. This Department has interests on Electrical and Computer Engineering, andis responsible for a degree on Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering, as well as aMaster´s degree on the same area. The faculty of the Department is composed by over sixty professors and lecturers (23 withPh.D. degrees). Annually, the Department receives around 150 undergraduate students, and over50 graduate students. The total number of students in the Department is over one thousand. Recently, we have reformulated the curriculum of the Engineering degree, which is fiveyears long (ten semesters) and has the following structure: Area Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Mathematics
Multisim and Mathsoft Mathcad into a Digital Communication Technology Curriculum XXX NAME HERE XXX XXX PROGRAM NAME HERE XXX XXX DEPT. NAME HERE XXX XXX UNIVERSITY NAME HERE XXX XXX CITY STATE POSTAL HERE XXXAbstractTechnology program texts that seek to teach digital communication fundamentals follow basicdevelopments that can be modeled in laboratory classes using computer-based electronicslaboratory simulators and computer-based symbolic mathematics systems. For technologyprograms, this is particularly important as the laboratory work reinforces foundational datacommunication
differences between cultures, administrative structures,educational goals, and languages. This paper explores potentials and issues of collaboratingwith Chinese engineering schools from a curriculum perspective. By comparing and contrastingthe curriculum of our electrical and computer engineering technology program (TAC of ABETaccredited) at Western Carolina University with that from a representative Chinese university,the following findings are presented in the paper: 1) Because of the administrative structure in China’s higher education system, the engineering curricula are centrally controlled to certain extent by China’s Ministry of Higher Education. Therefore, analysis of an engineering curriculum from one representative university can
of a into programs such as Excel to plot the slider linear velocity, 𝑣,mechanism and results obtained. This paper presents the coursestructure, provides example problems and student submission,and presents survey data obtained from students who took thecourse in the fall semester of 2024. Keywords—Dynamics; Computer-Aided Design; Simulation. I. INTRODUCTION Analysis and Synthesis of Mechanisms is a core course inthe mechanical engineering curriculum at the University of theDistrict of Columbia, typically taken in the junior year after thecourse pre-requisite Engineering Mechanics II (Dynamics).Students work to understand the function of various mechanisms(e.g., four bar linkages, slider cranks, and cam
Paper ID #48352Advancing AI Education: Curriculum Development in Florida’s Two-YearState Colleges for Student Career AdvancementDr. Ali Zilouchian, Florida Atlantic University Ali Zilouchian is currently the Director of Applied Engineering Research Center and Program Director at Keiser University, He was the founding Director of a $4.5 Million Dollars grant from DOE entitled: aˆ CœAn Articulated Community College-University FraDr. Nancy Romance, Florida Atlantic University Dr. Romance is Professor of STEM Education in the College of Engineering and Computer Science at Florida Atlantic University (FAU) and a graduate faculty
, comments from our Alumni Advisory Board thatengineers lack facility with the massive amounts of data now being collected in industry, and apractical need to refresh our lab course offerings – and leveraging our faculty’s expertise in thearea – the undergraduate curriculum at Carnegie Mellon University has undergone numerouschanges to increase the focus both on sensing and on computational science. Sensing forms abackbone for our design course sequence: It has been incorporated into a project in our third-yeardesign course since 2015 and our second-year design course since 2021. In 2018, ourUndergraduate Program Committee defined key learning objectives for sensing andrecommended that lab courses focus on sensing and instrumentation. These changes
Session 2793 Integrating Material Science and Processing into the Undergraduate Engineering & Science Curriculum Using the Web James M. Fragomeni and Anwar Hossain The University of Detroit Mercy, Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, College of Engineering and Science, Detroit, Michigan 48237, USAAbstractThe proper understanding of engineering materials is very foundational and important withrespect to all the various branches of engineering and technology for a complete undergraduateengineering program. The purpose of
AC 2011-2322: MENTOR TRAINING PROGRAM FOR A PEER-TO-PEERLEARNING ENVIRONMENT: LEADERSHIP VS. CURRICULUM BAL-ANCEFarrokh Attarzadeh, University of Houston Farrokh Attarzadeh earned his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Houston in 1983. He is an Associate Professor in the Engineering Technology Department, College of Technology at the University of Houston. He teaches software programming and is in charge of the senior project course in the Computer Engineering Technology Program. He is a member of ASEE and has been with the University of Houston since 1983. Dr. Attarzadeh may be reached at FAttarzadeh@central.uh.edu.Deniz Gurkan, University of Houston Deniz Gurkan received her B.S. (1996) and M.S
