, Page 9.1321.9and undergraduate-graduate courses. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationResearchAs discussed under “Background,” the success of many transportation programs is based on theability to establish and maintain a research program. One gauge of activity in transportationresearch is participation in the University Transportation Centers Program (UTCP), which wasestablished by the U.S. Department of Transportation in 1987 to “promote individual initiativesand scientific innovation in a variety of transportation modes and disciplines” (20). The programwas reauthorized in 1998, by the
and development approaches by teams that include more thanthe so-called hard sciences. Systems Thinking for Sustainability (SFTS) is an innovative teamtaught cross-disciplinary course for undergraduates from four colleges—Engineering, Design &Architecture, Education and Business/Economics—developed to address the current disciplinaryisolation of students and educators in STEM fields in order to improve undergraduate STEMeducation. The initial hypothesis was that the challenges of communicating about the difficult-to-define collection of problems called sustainability across different disciplinary boundaries duringproject-based work would provide the student teams and the faculty team with valuableexperience and increased skill in working
University. NSF and several private foundations fund his research. His research and teaching focuses on engineering as an innovation in P-12 education, policy of P-12 engineering, how to support teachers and students’ academic achievements through engineering, the measurement and support of the change of ’engineering habits of mind’ particularly empathy and the use of cyber-infrastructure to sensitively and resourcefully provide access to and support learning.Dr. Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monica E. Cardella is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and an Affiliate of the Division of Environmental and Ecological Engineering at Purdue University. She is the Director of the MEDLEE
Paper ID #9823Engineering to Enhance STEM Integration EffortsDr. Tamara J Moore, Purdue University Tamara J. Moore, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Moore’s research is centered on the integration of STEM concepts in K-12 and higher education mathe- matics, science, and engineering classrooms in order to help students make connections among the STEM disciplines and achieve deep understanding. Her research agenda focuses on defining STEM integration and investigating its power for student learning. She is creating and testing innovative, interdisciplinary curricular
noticed the change in pace and the need to“actively seek” teachers during office hours. She planned on studying more, forming a studygroup for each class, seeking tutors if she struggles in a course, and planning extracurricularactivities around her study schedule in the fall.Ashley’s academic motivation was also impacted by STEP. With regards to usefulness, shebelieved engineering courses would help her “think outside of the box,” which was importantsince engineers are “inventing things” and being innovative. The engineering course helped herrealize that she could not just “regurgitate” things that she learned: she would have to applythem. With regards to empowerment and success, she stated, “It made me definitely think that Ican make it but I
recognizing gender-diversity efforts at the university were excluded. The following seven awards34 were examined: • Eisenhart Award for Outstanding Teaching, established in the 1964-65 academic year (AY). • The Richard and Virginia Eisenhart Provost’s Award for Excellence in Teaching, established in the 1989-90 AY. • The Trustee’s Scholarship for outstanding academic scholarship, established in AY 2005-06. Page 24.595.8 • The Provost’s Awards for Excellence in Faculty Mentoring, established in AY 2011-12. • The Provost’s Innovative Teaching with Technology Awards, established
Professional Development for the Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning (INSPIRE) and a member of the educational team for the Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN).Prof. Krishna Madhavan, Purdue University, West Lafayette Krishna Madhavan is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue Univer- sity. He is also the Education Director and co-PI of the NSF-funded Network for Computational Nan- otechnology (nanoHUB.org). He specializes in the development and deployment of large-scale data and visualization based platforms for enabling personalized learning. His work also focuses on understanding the impact and diffusion of learning innovations. Dr. Madhavan was the Chair of the
classes where thestudent number is greater than 40. Therefore, innovative methods must be devised andimplemented to improve the retention and class performance in mathematics, engineering, andphysics. Table 3. Correlation between homework and grads* Final Grade A B C D F Number of students 1666 1882 2000 984 1138 Homework submission rate (%) 95 88 86 78 63 Average homework score 92 84 73 64 49 * Biswas and Lin4.Web-based application for homework submissionMany researchers have
- ever, he has evidently improved the luck of institutions by teaching undergraduate courses in design and mechanical engineering. Dr. Trivett is an Associate Professor at the University of Prince Edward Island, Canada. In 2014, he was appointed director of the Engineering Clinic in the Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering at the University of Waterloo. Thankfully, these institutions continue to thrive, and support innovative programs in engineering. Page 24.152.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 An Attempt to Gamify a First Course in
