been shown that they increase students’ likelihood to persist in these fields5. For manystudents, getting involved with undergraduate research is a life-changing experience, one thatallows them to get excited about science and thus, clarify their career paths7.Most studies, however, have focused on the value of undergraduate research in general, orspecifically in reference to programs targeting junior- and senior-level students. This is not allthat surprising, since not too long ago research was mostly reserved for graduate students. Thefact that many studies have come out in last decade listing the benefits of undergraduate researchhas driven a paradigm shift which has had notable positive results. However, since researchprojects are
. Systematic review techniques have recentlygained traction in the field of engineering education. A systematic review performed over aspecific area of practice can consolidate results from many studies into a synthesis of bestpractices.This paper presents the best practices for teaching introductory circuits which were identifiedthrough a systematic review of prior research. Relevant publications were identified andappraised with a set of coding criteria generated by the researchers. The coding results wereexamined and used to write a mixed-methods synthesis of consensus, disagreement, quality, andlimitations amongst studies identified by the systematic literature review. The results of thereview may inform educational techniques employed in post
-speed integrated circuits. Each of these sites consisted of ten undergraduate studentsselected from institutions all over the USA. Eligibility criteria were:a) citizenship or permanent resident of the United States; andb) completion of at least two years in electrical engineering, computer engineering or a related field with a grade point average of 3.0 or over.Major objectives of the REU site were:a) enhancement of student experience, competence, confidence and self esteem by working on a state-of-the-art electrical engineering research project;b) encouragement of students to pursue graduate studies in electrical engineering and to choose a career in microelectronics/VLSI research; andc) improvement of student oral and written skills
currentcontext of recent mechanical engineering graduates in their first 12 weeks of work. Because thefocus of this paper is a particular empirical approach—and not necessarily the specific results of theapproach—the next sections proceed in the following manner. First, we describe the rationale andbackground behind the approach. Next, we describe in detail the way the research was carried out,including questions asked, interactions with participants, and benefits and pitfalls.Executing the reflective journaling approachFirst, to recruit participants for the study, we conducted interviews prior to graduation, while potentialparticipants were still in school and thus still readily accessible. These anticipatory interviewsafforded several advantages: they
Associate Head for Graduate Studies and Research, at Purdue University School of Aviation and Transportation Technology in West Lafayette, Indiana. She earned her BS, MS, and PhD in Industrial Engineering from The University of Texas at Arlington. She has aerospace industry and university academic experience. Her research focuses on data driven analysis and process improvement in sustainability, process automation, and general aviation. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Exploratory Study of Sustainability Courses in Collegiate Level Engineering ProgramsINTRODUCTIONThe aerospace and
undergraduate and graduate engineeringstudents. Results of the pilot are presented in this paper.Study Population As previously described, the study participants came from a broad array of engineeringstudents in both undergraduate and graduate engineering at a major research university. A totalof 147 students participated in the pilot. Equal numbers of engineering students at undergraduateand graduate levels were included in the sample with 32% of the students indicating that thewere international students and a 32-68 percentage split between female and male studentsrespectively. This popuation diversity was deliberately achieved in hopes of testing diversevariables associated with global preparedness during the pilot.Study Results The
paper as a reflective resource for early graduatestudents and advisors navigating the transition between quantitative and qualitative research,offering insights into the challenges, learning processes, and adaptive strategies involved. Wehope readers will cite this work as an example of reflexive, experience-based inquiry thatcomplements more theory-driven studies, helping to broaden the conversation aroundmethodological transitions in graduate research. While we did not apply a formal theoreticalframework, the specific reflection topics emerged organically through our lived experiences,mutual dialogue, and the impressive moments we encountered during our dissertation journeys,allowing us to surface the themes we found most meaningful for other
