gathering the capstone design projects for theDepartments of Bioengineering (BIOE), Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE), Electricaland Computer Engineering (ECE), Industrial Engineering (IE), Mechanical Engineering andMaterials Science (MEMS). In addition, it includes final project designs for the course of“Product Realization” (PR), and “The Art of Making: Hands-on system design and Engineering”(AOM). The 2022 event took place on April 22, at the University Club, with the
to understand these pressures in order to take steps toaddress them in longer term capacities. In identifying that the concerns of administrators arerelated to processes specific to the task of implementing the e4usa program on their campus, itfurther identifies potential for support by limiting the focus.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.(e4usa). References[1] Saldaña, J. (2014). Coding and analysis strategies.[2] National Science Foundation Directorate for Engineering Engineering Education and Centers and Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering Division of Computer and Network
1993-2004. She was named the SHPE Educator of the Year 2005 and selected for the National Engineering Award in 2003, the highest honor given by the American Association of Engineering Societies. In 2002 the Society of Women Engineers named her the Distinguished Engineering Educator. She has received many other awards for her support of students. An ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speaker on the career opportunities in engineering, especially for women and minority students.Faye Navabi, Arizona State University FAYE NAVABI is a lecturer in the Department of Computer Science in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. She teaches CSE 110, Introduction to JAVA.Debra Banks, Consultant
. These included the topics involvingtransportation as a way to “hook” the students interests. The K-12 student mentoringadopted many forms of education tools developed by the graduate students, whichincluded lesson plans and in-class demonstrations, “hands-on” activities (the“manipulatives”), online computer tools (“ Question of the Week”), and teacherworkshops. By using transportation related topics as practical motivation, the K-12students were introduced to various fundamental concepts in physical sciences,mechanics, chemistry, materials, and thermodynamics. Through the project, theparticipating teachers have had their curriculum supplemented by ready-to-useinstructional tools in the classroom. The overall objectives of the project were
AC 2010-1296: "BRIEF ENCOUNTER:" A REFLECTION ON WILLIAMSPROPOSALS FOR THE ENGINEERING CURRICULUMJohn Heywood, Trinity College Dublin Professorial Fellow Emeritius of Trinity COllege Dublin (Ireland. Formerly Professor of Education and Chair Department of Teacher Education.Has published over 50 papers on topics related to engineering and technological education and several books. His book "Engineering Education; Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction" received the best reseach publication award of division i (professional) of the American Educational Research Association in 2005. previously he has been awarded a premium of the Education, Science and Technology division of the
will result in badly designed infrastructure that can harm the environment and thepublic.Student feedback on learning Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference University of North Texas, Denton, TX Copyright ♥ 2023, American Society for Engineering Education 7I taught the course through murder mysteries in Fall 2021 and Spring 2022 and had anoverwhelmingly positive response from the students. Forensic-based learning is a compellingstudent-centered learning model for teaching engineering material behavior and will benefit studentsacross engineering and sciences. The students were not only able to
as a microcosm of the four year program. Experiences and outputs from the coursecan be used to provide guidance and insights into curricular changes, teaching methods, andexposure to civil engineering practice in the Region; and helps in establishing enduringconnections with the industrial sector.IntroductionDesign is widely considered to be the central and the most distinguishing activity of civilengineering. It has also long been understood that engineering institutions should graduateengineers who could design effectively to meet societal needs. Historically, engineering curriculahave been based largely on an “engineering science” model, referred to as the “Grinter Model”,in which engineering is taught only after a solid basis in science
by one instructor fromthe Department of Engineering Mechanics (EM) and one from Electrical Engineering (EE).Course Objectives and SyllabusThe course objectives for Introduction to Biomedical Engineering were: 1. Obtain an understanding of basic physiologic systems, including cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, respiratory, neural, and sensory systems. 2. Develop an appreciation of various biomedical measurement methods and sensory feedback systems. 3. Apply mechanical principles to biological material properties and basic human movement. 4. Apply signal processing techniques to bioelectric signals 5. Apply engineering and design principles to solve physiologic problems related to aerospace
