Session 15552004 ASEE – Salt Lake CityGraduate Studies DivisionInvited Panel Session:Issues Driving Reform of Faculty Reward SystemsRelevant to Professional Graduate Engineering EducationInvited Panel Paper # 3 Issues Driving Reform of Faculty Reward Systems to Advance Professional Graduate Engineering Education: Expectations For Adjunct Industrial Faculty D. D. Dunlap,1 J. M. Snellenberger,2 D. H. Quick,2 I. T. Davis,3 J. P. Tidwell,4 A. L. McHenry,5 D. R. Depew,6 S. J. Tricamo,7 D. A. Keating,8 T. G. Stanford 8 Western
Paper ID #41891Board 341: Obstacles in Context: A Multi-Perspective Examination of Obstaclesof Revolutionizing Engineering Education in the NSF RED ProgramDr. Eva Andrijcic, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Eva Andrijcic is an Associate Professor of Engineering Management at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her major interests are in the areas of organizational change management, leadership education, and risk education.Dr. Sriram Mohan, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Sriram Mohan is a Professor of Computer Science and Software Engineering at Rose-Hulman institute of Technology. Sriram received a B.E degree in
Findings from Online Surveys of BusinessExecutives and Hiring Managers., 2018.[11] The Lemelson Foundation, "The Engineering for One Planet Framework: EssentialSustainability-focused Learning Outcomes for Engineering Education," 2022.[12] B. Jacoby, Service-Learning Essentials: Questions, Answers, and Lessons Learned. 2014.[13] A. Furco, "Service-learning: A balanced approach to experiential education," 1996.[14] J. Rubin, "Collaborative online international learning (COIL): Now preparing students forinternational virtual work," in Internationalization and Employability in Higher Education, 2019.[15] M. Esche, "Incorporating collaborative online international learning (COIL) into studyabroad courses: A training design," 2018.[16] ASME EGD
University of South Carolina 8 AbstractThis is the first paper in the panel session of the National Collaborative Task Force for reform ofprofessionally oriented engineering graduate education to make it more relevant to the needs of industryto ensure a strong U.S. engineering workforce for competitiveness. Because the practice of engineeringfor technological innovation is changing and because engineering education cannot meet all of therequirements relevant to the needs and skill sets required for career-long growth of engineers in industry,within the standard four-year baccalaureate curriculum, there is a heightened sense of urgency that majoreducational reform is needed at the graduate level. The
a frequent presenter and publisher on internationalization, strategic planning, globally focused academics, and Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL). Carrie is a 2019 Fulbright recipient and holds an Ed.D. in the Design of Learning Environments from Rutgers University.James Tippey, Excelsior College ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Technology and Society Incorporating ethics, inclusive belonging for excellence, and societal understanding into computer and technology and engineering education curriculum design(2025). CoNECD Conference, February 9-11, 2025, San Antonio, TX Session Outline
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition,Paper ID# 6639.. 10As mentioned, giving the subject community a role in the research process is a way toaddress any implicit bias or misunderstandings a researcher may have about acommunity that is not their own. Community collaborative research methods are acompelling way to create feminist research which reduces inequity in the researchprocess.Involving the research subjects as part of the research team has been demonstratedto be effective in gender research in higher education by Z Nicolazzo in their researchwith undergraduate trans-identified students [10]. Their research closely
Paper ID #44135Theorizing Neuro-Induced Relationships Between Cognitive Diversity, Motivation,Grit and Academic Performance in Multidisciplinary Engineering EducationContextProf. Duy Duong-Tran, United States Naval Academy Dr. Duong-Tran is currently an Assistant Professor of Mathematics at the United States Naval Academy (USNA). Before joining USNA, he was a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. He held a Ph.D. from Purdue University’s School of Industrial Engineering (IE) and a graduate certificate from Purdue’s School of Engineering Education in 2022. His main
and recognitionAbstractThe Latin American and Caribbean Consortium of Engineering Institutions (LACCEI) is a non-profit organization formed by institutions seeking to improve collaborations with and recognitionof engineering programs in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). Two LACCEI initiativesseek to improve international recognition of Latin America and Caribbean engineering programsby increasing the number that attains internationally recognized accreditation. In 2004, theAccreditation Committee of LACCEI proposed a five-level model for educational programprocess assessment that measures the capability of an engineering education program to achieverepeatable results. This model, called the Engineering Education Capability Maturity Model
