initiated during this design phase, before a product has assumedphysical form. This paper presents the Risk in Early Design (RED) method as thebackbone of the graduate level Function Based Risk Assessment course to teach aninterdisciplinary group of engineers how to use traditional PRA techniques such as failuremodes and effects analysis (FMEA), fault trees, and event trees in conceptual productdesign. The innovative use of specific engineering taxonomies and knowledge-basefailure data representation allows RED to identify product risks armed only with productfunction. Moreover, the engineering taxonomies used in RED drastically reducecommunication issues prevalent in risk assessment due to natural language. REDprovides the students with a database
AC 2007-2712: DISTANCE-LEARNING IN SUPPORT OF ANINTER-INSTITUTIONAL BME DEPARTMENTKathy Schmidt, University of Texas-Austin KATHY J. SCHMIDT is the Director of the Faculty Innovation Center for the College of Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. In this position, she promotes the College of Engineering’s commitment to finding ways to enrich teaching and learning. She works in all aspects of education including design and development, faculty training, learner support, and evaluation.Mia Markey, University of Texas-Austin MIA K. MARKEY is an Assistant Professor in Biomedical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin. The mission of her Biomedical Informatics Lab is to
obligations. If successful, such a program could become a model for otherundergraduate science and engineering curricula and programs offered online.1.0 IntroductionAlthough there are a number of online degrees available online today from some of the mostrespected educational institutions in the US, few accredited undergraduate engineering programsexist. Particularly lacking is an online program specifically designed and developed to addressthe many mid-career employees and non-traditional students who have yet to earn anundergraduate engineering degree. To address this need, our institution has sought to address thefeasibility of the development of an innovative ABET1-accredited online undergraduatemechanical engineering degree program. Of
student programs. He has published and presented widely in areas of surface science, electronic materials and processes, project management, and industry/university relations. He holds 4 patents and has received awards for excellence in technical innovation (IBM), technical authorship (IBM), teaching (University of Colorado), and scholarship (National Science Foundation).Shekar Viswanathan, National University Dr. Viswanathan is a Professor and Chair of the Department of Applied Engineering and Lead Faculty for Engineering Management and Homeland Security and Safety Engineering. He is the Lead for six full time and fifty two adjunct faculty members. His department offers three
. 10. NOTE: Senior design projects were eligible to compete for cash prizes in a College of Engineering wide senior design competition which is held twice a year. This competition specifically recognizes projects that demonstrate creativity, entrepreneurship, and innovation, and also address marketability of the “product.”Each team was required to document in writing its team activities and meetings. Instructions forthe same are summarized in Figure 3.Project ScheduleThe following is a summary of the process / logistics involved with the Senior Design project forthe Spring 2006 and Summer 2006 terms. 1. Develop a "Problem Statement" to present to the students in the Senior Design class. This needs to be done by
Promote Students’ Circuit Problem Solving”, The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, vol. 5, No. 6, December 2006.6. X. Chen, “Teaching undergraduates in U.S. postsecondary institutions: Fall 1998,” Education Statistics Quarterly, vol. 4, no. 3, 2002.7. C. Evans and K. Sabry, “Evaluation of the interactivity of Web-based learning systems: Principles and process”, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 89-99, January 2003.8. S. M. Brookhart, “The art and science of classroom assessment: The missing part of pedagogy,” ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, vol. 27, no. 1, 1999.9. J. Olmsted III, “Using classroom research in a large introductory science class,” New Directions
Outreach Session #1510 at the ASEE Annual Conference, Portland, OR, June 13, 2005. 5. Silverstein, D.L. “Who Wants to be an Engineer?”, Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual conference & Exposition, presented in the ASEE Multimedia Session #2793 at the ASEE Annual Conference, Nashville, TN, June 24, 2003. 6. “Flowers, FIRST and Gracious Professionalism - The MIT Enterprise Forum.” Southeast Innovations. March 23, 2004. http://www.innovationspublishing.com/georgia/loadarticle.asp?id=143, accessed Jan 8, 2007
second one in technology includingtechnology education for K-12 teachers. The students can complete credit certificates as well astwo-year Associate Degrees that articulate seamlessly with the schools of engineering andtechnology in six universities and colleges. Our stakeholders, administrators, directors,technology faculty members, and site coordinators can quickly respond to the changing needs oflocal industry by creating, approving and implementing new, industry-driven curriculum within amatter of months.The COT has received several National Science Foundation Advanced Technology Education(ATE) grants that have developed innovative curriculum, provided faculty developmentincluding industry externships and provided student scholarships
solution was a custom web based document submission system but this had a cost and thereare other solutions that would work as well.References1. Pugh, S. (1996). Creating Innovative Products Using Total Design : The Living Legacy ofStuart Pugh. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. Page 12.1267.14 13
