composition of thegroups (members from different colleges and departments) as being a positive factorbecause of the resulting diversity of perspectives.Virginia Tech is a large land grant university with some 1600 faculty (260 in engineeringdepartments) serving 25000 students. During its first year the program attracted 42 faculty(of which 3 were from Engineering) from across all colleges in the university. Insubsequent academic years (from 1997-1998 through 2000-01) similar numbers of facultyparticipated, some in new groups, and some in groups that continued for multiple years.The OpportunityThe study group program, as originally conceived by Wildman et al.,1 has a number ofimportant strengths when seen from the perspective of engineering education
Consulting Group, initiated the bank’s non credit service product management orga- nization and profit center profitability programs and was instrumental in the EDI/EFT payment system implemented by General Motors.Mark T. Carnes, Purdue University, West Lafayette Mark Carnes is a licensed Professional Engineer (PE) and is currently a doctoral student and a future faculty fellow in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Before coming to Purdue, he spent over 30 years as an electronics designer of control and power conversion circuits. He received an MS from the University of Michigan (1982) and a BS from the University of Notre Dame (1975), both in Electrical Engineering.Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue
courses in reading, writing, math and study skills as well as a math and writing labthat are open on a drop-in basis including evening hours. It has an array of programs and servicesthat teach students how to improve their study techniques and how to assess and make the mostof their individual learning abilities. Faculty and staff of ASC work closely with universityfaculty members to determine how they can best provide support for academic courses. Thiscollaboration has led to team-teaching, specialized labs, and effective referral systems. ASC alsomaintains liaisons with other support programs on campus such as Women in Engineering (WE)/ Technology (WIT), Multicultural Center for Academic Success (MCAS) to provide acomprehensive network of
"systemic approach to assessment linksprogram outcome assessment to specific student level performance on a variety oftargeted events such as homework, presentations, exams, etc. Faculty provide thefoundational student performance assessment data by participating in the IndividualCourse Assessment Process (ICAP).7 This process reviews performance criteria inselected courses in light of their mapped support to specific program outcomesemploying multiple techniques and methods often in numerous courses vq"ÐvtkcpiwncvgÑ"performance. Although ICAP has proven to be highly successful in supporting programassessment and evaluation, it does not support comprehensive course assessment. The linchpin of success of any program-level continuous
maneuverable and aesthetic concrete canoe.The design/build process required to create a competitive concrete canoe provides civilengineering students with an opportunity to gain hands-on practical experience and leadershipskills that will enhance their engineering education. They learn the importance of effectiveproject management and teamwork, including communication, organization, quality and costcontrol and safety. The technical challenges of the project are quite similar to thoseencountered in a high-quality undergraduate research project.Students who participate on a concrete canoe team gain valuable skills that they would notnecessarily learn in a standard engineering undergraduate curriculum. The concrete canoecompetition is a program that
watching two student entrepreneurs chase and grab hold of theirdream of starting a technology company and tempered by his own experience with a small start-upventure,14 Tom Miller started the Engineering Entrepreneurs Program (EEP)15 at North CarolinaState University in 1993. Funding from the National Science Foundation through SUCCEED, theSouthern University and College Coalition for Engineering Education,16 supported the creation ofthis program, designed to teach students how to navigate the entrepreneurial process.The Engineering Entrepreneurs Program (EEP) is a multi-semester experience in which studentsparticipate on project teams oriented around a corporate theme. The course seeks to promotesome of the skills we desire of engineering
engineering education, CBE provides a transition from universityto industry. Many parallels exist between CBE and industry practices, in particular thosesurrounding design-based concepts. In industry, new-product development (NPD) requiresattention to detail at the individual project, business, and systems level to create a successfulproduct launch [2], whereas university engineering design courses tend to focus on the individualproject level. Cooper’s [2] NPD success drivers often reflect the type of skills that are a focus inCBE. For individual new-product projects, overlapping concepts include voice-of-the-customer,pre-work, definition, and iterations. Building in the voice-of-the-customer may involve marketresearch for businesses, whereas
