(Lechuga, 2014).Additionally, each of the mentors possessed experience mentoring URM students, which theybelieved translated well to the IMPACT program.IMPACT MENTORING PROGRAM 24 Conclusion From this point forward, the mentors in the IMPACT program will continue to have theopportunity to give back and remain engaged in the field, to relive past academic careerexperiences, and to support the next generation of engineering professors while adjusting toretirement. In this particular phase of the program, only seven emeriti faculty were recruited tomentor 11 URM faculty. However, the program had a positive impact on the mentees
one standard error increase for thegroup after the Fellowship ended. These results suggest that multidisciplinary undergraduatescience communication fellowships with a cohort model may increase students’ confidence andself-efficacy in research. Other qualitative successes included students continuing theirextracurricular involvement in career-focused work after the program ended. The next step forthis research study is to conduct interviews with the students from prior cohorts to gainadditional insight into the potential broader impact of the program on student’s confidencewithin academia and in preparation for their future profession. We will continue to collect surveydata on future cohorts to grow our data set and get a more comprehensive
-school approach to implementing inquiry-based learning of STEM subjects using BrickLabsappeared to have made a significant and possibly legacy-level impact on the six elementary schools thatthis project focused on. Based on interviews of principals there is evidence to indicate that facultybenefited from the common professional development experiences, the presence of mentors, and theexposure and engagement in inquiry based instructional approaches, which led to enhancedcommunication, increased camaraderie, increased collaboration, increased cross-curricular activities andgreater community involvement in STEM education. Our data indicate that students across multiplegrades benefited from the teachers’ learning which led to the students being
student hassufficient mathematically capability and or background to fully grasp the models and equationsdiscussed in class. Software such as MATLAB and Simulink are sometimes utilized in lecturesto make it more appealing through visual representations of communication signals and systems.Nevertheless, students may struggle to understand some of the abstract concepts. This isespecially true in the electrical engineering technology classroom where the focus is more on a‘hands on’ approach with less mathematical rigor. In such a scenario as this, the question wasasked, “how can students be engaged in the classroom in a way that enhances their learning oftelecommunications fundamentals?” A novel approach was presented as a response to thepreceding
preparation of STEM students, use of STEM support services, and transfer to 4-year institutions. The objective of this study is to understand the impact the STEM Center has had on increasing the number of STEM students who are transfer-ready and who transfer to 4-year institutions.2. Background and literature review Previous research on transfer of community colleges to 4-year institutions have suggested that student characteristics, background, and academic preparations are significant factors contributing to a student’s successful transfer. Student characteristics that consistently contribute to higher transfer rates include being younger, having higher socioeconomic status, and better academic preparation in high school3
Paper ID #20934Student Descriptions of Self-Regulated Learning: A Qualitative Investigationof Students’ Reflections on Their First Semester in EngineeringKayla Nicole ArnsdorffMs. Ashley Tingting ChenDr. Rachel McCord, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Rachel McCord is a a Lecturer and Research Assistant Professor in the Engineering Fundamentals Divi- sion at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville. She received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include the impact of metacognitive and self-regulated learning development on engineering student success, particularly in the first
Paper ID #38255Improving Community College Students’ STEM Motivationand Achievement by Implementing Utility-ValueInterventionsDelaram A Totonchi Delaram Totonchi is a Research Scientist within the Center for Advanced Study of Teaching and Learning at the University of Virginia. Delaram's research efforts mainly focus on broadening participation and representation of historically underserved populations in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) disciplines. She designs, implements, and evaluates motivationally supportive interventions that promote student achievement and persistence.Emma HuelskoetterBradley
means ofdeveloping a diverse, internationally competitive, and globally-engaged science and engineeringworkforce. After an undergraduate research experience students should be prepared andmotivated to pursue careers in science and engineering. A critical component of an effectiveprogram is the cultivation of a positive and supportive community by fostering student-studentand student-faculty relationships. The potential benefits of transitioning a summer researchexperience composed primarily of isolated research and seminars to one based on a learningcommunity approach has recently been demonstrated. In 2008, the Department ofBioengineering at The University of California, San Diego (UCSD) initiated a ten-week summerprogram through a National
