with an extensive network of leaders in the engineering education landscape, including those at the helm of Engineering PLUS. Given the diverse engineering student population that Engineering PLUS targets, networking is a critical component, especially for our women and BIPOC Fellows. Therefore, these collaborations and personal interactions are desired and can be measured with evaluation instruments. Fortunately, evaluation data already show that Fellows are benefiting from such collaborations within stEm PEER Academy, within Engineering PLUS, and within their own institutions.Deliverable #2: Data One of the most important deliverables of stEm PEER Academy has been exploring publicly available data in the national
Doors for All: Creating an Inclusive and Equitable Engineering Education Model Inspired by the ASEE Mindset ReportI. IntroductionIn recent years, ASEE, in partnership with other national organizations such as the NSF, NAE,NAB, and the broader engineering community, has engaged in a multi-year effort to create a setof high-impact recommendations to transform the landscape of engineering education in the 21 stcentury. The 2018 ASEE and NSF report, Transforming Undergraduate Education inEngineering [1], emphasized that the engineers of tomorrow must possess “deep expertisewithin a single domain, broad knowledge across domains, and the ability to collaborate withothers in a diverse working environment.” This vision has been echoed in
value of integrating system-based, collaborative learning environmentsinto engineering curricula in order to bridge theory and practice more effectively. Overall, thiswork highlights the promise of LS in enhancing student engagement, motivation, and careerreadiness—advancing the broader goal of training engineers who can thrive in complex, real-world contexts.References[1] M. A. Alrizqi and A. Godwin, “Data-Driven Analysis of Engineering Curricula: A Cross- Disciplinary Study of Complexity in Seven Programs and Its Impact on Student Pathways and Career Outcomes,” in 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society For Engineering Education, 2025.[2] H. Petroski, Design Paradigms: Case Histories of Error and Judgment
Paper ID #27409Identifying Phenomena and Developing Sustainable Engineering EducationalModules that Integrate STEM Education Best Practices and Next GenerationScience Standards for Middle School Science TeachersMr. Michael Lorenzo Greene, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Michael Greene is a PhD Student at Arizona State University. He is pursuing his degree in the Engineering Education Systems and Design program, concurrently while pursuing a Master’s degree in Engineering. Michael graduated with his B.S. in Mechanical engineering from University of Pittsburgh in April of 2018. His research interest lies in diversity
, D.R., “The Future of Engineering Education: 1. A Vision for a New Century”, Chemical Engineering Education, 34(1), 16-25 (2000).2. Kirkpatrick, Allan “ASME Vision 2030: Designing the Future of Mechanical Engineering Education”, ASEE/CIEC: Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration, Phoenix, Arizona, February 6-8, 2013.3. Stevens Institute of Technology (2017): Engineering Design Spine. http://www.stephens.edu/academincs/undergraduate-studies/engineering-design-spine/4. Beddoes, K.D., Jesiek, B.K., and Borrengo, M., “Identifying Opportunities for Collaborations in International Engineering Education Research on Problem- and Project-Based Learning”, Interdisciplinary
early career development responsibilities to reach their creative andinnovative potentials, to do “over-the-horizon” engineering, and to become creators, innovatorsand leaders of new technology innovations throughout their professional careers, then thisrequires universities to create a new type of professional education for lifelong learning as alogical progression of growth beyond the professional masters level.3.2 Reshaping Professional Engineering Education for Creative PracticeTo meet the challenge, the National Collaborative Task Force is engaged in a complex projectthat requires a total systems approach. The stakes to enhance the innovative capacity of the U.S.engineering workforce for competitiveness are high.Broad sweeping changes are
Paper ID #30371 Carlos Santos is a first year graduate student at the Wake Forest University Department of Psychology. His research includes longitudinal measurement validity and developing personalized user-interface data tools.Dr. Michael D. Gross, Wake Forest University Dr. Michael Gross is a Founding Faculty and Associate Professor of Engineering at Wake Forest Uni- versity and is part of the team that is planning, developing, and delivering the brand new Engineering program. The Engineering department is viewed as an opportunity to break down silos across campus and creatively think about reimagining the undergraduate engineering educational experience, integra- tion and collaboration across departments and