is Assistant Professor of Engineering at Metropolitan State University of Denver. He was formerly on the faculty at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville. He has a B.S in mechanical engineering from Tribhuvan University, Nepal, a M.S. in Mechatronics from Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, South Korea, and a Ph.D. in industrial engineering from Western Michigan University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Page 1 of 9 ©2019 American Society for Engineering Education. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, June 15-19, 2019, Tampa, FloridaInnovative Baccalaureate Degree Program in Advanced Manufacturing SciencesRobert Park 1 and Ananda Paudel 21 Lockheed
of the National Science Foundation The authors are gratefulfor the support obtained from NSF to further engineering education.Bibliography1 Barrows, H.S., “A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods”. Medical Education, 1986. 20: p. 481-486.2 Altmans,C. Turns,J., Mabbering,F. “Integrating Knowledge Across the Curriculum”, 29th ASEE/IEEE Frountiers in Education Conference, 0-7803-5643-8/99 San Juan, Puerto Rico, Nov 19993 NSF, Restructuring Engineering Education: A Focus on Change, 1995, Division of Undergraduate Education, Directorate for Education and Human Resources, National Science Foundation: Washington, D.C4 NRC, Engineering Eduation: Designing an Adaptive System. 1995, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.5
Education. 2009 Aug 4;52(4):538-46.[St15] Stowell JR. Use of clickers vs. mobile devices for classroom polling. Computers & Education. 2015 Mar 1;82:329-34.[To21] TopHat. https://tophat.com/[VaAl20] Vahid F, Allen JM. An online course for freshmen? The evolution of a successful online CS1 course. In2020 First-Year Engineering Experience 2020 Jul 26.[WaLi14] Watson C, Li FW. Failure rates in introductory programming revisited. 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science education 2014 Jun 21 (pp. 39-44).[WhRa10]] Whitehead C, Ray L. Using the iclicker classroom response system to enhance student involvement and learning. Journal of Education, Informatics and Cybernetics. 2010;2(1):18-23.
Paper ID #14811Dialogues Toward Gender Equity: Engaging Engineering Faculty to Promotean Inclusive Department ClimateJ. Kasi Jackson, West Virginia University Dr. J. Kasi Jackson is an Associate Professor of Women’s and Gender Studies at West Virginia University. Her research covers supporting women faculty in STEM, STEM education, gendered impacts on animal behavior research, and the representation of science in popular culture. She completed her PhD in biology, with a focus on animal behavior, and graduate certificate in women’s studies at the University of Kentucky. She is a Co-Investigator on a National Science
Technology MajorsThe collaborative educational process of the Engineering Fundamentals Division insures apartnership between students and academic advisors in meeting the essential learning outcomes,ensuring academic success, and outlining the steps for achievement of the students academic andcareer goals. Student attrition is the biggest problem with any engineering program. Page 12.180.4Faculty MentorsThe EFD Faculty Mentors are on hand to advise students on each of the undergraduate engineering programs Electrical and Computer Civil and Environmental Mechanical Engineering Engineering Technology Engineering Engineering Dr. Amin Dharamsi Dr. William Drewry Dr. Sushil
Session 0555 Promoting Excellence in Education with an Outstanding Student Instructor Award Program Jennifer Kadlowec, Justin Shriver, Trevor Harding, Charles Choi University of MichiganAbstract The ASEE Student Chapter at the University of Michigan in conjunction with the Collegeof Engineering has developed and organized an annual Outstanding Student Instructor Award inrecognition of excellence in engineering education. The award not only acknowledges theoutstanding contributions of the individuals selected for the award, but also coincides with theASEE’s goals of promoting
AC 2007-1839: MEASURING STUDENT PARTICIPATION IN GROUP PROJECTSTHROUGH AN ONLINE PEER EVALUATION SYSTEMPhil Rawles, Purdue University Phil Rawles is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Information Technology at Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. Professor Rawles specializes in teaching network administration and information security in the network engineering technology program. Page 12.1044.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Measuring Student Participation in Group Projects Through An On-Line Peer Evaluation SystemBackgroundGroup work is an
Quigley, IBM Research Lauren Thomas Quigley, PhD is a Research Scientist focused on the development of responsible and inclusive technology. Specifically, she researches practical approaches for fairness and inclusion in AI, data representation, and projecting technology’s impact on society and the environment, through a lens of social justice. Her secondary area of research is the use of critical theories in engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Outsiders: Pathways and Perspectives from Engineering Education PhDs Outside AcademiaEngineering education doctoral programs have been predominantly academia-centric, stronglyemphasizing
