Value Tool,” NAFSA. http://www.nafsa.org/policy-and-advocacy/policy-resources/nafsa-international-student- economic-value-tool-v2 (accessed Apr. 03, 2023).[7] G. González-Ocampo and M. Castelló, “How do doctoral students experience supervision,” Stud. Contin. Educ., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 293–307, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1080/0158037x.2018.1520208.[8] L. Moxham, T. Dwyer, and K. Reid-Searl, “Articulating expectations for PhD candidature upon commencement: ensuring supervisor/student ‘best fit,’” J. High. Educ. Policy Manag., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 345–354, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1080/1360080x.2013.812030.[9] B. J. Barnes and A. E. Austin, “The Role of Doctoral Advisors: A Look at Advising from the Advisor’s Perspective,” Innov
departmental climate that increases a student’s sense of belonging,perceived faculty support, and satisfaction with the major,” in Innovative Higher Education,2020, 46(1), 95–109.[11] M. Xiao, K.D. Bradley, J. Lee, “Exploring the Relationship between Student Involvementand First-to-second Year Retention at Four-year Postsecondary Institutions”, Mid WesternEducational Researcher, 2020, 33(3).[12] L. Jacob, A. Lachner, K. Scheiter, “Do school students’ academic self-concept and priorknowledge constrain the effectiveness of generating technology-mediated explanations?”Computers and Education, 2022, 182, 104469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104469[13] M. Bong, E. M. Skaalvik
research. In the Center, she also supports other research projects and undergraduate labs on topics of high school science pedagogy and student engagement in science.Dr. Gina Navoa Svarovsky, University of Notre Dame Gina Navoa Svarovsky is an Associate Professor of Practice at the University of Notre Dame’s Center for STEM Education and the Faculty Director of the University’s Center for Broader Impacts. She has studied how young people learn engineering for nearly two decades.Mia Lettau, University of Notre DameKimberly MarfoAndrea Lorena Ortiz, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile Andrea is an Engineering MSc student with a major in Engineering, Design & Innovation and a PE Diploma in Information
innovation. 2020.[10] S. T. Jones and N. Melo, “‘Anti-blackness is no glitch’: the need for critical conversations within computer science education,” XRDS, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 42–46, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1145/3433134.[11] E. W. Huff et al., “Going Through a Process of Whitening: Student Experiences Within Computer Science Education,” in Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Virtual Event USA: ACM, Mar. 2021, pp. 1348–1348. doi: 10.1145/3408877.3432497.[12] S. Banjo and D. Bass, “On Diversity, Silicon Valley Failed to Think Different,” Bloomberg.com, Aug. 03, 2020. Accessed: Jul. 06, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-08-03/silicon-valley-didn-t
Paper ID #37764Is Natural Language Processing Effective in Education Research? A casestudy in student perceptions of TA supportNeha Kardam, University of Washington Neha Kardam is a third-year Ph.D. student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle.Ms. Shruti Misra, University of Washington I am a graduate student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. My research interest is broadly focused on studying innovation in university-industry partnerships. I am interesting in various ways that universitiesDr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington
. The new degree program was launched in the Autumn of 2020 at the OhioState University. Offered by the regional campuses which have traditionally been feeder campusesto the central campus, this employer-driven program will prepare graduates for high-demandmanufacturing occupations that require strong technical and management skills.The curriculum for the four-year degree program was based on industry needs that will allowgraduates of the program to help the state build the manufacturing workforce needed to competeand thrive. The curriculum is driven by a rigorous assessment process and foundational skills formathematics, physics, engineering, and management skills including the following: problem-solving, innovation, leadership, and change
, “Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence,” J. Higher Educ., vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 540-563, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772116 [Accessed Jan. 17, 2023].[20] L. Huang, “Co-curricular activity-based intercultural competence development: Students’ outcome of internationalisation at universities,” Innovations in Educ. & Teaching Int., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 184-193, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1184098 [Accessed Jan. 17, 2023].[21] P. M. King and K. S. Kitchener, Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults
learn self-directed and continual learning skills for thinking aboutwicked problems and possible solutions. What students learn can be assessed throughobservation and the use of the assessment-specific rubrics; however, how students learn is lessstraightforward to quantify within the typical engineering curricula. Despite the pedagogicalchallenges, we support deeper integration of policy-literacy skills into engineering classroomsfor preparing students as future societal leaders.AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by the Strategic Instructional Innovations Program (SIIP) and theAcademy for Excellence in Engineering Education (AE3) at the Grainger College ofEngineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, and the National Science
University Press, 2020). He is dedicated to engi- neering pedagogy and enriching students’ learning experiences through teaching innovations, curriculum design, and support of undergraduate student research.Dr. Alex M. Phan, University of California San Diego Dr. Phan received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California San Diego with a specialization in medical devices. He is currently an instructor for the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering focusing on hands-on education.Aidan Daniel CarriggKarthik SrinivasanJosephine Relaford-Doyle, University of California, San Diego ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Effect of automated instantaneous
army.Additionally, Dustin seems to consider his audience more carefully. In his initial entry, Dustinoccasionally uses technical language to align himself with an engineering and piloting discourse(e.g., “stall speed”), but we see a lack of this kind of technical language in his later entry, makingit more accessible to a wider audience.Dillon wrote about the advent of freeze-drying and allied landing at Normandy for his first andlast entries, respectively. Like Dustin, Dillon does not seem to align with any particular side forhis first define, using words such as “recipient” when describing the soldiers or emphasizing the“massive advantage” freeze-drying provided to demonstrate that innovators have overcome thedifficulties of war, but it is unclear in his
and Practice, Team-based Design & Innovation Leadership Introduction to Engineering Leadership, Engineering Leadership, Organizational Leadership & Team Development, Fundamentals of Self-Leadership, Principles of Leadership Other Diversity, Foreign Language, Critical Thinking, International Perspective, Engineering for Social Change, Global Studies 7Table 2. Professional Skills offered in the ABET accredited Engineering Management programs. Professional Skills Categories
theory. In K. R. Wenzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 35–53). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.[31] Carberry, A. R., Gerber, E. M., & Martin, C. K. (2018). Measuring the innovation self-efficacy of engineers. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34(2), 590-598.[32] Garrison, D. R. (1992). Critical thinking and self-directed learning in adult education: An analysis of responsibility and control issues. Adult education quarterly, 42(3), 136-148.[33] Chakrabarti R. (2021). The Art Of Lifelong Learning: A Practitioner’s View. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/sap/2021/02/17/the-art-of-lifelong-learning-a-practitioners- view/?sh=be4796f6d060[34
://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-043-9[18] H. B. Carlone, “Innovative Science Within and Against a Culture of ‘Achievement,’” Sci. Educ., vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 307–328, 2003, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10071.[19] H. B. Carlone and A. Johnson, “Understanding the Science Experiences of Successful Women of Color: Science Identity as an Analytic Lens,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1187–1218, 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237.[20] Z. Hazari, G. Sonnert, P. M. Sadler, and M.-C. Shanahan, “Connecting High School Physics Experiences, Outcome Expectations, Physics Identity, and Physics Career Choice: A Gender Study,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 978–1003, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea
designpromotes creative problem solving and divergent thinking [13], [14]. Furthermore, allowingstudents to engage in redesigning their solutions provides them opportunities to think analyticallyabout their design choices to come up with better and more innovative designs [15]. Contentintegration using multidisciplinary approaches prompts students to consolidate and applyconcepts and practices from multiple disciplines [16], [17]. Activities that allow students toengage in STEM practices and exhibit 21st century skills support students’ active construction ofknowledge and higher-order thinking skills [18], [19].Engineering Focus Moore et al.’s [15] framework for quality K-12 engineering education specifies some ofthe aforementioned features as
