PhD Candidate in the Department of Communication at the University of Washington. Her work focuses on the intersections of gender, race, nation, and culture in relation to digital/social media.Dr. Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Julia M. Williams is Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her research areas include technical communication, assessment, accreditation, and the development of change management strategies for faculty and staff. Her articles have appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education, In- ternational Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, and Technical Communication Quarterly, among others.Dr. Eva
the Boeing Max Air Disaster as A Role-Play Scenario for Teaching Ethical ThinkingIntroductionAlgorithms and software now drive decision-making across a range of domains, and the impact ofalgorithms in the digital future is hard to escape (O'Neil, 2016; Pasquale, 2015). They not onlyshape individual actions but are increasingly embedded into the structure of our society, makingdecisions at scale about who gets a loan, who gets hired or fired from a job, who receives socialservices, who can vote, who goes to prison, for how long, and when they get parole (Brayne, 2017;Buolamwini & Gebru, 2018; Eubanks, 2018). For instance, a software system with COMPASmachine learning-based recidivism risk assessment tool assigns disproportionately higher
frominstitutions [24], [25]. As such, institutions have become proactive and robust in makingprograms accessible through promotion and marketing activities.Marketing of the study abroad programs have, however, become increasingly commercial. This,in part, further challenges parents and students who are yet to understand the benefits ofinternational education programs [9]. Critics point out that education abroad has become moreentrepreneurial and consumer-oriented [26]. With the consumer mentality, universities generaterevenue from these programs [27] and market study abroad programs appealing to theirconsumers’ gaze (students) that fit the tourist model. In some cases, students often apply theirconsumer lens to assess the educational experience [26
Paper ID #33044Web-based Game vs. Virtual Reality Field Surveying Labs TowardsEnhancing Experiential EducationDr. Dimitrios Bolkas, Pennsylvania State University Dimitrios Bolkas, Ph.D., is currently an Associate Professor of Surveying Engineering at the Pennsylvania State University, Wilkes-Barre Campus. He has a diverse geodetic and geoscientific experience that in- cludes terrestrial, mobile, and airborne laser scanning, digital elevation models, unmanned aerial systems, GNSS networks, geoid and gravity-field modeling. His main research interest is on building methods to increase, understand, and assess the quality
laboratory, includingrenewable energy, environment, and manufacturing. The approach draws from studies of scientificcollaboration, student learning outcomes, and social network analysis. The lessons learned fromthis round of assessments will be used to improve the collaborative project.IntroductionThe primary aim of this paper is to present an online learning community for improvingcompetitiveness in the global green energy manufacturing environment, and for educating andtraining students who will form the future work force in the US manufacturing industry.“Globalization” is one of the main trends contemporary business organizations. Globallydistributed design, analysis, planning, manufacturing, and quality assurance facilities providecompetitive
numerous awards. Her research interests include biomedical optics – particularly optical coherence tomography and near infrared spectroscopy, microflu- idics, and point-of-care diagnostics.Dr. Monica Farmer Cox, The Ohio State University Monica F. Cox, Ph.D., is Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State Uni- versity. Prior to this appointment, she was a Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University, the Inaugural Director of the College of Engineering’s Leadership Minor, and the Director of the International Institute of Engineering Education Assessment (i2e2a). In 2013, she be- came founder and owner of STEMinent LLC, a company focused on STEM education
retention rate by 5% department goal Outcome Increase in sense of Grant proposal & Survey belonging department goal Activity Attendance at biweekly Grant proposal Internal records/logs meetings Activity Completion of service Grant proposal & Internal records/logs project / engineering design department goal projectAfter just 1.75 years into the 5-year grant, it is difficult to assess the major outcomes. However,the program is making progress in the right direction. ● First-year student retention data are not yet available. ● A majority of survey respondents indicated that
completed after each triad completes a manuscriptreview, feedback is gathered by coaches from their assigned triads. Surveys are completedseparately by mentors and mentees, and organized similar to a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses,opportunities and threats) analysis. Follow-up virtual meetings with coaches are conducted asneeded based on survey responses.EER PERT Research Activities The project explores the following research questions: How do scholars develop schemaand skills for providing feedback in EER peer reviews? To what extent are disciplinaryconventions related to manuscript quality and value similar or different across EER contexts? Isthere a tacit, shared EER schema assessing quality and value of EER manuscripts? Research