engineering education as a “system for lifelong learning”.2.0 How does Professional Engineering Differ from Research Engineering?To meet the challenges for enhanced educational engagement with industry and for purposefulreform that develops postgraduate professional education as an integrated system for lifelonglearning, the GSD-National Collaborative in Engineering and Technology Graduate Educationbelieves that a clear distinction must be made between traditional graduate education foracademic scientific research and that of innovative professionally oriented postgraduateeducation for advanced engineering practice and leadership of creative technology developmentand innovation in industry. We believe that the characteristics that differentiate these
collaborations with universities abroad. There aredifferent levels of institutional readiness in areas that are essential for successful collaborations,including access and support to secure external funding, research and publishing opportunities inHE areas, and evidence-based engineering education transformation. Funding. Governmentfunding for S&E R&D is often scarce and its access highly bureaucratic in countries likeColombia that invests less than 0.2% of its GDP in S&E R&D. Different than US universitiesthat have entire operations to secure funding from alumni, and private and public foundations,Colombian universities do not have a culture of alumni or foundation relations thus making itdifficult to secure funding for HE-related
collaboration helped increase engagement ofundergraduate students in a university course, improved retention of undergraduate students inthe field, developed a broader skill set for undergraduate students, and enhanced education formiddle and high school students in Philadelphia and Camden school district.IntroductionIn 2007, the National Science Board (NSB) identified challenges that should be addressed toimprove engineering education in order to meet the needs of the engineering workforce1. First, inaddition to providing good analytical skills, engineering education should help students developa broader skill set including good systems thinking, business aspects of engineering andknowledge to apply engineering to non-traditional problems. Second
, Mass.: Harvard Business School, 1991. 2. Smith, K.A., Sheppard, S.D., Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R.T., “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom- Based Practices,” ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no.1, 2005, pp.87 -102. 3. Prince, M., “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research,” ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no.3, 2004, pp.223-231 4. Prince, M., and Felder, R.M., “Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons and Research Bases,” ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, vol.95, no.2, 2006, pp.123-138. 5. Randolph, G.B., “Collaborative Learning in the Classroom: Writing Across the Curriculum Approach.” Journal of Engineering Education, vol.89
Engineering Technology at Western Carolina University. He has extensive experience in manufacturing. Page 13.493.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Engaging Engineering Technology Students using a Coordinate Measuring MachineAbstractWestern Carolina University’s Engineering Technology program prepares its students for avariety of industrial careers. Part of this preparation is based on the engage ment model that pairsstudents with real- life industrial projects, benefiting both the student and the industrial partner.Haldex Hydraulics Corporation is a company that makes internal
Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2003. His research interests include engineering education, aircraft and vehicle related engineering design, and dynamic failure and fracture of structures and materials. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Successful Model for Partnership between Community College and University Engineering Departments Leading to Expanded Access to Baccalaureate Engineering EducationAbstract Increasing numbers of engineering students are starting their higher education at acommunity college with intent to transfer to a four year university to complete their Bachelor ofScience degree. To facilitate the
Collaborative Task Force is proceeding on six main points: • Professional engineering education is a worthwhile enterprise, not because it is valuable in itself, but because it may enrich the lives of those who participate in it. • The mission of engineering is service to society for its general betterment. • Technology development is the primary driver of the nation’s economic growth and defense. • The primary creative intellectual capital for technology development rests with the creative, innovative, and leadership talent of the nation’s engineers. • Young creative talent must be encouraged to enter the engineering profession and to undergo basic professional education for entry into the profession
, Science and Social Sciences at Canterbury Christ Church University. His current research spans self, co, and socially shared regulation, Threshold Concepts, Computer Orchestration, Generative Artificial Intelligence for research and teaching and learning within engineering education. He also trains researchers in systematic reviews, meta-analysis and other research methods and has recently helped supported 250+ colleagues with their GenAI literacy through his signature mind-metaphors based framework for co-intelligence, co-inference and collaboration, allowing users to regain their agency when using GenAI models.Dr. Julie-Ann Sime FHEA, MBPsS, Lancaster University, UK Dr Julie-Ann Sime is an award-winning digital