Paper ID #8746Where do We Go from Here? Conversations with K-6 Principals FollowingThree Years of Engineering Education Professional Development for TheirFacultyDr. Louis S. Nadelson PhD, Boise State University Louis S. Nadelson is an associate professor in the College of Education at Boise State University, with a PhD in educational psychology from UNLV. His scholarly interests include all areas of STEM teaching and learning, inservice and preservice teacher professional development, program evaluation, multidis- ciplinary research, and conceptual change. Nadelson uses his over 20 years of high school and college math
even hard to get recognition for a sabbatical in industry … Please understand that I am not criticizing the current faculty. I am one of them, and I respect my colleagues greatly. Rather, I am criticizing a system that prevents us from enriching faculty with a complementary set of experiences and talents.”B) Responsive Universities ─Relevancy to the Creative Professions in the 21st CenturyThe National Collaborative agrees with president Wulf’s point of view of the need for watershed reformin the U.S. system of engineering education and suggests as the Kellogg Commission has pointed out ─in order to remain relevant to their constituencies, and to be more effective ─ universities must change.2Whereas universities have traditionally
% willing to recommend such activities to their teachersand classmates. This program is a good example of a successful university-industry-governmentpartnership to provide an alternative internship experience for students that could serve as amodel for other universities with similar aims.IntroductionThe importance of university-industry partnerships has been recognized in engineering educationthroughout the world. For example, the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) hasa division devoted to College Industry Partnerships [1] and sponsors an annual conference onIndustry and Education Collaboration [2]. Many ways to develop partnerships betweenuniversities and industry are described in the proceedings from this division and conference
Reform and Research Activity. She obtained a Ph.D. in English Literature from Chiba University in 2002. Her current main research interests are: 1) how including humanities courses in an engineering education curriculum can help students to gain flexibility, and an appreciation of equity, and a greater richness of ideas; 2) finding and solving the systematic issues impacting the effectiveness of engineering education, specifically in the context of project-based learnings; and 3) assessing the impact of interdisciplinary engi- neering project-based learnings. Below are her recent presentations at international conferences: WERA 2022, APAIE 2022, IIAI DSIR 2021, IIAI DSIR 2020, WERA 2019. She obtained the Outstanding Paper
included in the Appendix. ● Incubator, a smaller (~10 attendees) weekly meeting of researchers and faculty interested in exploring and supporting collaborations that emerge from mutual interests and interactions in the meeting. Discussions include upcoming grant proposals, practitioners concerns, and in-progress paper submissions. ● CLUSTER research group (website), similar to other research groups around the College, a weekly meeting focused on research interests. ● Faculty Travel Fellowship, supports faculty to travel to engineering education research and other teaching and learning conferences, such as the annual ASEE conference and the Teaching Professor conference. ● Research Initiation
AC 2007-342: FACULTY REWARD SYSTEM REFORM FOR ADVANCEMENT OFPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION FOR INNOVATION:REVISITING THE URGENCY FOR REFORMDennis Depew, Purdue University DENNIS R. DEPEW is dean of the college of technology, Purdue University.Gary Bertoline, Purdue University GARY R. BERTOLINE is professor and assistant dean for graduate studies of the college of technology, Purdue University.Mark Schuver, Purdue University MARK T. SCHUVER is director of the Rolls-Royce-Purdue Master’s degree program, Purdue University.Donald Keating, University of South Carolina DONALD A. KEATING is associate professor of mechanical engineering, University of South Carolina, and chair ASEE-Graduate
needed to lead people to develop and implement a new funding model for advanced practice professional graduate programs?References1. Boyer, Earnest L., “Scholarship Revisited: Priorities for the Professorate”, The Carnegie Foundation, 1990.2. Jescski, Martin, Speech to the board of trustees, May 2003.3. Dunlap, D.D., Tricamo, S.J. Sebastian, D.H., Keating, D.A., Stanford, T.G., “Growing the National Innovative System: Defining the Characteristics of Innovative Professional Graduate Education at the Master, Doctor, and Fellow Level for Technology Leaders in Industry”, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference 2003.Biography – National Collaborative Task Force MembersDENNIS R. DEPEW is professor