be prepared and presented to potential funding agencies. In the departmentconsidered in this study, it is common to have more than one million dollars in proposals of thiskind under review at funding agencies. This situation can be quite stressful for departmentleadership responsible for scheduling faculty and resources necessary to deliver on the teaching,research and service responsibilities of the department. Often, faculty and the department areattempting to achieve a specific minimum amount of funding, so there is a temptation to put outas many proposals as possible. However, there is always a possibility that entirely too manyfunding request will be approved, creating a situation where resources such as faculty time,graduate students
Session #1332 The Formal Research Group Model as an Undergraduate Retention Tool Patricia A. Nava Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Texas at El PasoAbstractUndergraduate attrition is a problem in urban Texas State universities, where the graduation rateis lower than 40%. A theory for college departure argues that this graduation rate could beincreased significantly by increasing the frequency of formal social contacts (technicalexperiences outside of the classroom). These
2006-1662: RESEARCH APPROACH TO TEACHING GROUNDWATERBIODEGRADATION IN KARST AQUIFERSLashun King, Tennessee State University Graduate Research Assistant, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Tennessee State University,Thomas Byl, U.S. Geological Survey Research Biologist, U.S. Geological Survey,640 Grassmere Park, Suite 100,Nashville, TN 37211 (tdbyl@usgs.gov)Roger Painter, Tennessee State University Page 11.1083.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Research-enhanced Approach to Teaching Groundwater Biodegradation in Karst Aquifers Abstract – TSU
began their graduate studies in thespring quarter of 2003.This paper provides an abbreviated description of the program, an overview of program goalsand metrics and a discussion of some innovative methods of instruction that are being introducedalong with the program.MSTET Program DescriptionThe MSTET program at RIT is a 48 quarter credit hour program consisting of four elements: • Telecommunications core courses • Technical electives • Management electives • Capstone projectThe core courses, which account for 24 of the required 48 quarter credit hours, cover basictelecommunications technology, networks and protocols, policy and regulation and projectmanagement. All students must complete the core courses or have completed
to the more regimented industrial society in which they will be making their Page 9.267.8 career. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education• Students are more easily motivated to study a problem that is obviously realistic.Potential conflicts of interest - so often feared from industrially-sponsored research - have notbeen experienced with their educational involvement. The nature of education is less prone tothis anyway, but keeping the final responsibility for course content within the
Urbana-Champaign I am an undergraduate student at the Grainger College of Engineering studying electrical engineering interested in soft robotics.Mr. Javi Cardenas, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign I am currently a junior in electrical engineering, graduating in May 2023. I hold a paid research position for the Grainger College of Engineering working with professor Dr. Golecki. I am interested in pursuing a career in health technology and I see myself working with medical devices in the future.Sara Xochilt Lamer, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Sara Lamer (she/her) is a junior studying Mechanical Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. She is an ARISE scholar in the
graduate studies; 2) to increase the number ofwomen and minority students from underrepresented groups who engage in security research andprovide support for them to become security researchers; 3) to provide research opportunities ina high-demand area to those who would otherwise have no access to research facilities; and 4) toincrease awareness of, and approaches to, challenging problems of security in mobile devicesand networks. We shared our experience of student recruitment, faculty mentor support, researchactivity planning and logistics of running an REU site at high living cost metropolitan area. Theoutcome and success stories of students’ accomplishments are outlined in this article.IntroductionAs more smartphones, tablets and other mobile
Pennsylvania State University. Currently, sheserves as a graduate research assistant in the Center for the Study of Higher Education. Her primary researchinterests are in the areas of teaching and learning as well as comparative and international issues in highereducation. Susan is an active member of the American Educational Research Association and the Association forthe Study of Higher Education. Page 3.529.6CAROL COLBECK is assistant professor and research associate at the Center for the Study of Higher Education atThe Pennsylvania State University. She is associate director of evaluation for the NSF-funded EngineeringCoalition of