Award for Innovative Excellence in Teaching, Learning and Technology from the Center for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning, Jacksonville, FL (2005). Her research interests are in a cross-section of cognition and technology. Together with Dr. Zywno she is a holder of a nationally funded grant to support their research in engineering education. She is a member of ASEE, SME, and a registered Professional Engineer. Page 12.137.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 A Qualitative Analysis of Engineering Students’ Interactions with an Online Learning Object in the Context of their
orchallenge and utilized their knowledge bank (Epistemology) to arrive at an innovative design.They had experiential knowledge available through Paxton’s design and construction of largegreenhouses, they had expert knowledge available on cast and wrought iron, but putting this togood use demanded a lot more. To provide the amount of space required and to do so with abuilding that the public and exhibitors would like and be sympathetic to the environment andlandscape took great ingenuity. First Logic had to be brought to bear so that the design could be Page 12.1453.11realized – the production and management of the project within a very tight time
incorporated into subsequent workshops.Conclusion Page 12.1519.13 The partnership developed to implement this program is an innovative one that hasspawned other valuable activities. The first year of this program is considered a success, andmany teachers have requested their school be allowed to send more teachers next year. Not onlywas the partnership able to acquire external funding to support the program, but the partnershipworked effectively and efficiently to organize and implement the Institute. The participatingscience teachers experienced hands-on lab activities that were objective-centered andexperiment-oriented. The teacher evaluations
redesign of the course to integrateconstructivist approaches for on-line learning environments. Instructional and outcomesassessment data, as well as demographic and tools usage survey data (including the results of alearning styles survey) was collected for each class. This paper will: (1) Compare the before andafter instructional assessment and outcomes assessment data for the course; and (2) Analyze thepatterns of learning tool usage based on demographic variables. Innovative uses of instructionaltechnology discovered along the way will also be presented.The paper is organized into the following parts:1. Introduction2. On-line teaching options, strategies, and considerations3. Teaching strategies and learning activities for
achieved facilities‚ Quality management ‚ Involve constituencies in outcomes‚ Quantitative process management evaluation‚ Comparison with peer institutionsLevel 5: Optimizing – Continuous process improvement is enabled by quantitative feedbackfrom the process and from testing innovative ideas and technologies. Includes all characteristicsof Level 4.‚ Process change management ‚ Defect prevention: Student retention‚ Technology change management management, graduation rate management‚ Total faculty involvement ‚ Feedback results in changes in programThese five levels and the key process areas that have
Page 12.906.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Instructional Strategies and Tools to Teach Six Sigma to Engineering Technology Undergraduate StudentsAbstractThis paper presents innovative instructional strategies and tools to teach Six Sigma toEngineering Technology undergraduate students. Six Sigma is an improvement methodologyfocusing on understanding and reducing variation in processes. Many students can easily learnand even apply the basic quality tools in a separate and non-integrated manner, but the realchallenge is to help the students learn and apply the tools of Six Sigma in a synthesized way toattain the true power of an integrated approach. This paper will discuss the
applications for admission, and tuition and fees are paid to the host university. Studentsare required to work with an MSU advisor to plan their coursework abroad and get agreement ofwhat courses will be accepted for transfer.We provide a few examples of the programs. The Munich University of Applied Sciences offersa summer program in Mechanical and Automotive Engineering. The Engineering College ofCopenhagen offers an Innovation and Entrepreneurship Semester. Institut NationalPolytechnique de Grenoble (INPG) offers a variety of general and specialized engineeringcourses during the summer. They also provide an optional intensive French language course.Through our partnership with Clemson University, BCoE student can participate in Clemson’ssummer
AC 2008-1248: IMPLEMENTING A MULTI-FACETED APPROACH FORPROMOTING DIVERSITY IN GRADUATE ENGINEERING EDUCATIONEugene DeLoatch, Morgan State University Eugene Deloatch is Dean of Morgan State College of Engineering. He served as the President of ASEE in 2002-2003.Sherra Kerns, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Sherra Kerns is Vice President for Innovation and Research at the Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering. She served as the President of ASEE in 2005-2006.Lueny Morell, Hewlett-Packard Lueny Morell is Director of Hewlett Packard Latin America University Relations Program and former Professor of Chemical Engineering, University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez.Carla Purdy, University of
organizers the ability to track individual gains and learning outcomes as a result of the summer experience. Additional insights about program assessment will likely be possible when quantitative and qualitative data is triangulated.2. Potential collaborations with the UH REU Innovations in Nanotechnology program during the summer of 2008 would result in additional assessment data and co- authored publications comparing the two sites. A potential collaboration might include: a. Using the same guiding research questions at both sites b. Administering the same quantitative pre- and post surveys at both sites c. Conducting post-program interviews at both sites using same interview guide d. Having students complete
