Laboratory Are Magnus Bruaset holds a PhD in mathematical modeling from the University of Oslo. Since 2007, he has served as the assistant director of the Simula School of Research and Innovation. In addition, since late 2004, he has built up Simula’s research group in Computational Geosciences in close collaboration with StatoilHydro. He still leads this research group. Bruaset is also a professor at Department of Informatics, University of Oslo. For this national workshop, he served the lead organizer and as a principal instructor in the critique sessions.Melissa Marshall, Pennsylvania State University Melissa Marshall is a lecturer with the Department of Communication Arts & Sciences at
testingplays in conducting structural engineering research and education, the basic approach to theproposed research in the REU Site is discovery through actual construction, experimental testingand/or computer simulation, observing and recording, synthesizing the data collected, andgeneralizations. This approach provides an opportunity for individual growth and challenge tothe young and inquisitive mind.Pre-Preparation. To prepare the students for the research, reading material is sent four weeksprior to their arrival, which includes: project goal and objectives, important literature, tentativestudy plan, descriptions of test procedures and equipment, weekly activities, and information ofteam partners.Targeted Progress. The first day of the REU Site
functions. This same student may become more open tostudying other aspects of polynomials and other functions. These techniques can provide a quickcheck of computer-generated graphs or be employed when a computer is unavailable orinconvenient. If we desire to recruit more students into the analytical and other sciences, weneed to discover better, easier and more pleasurable ways to present conventional math conceptsbefore attempting to accelerate curricula by moving advanced differential concepts into thelower grades.Contents 1. Introduction 2. Polynomials 3. Arithmetic operations on functions and their effect on curves Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division 4. Elementary operations on curves and
- standing cross-cultural factors impacting student learning process as well as design curriculum based on engineering classes to empower engineering skills through hands-on activities and blended learning en- vironment. He is also interested in design methods which are based on the technology tools usage to stimulate engineering thinking for diverse students.Prof. Charles Morton Krousgrill, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Charles M. Krousgrill is a Professor in the School of Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University and is affiliated with the Ray W. Herrick Laboratories at the same institution. He received his B.S.M.E. from Purdue University and received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Applied
Paper ID #25605Sociotechnical Habits of Mind: Initial Survey Results and their FormativeImpact on Sociotechnical Teaching and LearningDr. Kathryn Johnson, Colorado School of Mines Kathryn Johnson is an Associate Professor at the Colorado School of Mines in the Department of Elec- trical Engineering and Computer Science and is Jointly Appointed at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s National Wind Technology Center. She has researched wind turbine control systems since 2002, with numerous projects related to reducing turbine loads and increasing energy capture. She has applied experiential learning techniques in
chemistry sets, kitchen chemistry Took care of or trained an animal Planted seeds, watched plants grow, watched animal behavior, collected things in nature (e.g., butterflies, rocks) Observed or studied stars and other astronomical objects Participated in science groups/clubs/camps Participated in science/math competition(s) Read/Watched non-fiction science Read/Watched science fiction Played computer/video games Wrote computer programs or designed web pages Talked with friends or family about scienceTable 5. Students’ intensity of experience with out-of-school experiences with follow up Tukey’sHSD for significant differences between groups. Tukey’s HSD Outcome
. She specializes in eval- uation and research in engineering education, computer science education, and technology education. Dr. Brawner is a founding member and former treasurer of Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an Ameri- can Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the American Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Exten- sion Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies
Building Escape Rooms to Increase Student Engagement in First Year Engineering ClassesThis complete evidence-based practice paper will discuss building escape rooms usingprogramming, computer aided design (CAD), engineering design, and prototyping to teach firstyear engineering students the fundamentals of engineering. An escape room is a cooperative playexperience where a team of players solves a series of puzzles in a set amount of time to win. Inthe work described here, students design and build escape rooms containing puzzles made usingArduino hardware, laser cut and CNC milled parts, and 3D printed models.Students become more invested in their education when they find the course content interestingand engaging