Paper ID #26677Creating a Biomedical Engineering Summer Study Abroad Program in CostaRicaDr. Elizabeth Kathleen Bucholz, Duke University Dr. Bucholz is an Assistant Professor of the Practice for the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Duke University and has served as the Associate Director of Undergraduate Studies for the Department of Biomedical Engineering in the Pratt School of Engineering for the past five years. She has been teaching for the department for 8 years, and graduated from Duke University with a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engi- neering in 2008 from the Center for In Vivo Microscopy under the guidance of Dr. G
class. LCP motivates learners to become immersed in mechanisms of creating technical reports in IEEEformat that connect the content of the course to the state-of-the-art advances in the field. Students thenparticipate in double-blind technical review processes to select panelists who will answer questionsasked by other students. To facilitate technical topic debate, the panel is conducted using real-timecollaboration tools and professional protocols. Thus, undergraduate students become immersed inmechanisms associated with technical research while becoming more aware of options that they couldpursue during graduate studies in topics of their interest that also refresh content within the course.Students increase preparation for their future
an entrepreneurial twist to refocus senior studentspursuing careers and graduate programs in STEM fields.The field of advanced materials is very broad; however, the REU curriculum focused the studentat several key, real world application-based endeavors. Several projects involving the processingand applications of nanomaterials and multiscale-multifunctional composite materials werechosen to be student research project initiatives. These were selected to equip the students withknowledge in the synthesis and characterization of nanomaterials and their utilization inmanufacturing processes. Students learned the fundamental synthesis mechanisms ofnanomaterials critical to controllable and consistent production. The students also learned
with emphasis on intersectionality, context, and environmental factors [e.g.,33]. For example, research on culturally responsive programming for Native American pre-college students is widespread [33-37]. Less research focuses on the role of cultural backgroundsin undergraduate and graduate experiences. One study of college students in STEM fieldssimilarly found that Native American students were likely to endorse communal goals tied totheir tribal identities that may encourage feelings of belonging uncertainty in STEM [38]. Arecent literature review of Native American graduate students in STEM fields found thatalthough they are engaged in a number of career interventions, traditional academic mentoringshould incorporate indigenous values and
potential customers to meet theirdeadline for capstone projects and deadline for the externally funded research. Software,hardware, interface, system integration, and testing all involved other researchers instead of justthe capstone team. This created new challenges in terms of team work, communication,documentation, scheduling, and many other aspects of project management. In a sense, thesekinds of projects resemble larger scale projects in industry.The importance of undergraduate research has been studied by many scholars over the past twodecades6,9,13,16,18,25,29,30,32. The benefits of undergraduate research include its impact on astudents’ decision to pursue a graduate degree and a career in the science, technology,engineering, and mathematics
assessments 11 . Interview format can range from a very structured set of questionsthat is to be followed explicitly to a nearly unstructured format with few guidelines, depending onthe need and purpose of the research being performed 20 . This approach allows for new ideas to beuncovered and explored based on what the participants say, rather than potential preconceptionsof study authors. The end goal of such a qualitative study is to gain an understanding of theparticipant’s point of view concerning the course and its content 5,13 .MethodologyStudent volunteers were solicited from an introductory cybersecurity course and included bothupper division undergraduate as well as graduate students who participated in the semester longstudy. To help
best answer their research question, hypothesis, orpurpose of the study [1]. A mixed methods research methodology that a researcher may select isQ methodology. Q methodology is a social science research methodology focused onsystematically studying subjectivity utilizing both qualitative and quantitative researchtechniques [2]–[6]. While Q methodology has had limited use in engineering education research,it has been used in studies regarding the career paths of engineering education doctoral graduates[7], competencies for nanotechnology [8] and IT [9], curriculum design for information systems[10], construction engineering technology program assessment [11], and undergraduateengineering students’ out-of-class activities [12]. However, Q
, research progress, a buddy system and language immersion. • A resident graduate supervisor is present with the team for the duration of the summer program. • CUNY graduate students rotate every two weeks and provide special topic seminars to the team participating in the research. • Special Lectures in Urban Studies, Professional Development, Environmental Studies, Colombian History-Palenque, and the Pro Boquilla Foundation. • Community Service activities (once per week for ten weeks) working with the Pro Boquilla Foundation • Language Immersion (three hours per day first three weeks). • Academic Coordinator and Program manager available via Skype for group discussions and individual