immediate demands without considering future consequences. As a result, it isimportant to start educating students not only to be aware of the world with clear understandingof cross-cultural differences, but also with very high ethical standards and the ability to assessthe local and global impact as well as the short and long term impact of their decisions during thedesign of products, systems and processes. This paper describes the approach used in a freshmanIntroduction to Engineering Design course to incorporate global and ethical issues through acollaborative design project carried out in collaboration with other students in Latin America.IntroductionGlobalization has had a tremendous impact on the way the companies are organized and aredoing
resourcesharing.D. Sense of BelongingWhile the majority of students shared that they felt valued and connected to the university, onestudent shared that they do not think they are a good fit and that they are falling short ofexpectations. Having the relatively small EMPOWER community, students feel morerepresented and more connected. Comfort has come from many of the resources offered eitherdirectly through the program or indirectly, by the program connecting the additional alreadyavailable resources to the specific students in need.Summary and Future WorkMajor transitions and their impacts on transfer engineering students are important to understandand influence with institutional support. Financial assistance and a multitude of high-impactpractices
healthThere is limited formal study of engineering culture and its impact on student well-being.However, it is widely known that stress is a trigger for individuals living with a mental illness,often precipitating episodes of anxiety and depression [8]. In addition, it is recognized that stresstends to be the norm rather than the exception in the field of engineering. Living in constantstress and learning to live with it become a rite of passage for aspiring engineers measuring up tocurrent standards in highly demanding majors. In this environment, a lack of sleep, anddeprivation from social and leisure time become badges of honor that subconsciously measurebelonginess. It has been argued that a stressful college culture is a contributing factor in
Engineering Education, 2012 Incorporating Clickers and Peer Instruction into Large Structural Engineering ClassroomsAbstract Interaction and feedback are particularly challenging in large lecture environments,where class size limits student-faculty interaction. Clickers can be used to ensure studentsunderstand fundamental concepts by providing instant feedback to the instructor about studentknowledge gaps or misconceptions [1]. The use of clickers also helps maintain students’motivation and engagement in what’s going on in class, and provides an opportunity for PeerInstruction (PI). Clickers have been used since the 1980’s in many science and humanitiescourses such as physics, biology, chemistry, history
project was developed through a collaboration between two community college faculty atCuesta College in San Luis Obispo, California as part of an LSAMP (Louis Stokes for MinorityParticipation in STEM) NSF grant. The overall goal of the grant is to support traditionallyunderserved students majoring in STEM succeed at the community college and to transfer into afour-year institution as STEM majors. One of the main pillars of the program is to expose studentsat the community college level to undergraduate research so that when they transfer, they have hadequitable access to similar experiences as their university and white student counterparts.The framework presented is supported by research that shows that 1) undergraduate research is ahigh impact
Design-Build-Test-Communicate ClassIntroductionIn the following paper, we describe our initial experiences in replacing the detailed analyticrubrics used for assessment in our team-taught first-year engineering technical andcommunication course with a holistic rubric. We address the issues we identified with theanalytic rubrics we had been using, the holistic rubric we developed to address these issues, andthe preliminary understandings we’ve developed--through our own reflections and an informalonline survey of our students--of the impact of this change on our teaching and our students’experiences in the course.Rubrics are frequently used to convey assessment criteria to students; their use in post-secondaryeducation has been shown to have
sciences have either made significant progress toward, or achieved, genderparity (Diekman, 2010) while those that are perceived as not affording communal valuesuch as ECE still have the lowest participation of women (10%) of any engineeringdiscipline (NSB, 2018). Prosocial engagement lies at the intersection of social responsibility (i.e., evaluating thebroader impacts of a one’s work on public welfare) and communal value (i.e., a person’sdesire to work with and help others). Prosocial engagement is a key variable inunderstanding the formation of the engineering workforce because it contributessimultaneously to the recruitment and retention of students who want to work incollaborative environments (Diekman, 2017) and shapes the culture of the