persistence of various groups ofstudents in civil engineering education and careers, this paper describes findings from a surveytaken by 223 undergraduate (165) and graduate students (58) in civil engineering. The surveyaims to address the following questions:• What are the factors that affect why women and minorities choose to pursue education in civil engineering?• What aspects of the civil engineering curriculum and course work do students find particularly motivating and interesting? Do students feel that they have a mentor? What kind of work experience and internships have students had? Are they members of student/professional engineering organizations? Do the answers to this question depend on the gender or ethnic/racial
approximately three months) in the technical aspects of using videography equipmentfor recording and in using computer software for editing audiovisual digital media.Subsequently, apprentices in the digital-storytelling track chose to follow and document eitherthe sustainable design project happening on site at their VTC or one of two others happening off-site (see below for more details on these projects). For the remaining five months of the schoolterm, the youth were responsible for shadowing and collaborating with their professional andundergraduate videography mentors to produce a short (5-7 minute) “digital story” about asustainable design project that could be presented to public audiences. While the burden of thefinal production fell to the
Paper ID #16384Work in Progress: A Preliminary Investigation of the Ways Engineering Stu-dents Experience InnovationMr. Nicholas D. Fila, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nicholas D. Fila is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He earned a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and a M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His current research interests include innovation, empathy, and engineering design.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette enay Purzer is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education. Her
Paper ID #23427Understanding Ethical Reasoning in Design Through the Lens of ReflexivePrinciplismDanielle Corple, Purdue University, West Lafayette Danielle Corple is a Ph.D. student in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue University. She studies organizational communication as well as qualitative and computational research methods. Her specific research interests are gender, organizing, and ethics in online and offline contexts.Mr. David H. Torres, Purdue University, West Lafayette David is a fourth year doctoral candidate in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue Uni- versity pursuing a PhD in
of four to six students and often one mentor, thisapproach would be taxing for one instructor teaching 20 to 30 students. However, because ourcourse has a stable of experienced mentors, we can have several simultaneous critique sessionsfor a class of 42 students. In addition, for the critiquing sessions, we use a special classroom(shown in Figure 2) that has conference-style tables. Each table, which seats six students and amentor, has a large computer monitor on one end such that each manuscript can be projected toallow for targeted discussion of a passage.Preliminary Results: The approach of scaling technical writing by using undergraduatementors shows much promise, but faces significant challenges For this proof-of-concept paper
Paper ID #28951Self-Efficacy Development in Students in a Declared EngineeringMatriculation StructureDr. Racheida S Lewis, University of Georgia Racheida S. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor at the University of Georgia in the Engineering Educa- tion Transformations Institute (EETI) and the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. She has been recognized as a Gates Millennium Scholar, GEM Associate Fellow, New Horizon Scholar, and a 2019 inductee into the Bouchet Honor Society. She completed her doctoral work at Virginia Tech where she focused on the impact matriculation structures have on self-efficacy
Carlson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Patricia Carlson is a professor of rhetoric in the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences. She is a long-time advocate of writing in engineering education. Carlson has been a National Research Council Senior Fellow for the U. S. Air Forcer, as well as having had several research fellowships with NASA (Langley and Goddard) and the Army’s Aberdeen Proving Ground. She has also been a research fellow at NASA’s Classroom of the Future located in Wheeling, WVA. Her primary research area – computer-aided tools to enhance writing in engineering education – has been funded through two NSF grants