integrate design into theengineering curriculum (e.g., Crawley, 2002) and to identify effective ways for assessment (Dym et al.,2005). Some faculty were comfortable engaging in a pedagogy based on project-based learning (PBL)(Smith et al., 2005). Employers started to recognize the qualities that PBL provides for students, includingcommunication, teamwork skills and interest in life-long learning (Oakes, Coyle, & Jamieson, 2000;Smith, 2004).The constantly changing nature of the engineering curriculum, in concert with economic, social andglobal contexts, continuously call for engineering faculty to adapt, by incorporating new content as wellas utilizing effective educational interventions. A recent study on The Global State of the Art
already on the books that are being revised. The review process includes monitoring that Student Learning Outcomes of the course(s) are aligned with the EUSLOs from the Liberal Studies curriculum, that they are measurable, and that there is an assessment mechanism in place. I also evaluate the section of departments’ program reviews that pertains to Liberal Studies. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Creating Opportunities to Help Students Be Prepared for Careers in a STEM Field Edel Reilly Indiana University of PennsylvaniaThis paper reports on an ongoing National Science Foundation's
Vulnerability assessment and management Analyze Performs highly specialized review and Threat analysis evaluation of incoming cybersecurity Exploitation analysis information to determine its usefulness for intelligence All-source analysis Targets Language analysis Collect and Operate Provides specialized denial and deception Collection Operations operations and collection of cybersecurity Cyber Operational planning
(RED) grant at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Dr. Cross’ scholarship investigated stu- dent teams in engineering, faculty communities of practice, and the intersectionality of multiple identity dimensions. Her research interests include diversity and inclusion in STEM, intersectionality, teamwork and communication skills, assessment, and identity construction. Her teaching philosophy focuses on student centered approaches such as culturally relevant pedagogy. Dr. Cross’ complimentary professional activities promote inclusive excellence through collaboration. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021
, motivation, scholarships, community service project, student successSection I: IntroductionThe “Scholars of Excellence in Engineering and Computer Sciences” (SEECS) program wasestablished in 2008 at Gannon University, funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF)Scholarships in Sciences, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (S-STEM) program [1].Since then, the grant has been funded twice more; the current award period started in 2017 andwill run until 2021. The goals of the program, the structure, and its assessment have beenpublished in several conferences [2] - [4]. One of the highlights of the program is that allstudents must participate in a community-based design project, undertaken for a non-profit entityin the local region. This project
Director of Undergraduate Studies in the School of Engineering and Sciences at Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico. He collaborates with the Faculty of Engineering of the Universidad Andres Bello in Santiago, Chile. Professor Zavala is National Researcher Level 2 of the National System of Researchers of Mexico. He works with the following research lines: conceptual understanding, active learning, development of assessment tools, faculty development and studies in STEM. Genaro Zavala was appointed to the editorial board of the Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research journal of the American Physical Society for the period 2015 to 2018, vice president of the Latin American Physics Education
investigated technology-enhanced learning research trends by identifying the 40 most influential articles and their authorsin the field. These studies are in computer science education-related domains, but none of themdirectly addressed computer science education research with a bibliometric approach. Papamitsiouet al.[25] have applied co-word analysis with social network analysis to keywords from two con-ferences’ publications in computing education. This bibliometric study characterized the CSERresearch landscape by showing the dominant research fields: learning approaches, aspects of pro-gramming, computational thinking, feedback, and assessment. Integrity and diversity are twoadditional areas that attracted researchers’ attention. Merlo et al. [26
