, and work-in-progress articles, were removed from the final list. In thesecond step, these 1821 articles were screened based on their titles and abstracts to assess theirrelevance and applicability to the study. Out of these, 65 articles were selected for furtherconsideration. Articles not meeting the relevance and applicability criteria were excluded fromthe study. In the third step, the remaining 48 articles were screened based on their full text toensure they met the exclusion criteria. In the fourth step, the 21 articles that remained werecritically reviewed to extract the relevant information necessary for the analysis. Informationsuch as research questions, research design, data collection, and data analysis, among others,were retrieved
asinterpersonal interactions with a more diverse collection of colleagues [25]. While capstoneexperiences could not fully prepare individuals for these challenges, their tendency to replicatemany aspects of the workplace provided moderate preparationLooking to the Canadian context where lifelong learning is still recognized as a graduateattribute for accreditation, there has been some engineering education research into teaching,learning, and assessing lifelong learning within undergraduate programs. We reviewed graduateattribute definitions from 16 Canadian universities and found that lifelong learning was mostoften conceptualized in terms of self-directed learning skills with few institutions consideringstudents’ developing dispositions, orientations
maynot engage within a team as expected due to logistical barriers to participation, marginalizationby other team members, or disinterest in the major/project [11], [13]–[15]. Rather than “socialloafing” which has negative connotations, we propose the use of the term “engagement-relatedconflict” when describing these instances where students are evaluated by their peers as notcontributing to their team as expected.Routine use of validated peer evaluation tools, such as Comprehensive Assessment of TeamMember Effectiveness (CATME), can alert an instructor or TA to a team conflict; they can thendiscern the true cause of this conflict to remedy the situation [15], [16]. However, there is littleguidance for instructors or TAs on how to coach
Engineering, George Mason University (Mason), Fairfax, VA. His areas of expertise include Critical Infrastructure Protection, vulnerability assessments and mitigations, probabilistic risk evaluation and risk management, Security engineering, blast modelling and mitigation of effects, facilities engineer- ing, and facilities management. He is an incoming member of the Executive Committee, Engineering Accreditation Commission of ABET. As a program evaluator and a team chair, Dr. Kathir has evaluated engineering programs for accreditation at over 25 institutions in the U.S. and internationally. He currently serves as the chair of ASCE’s Committee on Accreditation.Mehdi Amiri ©American Society for
article by Alkhouri includes a few inthis space including “YOU at College”, “B Well UAB”, and “Unmasked” [4]. Apps like “YOUat College” and “B Well UAB” can be beneficial as they include ways of self-assessing and alsoinformation on resources available on campus [5] [6], but require an internet connection on theuser’s device in order to work / provide information. This was seen as a hinderance since aninternet connection may not always be available during a mental health crisis. The informationshould be available with no reliance on connectivity whatsoever. Unmasked is another app in this space, but serves more as a way for students to give oneanother advice anonymously with some oversight from admins to ensure nothing serious
this course is still in session. Further results will be assessed via focusgroups and anonymous surveys.DiscussionStudent feedback about both courses and their hands-on experimental nature has beenoverwhelmingly positive. Given the positive feedback, more courses across educational levelswill be developed using this model. The takeaway being that hands on experimentation is acompelling way to teach optics fundamentals. In the future, courses like this will be part of anoptical engineering certificate program in development within the electrical engineeringcurriculum. The program in development offers an opportunity to build many courses utilizingthe paradigms used in both the first year seminar and senior level course. Going forward
teaching community college engineering transfer students for 20 years. His teaching and research interests include developing, implementing and assessing active learning instructional strategies and course-based undergraduate research experiences. Eric has been a member of ASEE since 2001. He currently serves as awards chair for the Pacific Northwest Section and was the recipient of the 2008 Section Outstanding Teaching Award. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Categorizing student interactions with manipulatives in staticsAbstractThis work in progress paper describes ongoing work to understand the ways in which studentsmake use of