1 Computer Science 1 Electrical & Computer Engineering 8 Information and Communication Tech 1 Mechanical Engineering 13 Page 23.674.6 Table 3. Year in School of Engineering Undergraduate Participants # of Year in School Students First 7 Second 11 Third 9 Fourth 4 Fifth 2 Sixth 1Research Findings: Sources of Support
Paper ID #6100A Survey of Former GK-12 FellowsDr. Jed S. Lyons, University of South Carolina Dr. Jed Lyons is professor of Mechanical Engineering and interim associate dean for Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering and Computing at the University of South Carolina. His passion is developing hands-on learning experiences for engineering students from grades K through Ph.D.Ms. Erica Pfister-Altschul, University of South Carolina Erica Pfister-Altschul has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from MIT, and an ME in Mechanical Engi- neering from the University of South Carolina. In addition to eight years of industry
implementation and assessment of the impact ofsupplemental instruction in other freshmen core courses is warranted, including evaluation ofwhether trigger thresholds and impact differ among other demographic populations (e.g.,international students and students for whom English is not their native language). The issuesraised are important topics of focus for future work in order to gain a better understanding of theimpact of supplemental instruction on demographics other than male/female and honors/non-honors and in the freshmen curriculum as a whole.References1 K. Coletti, M. Covert, P. A. DiMilla, L. Gianino, R. Reisberg, R., and E. O. Wisniewski. (2013). “Understanding the factors influencing student participation in supplemental instruction in
On Teaching and Assessing Engineering Innovation* Daniel Raviv+, Melissa Morris+, Karen Ginsberg++ + Department of Electrical Engineering ++ Department of Computer Science and Engineering Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431 E-mail: ravivd@fau.edu (561) 297 2773AbstractThis paper details data, analysis, and evaluation of one facet of innovation: ideation.Over the past six years college and high school students were exposed to several idea generationmethods in an
AC 2012-2999: PROJECT-BASED RENEWABLE ENERGY COURSE FORUNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING STUDENTSDr. Kala Meah, York College of Pennsylvania Kala Meah received a B.Sc. degree from Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology in 1998, a M.Sc. degree from South Dakota State University in 2003, and a Ph.D. degree from the University of Wyoming in 2007, all in electrical engineering. From 1998 to 2000, he worked for several power companies in Bangladesh. Currently, Meah is an Assistant Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering program, Department of Physical Sciences, York College of Pennsylvania, York, Penn., USA. His research interest includes electrical power, HVDC transmission, renewable energy, energy
During the Pandemic. Existing course activitieswere preserved in the curriculum but modified for effective delivery in the remote learningenvironment. For example, lectures covering specific engineering design concepts weredelivered synchronously (i.e., in real-time) over Zoom, and questions or feedback were takensynchronously throughout or after the presentation, or otherwise facilitated using Zoom’s chatfunction. The presentations were often recorded so students could return to the lecture materialthroughout the quarter. Table 1 provides additional examples of existing course activities and themodifications for the remote course environment.Table 1. Existing course activities that were modified for a remote course environment. A moredetailed
each of these was not the correctresolution but could not find an answer. Eventually, we reached the end of the class period, and Isaid, “I’m really sorry you guys, thank you for your patience,” and again promised to resolve thequestion after class and send out an email. Several students remained after class, and oneeventually noticed the second error, in the definition of pH, which cancelled out the first. I thankedthat student and corrected the slides, removing all trace of the mistake-filled slides from both thecourse Canvas page and my own computer despite this ongoing research project; Figures 6c and6d are reconstructions based on my notes. I then recorded a video explaining the correctcalculations and emailed students with a link to the
. Woodworth, A. Lomedico, L.L. Hyder, and S.V. Faraone, “Adult outcome of attention-deficit / hyperactivity disorder: A controlled 16-year follow-up study,” Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 941-950, 2012.[28] A. Zolyomi, A.S. Ross, A. Bhattacharya, L. Milne, and S.A. Munson, “Values, identity, and social translucence: Neurodiverse student teams in higher education,” CHI ’18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2019, Paper No. 499, pages 1-13, https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174073[29] D.R. Delp, “WIP: Practical applications for students with autism spectrum disorders in the freshman engineering curriculum,” Proc. American Society for Engineering