possibilitiesfor presenting the physical design information of a 5th year Architecture Thesis project at theuniversity and how that effort could benefit the Computer Game Design and Development stu-dents as well as the Architecture Thesis students.The Architecture Thesis level of studios at the university’s Architecture Program allows consid-erable latitude in project selection and presentation technique and media. Similarly, the universi-ty’s Computer Game Design and Development program is a Capstone effort executed in thefourth year of the major and encourages innovative design and creative presentation. Ultimately,two faculty instructors from Architecture Thesis, a design instructor and the dean, joined with thecoordinator of the Computer Game Design
thesevideos on student learning on the topic of phase diagrams was quite positive also, as will bediscussed later.Another significant milestone is that Wiley Publishing has adapted over two dozen shortMuddiest Point videos into the Wiley Plus student learning resource site that are linked to thelatest 9th edition of their best-selling introductory materials textbook by Callister and Rethwisch,Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction. The tutorial videos are denoted in thetextbook with “margin concept cues” that inform the student that a short tutorial video isavailable to clarify and remedy Muddy Points on a particular topic. It will be interesting to seethe effects of this innovation on instructor teaching and student learning in materials
, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foun-dation.Bibliography1. National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century, NationalAcademies Press, 2004.2. National Science Board, Moving Forward to Improve Engineering Education, National Science Foundation Re-port NSB-07-122, 2007.3. Bill Seil, “Design anywhere, build anywhere, work anywhere”, Boeing Frontiers, June 2005. Online at: (Re-trieved March 30th 2014: http://www.boeing.com/news/frontiers/archive/2005/june/ts_sf08.html)4. Bart H. M. Gerritsen, “How to Adapt Information Technology Innovations to Industrial Design and Manufactur
Paper ID #9828High School Students’ Attitudes to Engineering and Engineers related totheir Career ChoiceMrs. Adriana Anunciatto Depieri, University of Sao Paulo For almost 10 years I have worked as an assintant professor and since 2003, I have worked for the Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology and innovation in the Popularization of Science and Technology issues. Besides policy formulation and implementation of programs to popularize S & T, we give support to improve science teaching in schools, in partnership with the Ministry of Education. Authorized by deads, I have dedicated most of time as a PhD candidate
the past decade and have resulted in a field of research andteaching in what is now called engineering ethics.4 ABET’s Engineering Criteria 2000 pose Page 24.674.3substantial challenges for curricular innovation, faculty development, and program assessment,13but engineering ethics has begun to make its mark on engineering curricula. Evidence of thisimpact includes both required courses and numerous electives in engineering ethics. Lynch14reports that nine of the top 10 US engineering schools have some ethics component in theircurriculum. However, several researchers3,15,16,17,18,19 have criticized the microethics approachthat is typical in
Paper ID #9416Identification of Students’ Epistemological Frames in EngineeringChristina Smith, Oregon State University Christina Smith is a graduate student in the School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineer- ing at Oregon State University. She received her B.S. from the University of Utah in chemical engineering and is pursuing her PhD also in chemical engineering with an emphasis on engineering education. Her research interests include diffusion of innovations and student personal epistemology.Alec Bowen, Oregon State University Alec Bowen is an undergraduate in Chemical Engineering at Oregon State
Paper ID #8460Judging the Quality of Operationalization of Empirical-Analytical, Interpre-tive and Critical Science Paradigms in Engineering Education ResearchMs. Gurlovleen K. Rathore, Texas A&M University Gurlovleen Rathore is pursuing her Ph.D. in Interdisciplinary Engineering at Texas A&M University. Her research interests include problem-based learning, design creativity and innovation, design education and future faculty professional development. She received her B.S. in Engineering Physics from the University of Michigan and a M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Texas A&M University
doctoral dissertationmorphed into a proceedings paper.12 The editorial also included a letter of apology by theplagiarists, who stated that just one of them committed the deed. While that may be true, theother two authors are certainly complicit in the action, as their names also appear on the article.“Plagiarism,” conclude the editors, “is a dirty thing, that can kill people's innovative capabilityand hurt fair competition in research”12Ned Kock, who teaches management information systems at Temple University, recounts hisexperiences with confronting a plagiarist; the individual, whom Kock dubs Plag, had copied textand graphics from one of Kock’s articles. Kock initially investigated legal avenues and, given the