professionally, and developed teamwork, problem solving, communication, and presentationskills which are highly valued in today’s educational system and industry.Improving math skills, Introduction of hands-on work into classroom, Providing community-based support system: Erickson-Ludwig et al.19 described a summer bridge program orientedtoward women and minority students entering engineering at the College of Engineering atDrexel University to improve success and retention. The College of Engineering hosted a “pre-orientation” program that familiarized students with the engineering curriculum and preparedthem to succeed in their freshman year through community building and social activities.Program participants showed significant positive outcomes in
AC 2011-911: WORK IN PROGRESS: INCORPORATING PERVASIVECOMPUTING CONCEPTS INTO AN AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE JOBTASK CARD SYSTEMTimothy D. Ropp, Purdue University, West Lafayette IN Tim Ropp is Assistant Professor of Aeronautical Engineering technology at Purdue University. His re- search area is in operational safety risk management and NextGen technology innovations in aircraft main- tenance. He has over 18 years experience in front line operations management and educational program development in risk-sensitive industries including aviation, emergency medical services, pharmaceutical and U.S. Navy and defense contractor operations. He is an FAA certificated aircraft mechanic with Air- frame and Powerplant ratings, and a
philosophical alignment. This isunsurprising since the Association is representative of school teachers, few of whom wouldhave practised engineering. The problem underlines the value of the work undertaken byKrupczak and his colleagues in clarifying these terms as a basis for philosophical discussion.Krupczak et al in their justification of the development of programs in engineering andtechnological literacy write that since “engineering concepts are pervasive in decisionmaking within industry, government, education, health care” every citizen should be exposedin their education “to the central ideas and principles underlying our technological society”[1]. They find support for this view in the National Academy of Engineering’s reports on“Technically
practice not only are the students better educated but the businesscommunity benefits with the solution of real industrial problems. There are several courses inthe UW-Stout Manufacturing Engineering program which may involve industrial based projects:Controls & Instrumentation, Design & Simulation of Manufacturing Systems, Facilities &Manufacturing Systems Design, Capstone I: Product Design by Concurrent Engineering, andCapstone II: Manufacturing Systems Design.This paper describes how the Manufacturing Engineering program at University of Wisconsin-Stout has incorporated industrial sponsored projects into the senior level capstone coursesequence. An example of an industrial project will be presented.Capstone at UW-StoutThe
team of three mechanical engineering students were given the assignment to redesign majormechanical systems having issues with the existing gasifier hardware. To address the hole in theroof of the gasifier, the students brainstormed different concepts on how to patch the roof. Fromthis brainstorming session, the students wrote up a protocol that SAIC used as a basis forrepairing the roof. The students also wanted to make it easier to load trash into Old Blue. Theydecided that instead of manipulating the door of the gasifier with a forklift, a swinging door onhinges would be better. Students made conceptual drawings of the hinged door and foundsuppliers for hinges that could support between 6,000 and 20,000 lbs. Finally, the studentsexplored
technology education for K-12 students and few state frameworks coverengineering and technology as stand-alone topics.Exposing children to engineering has generally fallen to enrichment programs. Although there is risinginvolvement in these programs, students participating are still a small, self-selected group (comprisedmostly of those already showing an interest in science and math). In addition, since these programs donot exist in all communities, they do not always reach minorities and girls. Furthermore, they are oftentargeted to high school and middle school students. Studies, however, show that most kids are turned offto science and math before they reach middle school. Putting kids on an earlier track to engineeringmay help reverse the trend
George Fitzmaurice. Gamicad: a gamified tutorial system for first time autocad users. In Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pages 103–112. ACM, 2012. [4] Holly K Ault. The inside story: Revealing the contents of cads black box. Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2011. [5] Roger Toogood. Pro/Engineer Wildfire 5.0 Advanced Tutorial. SDC publications, 2009. [6] Maaike Waalkens, Vincent Aleven, and Niels Taatgen. Does supporting multiple student strategies lead to greater learning and motivation? investigating a source of complexity in the architecture of intelligent tutoring systems. Computers & Education, 60(1):159–171, 2013. [7
