and equipping faculty with the knowledge and skills necessary to create such opportunities. One of the founding faculty at Olin College, Dr. Zastavker has been engaged in development and implementation of project-based experiences in fields ranging from sci- ence to engineering and design to social sciences (e.g., Critical Reflective Writing; Teaching and Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering, etc.) All of these activities share a common goal of creating curricular and pedagogical structures as well as academic cultures that facilitate students’ interests, moti- vation, and desire to persist in engineering. Through this work, outreach, and involvement in the commu- nity, Dr. Zastavker continues to focus
designs, andmethods of VL assessment to understand how these tools meet or do not meet the needs of uniqueand diverse populations of students. Finally, many scholars contend that VLs and digital learningcommunities offer several benefits to diverse student learning communities, e.g. flexible learning(synchronous and asynchronous learning), expansion of learning opportunities (risk-freeexperimentation with dangerous or expensive materials, where students can be provided access toenvironments where they would otherwise be restricted), enhanced engagement and motivationthrough adaptive learning and inclusive learning environments. Thus, VLs could theoreticallyprovide a pathway towards personalized learning, which is one of the 14 Grand Challenges
among STEM students and faculty, and sus- tainable community development. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Maintaining student engagement in an evening, three-hour long air pollution course: integrating active learning interventions and flipped classesAbstractMaintaining student engagement for three consecutive hours during an evening lecture-basedcourse that meets once per week can be challenging. With the objective of enhancing studentengagement, we integrated active learning interventions and four flipped classes in the evening,three-hour long senior-level air pollution control course at the Colorado School of Mines. Theactive learning interventions and flipped classes were purposefully
Community and Self-Efficacy Building of Civil Engineering StudentsIntroductionThe Citadel, a regional, residential military college, is currently engaged in a multi-year NSF S-STEMproject to encourage persistence of academically-talented, low-income civil engineering students. OurExcellence in Civil Engineering Leadership (ExCEL) scholarship program builds on a prior program (ofthe same name) that included 34 scholarship recipients, of which 85% graduated with a STEM degree and65% met the academic requirements to graduate as an ExCEL scholar [1]. The current ExCEL programseeks to retain several community-building and support services that were highly valued by our formerstudents, including: (1) funding to attend the
ProgramAbstract Research experiences for undergraduates have increased in availability at universities andgovernment laboratories throughout the nation. Government agencies, universities and privatedonors support these activities with a variety of expectations, including providing a more skilledworkforce, creating a greater emphasis on graduate education and increased retention of studentsin highly technical fields. While the value of these programs has been well-established, there is apaucity of empirically-based research on the various models and practices of these experiencesthat have the greatest impact on the students. The focus of this study was a National ScienceFoundation funded Research Experience for Undergraduate (REU) program at a 4
instructional opportunity for facultyto communicate to students the importance of teamwork and to identify teamwork principles thatwill be practiced in the program. Icebreaker activities for new students can be mini-projects forpracticing team skills and reinforcing teamwork principles for eager learners. When students Page 23.260.13begin project-based learning experiences, whether as freshmen or more advanced students, theirorientation to team projects should include additional content and skill-building exercisesfocused on teamwork development. Once engaged in team projects, the project mentors cansystematically in team meetings prompt discussions of
. TheNational Academy of Engineering committee on technological literacy noted these trends and suggesteda possible cause: Most people have very few direct, hands-on connections to technology, except as finished goods. They do not build the devices they use, tinker with them to improve their performance, or repair them when they break. Because of this lack of engagement, people today learn relatively little about technologies through direct experience.1Coupled with the lack of public understanding is the dearth of students, especially women andminorities, studying engineering in school and pursuing engineering careers. In 2002, fewer than sixpercent of the 1.1 million seniors who took the ACT Assessment college entrance