preliminary thoughts about the history of disability,governmentality and experience. Educational Philosophy and Theory: 56-63.15. Hughes, B. (2009.) Wounded/monstrous/abject: A critique of the disabled body in the sociological imaginary. Page 23.247.14Disability & Society 24, 4: 399-410.16. Humphrey, J.C. (2000). Researching disability politics, or, some problems with the social model in practice.Disability & Society 15: 1- 36.17. National Science Board. (2010.) Preparing the next generation of STEM innovation. Washington, DC: NationalScience Board/National Science Foundation.18. Schwartz, R. B., Ferguson, R., and Symonds, B
award, 2012 Labovitz Entrepreneurialism award, and 2012 Innovator of the Year award from the Rural Community College Alliance all for his work in developing the Iron Range Engineering program. His degrees are in civil engineering (B.S., University of North Dakota), and mechanical engineering (M.S., University of Central Florida). He is licensed as a professional engineer in the state of Minnesota Page 23.260.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Building Student Capacity for High Performance TeamworkAbstractIt is generally known that effective teams produce
(www.vanth.org) are concerned about how their innovative efforts to integratecommunication instruction into their classes can be promulgated throughout the curriculum.To investigate these problems and gather data to help us improve the teaching of writingthroughout the curriculum, our interdisciplinary committee--faculty from engineering, writing,and the learning sciences—collaborated to: (1) systematically gather information about the writing standards that engineering faculty want to support (2) discuss the standards with faculty in relation to preferred teaching methods (3) disseminate those standards through a websiteOur primary research question was to determine whether engineering faculty within and acrossdisciplines share
do some things and hard to do others. AsCorlann G. Bush (1983) expresses it, “Every innovation has both positive and negativeconsequences that pulse through the social fabric like waves through water.” Tools, Bush argues,are not neutral; they have a valence, ‘a bias or “charge” analogous to that of atoms’ that results ina tendency for “particular tools to be favored in certain situations. . .to perform in a predictablemanner in these situations, and . . .to
technology in a historical context. This section was addedafter a review by focus groups concluded that there needed to be a more explicit link betweenthe development of scientific and technological knowledge and the history of both WesternEurope and Islamic Spain. Students in this course tend to think of modern science andtechnology beginning with the Renaissance in Western Europe—they often do not have thehistorical knowledge as to how most of this knowledge was transmitted to Western Europe. Inthe remainder of this section looked at specific scientific innovations and technologies that weretransferred to Western Europe through Islamic Spain and was divided this into three sections:mathematics, astronomy, and chemistry and medicine.Each section of
engineer. However, these terms are somewhat vague and oftenmisunderstood. This is so because integrated-circuit technologies have evolved at a rapid rateduring the last couple of decades. Increased chip complexity and chip functionality—coupledwith new product innovations—have helped blur the definitions. In the modern era, nearly threebillion CPU’s are put to market every year6. And the number will only continue to rise at animpressive rate.One of the foremost questions related to the design of embedded systems is the following: Whatshould be classified as an embedded computer? As an example, consider the personal computer(a.k.a., PC), which immediately evokes the following secondary questions: • Does the PC contain one or more embedded
:‚ Gradually end the subsidization of higher education. This will have two benefits: reduce the numbers of university bound students as well as generate the needed income to improve the conditions of the struggling institutions. The current Egyptian Constitution states that instruction in State education institutions is free. Hence a constitutional amendment would be needed for such approach to be implemented.‚ Encourage the establishment of more foundation/organization owned/run institutions.‚ Promote the introduction and use of latest instructional technologies, “blended” eLearning, and distance and distributed educational approaches. This may not apply to all engineering classes the same way or to the same degree. Innovative
proposals and explain how this data was obtained in the assessment process; c) Excite the faculty by introducing innovation into the curriculum; and d) Playfully engage them, such as giving edible rewards to faculty who complete their assessment information on time.On the more pessimistic side: one respondent noted that it was difficult to maintain momentumbetween visits; one noted that they pointed to past failures to demonstrate how bad things couldbe if assessment processes were not conducted properly; and one respondent said they do notseek to involve faculty who are not interested (but rather seek to minimize their involvement andallow them to stay focused on their primary job of research and teaching). One respondentsummed it up this