possible as it is possible to learn the business side “[…] moreeasily and without sort of formal education.” (I09M, Pos. 13).5. Discussion and ImplicationsPrior studies show different approaches to implementing and assessing the impact of PBLmechatronics education [35–38]. However, they mainly focus on the teaching approach itself orevaluate the short-term effects on students.Based on our analyses, integrating the PBL approach in this mechatronics course sequence hascreated a technically intense learning experience valuable to future entrepreneurs. Students learnabout the theory, apply it to an open problem, and master the mechatronics skill set. Students andteams support each other, and the teaching team encourages a collaborative environment
engineering leader identity growth in the classroom. Moreover,these instructional features are discussed in terms of identity development processes that theysupport, providing educators with formalized frameworks through which they can betterunderstand their own programs and curricula. Finally, these findings provide rich insight intoidentity-based instruction and support the Design and Assess strategic initiatives of the LEADdivision.IntroductionIncreased industry demands for leadership skills among engineering graduates has led to asignificant increase in engineering leadership programs in universities over the past 20 years [1,2]. Many of these programs focus on specific leadership skills and behaviors. While thesecharacteristic-based programs
P2 CM,ACT FM CSYS,0 R P1 P 2 CM,0 R (3) 0 10 20 0 P10 P20 This estimate was reviewed and revised by an experienced engineer from industry who wasfamiliar with the overall costing of such systems, and the resulting fractions were assessed to bereasonably accurate for this educational use. This result might be expected since even a relativelynaïve estimate is likely to be accurate well withing an order of magnitude and therefore adequatefor instruction or even a very initial conceptual cost estimate for scoping or proposal repurposes.Scaling exponents were obtained from the
differ from their own and shift their focus tothe student’s unique thoughts and feelings (e.g., cognitive, other-oriented) empathy. Hoffman [8]called this back-and-forth dialogue pluralism.In addition to what empathy is, others have considered what empathy does. Batson [5], forexample, describes empathy as answering two important questions about our interactions withothers: (1) how we know what others think and/or feel and (2) why we respond to others’ suffering.Echoing these questions, Finn [9] identified three distinct “faces” of empathy, albeit within thecontext of therapeutic assessment. The first face of empathy, aligned with Batson’s first question,was a means of gathering information about others. The second face of empathy presented
studentsshould be able to receive certificates and degrees awards as early as Fall 2022.Initial Results and Future WorkIn the Fall of 2021, a preliminary pre/post comparison assessment was developed to evaluate theskills and resources related to students’ readiness for career and degree completion. Incollaboration with Patiste Marcel Gilmore, Education Research Analyst at Mt. San AntonioCollege, and Dr. Adriene Celaya, Senior Evaluator at the Mark USA Inc., we implemented aparticipant survey to self-reported outcomes for program participants. Preliminary dataundergoing parametric tests (using paired sample t-tests) were tested for normality via theShapiro-Wilk test and skewness to check for normal distribution. Across all student respondents(72) there
% of graduating ECSScholars will find career related employment or enter graduate studies.Engaging interested ECS Scholars undergraduate research opportunities is a year 2 activity. Firstyear scholars have received encouragement to explore research topic areas with faculty in theirmajor.Project Objective 5: Investigate and establish best practices for collecting and analyzing studentdata using the SSC dashboard to inform intervention strategies, produce predictive analytics,and assess the impact of student support and career preparation activities.Within Navigate, we set-up an ECS Scholars Care group that allows our project team to monitoractivities such as participation in student success activities (including tutoring), progress
mixed researchmethodologies, using a longitudinal design with formative and summative assessments tocompare outcomes over time for participating leaners and instructors/faculty. Our large-scalemulti-institutional evaluation and dissemination plan will also allow our teams to contribute toand advance current conversations in engineering education around low-resourcemaking/tinkering practices, valuing individual and community ingenuity, and project-basedlearning.ContributionsThe ultrasound educational system and associated teaching methods developed in this project arebeing designed with broad accessibility in mind. It will be low-cost so that engineering educators(ranging from K-12, technical colleges, and professional schools) around the world
Paper ID #37768Revising the Requirements of a Cross-Departmental Project-Centric Undergraduate Engineering Program and Launchinga new Sustainability and Climate-themed TrackRea Lavi Rea Lavi is Lecturer and a Curriculum Designer with the NEET undergraduate program in the School of Engineering at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. He received his Ph.D. from the Faculty of Education in Science and Technology, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. His research interests in STEM higher education involve the fostering and assessment of thinking skills involved in complex problem