services. There are also examples fromfields outside of library and information studies that offer advice on engaging participants in thevirtual environment. One study collected data on the pedagogical practices of nursing instructorsdelivering synchronous class sessions.1 They offer strategies for orienting students to the onlinetechnology and involving students with practice questions and virtual breakout rooms that aredescribed in the best practices section of this paper. Another example from early childhoodeducation addresses the need for instructional design in the online classroom to be centered onthe learner and the improvement of learning outcomes.2 Many of the suggested practices toincrease students’ active learning are relevant for
groups in need in ourcommunity, have had a positive technical return on the participating students as they tackledopen-ended problems which naturally characterize real human issues. As the NSF projectundergoes more years of execution, it is predicted that it will have an even bigger impact on thelocal community in which the University resides/serves. The bigger impact will come naturallyas more community partners get involved in the community projects. Also, once thecommunication data is available, it is expected to see an uptick in the students’ overallcommunication skills as a result of participating in this NSF project.References:[1] Koh, R. (2020, June), Engagement In Practice: Community Engaged Capstone DesignExperience Paper presented at
. Page 22.1139.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Parents’ Perceptions of and Familiarity with EngineeringIntroductionThere is a growing concern in the engineering community that the interest among youngpeople in engineering is declining. There is a need to strategically plan how a strongerengineering workforce in the United States can be accomplished 1. While some efforts hadbeen made in improving undergraduate education and recruitment, other efforts, like thisstudy, focus on K-12 education and how we can improve students’ understanding ofengineering at early ages. Furthermore, recent studies have provided evidence that learningengineering content, especially engineering design, can
somewhat speculative, the importance of this issue for engineeringdisciplines cannot be underestimated, and calls for further inquiry. Page 14.247.5ConclusionWireless communication devices provide a valuable context in which to teach importantconcepts in physics and engineering. Our findings indicate that, when included as part of a highschool outreach program that targets under-represented minorities and women, innovativecurricula based on interactive engagement pedagogies could motivate students to take physicsand AP courses during their high school years. In turn, this could lead to greater college accessand graduation rates for these students
, undergraduate degrees awarded in thefields of engineering have declined from 6.3 to 5.4 percent of the total degrees conferred. Animportant strategy for increasing the number of future engineers is to engage students fromtraditionally underrepresented groups in engineering, including women and ethnic minorities. Tobe successful in expanding the pool of potential engineers, the needs of these underrepresentedstudents have to be addressed. A majority of these students have low-levels of preparation forcollege-level course work, especially in math and science, and most have little or no pre-collegeexposure to the engineering profession. In 2009, a small Hispanic-serving community college inthe San Francisco Bay Area and a large comprehensive urban
renowned keynote speakers who discuss and explore a range of STEMeducation and learning topics. Topics included elements of comparing engineering design toscientific inquiry, implementing project-based learning, critical thinking throughout thecurriculum, using hands-on/minds-on materials in instruction, embedding 21st Century skills ininstruction, developing STEM career awareness, assessing learning of students engaged indesign activities, and how engineering design takes place in STEM business and industry. Partof the remaining time was allocated to allow participants to spend time experiencing STEM inplace-based workforce settings and developing and planning family/community STEM events.Data ConditioningFollowing data collection, we conditioned
program, she held instructional design responsibilities for 12 years at California State Polytechnic University Pomona, which included designing and developing courses with various delivery modes and multimedia learning objects, as well as facilitating faculty workshops on instructional strategies and effective use of technology. She now works at Lumen Learning as Director of Continuous Improvement, integrating data-driven improvements and community-contributed improvements into courseware with an emphasis on equity-centered design. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Women Students Learning a STEM Subject: An
improvement processes by ABET accreditation since the early2000s [3]. Therefore, we would like to receive feedback from the community on ourmethodological approach and discuss considerations to inform the design and implementation ofcontinuous improvement processes at other institutions.Figure 1. Varying levels of teacher engagement in outcome assessment at a course level(see student outcomes assessed in each period in the following link: http://bit.ly/2SeVzRj)6. Acknowledgements This study was funded by CORFO under grant No.: 14ENI2-26862, and partiallyfunded by the LALA project (grant No. 586120-EPP-1-2017-1-ES-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP).This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. Thispublication reflects the views only of