customized parts, and allow for the design of computer-integratedmanufacturing (CIM) scenarios. This manufacturing laboratory improvement will enhancestudent learning by introducing several new courses, and promote research in IndustrialEngineering (IE).Literature ReviewIncluded in the literature are several different applications of the use of robotics education inundergraduate curriculums. Wolfer and George presented how Indiana University South Bendhas deployed autonomous robots in their computer organization course to facilitate introducingcomputer science students to the basics of logic, embedded systems, and assembly language3.They observed that robots help to provide effective, real-time feedback on program operation
first-year mechanical engineering curriculum,” 2010. [4] R. Roemer, D. Mascaro, E. Pardyjak, and S. Bamberg, “A spiral learning curriculum for second year students in mechanical engineering,” 2010. [5] R. Roemer, D. Mascaro, and S. Bamberg, “A spiral learning curriculum in mechanical engi- neering,” 2010. [6] S. C. Ahn, J. H. Kim, and H.-G. Kim, “Computer supported remote learning and gaming using tele-face mouse system,” vol. 3942 LNCS, (Hangzhou, China), pp. 688 – 691, 2006. Mouse pointers;Remote learning;Tele face mouse system;Teleconference systems;. [7] K. Gierowski and T. Gierszewski, “Analysis of network infrastructure and qos requirements for modern remote learning systems,” vol. 3, (Wroclaw, Poland), pp. 293
-based wearable computing. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Curricular Complexity as a Metric to Forecast Issues with Transferring into a Redesigned Engineering Curriculum AbstractThis paper details quantifying the interconnectedness of a curriculum. We draw from Heileman’sCurricular Analytics tool and the curricular complexity metric. We extend this metric tohighlight how it can be used to forecast issues in transfer student experiences in redesignedcurricula. We focus on structural complexity in this paper by consolidating transfer studentpathways using plans of study from the Department of Electrical and Computer
Theme-Based Redesign of the Duke University ECE Curriculum: The First Steps a) Leslie M. Collins, a)Lisa G. Huettel, a)April S. Brown, a)Gary A. Ybarra, b)Joseph S. Holmes, a)John A. Board, a)Steven A. Cummer, a) Michael R. Gustafson, a)Jungsang Kim, and a)Hisham Z. Massoud a) Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708-0291/b)AcuityEdge, 437 Petty Road, Suite 201, Sanford, NC 27330Abstract. Historically, undergraduates in Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) atDuke University have had ample exposure to theoretical foundations and
Session 2238 Introduction of Finite Element Methods in the Lower Division Mechanical Engineering Technology Curriculum Thomas G. Boronkay, Janak Dave University of CincinnatiIntroductionMany engineering technology students work in positions requiring familiarity with engineeringanalysis as well as design. They are asked to use commercially available software packages as apart of their job function. Some of the simple analysis is off loaded to the designer. One of mainreason for this shift is integration of analysis as early in design process as possible. Anotherreason is
AC 2012-3423: SUSTAINCITY A INTERACTIVE VIRTUAL REALITYGAME PROMOTING ENGINEERING DESIGN IN PRE-ENGINEERINGCURRICULUMDr. Ying Tang, Rowan University Ying Tang received the B.S. and M.S. degrees from the Northeastern University, P. R. China, in 1996 and 1998, respectively, and Ph.D. degree from New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J., in 2001. She is currently an Associate Professor of electrical and computer engineering at Rowan University. Her research interests include virtual reality, artificial intelligence, and modeling and scheduling of computer- integrated systems. Tang has led or participated in several research and education projects funded by National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of
Session 1420 Evaluating the Impact of Real-time Systems Theory Course on a Multidisciplinary Embedded Systems Curriculum G. Singh1 , M. Mizuno1 , M. Neilsen1 , D. Lenhert2 , N. Zhang3 , A. Gross41 Department of Computing and Information Sciences, Kansas State University (KSU), fsingh,masaaki,neilseng@cis.ksu.edu2 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, KSU, lenhert@ksu.edu3 Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, KSU, zhangn@ksu.edu4 The IDEA Center, 211 S. Seth Child Road, Manhattan, KS, agross@ksu.edu Abstract The ChERT project is