AC 2009-2467: AN EXPERIMENTAL SET UP FOR OPTIMAL DESIGN OF AHUMAN-POWERED HYDRAULIC BICYCLEAlamgir Choudhury, Western Michigan UniversityPavel Ikonomov, Western Michigan UniversityJorge Rodriguez, Western Michigan University Page 14.193.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Experimental Setup for Optimal Design of a Human-Powered Hydraulic BicycleAbstractProduct development competitions through capstone design courses pose both, opportunities andchallenges for graduating seniors in engineering and engineering technology programs. Facultiesof relevant programs recognize the value of industry-sponsored projects for involvement
American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Twenty Years of Multidisciplinary Capstone Projects: Design, Implementation, and AssessmentIntroductionThe Quality Enhancement Systems and Teams (QUEST) Honors Program at the University ofMaryland unites undergraduate students with business, engineering, and science backgrounds inorder to promote a multidisciplinary, hands-on, learning experience. QUEST’s curriculumfocuses on quality management, process improvement, and system design. This curriculum isdelivered in the form of three required courses and two elective courses. The first programcourse introduces the concepts of innovation, design, and quality. Multidisciplinary teams workon a series of three projects
) attempted several types ofextracurricular programs for both undergraduate and graduate students in order to achieveseveral objectives including 1) improving practical skills for industry readiness, 2) improvingprofessionalism, and 3) promoting strong team working skills.Industry and university collaboration for construction engineering education was emphasized bymany previous studies. The practice of construction engineering and management increasinglydemanded construction professionals who are capable of solving many challenges both technical Page 24.423.2and social within a team environment 1. However, there are many barriers to
Session# 2660 Universal Model - A Partnership for an Accelerated Civil Engineering Program Bridging the Civil Engineering Education from the Community College to a University Dr. Nick M. Safai, and Dr. Larry Reaveley, Chair Engineering Department, Salt Lake Community College/ Chair Civil Engineering Department, University of UtahAbstractCurrently there is an initiative in progress to develop a (three semester) year round program ofstudy that will allow students to complete their Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering(BSCE) degrees in a shorter time frame. This initiative is
high energy lasers propagation through the turbulent atmosphere, developing advanced control algorithms for wavefront sensing and mitigating effects of the turbulent at- mosphere, digital inline holography, digital signal processing, and laser spectroscopy. He is also involved in developing new eye-tracking experimental techniques for extracting 3-D shape of the object from the movement of human eyes. Dr. Sergeyev is he is a member of American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and actively involved in promoting engineering education.Nasser Alaraje, Michigan Technological University Dr. Alaraje’s research interests focuses on processor architecture, System-on-Chip design methodology, Field-Programmable Logic
students and an even larger number of MS students have completed their degrees under his supervision. These former students now hold a wide variety of important positions in industry, government and academia both in the US and overseas. He is a frequent and active member of the PhD committees of graduate students not only in aerospace, but also civil and mechanical engineering at Virginia Tech and foreign universities. Page 22.22.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 A combined curriculum in aerospace and ocean engineering—38 years later This paper is
(IEEE), and a member of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology Department Heads Association (ECETDHA) Page 15.942.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Partnership with Industry to Offer a Professional Certificate in Robotic AutomationAbstractThe Electrical Engineering Technology program in the School of Technology at MichiganTechnological University is collaborating with Fanuc Robotics to offer a professional certificatein Robotic Automation. This certificate represents a good model of collaboration betweenindustry and academia. Robotic automation is on the leading edge of
