resources).3 The graying trendin the marine workforce adds to the urgency of educating new technical professionals that willadapt and excel in the rapidly advancing ocean workplace.4Recent workforce studies conducted by MATE and funded by the Office of Naval Research haveidentified more than twenty ocean occupations that are limiting the growth of ocean industriesbecause of the lack of qualified personal, including electronics/marine technicians (such asremotely operated vehicle [ROV] technicians); engineers (electrical, mechanical,civil/structural); and computer scientists (software application developers, computerprogrammers, hardware developers).5 However, these are not simply engineers, technicians, andcomputer scientists; they are
results on a post-test among an experimental group of subjects than those wholearned the material in standard lecture format 17. Our motivation is to deliver a mature brand ofthis agent driven instruction to the masses, so that the absence of a human instructor who needsto attend to individual students has positive, rather than negative, effects.Harnessing the Power of One-on-One TutoringOne-on-one tutoring is remarkably effective: we have long known that there is strong evidencefrom a myriad of domains that tutored students consistently outperform those taught inclassroom situations having standard student/teacher ratios. For example, in a meta-analysisconducted by Cohen, Kulik & Kulik of 65 evaluations of school tutoring programs, it
with underserved communities. She is also a lecturer in the Mechanical Engineering department where she currently teaches a course Global Engineers’ Education. Page 26.1235.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Practicing care in global engineering with underserved communities AbstractThis paper describes the inclusion of care as the central part of an undergraduateengineering course that brings together engineering students with underservedcommunities globally. It begins with a brief description of the course, its aims, and theunique approach it pioneers of students
Paper ID #10889Inspiring Student Engagement through Two-Minute FolliesDr. James L Klosky P.E., U.S. Military Academy Led Klosky is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civl and Mechanical Engineering at West Point. He is a past winner of ASEE’s National Teaching Medal and works primarily in the areas of Engineering Education and Infrastructure.Mr. Scott M. Katalenich, U.S. Military Academy Major Scott Katalenich is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineer- ing at the United States Military Academy, West Point, NY. He received his B.S. from the United States Military Academy
. Dr. Beal’s teaching interests include system dynamics and control, mechanical design, mechatronics and robotics, and first year introductory engineering. His research is focused on the application of control systems to vehicle dynamics to improve safety, stability, and performance of vehicles on roads with un- certain friction conditions. Current research projects include identification of road surface conditions from onboard measurements and approaches to maintaining stability during sudden changes in road condition.Dr. Amal Kabalan, Bucknell University Dr. Kabalan studied properties of semiconducting materials for photovoltaics applications at Harvard University. She completed her dissertation at Villanova
canresult in a student who is equipped to succeed in the regular engineering curriculum.Experiences at Boise State UniversityBoise State University is a metropolitan university with more than 18,000 studentsenrolling every semester. The College of Engineering was formed in 1997 and offersB.S. M.S, and M. Eng. Degrees in Electrical Engineering, Civil Engineering, ComputerScience, Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science & Engineering. A large fractionof the students at Boise State (46%) are non-traditional students defined as those olderthan 24 years of age. Because of this and because of the general population that BoiseState serves, many of our engineering students begin their studies under-prepared in mathand often require 2 or even 3
students came from a startling diversity of socio -economicbackgrounds; they came from inner city and rural schools, private schools, science andtechnology magnet schools, alternative or continuation schools, as well as your averageeveryday suburban public school. Some even came from home school situations,community computer clubhouses, or other types of organizations. The most noticeablething they had in common was how enthusiastic, motivated and focused they seemed tobe.These students now have various degrees of experience with planning, defining problemsand solutions, the design process, scheduling, mechanical engineering, programming,demonstrating, reporting results, and creating websites. In addition, some of the bestteams’ programming