), 179–211.[14] V. Vankatesh, M. Morris, G. Davis, and F. Davis, (2003). "User Acceptance of InformationTechnology: Toward A Unified View," MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.[15] V. Vankatesh, J. Thong, and X. Xu, (2012). "Consumer Acceptance and Use of InformedTechnology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology," MISQuarterly, 36(1), 156-178.[16] S. R. Wright, (2018). "Mobile Technology Adoption: Assessing Faculty Acceptance Usingthe Technology Acceptance Model," Dissertation Manuscript. Northcentral University, School ofBusiness and Technology Management. San Diego, California. 98 pages. .[17] N. Wingo, N. Ivankova, and J. Moss, (2017). "Faculty perceptions about teaching online:exploring the Literature Using the
than they had ever been exposed to before inthe U.S., which enabled them to have gain a broader understanding of the world. Developing thisbroader understanding will aid in developing the student participants as individuals, as a group,within their communities, within society, and as globally-engaged citizens.2. Educational Development in EngineeringStudent participants gained new knowledge and engineering-based skills in 11 learning areas.Proficiency in the 11 learning areas were assessed formatively throughout the program byassembling and practicing on the metering device. A summative evaluation was also conducted byensuring the students were able to use and explain device operation.1) Understanding the control for air pressure sensor
recruitment and selection.After participating teachers were identified, the team conducted a pre-assessment. An onlinesurvey was sent to them and asked them questions related to their demographics, priorknowledge in computing and engineering, and STEM teaching experiences. The team analyzedthe survey responses, identified participants’ existing knowledge/skills, and conducted trainingfor faculty mentors & graduate students (GAs).OrientationThe six-week summer program began with an orientation day for all RET participants. Ice-breaking activities were conducted to help participants, PIs, faculty mentors, and GAs know eachother. Drs. Na Gong and Shenghua Zha gave an overview of the program and addressed logisticsissues, such as lab access, pandemic
, “Clinical Immersion for BiomedicalEngineers: Pivoting to a Virtual Format,” Biomed Eng Education, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 175–179, Jan.2021, doi: 10.1007/s43683-020-00032-x.4. M. Kotche, “Clinical Immersion Internship Introduces Students to Needs Assessment,” in2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana, Jun. 2016,p. 26503. doi: 10.18260/p.26503.5. S. Stirling and M. Kotche, “Clinical Immersion Program for Bioengineering and MedicalStudents,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Columbus, Ohio, Jun.2017, p. 28041. doi: 10.18260/1-2--28041.6. A. Felder, M. Kotche, S. Stirling, and K. Wilkens, “Interdisciplinary Clinical Immersion: fromNeeds Identification to Concept Generation,” in 2018 ASEE
. 4. label the toolbox, hardware, and any tool boards for ease handling. 5. Establish a safe charging station for all the power tools hence minimize electrical hazard. 2.1 Before 5S Implementation Current state analysis of the garage workspace focuses on the current conditions of thegarage. Disorder, clutter, garage structure, and infrastructural hazards were used to assess thecurrent state of the garage workspace. The walkways to/from the vehicles to/from the house werenarrowed by clutter serving as potential trip hazards. Two free-standing shelves were disorganizedand overflowing with clutter, serving as potential spots for falling objects. Miscellaneous hardwarewas scattered randomly about the garage space. The toolbox was also
empirically assess the performance of the proposed gamified solution? 6- Did the research base the proposed gamified solution on a theoretical learning framework?Step 6: Synthesizing the extracted information: In this step, we synthesize the extracted data fromthe documents to map and summarize the extent of the existing research in this area and identifythe limitations, gaps in knowledge, and potential future directions for research and scholarlyworks.Preliminary resultsSo far, we have extracted a wide range of data from the identified relevant publications in thiswork-in-progress study. We briefly review some parts of the synthesized information in thissection. In terms of publication year, the oldest study was published in 2007. The evident
or signed extension can be easily observed and understood. Students can place a bus wire in the schematic diagram and the bus is a cluster of nets such as 8-bit bus or 16-bit bus. In a bus, each net inside the bus must be defined with a name. The concatenation process simply arranges different sources of nets to merge into a bus and can be intuitively understood through the use of Multisim. 5. Student learning assessment The assessment was done with four project based learning. The first project was a two- digit calculator and purely based on a combinational logic design. Students used TERASIC DE0-nano boards to implement with a schematic design entry. The second project was based