students create a concept map of sustainable engineering. In thiscontext, students had unlimited time to complete their concept maps, could use any resources,and were incentivized by the grade they would receive (8 points out of 500 points during thesemester).Sustainability-Focused Seminar CourseThe second course was a 1-credit seminar course focused entirely on sustainability. The coursewas being piloted for the first time in fall 2015, and counted as humanities and social sciences(H&SS) credit for students in the College of Engineering. The course was required for allstudents enrolled in two sustainability-focused Residential Academic Programs (RAPs). RAPsare similar to the living-learning communities (LLCs) that are present at various
themes, the GLC strives to foster these proficiencies in a global and societal context while impart-ing knowledge and developing professional skills applicable to life-long learning.The intellectual and professional development of GLC students includes exposure to professional andethical responsibility and is achieved primarily (but not exclusively) by way of the GLC’s reliance onproject- and team-based learning concepts from problem-based-learning pedagogy (PBL).3 TheGLC’s implementation of project- and team-based learning includes extensive use of the Internet bothas a research tool and as the primary communication medium outside the classroom (by way of theGLC on-line (Internet) database and electronic mail).4 GLC students also routinely use
between effort to implement and positive impact on students,engaging students, and improving the accessibility of course content.We intend to present this work in the traditional lecture style.Keywords: Pandemic, COVID-19, Engineering Education, Learning StrategyIntroThe COVID-19 pandemic has had far-reaching impacts on our society. It changed the way wetravel, communicate, and gather. It undoubtedly changed the way that we educate and learn aswell. With a rapid shift from traditional face-to-face courses to remote courses in March 2020came countless novel problems that university systems and faculty had to rapidly address.Universities had to maintain the health and safety of students - many of which reside on collegecampuses far from their
, faculty or industry professional), 3) workingindependently, 4) opportunity to actively participate in the experimental design, 5) opportunity topresent/communicate the results of the work, 6) appropriate facilities and spaces to conduct thework, 7) faculty availability for consultation and career advice, and 8) promotion of lifelonglearning and self-directed learning8,9.High impact teaching practices like problem-based learning and cooperative learning have beenbroadly investigated 10, 11, 12, 13. Problem-based learning helps students gain problem-solvingskills, motivates students to engage with problems that have more than one solution, promoteseffective collaboration among students, and allows students to extrapolate their knowledge andskills
surveys,we are able to comprehensively analyze both the perceived impact of our camp from theattendee’s perspective. We also acknowledge and thank Microsoft and Facebook for theirgenerous financial support of this effort.IntroductionLast year, a local middle school teacher contacted our research laboratory to request acybersecurity awareness presentation to her computer class. With two groups of students in anelective course, the presentation was held twice. Between the two classes there was one girl inattendance. During the discussions following the presentation, both students and teachers had aninterest in cybersecurity, but felt they lacked sufficient training and suitable subject mattermaterials. In discussions with other local schools, and
that environmental change will have disproportionate impacts ondifferent communities. Extreme weather events, supply chain disruptions, and responses to thesestressors embodied by the energy transition will all impact those people least able to respond tothese stressors. But members of these communities are also largely underrepresented in theworkforce, which limits our collective ability to identify culturally appropriate and resonant © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section Conferencestrategies to build more resilient communities. Of the many tools used by environmental resiliencecommunity, one tool that is approachable for undergraduate students
member’senvironment plays an important role in the nature of classroom instruction, and that faculty oftenmodify EBIPs based on their interaction with and observation of their colleagues. Unfortunately,barriers exist preventing faculty members from using CoP for knowledge transfer. Culturaldifferences, assumptions, and communication preferences affect the way members access andshare knowledge within CoP [14]. These barriers have been addressed using social exchangetheory as a means to impact the frequency with which members contribute knowledge to theircommunity [20].Social Exchange TheorySocial Exchange Theory [20] was first introduced as a “two sided, mutually contingent, andmutually rewarding process” involving transactions and exchanges among individuals
describe the experiment and the two courses in whichit was conducted. We present quantitative assessment data demonstrating the positive impact ofinstant messaging on student learning and on student satisfaction with both the course and theinstructor. We provide the authors’ qualitative findings about the positive and negative impactsof IM use, as well as recommendations for maximizing the effectiveness of this popularcommunication medium.The Instant Messaging PhenomenonInstant messaging (IM) is a communication service that enables real-time text messagingbetween two or more persons over the Internet. Most current IM systems include the capabilityfor file-sharing as well. America Online Instant Messenger, MSN Messenger, and Yahoo!Messenger are the