areas, such asengineering, social sciences, tourism [6], nursing [7], and education [2], [8]. Systems thinkinghelps to identify the behavior and the interactions of a complex system, and to expand the rangeof potential solutions to complex problems [9].A previous study interviewed 205 senior system engineers to explore their opinions about themechanism of systems thinking development [1]. The three most important mechanisms thatcould help to improve systems thinking are work and life experiences, individual characteristicsand traits, and environment [1]. Work and life experiences may not be a basis for commonground among university students, as those that have little or no outside work experience inaviation or aerospace have difficulty relating
University. Dr. Suchora has been at Youngstown State since 1975 and is a RegisteredProfessional Engineer. He is an engineering consultant to local and regional companies specializing in StressAnalysis, especially Computer Aided Finite Element Analysis.HAZEL M. PIERSONHazel Pierson is currently an Instructor of Mechanical Engineering and Freshman Engineering at Youngstown StateUniversity. Concurrently, she is finishing dissertation requirements for her PhD at the University of Akron. She hasworked as a materials and process engineer and currently offers consulting services to local industries. Her researchinterest is in the areas of vibrations, rotor dynamics, and advanced stress analysis. Page 9.610.11
complicated system, there are a lot of variables involved. . .” “The project is a great way to bring everything together . . . it is extremely useful to have a project because it pushes students to think more critically and gives them a way to apply the concepts of the course to real world applications. It puts the material in perspective and makes students understand why process controls are useful what the point is of learning about them.” “The final project was a great comprehensive learning tool to fully wrap up the course.” “Course project was challenging but I learned a lot from it.”Students have expressed some concerns about the open-ended nature of the project at times. “The course project being
features are common to all design but some are specific to foundationengineering practice. The discipline-specific features are associated with the sitecharacterization requirements of foundation engineering.Preparing the studentsThe specific discussion of ethics was not done up front. Instead, the topic was introduced as itnaturally occurred in the design process. The setting for the instruction was largely role playing.The students were told at the first class meeting that they have been hired out of college into ourgeotechnical design firm. They were new project engineers and I was their supervisoryprofessional engineer. The students have had a soil mechanics course as a prerequisite and wereenrolled in a concrete design course during this
, specifically ofwomen in the TEAMS fields. The leadership institute was formed to provide a mechanism forundergraduate and graduate students to network with leaders in their fields. Components of theinstitute that currently support this effort include a web site for coordination and informationdissemination, mentoring opportunities, and informal networking brunches.It is the intention of this institute to not only encourage students from the TEAMS fields tobecome leaders, but also to encourage retention and recruitment of female students into thesefields at PUC. As has been shown time and again, women are underrepresented in the TEAMSfields and Purdue University Calumet is no exception. A 1999 analysis revealed that only 29percent of the PUC student
to teach ethics as a new instructor. The National Society of ProfessionalEngineers has case material available under the title, “Professional Engineers in Education(NSPE-PEE).” An electronic disc containing eight cases with guidelines is available from theMurdough Center for Engineering Professionalism and Ethics at Texas Tech University, directedby Dr. Jimmie Smith. Dr. Michael S. Pritchard and others.The emphasis of the course will be on promoting thoughtful reflection and problem solvingrather than on role behavior or instilling specific norms. The course can provide the practicalsource of support for engineers in a real world setting providing more guidance than traditionalexercises emphasizing a choice between external whistle blowing
that information is presented helps to keep the students and the faculty engaged in thelearning process. Day after day of traditional lectures can make it difficult for the students to digest allthe material and make instructors feel like they are just relaying information instead of teaching.Neglecting fun in the classroom can be a mistake. Fun and games can help the classroom in three mainways: 1. Address the needs of individual and varied learning styles of students, 2. Encourage students to actively participate in learning, 3. Reinforce concepts through repetition in unique ways.First, students each have their own learning style, and learn in vastly different ways. Some studentsprefer a reflective approach to learning, while others
10.1372.1under-representation of women and minorities in engineering. Engineering students are often Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationmisperceived to be more concerned with their personal vocational interests and material goalsthan they are with society at large5-13.Engineers that seek to solve the problems of fulfilling basic human needs are likely to require adifferent education from that which is traditionally provided in an engineering program. Theseengineers will need an understanding of and sensitivity to human and natural systems and anethical framework upon which to base engineering decisions