, American Society for Engineering Education”During the initial stage of the curriculum development, some key technical topics wereidentified as necessary and critical to the overall knowledge of the graduates. Thesetopics are summarized in Table 1. Table 1. Key Topics for the Communications course in the AAS program Basics of electronic communication systems Signal representation and analysis Modulation and demodulation Analog communication systems The telephone system Digital data systems and transmission Multiplexing Computer network configurations and infrastructure components Data communications protocols Computer
1Session 3563 Curriculum Development in Manufacturing Technology:A Survey of Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME) College Fellows Ahmad Zargari, Robert Hayes, Robert Spradling Morehead State UniversityIntroduction Shortly after the end of World War II, American manufacturers diverted theirconsiderable military manufacturing capabilities into the production of consumer goods.At that time, the worldwide demand for American products was strong and U.S. firmsproduced almost half of all the manufactured goods sold in the world. During the past 20 years, America’s manufacturing leadership
Paper ID #46708Design Curriculum in Introductory Circuits Laboratory Assignments and theInfluence on Innovation Self-EfficacyMs. Heather Michelle Phillips, University of Pittsburgh Heather Phillips is a BPhil graduate in Engineering Physics from the University of Pittsburgh and an incoming Electrical Engineering PhD student at Stanford University.Mr. Nicholas Anthony Nobile, University of Pittsburgh Nicholas A. Nobile is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Pittsburgh who studies Integrated Photonic Computing with a focus in Memory Control and Optimization. He has presented at multiple conferences including CLEO and
). • Students engage with the lab classes (MOA: ~80% of the students reliably participate in the labs, see Appendix A); enjoy the course (MOA: student feedback, interaction in the labs, see Appendix B); and are SE-tool literate (MOA: time to get new tools working in the labs reduces significantly over the course).Seen from the overall curriculum perspective, teaching (selected) SECs in the first yearprovides a broad view on software development early on. This is beneficial as it • avoids a narrow-minded view on Computer Science in which programming is perceived as “the centre of the universe”; • illustrates abstract mathematical concepts in terms of SECs: ordering relations, equivalence relations, graph theory, and
ETD 455 Integrating IoT in Mechatronics Lab for Mechanical Engineering Technology Curriculum: Embracing Industry 4.0Jiayue Shen, Daniel Jones, Kazi Imran, SUNY Polytechnic Institute; Xiangyu Wang,Purdue University Fort Wayne; Weiru Chen, Slippery Rock University; Lanju Mee, University of Maryland Eastern ShoreAbstract In the context of Industry 4.0, mechatronics labs are increasingly incorporating Internet ofThings (IoT) technologies to enhance the teaching of system control and monitoring concepts.This paper presents the development of nine lab modules to integrate IoT technologies into themechatronics lab for
2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings Effect of Connected Courses on Student Retention in the First-year Curriculum Chris Gordon* Southern Illinois University Edwardsville cgordon@siue.eduAbstractThis paper describes results of an initiative to place freshmen residents of an engineering andtechnology residential community into a common course in their first semester. The motivationof this initiative is to enhance retention of first-year freshmen by facilitating study groupformation. Freshman engineering students at the investigator's university are provided
Paper ID #49378FRCDesign.org - An Open source Advanced CAD and Engineering DesignCourse for Highschool Robotics (Curriculum Exchange)David Doan, frcdesign.orgJonathan Mi, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Jonathan Mi is a doctorate student in the Robotics department at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. His research is focused on hardware and control of soft and tensegrity robots. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025FRCDesign.orgAn open source, free, learning coursefor learning advanced computer aidedrobot design for competitive high Makingschool
and management topics in Engineering Education, curriculum reform isneeded to adequately prepare students. Thus, this paper discusses the development of a minorprogram of specialty in Engineering Leadership & Management that can be pursued by allengineering and computer science majors while completing a BS degree.Keywords: Leadership, Management, Engineering Education, and Curriculum Reform.IntroductionEngineering education in the United States is currently undergoing a crucial period of awarenesswhere the necessity to reform academic program curriculum is becoming more evident in orderto maintain technological leadership and competitiveness of the US in a global economy. Thefollowing table shows the "Occupational employment projections
