Paper ID #37102Comparison of Four Flipped Classroom Implementations in aCivil Engineering Curriculum during the COVID-19PandemicKevin Francis Mcmullen Kevin McMullen is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, NY. He received his B.S. and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Connecticut. His research interest areas include bridge engineering, protective structures, and engineering education.David Carlson (Instructor) Major David Carlson is an assistant professor of Civil Engineering in the Department of Civil and
ETD 455 Integrating IoT in Mechatronics Lab for Mechanical Engineering Technology Curriculum: Embracing Industry 4.0Jiayue Shen, Daniel Jones, Kazi Imran, SUNY Polytechnic Institute; Xiangyu Wang,Purdue University Fort Wayne; Weiru Chen, Slippery Rock University; Lanju Mee, University of Maryland Eastern ShoreAbstract In the context of Industry 4.0, mechatronics labs are increasingly incorporating Internet ofThings (IoT) technologies to enhance the teaching of system control and monitoring concepts.This paper presents the development of nine lab modules to integrate IoT technologies into themechatronics lab for
Paper ID #36672Work-in-Progress: Introductory Reinforcement Learning forStudent Education and Curriculum Development ThroughEngaging MediumsRamakrishnan Sundaram (Professor)Benjamin Lubina © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work-in-Progress: Introductory Reinforcement Learning for Student Education and Curriculum Development Through Engaging EnvironmentsIntroduction This paper describes the setup of a reinforcement learning project intended to supportstudent research and curriculum development within the rapidly emerging fields of
the metacognitive skills development ofboth students and graduates of IRE. Our research has followed a two-pronged approach: (1)identifying and understanding the metacognitive skills students develop and use during theirpreparation as engineers in a PBL program, and (2) examining whether the preparation ofstudents in the PBL program (particularly in the area of metacognition) gives them a “leg up” intheir transition to the engineering workforce. At this point of our project, we have collected andanalyzed three data sources: interview data from IRE students that was collected at thebeginning and end of their program, think-aloud protocol data as students solved open-endedengineering problems that was collected from the same students and at the
service-learning teams, conjugating theoretical learning, critical thinking, and learning in practice with individual and collective feedback; • A master program providing a space for researching different subjects associated with solidarity technological developments, grassroots technology methods, etc.; • A high degree of institutionalization of both service learning practice, creative research, and undergraduate engineering disciplines; • Solid partnerships with relevant Brazilian social movements as well as universities and civil society’s organizations in Latin America; • Achievements in providing a new approach to rethinking public policies and the interaction between social movements and technology and
, utilizing Kaneka’s new multi-junction “Hybrid” amorphousmodules. The installation required that all work be completed in accordance with local laws andcodes as well as be designed for optimal array output. Working in an engineering clinicenvironment, modeled after the medical school approach, undergraduate engineering studentswere charged with design and installation of this system to meet any necessary political anddesign specifications. This involved every aspect of design, including obstruction shadinganalysis, PV array layout, single-line design, specification, procurement and purchasing of allrequired balance of system (BOS) equipment, as well as plan submittals for Rowan Universityand New Jersey Department of Community Affairs (DCA) approval
are broad in that there is little extant literature on the topic ofintegrating STEM and computational thinking for elementary-aged minority girls on how toimprove their content knowledge and CT skills, if an integrated CT curriculum improves theirself-perceptions as future technologists and ultimately increases the representation of minoritywomen in computing fields.Acknowledgements: This work is supported through funding from the National ScienceFoundation Funded (award number #1741999).References[1] A.I. Schäfer, “A new approach to increasing diversity in engineering at the example of women in engineering,” European J. of Eng. Educ., v ol. 31, no.6, pp.661- 71, 2006.[2] A. Godwin, and G. Potvin. “Fostering female
analysis required to make sense of the attendant data. As a result, CE students tendto play an outsize role in their groups’ sensing project. We intend to collect data to quantify thesedifferences and eventually mitigate this disparity in future cohorts.Since we are only beginning to offer these courses, we are still measuring the achievement forthe LOs and listening to student feedback. This information will be used to determine how ourcourses and threading will adapt over time. An area of particular interest and ongoing study ishow the new curriculum affects student assimilation and retention of knowledge in their coremechanics, materials, and environmental engineering courses.To make it easier for faculty to incorporate sensing into their
