Engineering EducationAnother critical gap lies in the integration of DEI principles into engineering education. Whilemany engineering programs have introduced courses on ethics and social responsibility, thesecourses often prioritize traditional ethical principles over DEI considerations. DEI topics, whenincluded, are frequently presented as standalone modules or elective courses, rather than beingembedded throughout the curriculum. This fragmented approach fails to equip future engineerswith the skills and perspectives needed to address intersectional inequities in their work.Moreover, existing educational resources often lack concrete tools and case studies that illustratehow DEI principles can be applied in engineering practice. For example, while
engineering students experienceindustry recognition across a four-year undergraduate program. The extent to which studentsbelieve other people see them as engineers influences how they see themselves as engineers.Students’ engineering identities can shape how they are motivated, persist, and learn engineering[1]-[3] which has inspired calls for the inclusion of identity development as part of theundergraduate engineering curriculum [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. Research has shown that howstudents feel recognized by others as the kind of person who can do engineering is the mostimportant element in the development of an engineering identity [9], [10]. Understandingrecognition is critical for designing high-impact curricular practices that can effectively
Paper ID #48830The ISP and GenAI Crossroads: A Student Crossroads Between InformationSearching and Ethics in Intro to Engineering CoursesDr. Kristina Bloch, University of Louisville Dr. Kristina Bloch is the Engineering Librarian at the University of Louisville. She received her BA in Political Science in 2009 and her MA in Curriculum & Instruction with a focus on Library Science in 2011 from Tennessee Tech University. She received her second MA with an EdS in School Administration from Bellarmine University in 2014. In 2023, she received her EdD in Leadership from the College of Education at Spalding
Grading Conference”, an annual two-day online confer- ence focused on reforming grading as we know it across STEM fields throughout higher education, now entering its fifth year. She coordinates a large general education Quantitative Reasoning with Statistics course for over 1,400 students per year as well as teaches a wide range of mathematics courses including Calculus and Linear Algebra.Dr. Emily L. Allen, California State University, Los Angeles Emily L. Allen, Ph.D., is Dean Emerita of the College of Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology at California State University, Los Angeles. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Examining Engineering Students’ Shift in
system of highereducation. However, Creek was unique among the participants as both her parents work in STEMeducation and industry. Her father is a professor of mechanical engineering and theoretical physics at aninstitution of higher education while her mother works in the computer science industry. Creek sharedthat their expectation was for her to major in a STEM field in college. Creek wants to follow in her dad’sfootsteps and become a college professor. Creek was diagnosed with an anxiety disorder and explainedthat she was transparent about her mental health experiences with peers and others as a way ofnormalizing mental health issues in STEM. She also later reflected on the possibility of her ownneurodivergence as likely in the form of
interest in engineering education. She develops materials and re- searches best practical classroom approaches for integrating computation and computational thinking in introductory CEE courses; and for promoting teamwork, communication and problem-solving in context, throughout the CEE curriculum.Dr. Ashlynn S. Stillwell, University of Illinois Urbana - Champaign Dr. Ashlynn S. Stillwell is an Associate Professor and the Elaine F. and William J. Hall Excellence Faculty Scholar in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research focuses on creating sustainable water and energy systems in a policy-relevant context. She earned a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the
Paper ID #37576Cross-Institutional Mentoring Communities ProgramAdrienne Minerick (Director, The ADVANCE Initiative and Professor,Chemical Engineering) Adrienne R. Minerick is Director of ADVANCE at Michigan Tech and Professor of Chemical Engineering. She has served as Associate Dean for Research and Innovation in the College of Engineering, Assistant to the Provost for Faculty Development, Dean of the School of Technology, founded the College of Computing, and most recently served as Interim Dean of the Pavlis Honors College. She has received numerous honors and awards, including the distinction of Fellow of