2006-1800: CHALLENGES IN CURRICULUM ADAPTATION ACROSSINSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION: INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONALSTUDENT TRANSFERRoland Kempter, University of UtahCynthia Furse, University of Utah Dr. Cynthia Furse Associate Professor, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah Dr. Furse received her B.S. in electrical engineering with a mathematics minor in 1985, M.S. degree in electrical engineering in 1988, and her Ph.D. in electrical engineering from the University of Utah in 1994. She is currently an associate professor at the University of Utah and has taught electromagnetics, wireless communication, computational electromagnetics, microwave
interactingwith a relative “expert” in the unfamiliar field. We feel that this enhanced learning significantly,and hope to measure this outcome in future course assessment.As emphasized in the student evaluation comments, exposure to computational tools (e.g.MATLAB) or wet-lab techniques (e.g. intracellular recording) represented experiences outsidethe traditional curriculum for one or the other group, and were very well received.Summary. By developing three new courses to serve as the backbone of the NeuralEngineering curriculum (Models of the Nervous System, Neural Engineering I, NeuralEngineering II), we have coalesced a large amount of material from traditionally separatecurricula. We believe that the undergraduate courses, when combined with
]. Available:https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prCHC52677624[3] E. Pereiro, M. Montaldo, V. Koleszar, and A. Urruticoechea, “Computational thinking,artificial intelligence and education in Latin America,” UNESCO. Accessed: Jan. 12, 2025.[Online]. Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381761[4] R. Salhab, “AI Literacy Across Curriculum Design: Investigating College Instructors’Perspectives, ” Online Learn., vol. 28, no. 2, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.24059/olj.v28i2.4426.[5] E. Gibney, “AI talent grab sparks excitement and concern,” Nature, vol. 532, no. 7600, pp.422–423, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1038/532422a.[6] Y. Li, J. Xu, C. Jia, and X. Zhai, “Investigation of College Students' Generative ArtificialIntelligence(GAI) Usage Status and its
main topics of the curriculum.I. IntroductionThe engineering design graphics curriculum is at a crossroads. Computer technology is enablingengineers and technicians to design and manufacture parts without relying on two-dimensionaldrawings. The curricula at many universities and community colleges still spend a great deal oftime focusing on 2D documentation drawings. This is even truer at the high school level. There areseveral possible reasons why some programs have not changed to a curriculum that focuses onconstraint-based, three-dimensional solids modeling. One obstacle to this type of change has beenthe cost of hardware and software. Some constraint-based programs can cost tens of thousands ofdollars and cannot realistically be purchased
(chemistry in the first semester,physics in the second), and a one-credit engineering course. The curriculum is taught by amultidisciplinary team of professors using a combination of traditional lecturing and alternativeinstructional methods including cooperative learning, activity-based class sessions, and extensiveuse of computer simulations. The goals of the curriculum are to provide motivation and contextfor the fundamental material taught in the first-year mathematics and science courses, a realisticand positive orientation to the engineering profession, and training in the problem-solving, study,and communication skills that correlate with success in engineering school and equip individualsto be lifelong learners. This paper summarizes program
(chemistry in the first semester,physics in the second), and a one-credit engineering course. The curriculum is taught by amultidisciplinary team of professors using a combination of traditional lecturing and alternativeinstructional methods including cooperative learning, activity-based class sessions, and extensiveuse of computer simulations. The goals of the curriculum are to provide motivation and contextfor the fundamental material taught in the first-year mathematics and science courses, a realisticand positive orientation to the engineering profession, and training in the problem-solving, study,and communication skills that correlate with success in engineering school and equip individualsto be lifelong learners. This paper summarizes program
excellent skills in advanced computer visualization and kinematic simulationprocedures. Course evaluations have been consistently excellent (3.8 out of 4, on the Page 8.741.3average). Examples of student projects are illustrated in figures 1 -4.Educational objectives and benefits to the students and programThe educational objectives and benefits offered by the introduction of a deployablestructure project are discussed in the following sections:a) Enhance students’ skills in the geometric conception and visualization of structuresThe integration of new research on deployable structures in the curriculum builds on theauthor’s ongoing effort to include a