generally and how they appraise their confidence in theirown leadership skills. Emerging research indicates that they place high significance on suchleadership-related skills as teamwork and communication but a lower significance on leadershipitself than on problem-solving, ethics, and technical skills (Bielefeldt, 2018; Passow, 2012).While this research contributes to our general understanding of the extent to which engineeringstudents perceive leadership skills to be important to the engineering profession, it has fallenshort of disaggregating data across demographic and academic variables, thus running the risk ofhomogenizing engineering students. Further, the research rarely examines the relationshipbetween two distinct measures—the extent to
to use engineering tools and engage in engineering thinking(empowerment), to engage students in multidisciplinary teams to explore the interplay amongsociety’s need for engineering (engagement), and to excite students about engineering design as aprocess of developing personal problem-solving agency (excitement). The higher order learningoutcomes of the course included designing a prototype under specified requirements andconstraints, communicating engineering design process, and considering the ethical impacts ofproposed engineering solutions on society.To achieve these learning objectives, the teaching team convened prior to the start of the semesterto redesign the first-year engineering experience course. In its past layout, students
: 10.1080/03043797.2012.738358.[6] I. W. Wait, J. T. Huffman, and C. T. Anderson, “Fostering critical thinking through a service-learning, combined sewer analysis project in an undergraduate course in hydrologic engineering,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2013.[7] M. C. Paretti, A. Eriksson, and M. Gustafsson, “Faculty and student perceptions of the impacts of communication in the disciplines (CID) on students’ development as engineers,” IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 27–42, Mar. 2019, Accessed: Feb. 10, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=8640263.[8] M. Pantazidou and I. Nair, “Ethic of Care: Guiding Principles for Engineering
learning experiences. Laboratory projectshave been shown to enhance development of discipline-specific skills and general research skills.Additionally, longer-term laboratory projects may allow students to develop skills associatedwith undergraduate research experiences. Undergraduate research has been shown to increase Page 13.316.2student satisfaction with education and serve as an “educational and personal-growth experiencewith many transferable experiences.”7,8The specific nature of student involvement in a course has a significant impact on studentsuccess and satisfaction.9-12 Biggs and Moore classify four types of motivation:12
infusing liberal arts and engineering in curricular and co-curricular activities. Thecurriculum proposal includes innovative approaches that intentionally promotedevelopment of professional, non-technical skills and focuses on student retention. Itsupports efforts on and studies of integrating engineering with general education. Thecurriculum parallels coursework in U.S. history and includes units on: technology andculture, technology in early America, transportation and industrial revolutions, theSecond Industrial Revolution, the communication revolution, technology in war andDepression, Age of Space and Science, the Information Age and biotechnology, andRomanticism, techno-phobia, and technology failures. History has to be rewritten in
undergraduate students, as well asbeing offered in a blended video-distance format to students from UAA to participate alongsidethe UAF students.The above courses have not only benefitted from increased student awareness and interest, but alsofrom the skillsets many of the design team students bring to the course. These skills includeknowledge of the general SEDP process, UAS-specific design experience, various constructiontechniques (eg, foam core/composite skins, balsa wood/Mylar skin, 3D printing), UAS flightexperience, and basic awareness of UAS flight rules. These competencies have had a significantpositive impact on the overall effectiveness of the classes taking these courses and have generallyprovided the students additional opportunities to
Frontiers in Education(FIE) Conference, Cincinnati, OH, October 16-19, 2019[18] S. C. Scogin, C. Alexander, L Gruenler, C. M. Mader, M. Bartoszek, Using AuthenticProject-Based Learning in a First-Year Lab to Elevate Students’ Perceptions of Engineering,International Journal of Engineering Education Vol. 36, No. 1(A), pp. 186–200, 2020.[19] M. Darbeheshti, W. Schupbach, A. Cervantes Lafuente, T. Altman, K. Goodman, M. S.Jacobson, S. O’Brien, Learning Communities: Impact on Retention of First-year Students,ASEE’s Virtual Conference, June 22-26th, 2020.[20] H. Lukefahr, C. Watterson, A. Roberts, D. A. Carnegie and M. A. Atkins, Project-BasedLearning to Improve Core First-Year Engineering Courses, in Proceedings IEEE Frontiers inEducation Conference