to assess the quality of information was discussed. Many of the faculty responsesconfirmed that in the classes they teach at the undergraduate level scholarly research is not anintegral part of the course. In some cases, faculty stated they do not have their students search forinformation or resources concerning an assignment, but rather gave it to them directly or showedthem exactly how to access it, such as a specific technical standard, for example.Another common response from the faculty members interviewed was acknowledging thatundergraduate students do not read their textbooks and that they are often asked to do a greatdeal of work for each of their classes. One faculty member specifically stated that they “pullback” quite a bit on
interviewtranscripts, the interview responses were shared with a small group of engineering and scienceeducation graduate researchers for help with coding. Descriptive and in vivo coding methodswere used for first cycle coding, and pattern coding was used for second cycle coding. Thisproject was conducted with approval of the institution’s IRB, project #IRB2020-375.The graduate perspective on the role of GLAs in the lab Before any change in roles could be commented on, the initial self-perception of a GLA’srole and responsibilities in the laboratory classroom had to be assessed to provide a baseline for a“normal” in-person semester. Perhaps not surprisingly, all GLAs surveyed indicated that theynoticed a change in their role and responsibilities since
Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, students could make asub-project the topic of their final year design project (one semester), their final year research project(two semesters), or use it to satisfy the practical training requirements of the degree (six weeks in their2nd and 3rd year). Students from other Engineering Departments could also work on sub-projects tofulfill the practical training requirements of their degrees.Conveniently, the final year projects were then directly assessed for the Engineering Council of SouthAfrica (ECSA) graduate attributes 6 (Professional and technical communication) and 9 (Independentlearning ability). However, since the AREND sub-projects were linked to the greater AREND teamand supported by the team leader
graphics [2,p. 30]. Computer-based learning allows students to receive immediate feedback by answeringpractice problems and incorporating low stakes graded assessments. This technology helps tokeep students accountable for remaining current with the course materials [4, p. 22]. Anothertechnology that enables students to have the necessary content is electronic books (e-books). E-books allow students to read and reference the course textbook virtually. As technologyimproves, e-books are being modified to be read on mobile devices, which enables true remotelearning from almost any location [9]. Providing feedback to students is essential for them to realize strengths and weaknesses.A challenge for the online learning environment is having
assessment methods.Mr. Peeratham Techapalokul, Virginia Tech Peeratham Techapalokul is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Computer Science at Virginia Tech. His research interests lie on visual programming languages and computer science education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Teaching the Culture of Quality from the Ground Up: Novice-Tailored Quality Improvement for Scratch ProgrammersAbstractAs quality problems plague the modern society’s software infrastructure, a fundamental learningobjective of computing education has become developing students’ attitudes, knowledge, and prac-tices centered around software quality. Teaching
Paper ID #28751Two Student Workshops on Identifying and Resolving Teamwork ConflictDr. Rania Al-Hammoud P.Eng., University of Waterloo Dr. Al-Hammoud is a Faculty lecturer (Graduate Attributes) in the department of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Waterloo. Dr. Al-Hammoud has a passion for teaching where she con- tinuously seeks new technologies to involve students in their learning process. She is actively involved in the Ideas Clinic, a major experiential learning initiative at the University of Waterloo. She is also re- sponsible for developing a process and assessing graduate attributes at the
teams by instructors with the expectation that theywould be able to work in teams effectively without receiving any teamwork training orconstructive feedback [12].Engineering programs need to find ways to effectively train engineering students in order tounderstand what is required to become a successful team member and what constructs associatedwith effective teamwork they need to master. However, training engineering students inteamwork is not a trivial task. In order to understand how to do it effectively, it is important tounderstand the impact that different teamwork frameworks which are used to assess a team’sattributes, process and effectiveness can have on student teams and the perceptions ofparticipants going through teamwork training
measures Uncertainty Avoidance, whichgroups the questions under Risk Avoidance and Ambiguity Intolerance. The higher the score(maximum 7), the less comfortable the individual is with uncertainty. The fourth dimension isMasculinity, which groups the questions under Masculinity and Gender Equality. The lower thescore (minimum 1), the better disposition towards femininity.To assess the quality of the research, the study stands on previous studies conducted by one of theauthors [4], [6], [35]. Content validity was discussed and determined by the researchers inconsensus [36]. Construct validity is addressed by using a survey that has been proven to be aneffective tool to assess the cultural dimensions of a group [24], [29], [30], [37], [38] and the