at the National Science Foundation and spent 12 years teaching science and engineering in rural and small town settings at the K-8 level. She is also a recipient of the Presidential Award for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching. Dr. Hammack researches science and engineering teacher efficacy and student engineering identity development at the K-8 level.Dr. Nicholas Lux Lux, Montana State University, Bozeman Nick Lux is an Associate Professor of Curriculum and Instruction in MSU’s Department of Education and is an affiliate in the Montana Engineering Education Research Center. He has worked in the fields of K-12 and higher education for over 20 years, and currently teaches in the teacher education program
Session 1675 Innovative Teaching Methods in the Civil Engineering Curriculum at The Pennsylvania State University Douglas G. Schmucker The Pennsylvania State UniversityAbstractThis paper describes several innovative teaching methods that the author has implemented in four courses in order toincrease student involvement in the lessons. These methods include questioning techniques, physicaldemonstrations, team-oriented in-class exercises using toolkits developed by the author, and lesson presentationtechniques. The methods have been
. Withoutviolating the curriculum, I inserted key concepts of Asian ethics into my lectures. Withinnumerable religions and sects in non-Christian religions, I was content to point out the manysimilarities in morality-based ethics and in most social and professional situations. But I wascareful to avoid dogma and contrasts, particularly of attitudinal differences. Hereinafter when I refer to individuals with the male pronoun, I will be implying the femalecounterpart, except when the context is gender specific.2. PROFILE OF THE TWO GROUPS Group-A was at the National University of Singapore, ranked by Quacquarelli Symonds (QS)as twelfth in the world and first in Asia1. The course was titled 'Engineering Professionalism' andwas required of all engineering
nanomaterial properties (e.g.,surface area, surface chemistry), as well as potential issues associated with nanomaterial disposal(e.g., transport in waste environments, health concerns).Rather than teach a singular elective course on nanotechnology, it was decided to distribute andintegrate the content across multiple courses. This paper describes the implementation of thatintegrated theme within a civil and environmental engineering curriculum. The integratedapproach is referred to as a Nanotechnology LINK, which stands for Learning Integration ofNew Knowledge (Pierce and Berge 2014). The proposed benefits of this approach are that (1)student learning of nanotechnology concepts and course-specific core concepts are simultaneousand connected, such
Paper ID #11358Organ-izing the Curriculum: enhancing knowledge, attitudes and interestsin engineering with biomedical course modulesDr. Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University Dr. Stephanie Farrell is Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University (USA) and Fulbright Scholar in Engineering Education at Dublin Institute of Technology (Ireland). She obtained her PhD in Chemical Engineering from New Jersey Institute of Technology in 1996. Prior to joining the faculty at Rowan in 1998, she was an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering and Adjunct Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University until
Engineers (PECASE) award for her NSF CAREER project on hidden curriculum in engineering. Dr. Idalis Villanueva has a B.S. degree is in Chemical Engineering from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez and a M.S. and Ph.D. degree in Chemical and Biological Engineering from the University of Colorado-Boulder. Soon after, she completed her postdoctoral fellowship from the National Institutes of Health in Analytical Cell Biology in Bethesda, Maryland and worked as a lecturer for 2 years before transitioning to a tenure-track in engineering education. Her experiences as a first-generation engineer, Latinx, woman of color, introvert, and mother has shaped the lens and research-informed practical approaches that she uses in her
chemicalengineering curriculum. In addition, using math toolkit software would most likely have to bedone on a college-wide basis as opposed to on a departmental basis. The other three engineeringdisciplines within Tuskegee's College of Engineering, Architecture and Physical Sciences (i.e.,Aerospace, Electrical and Mechanical) all have a computer programming requirement similar tothat of the chemical engineering department. It would be infeasible for the chemical engineeringdepartment to unilaterally drop the computer science requirement. Therefore the review teamdecided not to recommend the switch to a mathematical toolkit approach. Such an approachremains an option, however, and the chemical engineering department will continue to reviewthe curriculum as