’. This has the consequence that ‘Pedagogically, this approach provides no “cognitive hooks”, which might enable students to relate new material to that of previous courses - until the semester is almost complete” 19.Accordingly Scragg recommends a top down approach starting with material already familiarto students and then working towards less familiar material. We attempted therefore to find acommon conceptual framework held by students, from different disciplines (especially multi-media), as the basis for a cognitive structure.4. The PC – a constructivist model Page 5.111.4Models are used as a means of
, regardless of theirpreferred learning style, when they follow a cycle/spiral consisting of four steps: experiencing,watching, thinking/modeling, and applying/doing. Thus, both modeling and doing are crucial partsof learning. Kolb’s learning cycle has been used in engineering education including civil [5-7],mechanical [7], chemical [5, 6, 8], industrial [9], aeronautical [7], and manufacturing [5, 6, 10]engineering curricula.Most of the VR educational research is concerned with applications of VR environments inclassrooms and labs, not the education of the creators of VR experiences. For example, El-Mounayri et al. [11] describe an immersive VR environment to learn how to operate a computernumerical control (CNC) milling machine in a graduate course
designconstraints engineers face. Capstone courses are, in a majority of programs 1, done byteams of students. Since many capstone courses are industry sponsored, students are ableto learn project constraints and budgeting. For these reasons capstone courses are theprimary mechanism used by many universities to meet ABET criteria 2, particularly foroutcomes that aren’t met in more traditional course formats. Since capstone courses tendto focus on projects which are specific and unique there is no widely accepted model ortextbook on which capstone courses are based 3. The outcomes that can be easilyintegrated into capstone courses drawn from the a-k outcomes include: (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams (f) an understanding of
use Senior Exit Exams, or FE Test results, as the only means of program assessment.Whereas Quality Control (QC) is an in-process or embedded technique: In manufacturing, processes are monitored, to identify problems that could lead to non- conforming products Corrective action can be taken quickly, after each semester. Can also be used to test new materials, equipment, and methods. If a test did not work well, then fixing it can happen the next time the test is given.The EET continuous improvement process uses mostly embedded assessments, that is, theassignments, quizzes, tests, labs, reports and projects that are a part of the grading of the courseare used as the assessment tool. A specific rubric is developed
with data. The subject concludes with the students comparing their observations totheir predictions, complete with a discussion of possible error sources and analysis, andrecommendations for future work.Rationale and GoalsStudents at MIT do not declare a major during their first year at the Institute. Instead, they take astandard set of eight subjects over two semesters and have the option of taking one seminarsubject (graded on a pass/fail basis) each semester. None of the core first-year subjects include alaboratory component (with the exception of an optional physics section). There are manyreasons why the Institute chose this approach, but its drawbacks include: • The material from core subjects (particularly physics) remains
operated it in unsafe manner, poor road maintenance, mistakes of the software thatintegrated sensors into the system, or was the car mechanically unsafe at fast speeds? Regardless Proceedings of the 2024 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2024, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 505of what caused the incident, students all agree the safe operation of a vehicle is the responsibilityof the driver and the owner under legal, ethical, and moral principles.Business Ethics CasesFinancial corporate disasters better known as scandals, whether centered around corruption,bribery
% Chem./Chem.Eng Division of Chemistry Biomedical Chemical Engineering : 4% 26% Engineering/Biochem./Bio7% Biochem. & Biomed. Engr. : 4% Mechanical Eng Environm. Engineering : 2% Materials Eng./Science Materials Sci. & Engr. : 2%12% Civil Engineering : 1% Elec. Eng./Comp Sci./Math 30% Electrical
includes training for bothElectrical Instrumentation & Automation Technicians and Mechanical/Millwright Craft. Theprogram was created to align with the Department of Education’s Journeyman requirements andconsists of 1232 hours of classroom instruction combined with on the job training at the MosaicCompany facilities in Polk County. Specifically the program consists of the followinginstruction: curriculum from ManufacturingTDI that is aligned with the Manufacturing SkillStandards Council (MSSC) Certified Production Technician (CPT) national certification – 5Weeks; Industrial skills fundamentals curriculum – 18 Weeks; Trade-specific skills curriculum –12 to 18 Months; Advanced standing for current incumbents to meet program requirements