before the start of the Spring 2019 semester was no more than8-10 hours in total.Overall, the first version of this course was largely successful. Student evaluations were overallquite positive, with 100% agreeing or strongly agreeing that the course added to theirunderstanding of the impact of engineering solutions on society and that the course made themdemonstrate their ability to communicate, and 96% saying the course “frequently” or “almostalways” required them to communicate effectively and engage in contemporary issues.Evaluations of the Learning Portfolios demonstrated that all students in the course achievedproficiency in each course learning goal. However, there are a number of minor improvementsthat will be made in future iterations
their own learning. This, in turn, implies that teaching practices mustbe re-conceptualized as learning processes. In addition, educational goals must be re-conceptualized to meet the needs of individual and professional goals. Each of these changeshas impacts how institutions will find, keep, and engage faculty, including those in theengineering/technology disciplines, and will be discussed below in the section on implicationsand considerations.Issues and Trends in Engineering and Technology Faculty Recruitment, Roles, and Rewards In general, engineering/technology faculty are attracted to the institution throughadvertisements placed in specialized trade publications. Other ways faculty are recruited includeemployee referrals, college
asengineering, defined as accountable disciplinary knowledge (ADK) [6], change over the courseof an undergraduate education and entry into an engineering profession. In the first years of anundergraduate engineering degree program, introductory classes often focus on textbookproblems, larger lectures, and individual written exams. The ability to produce specificnumerical results to written problems is therefore ADK. In later years, ADK increasingly shiftstowards teamwork, communication skills, research, and collection and analysis of data. Coursesbecome more project-based and assignments have longer timelines with more open-endedsolutions. For students this shift in ADK can be a source of frustration or anxiety, as theyexperience a misalignment between
2006-1496: THE LASER CULT: HANDS-ON LABORATORY IN PHOTONICSAlan Cheville, Oklahoma State University Alan Cheville is an associate professor of electrical engineering at Oklahoma State University. Starting out along the traditional tenure path as a researcher in THz ultrafast opto-electronic devices, his interests are shifting to the larger problem of engineering education. Dr. Cheville is currently engaged in several curriculum reform efforts based on making engineering more relevant to students and emphasizing student development to an equal degree as content. Page 11.1308.1© American Society for
) of sustainability, and the well-being of communities and workers involved inagriculture. One important aspect of the experiential learning project was growing peanuts andhemp with FarmBots. Growing peanuts provided a unique opportunity to not only explore theagricultural contributions of George Washington Carver, an African American scientist in the early20th century, but also helped shedding light on his remarkable achievements in the context ofsocial justice. By integrating hemp cultivation on the FarmBot platform, the investigators createdan engaging space that highlighted the potential of this crop while addressing the historical andcontemporary social challenges faced by marginalized communities. The students honed theircontent on the
Paper ID #30680Engendering Community to Computer Science Freshmen through an EarlyArrival ProgramProf. Alark Joshi, University of San Francisco Alark Joshi is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science at the University of San Francisco. He was a co-PI on the IDoCode project (http://coen.boisestate.edu/cs/idocode/) that led to a change in the landscape of computer science teacher preparation and education in the state of Idaho. Currently, he is a co-PI on the S-STEM proposal focused on engaging students in the local community to enable successful outcomes for them with respect to courses and internships/jobs
designprojects [11, 12].Several studies offer clues about the most effective ways to group students on design teams.Mentzer [4] studied the time and quality of interactions of engineering teams (all female, allmale, or mixed gender) on two different design tasks. He found that all teams spent comparableamounts of total time on each design problem; however, all female teams spent less time onmodeling and communicating about potential design solutions than mixed gender or all maleteams. His study points towards the necessity of ensuring norms for engaging with teammembers is made explicit and team members are held accountable to those norms. Mentzer’swork is supported by other research [24, 25] in which female students reported equal efforttowards project
AC 2009-1643: COMMUNITY-BASED SERVICE PROJECT LEARNING IN CIVILENGINEERING COURSESClara Fang, University of Hartford Page 14.342.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Community-based Service Project Learning into Civil Engineering CoursesAbstractThis paper describes and analyzes the experience of implementing community-based serviceproject learning into civil engineering undergraduate courses at the University of Hartford, andconsiders the evidence of the impact of such learning on students and community organizations.The paper begins by discussing how such a learning module has been developed and analyzesthe