naturally lead into the last theory ofpersonal ethical responsibility we discuss—virtue ethics.There have been a handful of articles in engineering journals that attempt to show that virtueethics is a good framework to understand the ethical responsibilities of engineers.5 In general thismakes a lot of sense, because one central thread of all versions of virtue ethics is to evaluateactions in terms of the underlying character traits they express. And such good stable traits—thevirtues—are presumably what we really want out of our engineers when all is said and done. Ourhope is not just that engineers will always design safe versions of what they are told to design.More than this we also hope that engineers will create and pursue worthwhile projects
Paper ID #39661The Role of Information-Gathering on Students’ Satisfaction inEngineering MajorsMrs. Haleh Barmaki Brotherton, Clemson University Haleh Barmaki Brotherton is a graduate student in the Department of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. Her research interests include perfectionism, self-regulation, and decision-making. She earned her BS and MS from Middle East TechDr. Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University Marisa K. Orr is an Associate Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University
AC 2009-929: AN EXPERIENCE ON LEARNING OBJECTS REUTILIZATIONBASED ON EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES DEVELOPEDMiguel Latorre, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a DistanciaManuel Blazquez, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a DistanciaElio Sancristobal, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a DistanciaSergio Martin, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a DistanciaFrancisco Garcia-Sevilla, Castilla-La Mancha UniversityCatalina Martinez-Mediano, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a DistanciaGabriel Diaz, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a DistanciaManuel Castro, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia Page 14.191.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 An
Engineering FacultyAbstractIt is well established that female faculty represent a small percentage of the total faculty inengineering departments. It is also well known that engineering programs need to find solutionsto increase their number of female faculty. Academic careers are demanding, specially, in theearlier years when a lot is expected of young tenure-track faculty. For those female facultymembers who also would like to start a family, the demand of a full-time academic career forcesthem to choose between devoting time to family or pursuing professional goals. Often, thequestion becomes, start a family or get tenured? Male faculty, on the other hand, are less likely toface this dilemma. Moreover, most administrators are male who do not fully
international work in the non-profit sector.4 Engineering talent isnot making sufficient contributions toward the solutions of major human needs such as access toclean water, nutrition, as well as health and education facilities. It is also important to sustainboth human systems and natural systems within an ethical framework which recognizes thedisproportionate impact of engineering and applied science in contemporary society.9 Indeed thesite for resource development is often within countries noted for autocratic or even dictatorialleadership where the public, and especially the poor have little impact on decisions related to Page 9.734.1land or
further substantiated that they could leave out theirdesign tools and study materials without repercussions of theft, a constant reminder throughsignage in the library not to leave your items unattended. To further understand how students tailored study spaces, the photographic andcontextual data pointed towards a strong preference in having their Study Materials &Accessories on hand. This included headphones to drown out noise, microwaves, refrigerators,coffee, water bottles with filtered water stations nearby, textbooks, and blankets. Many of theseitems are often taken to the library, but cannot be left behind. Although the library has somelockers, the ability to leave items near or in a studio classroom space is ideal for students
AC 2009-1215: ASSESSMENT OF THE VANTH ENGINEERING RESEARCHCENTER ON GRADUATE STUDENTSJames Cawthorne, Purdue UniversityOsman Cekic, Purdue UniversityMonica Cox, Purdue UniversityMelissa Stacer, Purdue University Page 14.262.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Assessment of the VaNTH Engineering Research Center Experience on Graduate StudentsAbstract The Vanderbilt-Northwestern-Texas-Harvard/MIT (VaNTH) Engineering ResearchCenter, started in 1999, has focused on improving bioengineering education through theapplications of learning science, learning technology, and assessment and evaluation within thedomain of