. These techniques can provide a quickcheck of computer-generated graphs or be employed when a computer is unavailable orinconvenient. If we desire to recruit more students into the analytical and other sciences, weneed to discover better, easier and more pleasurable ways to present conventional math conceptsbefore attempting to accelerate curricula by moving advanced differential concepts into thelower grades.Contents 1. Introduction 2. Polynomials 3. Arithmetic operations on functions and their effect on curves Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division 4. Elementary operations on curves and the algebra needed to produce them Translations, stretches, compressions and flips 5
AC 2011-563: ACADEMIC PREPARATION IN A CO-OP PROGRAM AS ACAREER ENHANCEMENT TOOL FOR INTERNATIONAL ENGINEER-ING GRADUATESSandra Ingram, University of Manitoba Sandra Ingram, Ph.D., is an associate professor in Design Engineering and adjunct professor in Biosys- tems Engineering at the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg, Canada. Dr. Ingram is responsible for teaching an integrated approach to technical communication in Biosystems Engineering and Electrical and Computer Engineering. Her research interests include mentorship and networking within engineer- ing, integrated approaches to technical communication and post-graduate training of engineers, . Address: E2-262 Engineering and Technology Complex, University of
he has served since 2007.Jim Pfaendtner, University of Washington Prof. Pfaendtner’s research group focuses on multiscale modeling of biophysical systems. His group develops and applies new computational methodologies for a wide range of problems of chemical en- gineering interest including biomaterials and biocatalysis. Prof. Pfaendtner earned his B.S. from the Georgia Institute of Technology and his Ph.D. from Northwestern University. After serving a two year post-doc at ETH Zurich in Switzerland, he joined the faculty of Chemical Engineering at the University of Washington in 2009.Marvi A. Matos, University of Washington Marvi A. Matos is naturally from Puerto Rico. She obtained her BS in Chemical Engineering
AC 2011-1244: PHENOMENOGRAPHIC STUDY OF HUMAN-CENTEREDDESIGN: EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONSCarla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette CARLA B. ZOLTOWSKI, Ph.D., is Education Administrator of the EPICS Program at Purdue Univer- sity. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Electrical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering.William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette William Oakes is the Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University, one of the founding faculty members of the School of Engineering Education and a courtesy faculty member in Mechanical Engi- neering and Curriculum
. Most students arecompetitively admitted to engineering and computer science majors after their second year. Thesecond population in this study consists of a small private teaching university in the southeastwhich serves approximately 5,000 students with 33% enrolled in one of the followingengineering programs: Aerospace, Civil, Computer, Electrical, Mechanical, Software, and stillexploring. The university is primarily residential undergraduate institution. All engineeringprograms begin with a common first-year experience with typical class sizes throughout theundergraduate curriculum below 40 students.The Large Public University vs. the Small Private University: Several differences are notablewhen comparing large and small universities
propulsion systems and Engineering Education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 ACE up your Sleeve: An Analysis of Student Generative AI Usage in an Engineering Statics CourseAbstractRapid technological advancements, including the emergence of computer-aided design andsimulation, have had a significant impact on the engineering industry. This, in turn, extends toengineering education, demonstrating a similar influential effect. The latest development to havesuch reverberations is the launch of a generative artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot known asChatGPT. ChatGPT utilizes a large language model (LLM) that trains the platform to understandand generate human-like responses
Engineering Focus Mental Health Provider, the Assistant Dean for Graduate Affairs in the College of Engineering, and the Assistant Dean for Diversity, Inclusion and Funding in the Graduate School.PD Workshop on Mentoring Up: The co-leads of MRSEC’s diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts, who have decades of experience training research mentors and mentoring students, led a lunch session for the FFs about how to elicit effective mentoring from their PIs. The content was adapted from the CIMER Project’s mentoring up curriculum [18]and one of the co-lead’s books [19]. During the workshop, the students reflected on what they most need from their mentors at this stage of their training and practiced how they would request that from their