due to a gap in skills such as communication and problem-solving [1]. Newlygraduated and employed engineers must be ready to engage in workplace learning as self-directed learners. This preparation must come from engineering learning experiences designed tohelp students transition from instructor-led learning (as is typical of pedagogy) to more self-directed learning (as is typical of adult learning or andragogy) across the curriculum [2].However, there is much fixation on pedagogical approaches and engineering science learning,wherein students work to solve predominately close-ended problems [3]. Andragogicalapproaches focus on students becoming self-directed individuals who rely on their bank ofknowledge and apply their skills to perform
engineering student. I thought I would be something with visual or performing arts. But, when I was younger, I was a tinkerer. I liked to take things apart and find out how things worked. It didn’t always turn out well, but I still liked it. Now, as a sophomore, I’m in two engineering classes. One is statics, and the other I’m taking is engineering graphics, which is hand and computer drafting. I like the drafting one a little bit better, mainly because I’m learning different programs that are more relevant to engineering businesses. Statics is just a lot of vector analysis, and I am struggling with that. Physics 2 and statics, those two classes are really difficult for me. I suppose it’s a little bit of my mental health, and a
characteristics and uses of scholarly, peer-reviewed articles isnecessary and important in any STEM curriculum—a strong first step in teaching sourceevaluation. However, this is where many educators start and end the lesson. Limiting students tousing peer-reviewed works from academic databases is no longer sufficient. In the Digital Age, itis increasingly important that students also learn how to navigate the web in their research.STEM students are required to pull information from a wide variety of sources [1], and, as such,should be equipped with the latest source evaluation techniques to combat the misinformationand bias they will undoubtedly encounter online. Students can only benefit from being able torecognize poor-quality content in real life and
students’ accounts of engineering learning before and after the onset of remote instructions due to the Covid-19 pandemic? Research Question 2: What are the key themes in students’ accounts of their experiences learning engineering and making following the onset of remote instruction due to the Covid- 19 pandemic?While students may experience the same core curriculum, individual student experiences maydiffer. Identifying the commonalities in experiences among students allows for themes withindepartments as well as cohorts to be identified. These themes can be used to inform futureinstruction in the ongoing pandemic as well as any future situations that require shifts to onlineinstruction.4 MethodologyThe data gathered for this study was
traditional course offerings. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 31629Lecture Videos & PPTsThe instructor chose to develop online content using familiar software to focus on contentdelivery. The instructor also wanted the ability to make quick modifications to online contentfrom any computer at any time. Adopting familiar software also ensured that students were ableto access course content with ease.Lecture videos were created using the Record Presentation function in Microsoft PowerPoint.Research suggests that online lectures should be limited to 6-15 minutes in length to maintainstudent attention and support effective learning. 25 lecture
procedures forreviews changed: neither tutors nor students were present in-person, review sheets were sent tostudents in the Zoom chat, and tutors worked through homework questions on whiteboards overvideo. To ask questions, participants could unmute their microphones or post them in the chat.Through the College of Engineering (COE) Tutoring Office, students also had the option toreceive one-on-one drop-in peer tutoring for most courses taken in the first two years of theengineering curriculum. This office was staffed by undergraduate peer tutors. Prior to theCOVID-19 pandemic, peer tutoring was offered in person, which allowed students to “drop-in”during operating hours without an appointment. In Fall 2020 one-on-one tutoring was onlyoffered
. Even the simplest student design teamcan have multiple unique boundaries. The team members alone may comprise the system, or itmay be expanded to include the faculty coach and student advisors. It may also include sponsorsand suppliers, or peer teams working on the same design challenge. In this case study, a capstonedesign team with ten members was identified as the system. Capstone design projects provide anopportunity for students to apply their engineering skills to a design problem in a team setting.This capstone project serves as a culminating experience to the undergraduate curriculum [47].Senior engineering students also have been used to represent novice design engineers in casesstudy research [48].The second step is to administer the
leadership development, performance management, competency development and people analytics. She integrates her research in Engineering Education with prior background in Human Resource Management and Engineering to understand better ways to develop STEM workforce both in universities and companies.Prof. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S
professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and other non- cognitive aspects of the student experience on engagement, success, and persistence and on effective methods for teaching global issues such as those pertaining to sustainability.Ms. Shruti Misra, University of Washington Shruti is a graduate student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Washington, Seat- tle. Her research interest is broadly focused on studying innovation in university-industry partnerships. She is interested in the various ways that universities and industry come together and participate in driving
academic interests include biology, philosophy and religion. He is a researcher and writer for Lawyer-Ed, a legal publication. His research and career interests include medical law, legislation research, and engineering education.Dr. Kate Mercer, University of Waterloo Kate Mercer is the Systems Design Engineering, Electrical and Computer Engineering and Earth and Environmental Sciences, and is an Adjunct Assistant Professor in Systems Design Engineering at the University of Waterloo. Kate’s main duties include providing instruction and research services to students, faculty and staff. Kate graduated with a MI from the University of Toronto and completed her PhD at the University of Waterloo’s School of Pharmacy. Most
(reflected in the two chosen measures) across the threeworkshops in Figure 3, it is noted that workshop 3 indicated, in comparison to the other twoworkshops, higher satisfaction in both evaluations (mid- and end- of-semester). Workshop 2, onthe other hand, indicated a mean satisfaction level that was higher than workshop 1 in the mid-semester evaluations, yet lower than the workshop 1 in the end-of-semester evaluations. Theseresults reflect nothing, however, unless proven to be statistically significant. Hence Table 4represents the computational results of the statistical tests.It can be seen from Table 4 that there is strong evidence (p-value<0.005) to reject the nullhypotheses of normal distributions of either measures. Hence, the equality of
learning and usingEnglish due to events of a political and military nature5. In cases such as IEP where Englishlanguage learning is of primary concern, negative associations and cultural hesitations may beencountered and may persist in a way that non-IEP students do not experience.Another concern sometimes expressed is that in some cases the primary focus of IEP studentsand programs are to improve student TOEFL scores rather than improving the underlyinglanguage abilities that the TOEFL test is meant to quantify. Instead of curriculum-teaching, item-teaching (or “Teaching to the test”) is instruction aimed at improving test-preparation, awarenessof test tips and tricks, and increasing familiarity with the types of questions likely to beencountered
engineeringas needing a diversity of perspective to reach the best product (Slaton, 2015).In education-focused work, perhaps from the profession the diversity context moves to theunderrepresentation issues as embedded within the engineering education pipeline. Factorsrelated to the retention or attrition of underrepresented groups include curriculum overload, lossof interest, poor teaching, study skills, and a lack of role models (Seymour & Hewitt, 2000).Quantitative research helps position the educational context as a high leverage player for betteror worse in responding to the diversity problem of the profession.The diversity context might then relate underrepresentation issues to the human scale and notethe sorts of marginalizing experiences
characterization techniques and laboratory apparatus for advancement of novel electronic devices, in addi- tion to curriculum development for inquiry-based learning and facilitation of interdisciplinary, student-led project design. She emphasizes engineering sustainable solutions from a holistic perspective, incorporat- ing analysis of the full technological life cycle and socioeconomic impact.Prof. Bryan M. Jenkins, University of California, Davis, Dept. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering Prof. Bryan Jenkins teaches and conducts research in the areas of energy and power, with emphasis on biomass and other renewable resources. Dr. Jenkins has more than thirty years of experience work- ing in the area of biomass
to accurately diagnose any biases or aggressions.” While we recognize thatthe case studies can continually be improved upon, we interpreted these critiques as denying thatbias exists. Instances of bias are not always clear cut; rather, they can be ambiguous, messy, andoften invisible to dominant group members, which is what we strived to emulate in our casestudy. This theme of resistance to diversity among engineering students shows us the importanceof embedding diversity and inclusion topics throughout engineering curriculum as we realize thata single class period is not enough to promote allyship and improve culture.Differences between engineering and anthropology classWe noticed many differences between the responses from the anthropology