passionate about building community and belonging in undergraduate research experiences and designing effective mentorship strategies for new researchers. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Integrating Research, Design, and Communication Learning Outcomes in the Materials Science and Engineering CurriculumAbstractLearning outcomes in undergraduate capstone, design, and laboratory courses are typicallycentered around hands-on experience, providing students with the technical skills necessarywithin their engineering discipline. However, leaders in engineering education suggest that thesehands-on courses should encompass a broader set of learning outcomes in order to train studentsto “think
requires more flexible class schedule. In order to accommodate theneeds of both groups: the university enrolled students and industry representative, theeducational units must adequately adjust their curriculum providing students with theopportunity to learn via traditional, blended or purely on-line class styles. Figure 1 depicts allthree educational approaches. The first case represents a traditional model, in which the theoryand hands-on activities are delivered in-person. We note that even the traditional approachbranches in two distinctive models (not shown on the Figure 1). One model represents thetraditional engineering curriculum in which the theory of the subject is presented first, followedby the hands-on activities. There is an
empathy, design education, ethics education and community engagement in engineering. She currently teaches Cornerstone of Engineering, a first-year two-semester course series that integrates computer programming, computer aided design, ethics and the engineering design process within a project based learning environment. She was previously an engineering education postdoctoral fellow at Wake Forest University supporting curriculum development around ethics/character education.Maria Vasilyeva, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Transfer Learning from Math to Engineering and Using Scaffolds through Hands-on Learning to Build New Engineering
(PUL).These goals are: 1) demonstrate the ability to express ideas and facts to others effectively in avariety of written formats, 2) demonstrate the ability to synthesize information in order to arriveat reasoned conclusions, 3) demonstrate adaptiveness by modifying one’s approach to an issue orproblem based upon the contexts and requirements of particular situations [6]. Additionally, to assure that the Accreditation of Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) objectives are addressed, the course is designed to meet five goals. These goals are: 1)demonstrate an appropriate mastery of knowledge, techniques, skills and modern tools of theirdisciplines, 2) function effectively on teams, 3) communicate effectively, 4) recognize the
increasecuriosity, make connections, and create value – the three Cs [2]. As such, EntrepreneuriallyMinded Learning (EML) guides students in managing challenges, seizing opportunities, andincreasing their impact. Some other attributes of the entrepreneurial mindset include resiliency,risk-taking, creativity, collaboration, communication, vision, and adaptability [3]. Theentrepreneurial mindset is less about specific skills and more about a holistic approach toproblem-solving, opportunity recognition, and creating value. The Kern EntrepreneurialEngineering Network (KEEN) framework serves as a guide to incorporating EML intoengineering curriculum [2].Civil engineers play a crucial role in shaping and advancing the built environment. They workwith various
, inductive teaching and learning, and development of students’ professional skills.Dr. Anna Sadovnikova, Monmouth University Anna Sadovnikova is an Assistant Professor of Marketing, Leon Hess Business School. Monmouth Uni- versity. Her research interests are in innovation and new product development, technology commercial- ization and management, engineering education, and developing student professional skills. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Transforming Curriculum to Improve STEM Learning and Advance Career Readiness Abstract The paper describes the second stage of a cross-disciplinary study
Paper ID #37902Design of a Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing (MEP)Course to Enhance a New Construction Engineering ProgramRobert J. Rabb (Chair, Mechanical Engineering) Professor, Mechanical Engineering, The CitadelNahid Vesali (Assistant Professor) Dr. Nahid Vesali is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Leadership and Program Management (ELPM) in the School of Engineering (SOE) at The Citadel. She joined The Citadel in January 2020 and teaches courses in project management and construction engineering management fields. Dr. Vesali earned her PhD in Civil Engineering from Florida
