c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Integrating The Charrette Process into Engineering Education: A Case Study on a Civil Engineering Capstone CourseABSTRACTAs engineering educators rethink the structure and value of capstone courses, many have turnedto practical applications. In order to reflect the recent approaches within engineering, capstonecourses can be enhanced through the integration of charrettes. Charrettes are hands-on,collaborative sessions where stakeholders come to a design consensus. These sessions provideopportunities for students to improve communication, technical evaluation, teamwork, peerevaluation and professionalism skills. This research provides a framework for adapting thecharrette
Paper ID #13380Intra-Disciplinary Integration in Civil Engineering Education: An Approachto Integrate the Various Civil Engineering Disciplines with the Use of a De-sign Studio LabProf. Michael J. Davidson, Wentworth Institute of Technology Michael J. Davidson, P.E. – Assistant Professor, Wentworth Institute of Technology, Department of Civil Engineering Technology, 550 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, davidsonm2@wit.eduProf. James Lambrechts P.E., Wentworth Institute of Technology BSCE-Univ. Maryland, MSCE-Purdue University. Geotechnical engineer 27 years with Haley & Aldrich, Inc. Boston, MA before taking
. Page 10.1074.7Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright© 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationacknowledgementsThis material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.ESI-0227558, which funds the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE).CAEE is a collaboration of five partner universities: Colorado School of Mines, HowardUniversity, Stanford University, University of Minnesota, and University of Washington.Sheri Sheppard at Stanford University has been a visionary, gracious agent in seeing theAcademic Pathways Study through its design and inception.Lorraine Fleming, Kimarie Engerman, and Ashley Griffin at Howard
acquire valuable practical experience and new skills while working towards solvingreal-world problems [100].4. DISCUSSIONDesign thinking applied to higher engineering education is founded on actual challenges,research, and solutions [101], merging interdisciplinary and collaborative methods in project-based learning that emphasizes the holistic comprehension and resolution of intricate problemsand issues [11]. The utilization of design thinking as a pedagogical approach empowersengineering students to merge humanistic perspectives with their technical expertise, effectivelyaddressing intricate real-world issues. This approach lays a robust groundwork for students toacclimate to the demands of lifelong learning and future growth. Based on the
Paper ID #32150Training Engineering Students to Use Stories for Student Empowerment andCommunity-Building: The Re-Engineering Engineering Education Programatthe USC School of EngineeringDr. Brandi P. Jones, University of Southern California Dr. Brandi P. Jones is the Vice Dean for Diversity and Strategic Initiatives and Associate Professor of Engineering Education Practice at Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California. She works collaboratively with colleagues on strategies to increase the diversity and enhance the experiences of students, faculty, and staff, ensure an inclusive culture, and promote
Mines c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engagement in Practice: Regional Innovation Cluster: The Role of Entrepreneurship as a Tool for Closing the Gap BetweenEngineering Education and the Challenges of Local Communities.1. IntroductionTodays education is facing the challenge of preparing students and professionals to thrive in afast-changing world. To this gold, students should develop abilities like critical thinking,problem solving, persistence and collaborative work, beside science, math and language.However, a lot of countries are not working to develop these abilities [1].In order to strengthen the connection between what students need to learn and what theyactually do in the classroom, is
Dr. Ewert has been involved in cardiovascular engineering for over 25 years in both research and instruction. He has consulted for major medical device companies in the area of cardiovascular engineering and performed research with US and inte ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Bridging Theory and Practice: Innovation-Base Learning and NSF I-Corps in Modern Engineering Education Abigail Tubbs, Paige Beduhn, Enrique Alvarez Vazquez, Daniel Ewert, Ryan Striker University of North Dakota – Biomedical EngineeringI. Abstract This study investigates the mechanics of integrating the National Science Foundation'sRegional I-Corps program