methodologies that could bring real-world issues into engineering classrooms [9]. Theresults of their research led to recommendations to engineering educators on the importance ofdeveloping interdisciplinary technical case studies that facilitate the communication ofengineering innovations to students in the classroom.Active learning helps students learn by increasing their engagement in the process [10], [11].Active learning techniques help students to better understand the topics covered in thecurriculum [12]. Active learning helps students to be more excited about the study of engineeringthan traditional instruction [1]. The group work that often accompanies active learninginstruction helps students develop their soft skills [13] and makes students
, alternative evaluation methods ranging from peer assessment toself-assessment have emerged in the field of higher education with the latter gaining popularitywithin engineering courses [6, 8]. This innovative non-traditional method allows the students toassume the roles of both the learner and the evaluator. The DSHM has been explained inprevious studies [2, 3] but will be briefly summarized here. The assignment features twosubmissions. The first is completed by the student and submitted to the instructor in person oronline using a LMS similarly to the traditional method of homework. This submission is thengraded based on completion and on the basis that the student gave a “good faith” effort onanswering the questions correctly.Shortly after the
rather than the ELLC.Each ELLC had an Engineering major serve as their Resident Assistant. The community serviceproject served different clients over the years but the activities were similar (e.g., cleaning uplitter at a local community development center, doing the same at a local zoo, performing routinemaintenance at a therapeutic riding center, etc.). The co-curricular events varied from year toyear. On-campus events included guest speakers on topics ranging from nuclear proliferation tobusiness innovation, and a guided tour of a suspension bridge located near campus. Field tripsincluded visits to the Boston Science Museum, a tour of the HVAC systems at the Harvard ArtMuseums, and a tour of the Rhode Island Resource Recovery Corporation’s
Paper ID #37867Evaluating Spatial Visualization Learning Through DigitizedSketches: A Case Study of Engineering Students'Orthographic Projection ErrorsLelli Van Den Einde (Dr.) Lelli Van Den Einde is a Teaching Professor in Structural Engineering at UCSD. She incorporates education innovations into courses (Peer Instruction, Project-based learning), prepares next generation faculty through TA Training, serves as advisor to student organizations, and is committed to fostering a supportive environment for diverse students. Her research focuses on engagement strategies for large classrooms and developing K-16
previous prediction studies in FYE classrooms, there is a need to gobeyond prediction studies and think from a human-centered approach about How and Why userswill use the information from these studies. Finally, results of this case study show careerexploration materials to have an effect on the student’s final grade. This would suggest that therecan be space to investigate if this is the case for other settings, and if so, give more relevance tothese types of materials in FYE courses.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the Charles Koch Foundation.Bibliography[1] J. Bordogna, E. Fromm, and E. W. Ernst, “Engineering Education: Innovation Through Integration,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 3–8
Paper ID #38042Invisibilized Hypervisibility: Black STEM Doctoral Students,HBCUs, and MentoringLisa Merriweather Lisa Merriweather is a Professor of Adult Education at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte with a PHD in adult education from the University of Georgia, co-founder and co-editor of Dialogues in Social Justice: An Adult Education Journal, and aspiring writer of historical science fiction centering issues of race and racism. Employing the art of story and dialogic engagement, complete with creativity and innovativeness, emotionality and theorizing, and historical and contemporary cultural
engineering must avoid propagating a climate that encourages LGBTQ+ people toleave engineering because they do not feel included or as they belong. However, without beinginformed about differences in identities and deliberately making space for those differences,uncomfortable and awkward interactions can occur between queer and non-queer individuals [4],climate can be chilly [5], and culture can continue to transmit a lower sense of belonging toLGBTQ+ individuals [6]. Rather than risk global competence and innovation whilesimultaneously burdening LGBTQ+ individuals to cover “undesirable” behaviors andmannerisms or asking them to pass for heterosexual and stay in the closet, engineeringpractitioners and other STEM educators and practitioners are