one was video-taped, critiqued, andrepeated in the same session, as time allowed, following the same rigorous pattern established inthe first prepared presentation.Stand-alone oral communication courses provide many opportunities for students to present andreceive feedback on a wide variety of topics. Students in this course gave five presentations.Repeating them a second time following faculty, peer, and video feedback intensifies theprogress. Coordinating the topics with content from the course themes ensures maximumeffectiveness as well as efficiency. Students understand that both content and delivery of thecourse presentations will prepare them for collaborating with business students on real-worldprojects involving innovative technology
continuing volatility as non-renewable resources dwindle. Solutionsmust come not only from technical innovation, but also through changes in business practices,legislation, and personal choices. Individuals in all walks of life will be affected by the changingworld energy situation. This project has the potential to elevate students’ comprehension of thecomplete energy picture, and to give them tools that will remain relevant and useful throughouttheir lives and careers.Bibliography1. Deffeyes, Kenneth S., Beyond Oil: A View from Hubbert’s Peak (paperback ed.), Hill and Wang, 2006.2. Hayden, Howard C., The Solar Fraud: Why Solar Energy Won’t Run the World (2nd ed.), Vales Lake Publishing, 20043. Kraushaar, Jack J., Ristinen, Robert A
. Martin, B. Maytham, J. Case and D. Fraser, Engineering graduates' perceptions of how well they were prepared for work in industry. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2005. Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 167- 180.5. N. S. Edward and J. C. R. Middleton. Occupational Socialisation -- a New Model of the Engineer's Formation. in International Conference on Engineering Education. 2001. Oslo, Norway.Session 8D2 pp11- 22.6. E. Baark, New Modes of Learning in Services: a Study of Hong Kong's Consulting Engineers. Industry and Innovation, 2005. Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 283-301.7. S. Florman, Non-technical studies for engineers: The challenge of relevance. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1997. Vol. 22, No. 3, pp
with evidence of satisfying a standard, check the standardsorganization’s (probably UL) website to find out more about the particularstandard(s) applied. If no information is found, so indicate in your report.Table 6: Specifications Homework Assignment in MECE 2361 for Fall 2007Wishing to expand its product line, Horse&Buggy, Inc., a major manufacturing companywhich specializes in large transportation related products, has decided to take the giantand risky step of entering the personal vehicle market. Their Director of Innovation hasconvinced the Board of Directors that Horse&Buggy, Inc. should design and manufacturea completely new, personal, urban, transportation (the PUT) device. Since the company’sstrength is design and
marketing P3 Management 1/organization & individual. Technology of organization. People and machinesMaterials and processes Product innovation and implementation P4 management 2. Marketing/Product innovation.Problem based problem Quality controlsolving techniques Technique and organization P5 Technology and Society P6 continuation of man and
Chester F. Carlson Award in recognition of distinguished accomplishments in engineering education.Helen Chen, Stanford University HELEN CHEN is a Research Scientist at the Stanford Center for Innovations in Learning and the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE), Stanford University. Her current research focuses on the application of electronic portfolio pedagogy and practices in engineering education and the evaluation of eportfolios and other social software tools (wikis, weblogs, etc.) to facilitate teaching, learning, and assessment for students, faculty, departments, and institutions
gifted high school students in the Baltimore/Washington area with a strong aptitude inmathematics and/or science.The first two years of the program consisted solely of a series of lecture based seminars coveringtopics as diverse and dynamic as plasma physics, stealth astrophysics, and satellitereconnaissance. The 2003 seminar program sparked a soon to be dynamic change in the formatand structure of the program. Two University of Maryland, Baltimore County professors whopresented a lecture entitled “Careers in Engineering and Introduction to Engineering Design”were the impetus for change. Their innovative, engaging, and “hands-on” style lectureimpressed the Board of Directors at the museum and was rated with great enthusiasm by thestudents who
: Entrusted by society to create a sustainable world and enhance the global quality of life, civil engineers serve competently, collaboratively, and ethically as master: • planners, designers, constructors, and operators of society’s economic and social engine, the built environment; • stewards of the natural environment and its resources; • innovators and integrators of ideas and technology across the public, private, and academic sectors; • managers of risk and uncertainty caused by natural events, accidents, and other threats; and • leaders in discussions and decisions shaping public environmental and infrastructure policy.6The
remained a structural engineering consultant for a worldleader in structural engineering and continually brings the lessons learned from real life projectsinto the classroom. He developed an interdisciplinary senior project incorporating a dozen CalPoly ARCE students with Iowa State architecture students and presented the results at the ASEEannual convention. He offered case studies from his consulting work with structural engineeringfirms at the 2003 Architectural Engineering Institute national convention. He has developed aStatics is Your Friend presentation that he has delivered at both the ASEE convention and atArizona State University. Many of his efforts were made possible through the ProfessionalDevelopment Grant, Innovations in Teaching