, we developed the Plug -n- Play approach, a flexiblepedagogical approach which ensures instructors have a fixed core structure, flexibility inleveraging their own teaching style, and a mechanism for constant reflection which allows foradaptations to the course structure over time. The PNP approach focuses course design around thestudent experience, while acknowledging and supporting individual teaching styles and teachingmethods.To assess PNP, a classroom observation protocol was developed to evaluate student engagement,as well as examination of sixteen sections worth of grades and student evaluations. The resultsshow that students are highly engaged with the course material, peers in the class, and theinstructors. Finally, the PNP approach
, Virginia Tech Maura Borrego is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Dr. Borrego holds an M.S. and Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from Stanford University. Her current research interests center around interdisciplinary graduate education in engineering. She has an NSF CAREER and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) award for this work.Kacey Beddoes, Virginia Tech Kacey Beddoes is a Ph.D. student in Science and Technology Studies at Virginia Tech. Her current research interests are interdisciplinary studies of gender and engineering education. She serves as Assistant Editor of the journal Engineering Studies and co
withwhich students can assess and direct their own energy resource decisions in the future. Theproposed four semester syllabus is enclosed as an appendix.One likely side effect of the proposed just-in-time approach: students will read and write morethan in the previous ELG. This will come at some expense of the technical material. However,reading and writing more is a positive change. As mentioned earlier, the context of energyscience is what makes it this course extremely interesting for the students. Context will help thestudents understand energy better, and retain more of what they learn. And perhaps just asimportantly, readings, papers, and discussions punctuated by just-in-time technical modulesshould help retain students in the ELG over two
an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at Baylor University. He received hisB. S. in Aeronautical Engineering from the USAF Academy and his M. S. in Engineering from PrincetonUniversity. He completed his DPhil in Engineering Sciences at the University of Oxford, UK. At Baylor he teachescourses in laboratory techniques, fluid mechanics, energy systems, propulsion, and freshman engineering.STEVEN EISENBARTHSteven Eisenbarth is Associate Dean of the School of Engineering and Computer Science at Baylor University. Hereceived his B.S. in Mathematics and Physics from Albertson College of Idaho and a Masters and Ph.D. in Physicsfrom Baylor University. He teaches courses in electrical and computer engineering including embedded
Paper ID #43153Board 370: Research Initiation in Engineering Formation: Literature Reviewand Research Plan for an Engineering Specific Empathy ScaleDr. Emmabeth Parrish Vaughn, Austin Peay State University Dr. Emmabeth Vaughn is an Assistant Professor in the Physics, Engineering, and Astronomy Department at Austin Peay State University. Before join faculty at Austin Peay, she worked in industry as a Product Development Engineer for a commercial roofing manufacturer. She holds a bachelors degree from the University of Tennessee in Materials Science and Engineering. She earned her PhD from the University of Pennsylvania
. degree from Tulane University in Mechanical Engineering where he was a four-time varsity football letterman and named an NCAA and Entergy Corporation Winning for Life Scholar Athlete. He completed his M.S. in Mechanical Engineering at Vanderbilt University. Page 14.61.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 A Model for Technology Commercialization: Mississippi State UniversityAbstractCommercializing university technologies has been a focus of many research directors throughoutthe country. In most cases however, the desire to commercialize
. 230–231, 2002.[3] O. Ha and S. A. Brown, “Spatial Reasoning Difference between Civil andMechanical Engineering Students in Learning Mechanics of Materials Course: ACase of Cross-sectional Inference,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[4] M. C. Linn and A. C. Petersen, “Emergence and Characterization of Sex Differences inSpatial Ability: A Meta-Analysis,” Child Dev., vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1479–1498, 1985.[5] [1] D. H. Uttal et al., “The Malleability of Spatial Skills: A Meta-Analysis of TrainingStudies,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 352–402, 2013.[6] N. L. Veurink et al., “Enhancing visualization skills-improving options and success(EnViSIONS) of engineering and technology students,” Eng. Des. Graph. J., vol.73, no. 2, pp