Paper ID #9643”Rounding-up the industrial engineering educational profile with adaptivesoft skills framed by a cultural competency approach in an industry-universitypartnership.”Dr. Imelda Olague-Caballero, New Mexico State University Dr. Imelda Olague studied Civil Engineering at the University Autonomous of Chihuahua (UACH) and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at New Mexico State University (NMSU). Currently, Dr. Olague is pursuing a second Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering at NMSU. She is the institutional liaison between UACH and NMSU supporting academic partnerships and research collaborations. Her research area is in
underrepresented engineering students to leaders in theindustry with shared identities and backgrounds which ultimately provided them with the tools tobolster their knowledge of possible career paths and skills to navigate the engineering industry. Interpersonal Relations:Students reflected on developing skills such as communication, cultural empathy, collaboration,networking, respect, as well a sense of belonging in the REU community. This REU offeredstudents opportunities to feel a deep sense of belonging and form a community amongst peopleof shared identities in engineering. One student shared, The sense of community was a strange feeling compared to most of my experiences I recall during my engineering education, and I feel like it
is a work-in-progress and presents a successful pilot of a new communitycentered engineering educational initiative. Five specific areas associated with launchingthis pilot prototype two-week DTSC are presented including:1. Processes, methods and techniques used to develop new curriculum.2. Pedagogy, instructional concepts, activities, outcomes and environments.3. Developing effective collaboration and community partnership models.4. Review of results, outcomes and assessment techniques employed.5. Insights and details on how to improve and develop high school STEM programs.Processes, Methods and TechniquesThe ability to offer cutting edge innovation, creativity and design curricula was madepossible by a ten-year investment on the part of
Paper ID #14838The Value of Interpersonal Skills Training in Engineering Education: An In-teractive Panel Discussion with the Tau Beta Pi Engineering Futures ProgramDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Initiatives at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engi- neering from the University of Michigan. She has published more than two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her
with an extensive network of leaders in the engineering education landscape, including those at the helm of Engineering PLUS. Given the diverse engineering student population that Engineering PLUS targets, networking is a critical component, especially for our women and BIPOC Fellows. Therefore, these collaborations and personal interactions are desired and can be measured with evaluation instruments. Fortunately, evaluation data already show that Fellows are benefiting from such collaborations within stEm PEER Academy, within Engineering PLUS, and within their own institutions.Deliverable #2: Data One of the most important deliverables of stEm PEER Academy has been exploring publicly available data in the national
Paper ID #27409Identifying Phenomena and Developing Sustainable Engineering EducationalModules that Integrate STEM Education Best Practices and Next GenerationScience Standards for Middle School Science TeachersMr. Michael Lorenzo Greene, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Michael Greene is a PhD Student at Arizona State University. He is pursuing his degree in the Engineering Education Systems and Design program, concurrently while pursuing a Master’s degree in Engineering. Michael graduated with his B.S. in Mechanical engineering from University of Pittsburgh in April of 2018. His research interest lies in diversity
, D.R., “The Future of Engineering Education: 1. A Vision for a New Century”, Chemical Engineering Education, 34(1), 16-25 (2000).2. Kirkpatrick, Allan “ASME Vision 2030: Designing the Future of Mechanical Engineering Education”, ASEE/CIEC: Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration, Phoenix, Arizona, February 6-8, 2013.3. Stevens Institute of Technology (2017): Engineering Design Spine. http://www.stephens.edu/academincs/undergraduate-studies/engineering-design-spine/4. Beddoes, K.D., Jesiek, B.K., and Borrengo, M., “Identifying Opportunities for Collaborations in International Engineering Education Research on Problem- and Project-Based Learning”, Interdisciplinary
early career development responsibilities to reach their creative andinnovative potentials, to do “over-the-horizon” engineering, and to become creators, innovatorsand leaders of new technology innovations throughout their professional careers, then thisrequires universities to create a new type of professional education for lifelong learning as alogical progression of growth beyond the professional masters level.3.2 Reshaping Professional Engineering Education for Creative PracticeTo meet the challenge, the National Collaborative Task Force is engaged in a complex projectthat requires a total systems approach. The stakes to enhance the innovative capacity of the U.S.engineering workforce for competitiveness are high.Broad sweeping changes are