Paper ID #24099An Exploration on the Reform of China’s Engineering Education under theBackground of ’Made in China 2025’Dr. Huiming Fan, East China University of Science and Technology I am a lecturer from Institute of Higher Education, East China University of Science and Technology. I got Ph.D. degree from Zhejiang University in 2014. I was also a visiting scholar at the area of University- Industry Collaboration at North Carolina State University from 2012.12-2013.7. My research focuses on engineering education, university-industry collaboration, entrepreneurial university, etc. c American
Penn State University. Particular current areas of collaboration include STEM teacher development, immersive technologies, engineering education and evaluation. In addition, Dr. Jackson teaches a course in Penn State’s Higher Education Department.Dr. John Jongho Park, Penn State University Dr. Park is an assistant research professor in the Engineering Leadership Program at Penn State Uni- versity. There is four interrelated areas of inquiry characterize Dr. Park’s scholarship: psychological attributes, professional identity development, group processes, and engineering leadership development. Particularly, he examines how possible future-self influences engineering students’ learning, academic motivation, and career
internal validity ofthe teamwork measurement scales and the extent to which teamwork skills can be consistentlyevaluated across time and situations [28]. Finally, interrater reliability must be considered asvariations in observers’ ratings do in the teamwork measurement process [20].4. MethodsThis exploratory study aimed to explore a methodology for performing a literature review onteamwork in engineering education across cultures. To this end, we followed a process with twophases:Phase 1 identifying a small but representative set of recent articles.We used the search terms “团队 (tuandui, team),” “小组 (xiaozu, group),” and “团队合作(tuanduihezuo, collaboration)” to search Chinese literature in the journal Gaodeng gongchengjiaoyu yanjiu (高等工程教育研究
“values” incorporated into a research or project design to extended descriptionsof tribal philosophies drawn from extensive oral narratives. In several papers, a citizen of theNative nation of focus served as a primary author, thus bringing their perspectives to every stageof the study. Many of the papers with explicit outcomes tied to Native communities were in facta product of a collaboration between a Predominately White Institution (PWI) and one or moreTribal Colleges and Universities (TCUs). Seven such papers were in some way related to NSF-funded programs aimed at building TCU capacity through partnerships with PWIs. One suchexample is the Pre-Engineering Education Collaborative (PEEC), which is currently in its secondphase of funding
. Hatice Ozturk is a Teaching Associate Professor at North Carolina State University, Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering. She teaches Signals and Systems, works on curriculum development and coordinates assessment and accreditation activities. Her engineering education area of research is devel- opment of instructional technologies for successful math to engineering transition. She also collaborates with faculty in Women’s and Gender Studies to study the impacts of interventions done to increase the number of women in engineering.Prof. Kelly A Umstead, North Carolina State University Kelly Umstead is an assistant professor of industrial design at North Carolina State University. She earned her MID from NC State
the PEER Collaborative, a peer mentoring group of early career and recently tenured faculty and research staff primarily evaluated based on their engineering education research pro- ductivity. She can be contacted by email at apawley@purdue.edu.Dr. Erin A. Cech, University of Michigan Erin Cech is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Sociology at the University of Michigan. Be- fore coming to UM in 2016, Cech was a postdoctoral fellow at Stanford’s Clayman Institute for Gender Research and on faculty at Rice University. She earned her Ph.D. in Sociology from the University of California, San Diego and B.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering and Sociology from Montana State Uni- versity. Cech’s research seeks
University. Olga is a national thought leader in higher education and engineering education. She is a biomedical and mechanical engineer as well as an STEM education researcher. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Inclusive and Bias-Minimizing Hiring Practices to Build a Diverse Team at Wake Forest Engineering: Transforming Engineering Education through Faculty Diversity and Broadening ParticipationThis paper presents a comprehensive case study of Wake Forest Engineering's successful launchand transformation to build a diverse faculty team to support innovation across curriculum,pedagogy, research, and community impact. By implementing research-grounded hiringpractices focused on