, it would be of value, moving forward, to develop direct assessment measures to identify ifthe objectives of this STEM outreach program are being met. Such measures could includeprospective and current student, alumni, parent, Mason STEM-outreach program participant, andfaculty surveys to identify if the podcast played a role in naval STEM outreach programparticipation, career pathway decisions, or influenced the pursuit of internship or fundingopportunities. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section ConferenceAcknowledgementsThis work has been supported by the Office of Naval Research under grant N00014-18-1-2587 overseen by Anisur Rahman and
still allowing for specialization within the track. For this M.Eng. program the electives could have been reduced from two to one course and consequently the core can be increased to 12 credit hours, to include all four core courses offered, which would have helped with the enrollment in the respective courses. • A more detailed plan for incorporating assessment of aggregate student performance and closing the loop in the program development process and ongoing improvement of the program should have been developed and communicated to the university leadership. • This proposed graduate program is an example of outcomes based curricular design developed to fit very local needs, goals, and constraints
will be developed and the students will be asked to complete itbefore and after they complete this assignment. This will help assess the attainment of thelearning outcome of creating EJ, SJ, and EE awareness.ConclusionIn conclusion, infusing SJ, EJ and EE discussions into the classroom is essential for creatingresponsible, empathetic, and ethical members of society. This process can be challenging, but itis essential in preparing students to be socially and environmentally conscious professionals. Bycreating awareness, establishing class norms, and providing practical skills and knowledge,instructors can facilitate meaningful discussions, engage students for a deeper understanding ofthe complex issues involved in justice and ethics, and equip
indicated on the syllabus, there are two group projects in this course. Students will be paired up with students in another country (groups may have 3-4 students). Building on the case studies they worked on (to provide scaffolding for this assignment and get the students working on the project as early as possible) they will create a short report and a short presentation. All students will be expected to contribute to all parts of this activity. The instructors will assess how the students shared the work, how much they interacted to prepare the report and presentation, who did they seek help from (ideally almost all faculty being involved in the course). 4- Reflections: Students will be asked to reflect
Statistics, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 8 Sept. 2021, https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/stem-employment.htm.[2] José, María, et al. “Interest in STEM disciplines and teaching methodologies: Perception ofschool students and preservice teachers.” Educar, July 2020, pp. 1-18.[3] Tian, L., So Winnie, W. M., Wan, Z. H., & Li, W. C. (2021). STEM stereotypes predictstudents’ STEM career interest via self-efficacy and outcome expectations. International Journalof STEM Education, 8(1) doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00295-y[4] Wei-Cheng, M., Chen, S., & Chi-Chau, L. (2019). Assessing high school Student’s STEMcareer interests using a social cognitive framework. Education Sciences, 9(2)doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020151[5
. ● Demonstrate the ability to learn and develop competencies in specialized or emerging computer science fields. ● Demonstrate the ability to read, analyze, and discuss research papers in computer science.Student learning objectives are assessed in a variety of ways, including (i) courseworkperformance, which includes faculty in individual courses monitoring student progress on coursematerial; (ii) early and frequent check-in meetings with students during their first semester, endof semester evaluations, and evaluation of student engagement in the cohort-based learningmodel; and (iii) presentations and mentor feedback on individual study projects.Holistic Graduate AdmissionsOur graduate admissions process encourages applicants to provide a
savialab program,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2019, doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 32206.[17] R. K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th ed. Los Angeles, California: Sage, 2009.[18] FABIDI, “Escuela de Fabricación: una guía sobre el qué, cómo y por qué,” Santiago, Chile, 2019.[19] U. Flick, An introduction to qualitative research. sage, 2018.[20] A. Strauss and J. Corbin, “Grounded theory methodology: An overview.,” 1994.[21] J. Beebe, Rapid assessment process: An introduction. Rowman Altamira, 2001.
contexts of engineering. Blog Posts (30%)and Presentations (15%) were used as intermediate learning assessments to address the breadthof student learning on a variety of topics. An independent Project (40%) allowed each individualstudent to explore a topic of interest with more depth. Finally, Engagement (15%) was assessedas part of the grade because participation was considered a significant aspect of this immersivecourse experience. A summary of all assignments and the learning objectives they addressed isincluded in Table 4. An “unofficial objective” of cultural awareness is included because it wasalso intended that, as a study abroad course, the students would gain a sense of culturalawareness during their experience abroad.Table 4