learned aboutimplementing a successful first year engineering experience based on multi-level, verticallyintegrated projects.Structure for the VITDPVITDP is a vertically integrated design experience has been incorporated into four requiredchemical engineering courses – Tools for Chemical Engineering, Material & Energy Balances,Mass Transfer, and Process Design I. For the last five years, the Department of ChemicalEngineering at The University of Akron has implemented VITDP for the entire undergraduatechemical engineering student population. Rather than segmenting the acquisition of engineeringskills via projects in each of the four courses, a common design project is assigned during a fiveto seven week period in the Fall semester. Our
difficulties in understanding the sketching systems overcome that handicap.In the curriculums of engineering field degrees in the framework of the European Space forHigher Education (ESHE), the spatial vision capability is present as a competence that should bedeveloped by students as a foundation of all engineering degrees.The use of technologies applied through a suitable methodology may be included in thecurriculums of Engineering Graphic subjects to provide to the students a better level of spatialability.The main aim of this work is the development of didactic material based on several virtual andaugmented reality formats, knowing how students behave while using them, and checking if theyare useful materials to improve their spatial abilities.The
traditional, printed educational resources and the use of PowerPoint presentations,the Faculty Innovation Center is developing interactive, multimedia modules that give studentsthe freedom to explore business concepts in a novel, self-paced environment. With theproliferation of the Web and its use in education, we felt that students would want to have accessto materials in an on-demand manner. Electronic resources can be used in actual classroominstruction and are also available to students as they deem appropriate, either as students or whenthey enter the workforce. Page 8.266.8 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering
Paper ID #12642Peer Mentoring Program: Providing early intervention and support to im-prove retention and success of women in engineering, computer science, andphysicsMrs. Jennifer I Clark, Montana State University Jennifer Clark is an academic advisor in the Education, Health & Human Development College at Mon- tana State University and a doctoral student in the Adult & Higher Education program. Her research focuses on undergraduate student success, retention, and peer advising and mentoring.Dr. Sarah L Codd, Montana State University Dr. Sarah Codd is a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering program at Montana State
thespring and fall semesters. It is a 75-min 8am class offered 2 days a week for 14 weeks. Enrolleesare high school seniors to university seniors, 90% of whom are engineers. It is one of our univer-sity’s Science, Technology and Society Knowledge Area courses because: 1) It provides a broad -based coverage of the biomedical engineering [BmE] field; 2) It focuses on rehabilitation engineering as a subfield of BmE, allowing students to see concrete applications applied to real-life cases; and 3) Ethical dilemmas are posited throughout (covered more in a companion paper).10A fuller course description and its philosophy can be found in ASEE’s and other publications.1-4I.2. A Young Puppy Figured Out by Himself How to TeachThis instructor’s
for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) at the University of Toronto. He designs and facilitates leadership programs for engineering students and professionals - with a range of focus from tangible skill development to organizational leadership to complex social problems. Mike is a PhD student in Higher Education at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education and has an MA in Higher Education and a BASc in Engineering Science from the University of Toronto. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Where’s my code? Engineers navigating ethical issues on an uneven terrainAbstractClaims to professionalism among engineers are rooted in
AC 2009-973: INTEGRATING HISTORICAL TECHNOLOGIES AND THEIRIMPACT ON SOCIETY INTO TODAY'S ENGINEERING CURRICULUMWilliam Loendorf, Eastern Washington University William R. Loendorf is currently an Associate Professor of Engineering & Design at Eastern Washington University. He obtained his B.Sc. in Engineering Science at the University of Wisconsin - Parkside, M.S. in Electrical Engineering at Colorado State University, M.B.A. at the Lake Forest Graduate School of Management, and Ph.D. in Engineering Management at Walden University. He holds a Professional Engineer license and has 30 years of industrial experience as an Engineer or Engineering Manager at General Motors, Cadnetix, and