Session 1280 Integrating Design, Analysis, and Problem Solving in an Introduction to Engineering Curriculum for High School Students Ann McKenna and Alice Agogino Graduate Group in Engineering, Science and Mathematics Education/ Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, CA 94720AbstractThe current paper describes an Introduction to Engineering class that was taught to a group ofhigh school students in the summer of 1997. The class was offered through an outreach programat the University of California at Berkeley called the Academic Talent Development Program(ATDP
) initiative [2] integrates new problem-solving approaches into engineering education toprepare students to tackle sustainability challenges alongside historically marginalized communities.Additionally, increasing the participation of underrepresented students, including first-generation collegestudents, in engineering is vital for sustaining the U.S. research and innovation capacity. However, thesestudents must navigate complex challenges to see themselves as integral members of the field [1].Teaching sustainable ethical designs and service-based components for undergraduate students helps thenext generation in understanding their engineering identity and belonging. In this paper, a curriculum thatincludes community partnerships helps future
Paper ID #13290Formative vs Summative ABET Assessment: A Comprehensive Graphic Rep-resentation for A New BME ProgramDr. Davide Piovesan, Gannon University Davide Piovesan was born in Venice, Italy on October 10 , 1978. He is currently Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering department at Gannon University and the director of the Biomedical Engi- neering Program. He received his M.S.M.E in 2003 and D.Eng in Mechanical Measurement in 2007 at the University of Padova, Italy. His dissertation presented a set of experimental and analytical validation techniques for human upper limb models. From 2004 to 2008 he was a
Session 1449 Integrating Instruction in Geographic Information Systems with a Civil Engineering Technology Curriculum William H. Sprinsky Pennsylvania College of TechnologyAbstractAt the Pennsylvania College of Technology, we feel that the tools of project design andmanagement, such as Geographic Information Systems (GIS), should be taught along with themore usual subjects in a Civil Engineering Technology curriculum. Such a tool is an applicationof some very basic concepts to design and construction. Students learn the use and constructionof coordinated
Session 3242A Proposed Model for the Incorporation of the Enterprise Governance Topic in an Engineering Management Curriculum Kim LaScola Needy1, David I. Cleland1, Dennis P. Slevin2, Heather Nachtmann1, Steven L. Cohen1 University of Pittsburgh Department of Industrial Engineering1 1048 Benedum Hall Pittsburgh, PA 15261 412-624-9830 (phone); 412-624-9831 (fax) Katz Graduate School of Business2
effectively pass it on to the next generation of individuals responsible for keeping our economyviable.This brings us to the issue of Engineering Education. The young people entering our Colleges andUniversities represent a new era of essentially instant communication. Facebook, Youtube and manyother such social organizations have changed society dramatically and our students are certainly arepresentative of this trend. Demands on a practising Engineer are constantly evolving. How do us aseducators deal with these major changes. The old Sage on the Stage paradigm doesn’t seem appropriatewhat with bored students sitting in the back of a classroom listening to their latest music on an iPod,communicating with others with their cellphone or playing
effectively pass it on to the next generation of individuals responsible for keeping our economyviable.This brings us to the issue of Engineering Education. The young people entering our Colleges andUniversities represent a new era of essentially instant communication. Facebook, Youtube and manyother such social organizations have changed society dramatically and our students are certainly arepresentative of this trend. Demands on a practising Engineer are constantly evolving. How do us aseducators deal with these major changes. The old Sage on the Stage paradigm doesn’t seem appropriatewhat with bored students sitting in the back of a classroom listening to their latest music on an iPod,communicating with others with their cellphone or playing
Paper ID #12758RESISTANCE IS FUTILE: A NEW COLLABORATIVE LABORATORYGAME BASED LAB TO TEACH BASIC CIRCUIT CONCEPTSDr. James G. O’Brien, Wentworth Institute of Technology James G. O’Brien is an associate professor of Physics at Wentworth Institute of Technology in Boston, MA. James is currently pursuing educational pedagogies in engineering education through game-ification of education and the design of competitive table top games which engage students in an exciting atmo- sphere to help facilitate learning of essential physics concepts. Aside from a love of gaming and its role in education, James is also the Vice President