.) She has an Ed.D. in Education Leadership and Culture Studies from the University of Houston.Ms. Sarah R. Phillips, Rice University Sarah Phillips is the Education and International Initiatives Manager for the National Science Foundation Partnerships for International Research and Education (NSF-PIRE) ”U.S.- Japan Cooperative Research and Education on Terahertz Dynamics in Nanostructures” grant at Rice University. In collaboration with the PI and Education Director, she manages all aspects of the NanoJapan: International Research Expe- rience for Undergraduates Program. Since 2006, this program has sent 130 young U.S. engineering and physics students to Japan for research, language, and cultural study. She works
graduate programs involving undergraduates in research activities. Assuch, most REU Sites have similar objectives, as follows:• Increase graduation rates. REU programs are meant to enhance the students’ curricular activities to keep them more engaged in their field of study and thus increase graduation rates.• Increase recruitment of students in graduate programs. Students work side-by-side with faculty members on interesting and challenging technical problems and realize the importance of graduate education in meeting these challenges. They also attend presentations describing the advantages of graduate education, the application and admissions process, and available funding opportunities.• Increase student involvement
Technology, 2012). The VMC collection illustrates studentlearning topics in pre-algebra, algebra, statistics, probability, geometry and calculus. NCTM (2000) also provides anational discrete mathematics standard for grades 9-12. They require a mathematics curriculum to include learningto represent problem situations using discrete structures. Additionally, NCTM (2000) provides a national counting,probability and problem solving in general. These fundamental requirements are essential for later durable college-level and industry engineering education.The paper provides results from studies of teachers and graduate students who have made use of the VMC tools andresources to explore mathematical ideas and study student learning. Research assessment
-2023 that include “an ability to function effectively ona team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusiveenvironment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives,” [8].EL programs throughout North America emerged at both the undergraduate and graduate levelsto address these iterations. With over 50 EL programs to date in North America, a community ofpractice has emerged to address programmatic and research needs. ASEE’s EngineeringLeadership Development Division (LEAD) [9] and Canada’s National Initiative on CapacityBuilding and Knowledge Creation for Engineering Leadership (NICKEL) [10] have producedconferences, workshops, and research to nurture and advance the forming discipline of EL. Intheir study
Jiao Tong University. Her primary research interests relate to the assessment of teaching and learning in engineering, cognitive development of graduate and undergraduate students, and global engineering. She received her Ph.D. from the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University in 2013. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 The Design and Implementation of Engineering Leadership Programs: A Comparative StudyAbstractChanging technological world requires future engineers not only show excellent technicalskills, but also possess multiple skills and attributes, in particular leadership skills. Againstthis context, some universities and engineering
National Science Foundation’s Ethical and Responsible Research (ER2) Program andstrives to fill these gaps through the following three research objectives: O1) Characterize patterns of ethical development as engineering students transition from their undergraduate studies to the beginning of their professional careers and/or graduate studies, O2) Investigate how prior and current experiences impact early career professionals’ understandings of ethics and social responsibility, and O3) Identify how professional contexts (including the culture of a specific company or institution, discipline, and/or industry sector) influence early career professionals’ views of ethics and social responsibility. In addition to expanding
students, and is now pursuing graduate studies inchemical engineering at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. These two students startedworking on the project before all the principal investigators were present, and as a result wereheavily involved in evaluating, selecting, and ordering the equipment for the project. Student 2found his experience to provide valuable insight into the world of research: The Vicher project outlined what research would be like in graduate school. It was the first time that I had been given this amount of autonomy in deciding the fate of a project. I was forced to very quickly learn a lot about VR equipment. I was constantly asking myself, "Will this really work?" Currently, as I am trying