University. His research areas include bioremediation, natural products, food science and science education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 MAKER: Use of Natural Products in Manufacturing Engineering Education at a Minority Based Land Grant InstitutionABSTRACTNear-term processing of cellulosic materials requires them to be scalable in material propertiesfor scaled up manufacturing purposes. The use of cellulosic materials is gaining favor inproduction applications because the synthesis and extraction of cellulose can be a green processfrom start to finish and is renewable in nature. The implementation and integration of
Paper ID #41507Employing the Rio Grande Basin as a Resource for Encouraging Hispanic-Americansto Pursue Engineering Education Work in ProgressDr. Daniel Tillman, University of Texas at El Paso Dr. Tillman is an Associate Professor in Educational Technology, working primarily within the El Paso region of the southwestern United States. His research focuses on the implementation and assessment of innovative pedagogical approaches that address STEM inequities.Dr. Diane Elisa Golding, University of Texas at El Paso Diane works diligently to support minorities, especially women in STEM and preparing future educators to be STEM
Paper ID #43289Enhancing Engineering Education Through Hands-on Virtual Reality TrainingExperiences: Developing Skills in the Continuous Improvement of ManufacturingSystemsDr. David Parsley, University of Kentucky David Parsley is an Assistant Professor in the Fujio Cho Department of Engineering Technology. He has been appointed as the Toyota Engineering Technology Fellow and the Director of Undergraduate Studies for the Lean Systems Engineering Technology degree. Before this role, David was an Industry Extension Specialist who was responsible for facilitating the professional Lean Systems Certification at the University
Paper ID #44572Narrative Integration in Engineering Education through Story-BasedPedagogy: Lessons from a First-Year Engineering Case StudyDr. Claudio Freitas, Purdue University Fort Wayne Assistant Professor of First-Year Engineering ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Narrative Integration in Engineering Education through Story-Based Pedagogy: Preliminary Lessons from a First-Year Engineering Case Study Claudio Cesar Silva de Freitas Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Purdue University Fort Wayne
transdisciplinary,holistic, and problem-solving abilities [18]. Research indicates that incorporatingdesign thinking into engineering education yields several positive outcomes, includingenhanced creativity, sustainability, and career readiness[19]. Furthermore, it has beenshown to improve students' leadership, algorithmic, entrepreneurial, and criticalthinking skills, fostering a culture of design and creativity [20]. Graham’s studyshows [21] design thinking enhances empathy, entrepreneurship, emergingtechnologies, material science, collaboration, and a human-centric focus.Traditionally, engineering education has heavily focused on critical thinking withintechnical realms, nurturing students' proficiency in managing tasks [22]. In contrast,design thinking
organization. Page 26.1627.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Understanding the NSF Transforming Undergraduate EngineeringEducation Report – Why are Industry and Academic Pathways toward Knowledge Development at Odds? IntroductionOn May 9-10, 2013, the first of a series of workshops titled ‘TransformingUndergraduate Education in Engineering’ (TUEE) was held in Arlington, VA. Hosted bythe American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), the event brought togetherprogram officers from the National Science Foundation (NSF), staff from the ASEE,professors from academic
educational outreach experiences, as illustrated in Figure 3. To help promote the creation of the repurposingenterprise and address litter from used sachets in the village, the team led a community widepick-up collaborating with each of the local schools. The next phase of this education willinclude placement of used sachet receptacles at schools and other parts of the village forcommunity recycling. Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, The University of Texas at Arlington, March 21 – 23, 2013. Copyright © 2013, American Society for Engineering Education
all three examples presented in this paper, participantswere volunteers and in the third example they also received compensations of $50 every sixmonths. However, students do not normally volunteer to participate in reflective activitiesbecause reflection is incorporated into their assignments. Further studies can reveal the possibleimpact of voluntary participation in reflection activities comparing to making them requiredassignments.By drawing attention to synergies between the HCI concept of probes and the engineeringeducation interest in reflection, we hope to inspire more opportunities for practitioners in HCIand engineering education to collaborate on designing probes-inspired reflective activities and tolearn through and from the