has worked in the areas of construction of infrastructures and buildings, failure assessment of buildings and bridges, construction accident investigations, forensic engineering, ancient buildings, ancient bridges, and the ancient history of science and engineering for over 40 years. The tools he uses include fault tree analysis, fuzzy logic, artificial intelligence, and virtual reality.Dr. Michael Parke, The Ohio State University Dr. Parke has over twenty years experience in satellite based earth science research. He has been teaching first year engineering for the past eighteen years, with emphasis on computer aided design, computer programming, and project design and documentation.Ms. Olga Maria Stavridis, Ohio
the client, interact with the contractor, interact with thevendor”. He had not done any volunteer engagement, and while he had mentored co-op studentshe saw this as helping, not as leadership.Milan’s leadership behaviours match those from the literature and a pattern observed across mostcases: He asked questions, he built relationships to be able to learn technical knowledge fromdifferent disciplines, and he showed initiative in teaching himself several key computer programsthat are crucial to his job but that he had not learned in university. 13Milan shows consistency in his belief that leadership is equated with management and the use ofpositional
Education in the Human Computer Interaction (HCI) program at Iowa State University. Currently, I am a faculty member of the Aerospace Engineering Department at Iowa State University as the direcotor for the Make to Innovate program at Iowa State University. This program provides our students with an opportunity to do hands-on projects and includes everything from underwater to space projects. In addition to my duties at Iowa State University, I also serve as the president of the Stratospheric Ballooning Association. This organization aims to promote, educate, and encourage collaboration for high-altitude balloon projects.Dr. Benjamin Ahn, Iowa State UniversityMrs. Christine Nicole Nelson, c
of Soltec’s projects. Each projecthas about six undergraduate/ graduate students. Students’ courses/ backgrounds vary, includingProduction Engineering, Electronic and Computer Engineering, Environmental Engineering,Sociology, Social Service, and Architecture and Urbanism.ITCP is an acronym for “Technological Incubator of Grassroots Cooperatives.” There are morethan a hundred of such incubators across the country, each one an extension center linked to auniversity, supporting a great variety of productive enterprises [23], [4]. For grassrootsengineering, however, the particularly relevant one is that of Unicamp.ITCP/Unicamp was founded in 2001, linked to the Office of the Vice-President for Extensionand Outreach [24]. In 2013, a second ITCP
student assistants could convey command knowledgeand troubleshoot where needed.For this project, we chose to use Rhinoceros 3D modeling software (henceforth, simply Rhino),because we assessed it to lie between traditional engineering CAD software (e.g., Siemens NX,Autodesk AutoCAD, and SolidWorks) and modeling software dedicated to computer graphicimagery (CGI) applications (e.g., Autodesk Maya and The Foundry’s Modo). We hoped Rhinoalso would enable even novice students to make relatively quick mockups with sophisticatedgeometry, and thereby would encourage early design concept exploration.2Extending Chester’s Domains of CAD Knowledge: Command, Strategic, and EpistemicIn his 2007 article, “Teaching for CAD Expertise,” Ivan Chester makes the case
UR also aided in the process of “becoming a scientist” – understanding thenorms of professional practice and connecting to the field [6], [7]. Especially in terms of“developing an identity as a scientist”, students cited the impact of UR more than coursework orthe general college experience.While many studies have focused on students in the sciences, especially biology, studies have alsobeen conducted on the specific impact within the engineering curriculum. At the University ofDelaware, Zydney et al. conducted a study of the impacts of UR through a survey of alumni of theCollege of Engineering [8]. Questions about outcomes of the college experience were distributedto alumni who participated in UR, as well as those who did not. The authors
Paper ID #15756Becoming Boundary Spanning Engineers: Research Methods and Prelimi-nary FindingsProf. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He is also an Associate Director of Purdue’s Office of Global Engineering Programs, leads the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from
-residents, and 3% are permanent residents. The racial makeup of the student sample is:White students (62%), Asian students (23%), Hispanic students (8%), Black students (2%), andnot indicated (4%). With this, 10% of the sample (Black and Hispanic students) are fromunderrepresented populations. Notably, Asian and Hispanic students are represented in thiscourse at a greater percentage when compared to demographics of the university as a whole.Most of the students in our sample majored in an engineering degree: mechanical (44%),electrical (9%), aerospace (9%), industrial operations (7%), computer science (6%), biomedical(5%), chemical (3%), computer (3%), and other engineering fields (5%). Adding to themultidisciplinary nature more broadly outside of