systems engineering requires a flawless interface between team members workingtoward a common system thinking to correctly execute the design process. The focus of this paper wouldbe very much on techniques and challenges on curricular structures, course design, implementation;assessment and evaluation.Adding a UAV engineering experience into an undergraduate aeronautical/aerospace engineering programenriches the quality of the education. The students will be more confident when they discover that UAVflight will confirm what the equations of motion are predicting. This will directly impact their in-classeducation by helping them to better comprehend the theory. When students experience a real aircraft andfeel its complexity and capability, they
agateway between the experiment and the remote computer for clients. There should be somemiddleware that facilitates the information exchange between the local and remotecomputers.These facilities utilized embedded processors for accessing multiple experiments,manipulating experimental setup from remote locations, integrated assessment, and real-timelearning management features. The developed facilities are used for delivering a number oflaboratory courses, while gathering data in terms of achieving learning outcomes andassessing the effectiveness of the system in terms of system designs. The paper will describethe development and implementation of remote laboratory systems in terms of designphilosophy, system design implementation, pedagogical
beyond. He is actively engaged in different projects at the department focusing on teamwork and leadership competencies in engineering.Dr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the Program Assessment and Research Associate at Design Center (DC) Colorado in CU’s Department of Mechanical Engineering at the College of Engineering and Applied Science. He holds a B.A. in psychology from Louisiana State University, an M.S. degree in industrial/organizational psychology and a Ph.D. degree in education, both from the University of Tennessee. Dr. Knight’s research interests are in the areas of K-12, program evaluation and teamwork practices in engineering education. His current duties include
IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, 2014.[7] H. K. Ro and D. B. Knight, “Gender Differences in Learning Outcomes from the College Experiences of Engineering Students,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 478–507, 2016.[8] C. J. Finelli et al., “An Assessment of Engineering Students’ Curricular and Co-Curricular Experiences and Their Ethical Development,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 469–494, Jul. 2012.[9] D. B. Knight and B. J. Novoselich, “Curricular and Co-curricular Influences on Undergraduate Engineering Student Leadership,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 44– 70, 2017.[10] A. W. Astin, “Student Involvement : A Developmental Theory for Higher Education,” J. Coll. Stud. Dev
the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign; studies the role of the teacher in implementing and assessing collaborative problem solving in STEM classroomsProf. Leon Liebenberg, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign For the past 25 years, Leon Liebenberg has been engaged in engineering teaching, research, and commu- nity engagement. He was a professor of mechanical engineering at two South African universities (Univer- sity of Pretoria; North West University), before becoming a higher education consultant in Switzerland where he worked with colleges of engineering and technology management. Leon is passionate about multidisciplinary research, particularly in the fields of energy engineering, biomedical
Number of full-text articles assessed for 17 eligibility and categorization Articles excluded after n=35 reading full textFigure 1. Search and selection process extracted from the PRISMA flow. Adapted from [10, p.4].Analysis Research suggests that a rubric can be used for organizing research component findings intables [11], [12]. We used tables to categorize our findings and developed themes as suggested byHarden and Thomas [13]. For this systematized literature review, we conducted a three-stepanalysis. In the first pass, we assessed the abstracts of the primary articles to generate an overview
reluctance of Generation Z’s participation. [11, p.167]Furthermore, Generation Z students may need to be educated on how individual choices can impact alarger problem or solution. Their we-centric, social-change-based way of looking at things can havethe negative consequence of overlooking solutions at the individual level [11]. This is an opportunityfor those in areas like WE@RIT to educate and engage Generation Z.Gen Z, Meet WE@RIT Going forward, as the data from the spring 2020 WE@RIT needs assessment survey ispresented, it is important to frame the biggest characteristics of what it means to be a member ofGeneration Z: possessing high academic drive yet suffering high levels of anxiety; valuinginterpersonal relationships