Paper ID #30371 Carlos Santos is a first year graduate student at the Wake Forest University Department of Psychology. His research includes longitudinal measurement validity and developing personalized user-interface data tools.Dr. Michael D. Gross, Wake Forest University Dr. Michael Gross is a Founding Faculty and Associate Professor of Engineering at Wake Forest Uni- versity and is part of the team that is planning, developing, and delivering the brand new Engineering program. The Engineering department is viewed as an opportunity to break down silos across campus and creatively think about reimagining the undergraduate engineering educational experience, integra- tion and collaboration across departments and
engineering education as a “system for lifelong learning”.2.0 How does Professional Engineering Differ from Research Engineering?To meet the challenges for enhanced educational engagement with industry and for purposefulreform that develops postgraduate professional education as an integrated system for lifelonglearning, the GSD-National Collaborative in Engineering and Technology Graduate Educationbelieves that a clear distinction must be made between traditional graduate education foracademic scientific research and that of innovative professionally oriented postgraduateeducation for advanced engineering practice and leadership of creative technology developmentand innovation in industry. We believe that the characteristics that differentiate these
collaboration helped increase engagement ofundergraduate students in a university course, improved retention of undergraduate students inthe field, developed a broader skill set for undergraduate students, and enhanced education formiddle and high school students in Philadelphia and Camden school district.IntroductionIn 2007, the National Science Board (NSB) identified challenges that should be addressed toimprove engineering education in order to meet the needs of the engineering workforce1. First, inaddition to providing good analytical skills, engineering education should help students developa broader skill set including good systems thinking, business aspects of engineering andknowledge to apply engineering to non-traditional problems. Second
, Mass.: Harvard Business School, 1991. 2. Smith, K.A., Sheppard, S.D., Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R.T., “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom- Based Practices,” ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no.1, 2005, pp.87 -102. 3. Prince, M., “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research,” ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no.3, 2004, pp.223-231 4. Prince, M., and Felder, R.M., “Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons and Research Bases,” ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, vol.95, no.2, 2006, pp.123-138. 5. Randolph, G.B., “Collaborative Learning in the Classroom: Writing Across the Curriculum Approach.” Journal of Engineering Education, vol.89
Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2003. His research interests include engineering education, aircraft and vehicle related engineering design, and dynamic failure and fracture of structures and materials. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Successful Model for Partnership between Community College and University Engineering Departments Leading to Expanded Access to Baccalaureate Engineering EducationAbstract Increasing numbers of engineering students are starting their higher education at acommunity college with intent to transfer to a four year university to complete their Bachelor ofScience degree. To facilitate the
Collaborative Task Force is proceeding on six main points: • Professional engineering education is a worthwhile enterprise, not because it is valuable in itself, but because it may enrich the lives of those who participate in it. • The mission of engineering is service to society for its general betterment. • Technology development is the primary driver of the nation’s economic growth and defense. • The primary creative intellectual capital for technology development rests with the creative, innovative, and leadership talent of the nation’s engineers. • Young creative talent must be encouraged to enter the engineering profession and to undergo basic professional education for entry into the profession
recognizing/redressing bias in thesystem. Our analysis revealed that cultural competence codes were the most common criteriacategory in this study. Sub-codes under cultural competence included reflecting on personalcultural lens, drawing on students’ culture to shape curriculum and instruction, communicating inlinguistically relevant ways, and collaborating with external funds of knowledge such as studentguardians and parents.In summary, we came up with a listwise description of what culturally relevant engineeringeducation looks like in the University of Iraq. We found in the responses of our participants that:With respect to Academic Achievement, culturally relevant engineering education in this context • involves teaching engineering using a lot