born to families made up of engineers and otherprofessional in closely aligned fields (e.g., scientists), no one grows up using the language andliteracy practices of engineering, exactly. These abilities are taught and learned and make up thebasis for writing pedagogy in engineering education often called writing in the disciplines orwriting across the curriculum. The underlying the academic literacy practices in engineeringidentities resides an array of linguistic practices – what Gee would call ways of saying-being-doing-feeling. Considering the cultural basis for these ways of making meaning is important inthe age of AI as students collaborate with and negotiate language with large language models.However, before considering how language
AC 2011-2428: EXCHANGE - EXPERIENTIAL EARTHQUAKE ENGI-NEERING EDUCATION FOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS THROUGHTHE CALIFORNIA STATE SUMMER SCHOOL FOR MATHEMATICSAND SCIENCELelli Van Den Einde, University of California, San Diego Lelli Van Den Einde is a Lecturer (LPSOE) in the Department of Structural Engineering at UC San Diego’s Jacobs School of Engineering. Dr. Van Den Einde’s research has evolved from large-scale ex- perimentation in earthquake engineering with primary focus on reinforced concrete bridges, to research in engineering education focusing on introducing cyberinfrastructure and technology into engineering curriculum.Samuel Lee, UC San Diego Structural Engineering
Paper ID #40802A Longitudinal Engineering Education Study of a Holistic EngineeringPedagogy and Holistic Design Thinking Methodology on PostsecondaryStudent Academic Success and RetentionMark Povinelli, Syracuse University Dr. Mark Povinelli was the Kenneth A. and Mary Ann Shaw Professor of Practice in Entrepreneurial Leadership in the College of Engineering and Computer Science and the Whitman School of Management at Syracuse University. He is currently an adjunct professor in the College of Arts and Sciences, where he teaches in the Ren´ee Crown University Honors Program at Syracuse University. Dr. Povinelli is the New
in Higher Education. She has created qualitative and quantitative instruments for outcome assessment in enginering education. She has also evaluated policy efforts towards engineering diversity and undergraduate research.Miss Constanza Melian, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile Sociologist. Assessment and Evaluation Coordinator, Division of Engineering Education (Pontificia Uni- versidad Cat´olica de Chile).Miss Javiera Meza, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile Javiera Meza has a Bachelor of Engineering Science in Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile. She is a research assistant of the Engineering Education Division, responsible for supporting research tasks and collaborating in data collection
26.204.1 tunity to present at a regional and national conference and she has conducted research internationally. In addition, Ms. Hester is a licensed graduate social worker (LGSW) in the state of Maryland and pro- vides outpatient mental health treatment to members in underserved communities. Contact information: shawnisha@gmail.com c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 An NSF AGEP Program’s Unintended Effect on Broadening Participation: Transforming “Non-STEM” Graduate Students into Engineering Education Faculty, Researchers, K-12 Educators, and Advocates Introduction The National Science Foundation’s Alliances for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP
dialogue principles. • Students will practice listening and collaboration to create shared definitions of courageous dialogue and expectations for themselves and their peers and how they will work together moving forward. • Students will discuss and identify behaviors that uphold courageous dialogue principles. Seminar 2: Your • Students will be able to identify the big five financial wellness topics: Money Story earning, spending, borrowing, protecting, saving/investing. • Students will examine and analyze their
Paper ID #27144Board 16: Work in Progress: Design of ”Risk and Resilience” Focused Coursesfor Undergraduate Engineering Education Towards a Hazard-Resilient BuiltEnvironmentProf. Lei Wang P.E., University of the District of Columbia Dr. Lei Wang is an Assistant Professor of Geotechnical Engineering and Graduate Program Director of Civil Engineering Department at the University of the District of Columbia. His research interests include geotechnical risk and reliability, resilient geotechnical infrastructure, foundation engineering, supported excavation and tunneling, earthen levee and dam, soil liquefaction and geotechnical
Session 2220Designing Toy Robots to Help Autistic Children - An Open Design Project for Electrical and Computer Engineering Education Francois Michaud, André Clavet, Gérard Lachiver, Mario Lucas Université de Sherbrooke (Québec Canada)AbstractIn our curricula, freshmen use an autonomous robotic platform to get introduced to fundamentalconcepts in Electrical and Computer Engineering. Using this platform, teams of studentsinterested by the challenge are invited to apply knowledge acquired during their first year ofstudies by participating in a toy robot design contest. Initiated in 1999, the challenge is to