whether the feedback aligns with an assessment for learning approach. The types offeedback on the papers is characterized using a hierarchical schema with check marks (basicvalidating feedback) being the least effective, and textual comments (elaborating feedback) beingthe most effective. The proposed classification is then used to code graded student test papers(naturalistic material) from three electrical engineering courses. The material includes 7problems from each course, leading to 21 engineering problems in total. Between 16 and 27graded student solutions are randomly selected for analysis for each problem. The resultsdemonstrate that poor quality student solutions receive less, and less valuable feedback than highquality student work. The
teaching skills and techniques Development of interpersonal skills (e.g. collaborative or cooperative work) Affective outcomes- evidence of changes in faculty/student motivations to learn, in values and attitudes about science, other attitudinal changes DeNeef18 identified 129 alumni of the Preparing Future Faculty program (PFF) who weresubsequently hired in faculty positions. The study showed that the PFF program helpedparticipants negotiate challenging academic job markets and balance their teaching and researchresponsibilities. On the other hand, the study did not attempt to evaluate value or effects ofpedagogical knowledge or skills gained. Bouwma-Gerahart19 addresses the research question of “What effect
morning sessions in each semester offall, spring, and summer at the Chicago Museum of Science and Industry.Teacher professional development for CHiS&EProgram teachers received background content and instruction, STEM pedagogy anddirect guidance in the facilitation of each engineering activity. Upon completion of theprofessional development, teachers were able to a) to identify K-12 learning opportunitiesand challenges, b) describe engineering careers and K-12 engineering activities, c) relatethe connectedness of mathematics and science in the context of engineering designthrough hands-on practice, d) emphasize for students the role of mathematics and sciencein collecting, recording, analyzing, and communicating observations, e) demonstrate
mechanical engineering and minor in Data Science. He has been assisting Dr. Huihui Qi at the Engineering Pedagogy and Design Lab, with the work of processing and analyzing data from survey responses to study the impact of oral exams on students’ learning.Prof. Curt Schurgers, University of California, San Diego Curt Schurgers is a Teaching Professor in the UCSD Electrical and Computer Engineering Department. His research and teaching are focused on course redesign, active learning, and project-based learning. He also co-directs a hands-on undergraduate research program called Engineers for Exploration, in which students apply their engineering knowledge to problems in exploration and conservation.Marko V. Lubarda
Boys and Girls Clubs spend a Saturday at CSU-Pueblo in hands-on science and engineering activities. She is the CSU-Pueblo coordinator for the Colorado Alliance for Minority Participation. She was the Principal Investigator for a $485,000 grant to CSU-Pueblo from the National Science Foundation for scholarships in Computer Science, Engineering, and Page 15.248.1 Mathematics.Abhijit Gosavi, Missouri University of Science and Technology Abhijit Gosavi is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering at Missouri S & T. His Ph.D. is in industrial engineering with
) 5 Material Science and Engineering (MSE) 2 Did not specify 6 Note: Participants were able to select more than one department/schoolDescription of Most Recent CourseThe courses about which instructors responded came from all levels of undergraduateengineering curricula, from advanced courses with small enrollments (less than 15 students) tolarge first-year courses (more than 100 students). These courses also represented a wide range ofcourse types, including core courses and technical electives, as well as project-based courses andlaboratory or studio courses. Tables 3, 4, and 5 give an overview of the reported
. “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Educational Annual Conference & Exposition”.7. Amason, A.C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision- making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. “Academy of Management Journal”, 39(1), 123-148.8. Jehn, K. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. “Administrative Science Quarterly”, 40(20), 245-382.9. Keller, R. T. (1994). Technology information processing fit and the performance of R & D project groups: A test of contingency theory. “Academy of Management Journa”l, 37(1), 169-179.10. Mullen, B., & Cooper, C. (1994). The relation between group
specificcriteria) for direct assessment of these outcomes.IntroductionIn an Electrical/Computer Engineering Technology degree, there are many classes that usemicroprocessors/microcontrollers as part of their curriculum. The format for these classes aresimilar (in curriculum) in that their end goal is to teach ‘C’ or ‘C++’ programming, as well asembedded hardware and applications. Most computer courses employ a large amount of hands-on lab material and selecting a proper embedded processor can greatly improve theoutcome/success of the course. In general, the preference is to use a processor that has:• Wide industry acceptance (usage after graduation). This allows the students to leverage their knowledge into better/more advanced job positions