publications of international engineering education are critical in providinginformation and stimulation to educators who cannot participate in person. Theparticipants in this Congress recommended that the output from such conferences shouldbe made available in both printed hard copy and via the World Wide Web. The lattershould make the material available more broadly, and at more reasonable cost, to those indeveloping countries.Some discussion at the Congress focussed on the articulation between advancedengineering education programs and lower level feeder schools that helped to preparestudents to succeed in the engineering institutions. Feeder systems often operate within agiven country, but there are good examples of feeder schools in developing
Paper ID #48766Towards a framework for assessing systems thinking in collaborative problem-solvingin STEMDr. Lykke Brogaard Bertel, Aalborg University Lykke Brogaard Bertel is Associate Professor in PBL and digital transformation at the UNESCO center for Problem-based Learning in Engineering, Science and Sustainability at Aalborg University.Dr. Rea Lavi, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Rea Lavi received his Ph.D. degree from the Faculty of Education in Science and Technology, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. He is Lecturer and a Curriculum Designer with the NEET program, School of Engineering
two years, the effect of this program on retention is promising. The Fall 2006 program hasbeen enhanced and is anticipated to further increase continued enrollment. Assessment of theprogram will be ongoing, focusing on retention and academic performance.IntroductionAs the economy changes and more emphasis is placed on jobs in technology-related industries, itfalls to the higher education system to prepare students for careers in these fields. Many collegesof engineering, especially those with an urban mission, have recognized that a poor preparationin math and science reduces their students’ chance for success in an undergraduate engineeringprogram. However, for many students it is lack of opportunity – rather than lack of ability – thatis
: Implicationsfor engineering education. In J.R. Bourne, A. Brodersen, & M. Dawant (Eds), The influence oftechnology on engineering education (pp. 36-65). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Dessouky, M.M., Bailey, D.E., Verma, S., Adiga, S., Bekey, G.A., & Kazlauska, E. J. (1998). Avirtual factory teaching system in support of manufacturing education. Journal of EngineeringEducation, 87(4), 459-467.Ditcher, A.K. (2001). Effective teaching and learning in higher education, with particularreference to the undergraduate professional education of professional engineers. InternationalJournal of Engineering Education, 87, 459-467.Doolen, T.L., Porter, J.D., & Hoag, J. (2003). The relationship between PDA usage and studentperformance in an introductory
Engineer’s Skills forNational Manufacturing Initiatives Xavier Fouger Senior Director Global Academia Programs XFR@3DS.com Dassault Systemes a Scientific company 15,000 passionate people 210,000 enterprise customers 3,500 partners Long-term driven2 Clients: Leading Employers at the heart of Innovation Transportation & Mobility
not have been successful without the extraordinary assistance provided by manyfaculty members, staff, and indeed without the motivation and hard work of the participatingstudents.REFERENCESPang, Laura. “A Curricular Reform and Modernization Proposal for Internationalizing Engineering Education.” Colorado School of Mines, Golden Department of Global Systems and Cultures, Evaluative/Feasibility Report, Golden, Colorado, 1989.Saikali, J.G. and R.K. Jain. An Analysis of International Engineering Programs in North America, College of Engineering, University of Cincinnati, CEAP-IEP, 96-1, 1996.Scott, Robert. “The Challenge of Internationalization: Relating to Multi-cultural Education.” In The John Carroll University
competition lies in education. The case for theI2P® UT Austin Competition as an education program for engineers has been established in aseparate paper. Starting from that and a more recent formal educational assessment of thecompetition a more comprehensive examination of the international competition is possible,which frames the body of this paper.The creation of the competition was facilitated in many ways by the culture at The University ofTexas at Austin. Yet, this culture was deliberately created through the tireless efforts of a coregroup of students, faculty and community supporters over a period of many years. Universitiesappropriately change slowly, but they do change. It can still be said that the local competitionestablished an academic
has supervised more than 250 student design projects, and his students have won top design awards. His research interests include usable educational research, design theory, medical devices, sensor development, heat treatment of metals, and lean manufacturing. Page 14.691.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Implementation of a Novel Biomedical Systems Engineering Concentration Within An Established And EAC-of-ABET Accredited Electromechanical Engineering Program Wentworth Institute of Technology, Boston, MassachusettsABSTRACT: This paper reports on the progress made in