recognizing/redressing bias in thesystem. Our analysis revealed that cultural competence codes were the most common criteriacategory in this study. Sub-codes under cultural competence included reflecting on personalcultural lens, drawing on students’ culture to shape curriculum and instruction, communicating inlinguistically relevant ways, and collaborating with external funds of knowledge such as studentguardians and parents.In summary, we came up with a listwise description of what culturally relevant engineeringeducation looks like in the University of Iraq. We found in the responses of our participants that:With respect to Academic Achievement, culturally relevant engineering education in this context • involves teaching engineering using a lot
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Integrating The Charrette Process into Engineering Education: A Case Study on a Civil Engineering Capstone CourseABSTRACTAs engineering educators rethink the structure and value of capstone courses, many have turnedto practical applications. In order to reflect the recent approaches within engineering, capstonecourses can be enhanced through the integration of charrettes. Charrettes are hands-on,collaborative sessions where stakeholders come to a design consensus. These sessions provideopportunities for students to improve communication, technical evaluation, teamwork, peerevaluation and professionalism skills. This research provides a framework for adapting thecharrette
Paper ID #13380Intra-Disciplinary Integration in Civil Engineering Education: An Approachto Integrate the Various Civil Engineering Disciplines with the Use of a De-sign Studio LabProf. Michael J. Davidson, Wentworth Institute of Technology Michael J. Davidson, P.E. – Assistant Professor, Wentworth Institute of Technology, Department of Civil Engineering Technology, 550 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, davidsonm2@wit.eduProf. James Lambrechts P.E., Wentworth Institute of Technology BSCE-Univ. Maryland, MSCE-Purdue University. Geotechnical engineer 27 years with Haley & Aldrich, Inc. Boston, MA before taking
. Page 10.1074.7Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright© 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationacknowledgementsThis material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.ESI-0227558, which funds the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE).CAEE is a collaboration of five partner universities: Colorado School of Mines, HowardUniversity, Stanford University, University of Minnesota, and University of Washington.Sheri Sheppard at Stanford University has been a visionary, gracious agent in seeing theAcademic Pathways Study through its design and inception.Lorraine Fleming, Kimarie Engerman, and Ashley Griffin at Howard
acquire valuable practical experience and new skills while working towards solvingreal-world problems [100].4. DISCUSSIONDesign thinking applied to higher engineering education is founded on actual challenges,research, and solutions [101], merging interdisciplinary and collaborative methods in project-based learning that emphasizes the holistic comprehension and resolution of intricate problemsand issues [11]. The utilization of design thinking as a pedagogical approach empowersengineering students to merge humanistic perspectives with their technical expertise, effectivelyaddressing intricate real-world issues. This approach lays a robust groundwork for students toacclimate to the demands of lifelong learning and future growth. Based on the
Paper ID #32150Training Engineering Students to Use Stories for Student Empowerment andCommunity-Building: The Re-Engineering Engineering Education Programatthe USC School of EngineeringDr. Brandi P. Jones, University of Southern California Dr. Brandi P. Jones is the Vice Dean for Diversity and Strategic Initiatives and Associate Professor of Engineering Education Practice at Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California. She works collaboratively with colleagues on strategies to increase the diversity and enhance the experiences of students, faculty, and staff, ensure an inclusive culture, and promote
Mines c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engagement in Practice: Regional Innovation Cluster: The Role of Entrepreneurship as a Tool for Closing the Gap BetweenEngineering Education and the Challenges of Local Communities.1. IntroductionTodays education is facing the challenge of preparing students and professionals to thrive in afast-changing world. To this gold, students should develop abilities like critical thinking,problem solving, persistence and collaborative work, beside science, math and language.However, a lot of countries are not working to develop these abilities [1].In order to strengthen the connection between what students need to learn and what theyactually do in the classroom, is
Dr. Ewert has been involved in cardiovascular engineering for over 25 years in both research and instruction. He has consulted for major medical device companies in the area of cardiovascular engineering and performed research with US and inte ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Bridging Theory and Practice: Innovation-Base Learning and NSF I-Corps in Modern Engineering Education Abigail Tubbs, Paige Beduhn, Enrique Alvarez Vazquez, Daniel Ewert, Ryan Striker University of North Dakota – Biomedical EngineeringI. Abstract This study investigates the mechanics of integrating the National Science Foundation'sRegional I-Corps program