students' opinions in class, and students' empowerment. In other words, we wanted to understand how showing respect to students and respecting their input and ideas in class affects their empowerment. Second, we questioned how effective and powerful is valuing students' opinions and how that affects their perception of how faculty cares about them. In response, we proposed a study that tests the causal relationship between how faculty's effective communication affects students' motivation in capstone design projects. Our results showed strong evidence of the faculty's effective communication's impact on student's motivation. Theory [13,14,15,16,17,18] suggests that when students are more motivated, it
moresuccessful and satisfied in online courses when there is a sense of community and personalinteraction.[30-33]. This study aims to expand on previous research into the effects of distance learning onAfrican American students enrolled in engineering courses and the digital divide they face. It willspecifically focus on the impact of distance learning on African American students takinglaboratory-based engineering technology courses during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study willcompare the academic performance and satisfaction of students who took the course in-person tothose who took it remotely. The results will provide valuable information on how to effectivelydeliver laboratory-based engineering technology courses to African American students
illustration provides an opportunity to study the variations in speechduration and the interaction among speakers that are involved in the communication with each otherover a certain time learning duration. DescriptionMotivationThe development of speech and language is a very critical aspect for a child’s long term learningability and educational growth. If a child is not exposed to a multitude of language environments,then there is a risk that it could have a negative impact on the child’s language growth[1]. Recentstudies [2-4] have shown that the LENA recorder (see figure 1) allows for the collection and initialanalysis of these interactions between the parents and children. Chord diagrams are visual
improving student experiences and outcomes incore engineering courses. The practice of the community is the set of specific actions that thecommunity engages in to explore the domain. In our context, the CoPs’ practice is the use ofcontext-rich collaborative problem solving.Interpreting the spread of the RBIS from the perspective of CoPs reveals a CoP of CoPs. SIIPprovides an overarching community in which faculty learning takes place. Faculty within SIIP areunited by the common identity of innovators and course reformers of core engineering courses.Smaller embedded communities share a narrower identity and practice focused on specificcourses within specific departments. Faculty in these smaller, departmental CoPs share commonidentities by
learning outcomes, and 2) toenhance facilitation, teamwork, communication, and leadership skills among undergraduate peereducators. To do this effectively, our training includes having facilitators build community, model andpractice evidence-supported strategies, and share ideas within disciplinary cohorts and across thefacilitator community. We employ several forms of feedback through the semester so that peereducators collectively and independently reflect on practices and implement improvements within asemester.Feedback to facilitators - from program staff, peers, and enrolled students – is intended to alertfacilitators to whether, and how well, their facilitation strategies are contributing to achieving programobjectives. After receiving the
reducing or eliminating commute time tocampus and its associated environmental impact and financial costs. Using a survey design, astudy was conducted to evaluate students’ experiences with and perceptions of the remote-synchronous course delivery method during the COVID-19 pandemic across multiple programs,including engineering and architecture, at two universities, one in the US and one in the EU. Thispaper provides an assessment of a selection of these experiences and perceptions by programtype, program level, and institution. A non-parametric statistical analysis is conducted withordinal variables using SPSS-based data analysis. At the institutional level, some variation inlearning experiences for MSU Denver and University of Pécs students is
gains [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. Yet, outside of time-consuming observation protocols [8, 9],little systematic work has been done in characterizing classroom activities, due in part to a lackof proper instrumentation [10]. Additionally, students can engage in activities in very differentways than instructors intend [1, 2], so it is important to account for the student perspective. Thispaper reports current progress towards an effort to develop and rigorously assess a student surveyinstrument aimed at this purpose in post-secondary STEM classrooms: the Student Class Activityand Engagement Instrument (SCAEI).The SCAEI is based on Chi’s Interactive, Constructive, Active, and Passive (ICAP) framework[1, 2] . The ICAP framework differentiates