mastering these concepts, what we have not known is howtheir perceptions of engineering design have changed during the semester in which theycompleted the solid modeling course. In this study, we follow a cohort of students through afifteen-week solid modeling course. The identical web-based survey is administered during thefirst week and after the fifteenth week of classes. The survey is composed of several open-endedand multiple-choice questions that ask students what they feel are important attributes in solidmodeling and engineering design. Our goal is the development and refinement of a tool that canmeasure the progress of students as their understanding of engineering design evolves from arelatively immature state to a more advanced
Design Engineering and the Blended Learning Unit at the University of Hertfordshire, UK. Page 12.1568.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Using technology to support engineering laboratory studiesAbstractLearning requires activities that facilitate exploration, personal (first-hand) experience as wellas provide opportunities for students to develop and re-conceptualise their growingknowledge. Laboratory studies present an ideal opportunity for such personal action andreflection whilst also bringing some of the classroom activity to life. Although carefullyconsidered laboratory studies have the potential
engineering, the part with all the equations and science. Perhaps because ofthis focus on analytical thinking, prior studies have found that many students exit theirengineering classes with a negative affect towards the topics discussed over the semester and asa result feel alienated from their peers. Purpose: In response to these findings, an engineeringtechnical elective was designed to focus on aesthetics, to allow students to use their engineeringknowledge in new ways. This study was initiated to understand the influence of this course onstudent affect. Design: By examining the experiences and engineering identities of students insuch a course (n=29), this study demonstrates that these students not only begin to observeaspects of engineering in
level of understanding andconfidence in implementing projects using the engineering design process.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Sue Wainscott for her insightful comments concerningassessment of student knowledge, as well as Drs. Ming Huang, Rick Olson, and Susan Lord, fortheir help in collecting assessment data during the design exercise. The authors would also liketo thank the DEED reviewers for their helpful feedback. USD Institutional Review Boardapproval was obtained in the Fall 2008 semester (project number 2008-09-009).Bibliography1 Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, 1998 ABET Accreditation yearbook, IV.C.3.d(3)(c), 1998.2 W. C. Oakes, L. L. Leone, and C. J. Gunn, Engineering Your Future: an
AC 2011-202: STUDENTS LEARN FUNDAMENTALS OF ENGINEERINGDESIGN WHILE PURSUING THEIR OWN ENTREPRENEURIAL IDEASKevin D. Dahm, Rowan University Kevin Dahm is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He received his B.S. from WPI in 1992 and his Ph.D. from MIT in 1998. He has published on teaching engineering design, assessment of student learning, and use of process simulation in undergraduate education. He is the recipient of the 2004 Fahien Award and the 2010 Mid-Atlantic Section Outstanding Teaching Award from ASEE.William Riddell, Rowan University William Riddell is an Associate Professor in the Civil and Engineering Department at Rowan University. His research interests include design
newlyimplemented engineering design course students value in their subsequent years in anengineering program.The current study summarizes how course participants describe their experiences about theusefulness of the course in their successive years in their college experience (i.e. freshman,sophomore, junior, senior). We are interested in usefulness because it refers to the potential waysstudents believe that they can benefit from coursework [2]. This component is similar to theutility value component of the Expectancy-Value motivation theory [3] which offers one of themost effective models for understanding cognitive processes, achievement, and academicmotivation. Utility value is one of the constructs in motivation theories that have been found
. Linsey is an Assistant Professor in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technological. Dr. Linsey received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas. Her research area is design cognition including systematic methods and tools c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #16125for innovative design with a particular focus on concept generation and design-by-analogy. Her researchseeks to understand designers’ cognitive processes with the goal of creating better tools and approachesto enhance engineering design. She has authored over 100
real-worldengineering design projects and their related challenges. Engineering students are tasked todesign and build an off-road vehicle that will survive the severe punishment of rough terrain andsometimes even water1. The team project shall progress from the conceptual design phase to acomplete functional vehicle which meets all of the safety, performance, and other criteriaoutlined by the competition sponsors2.SAE Baja project proves to be an effective tool to enhance student learning in a variety of ways.There are extensive literatures on this topic. Sirinterlikci and Kerzmann indicated that a SAEBaja project can serve as an active learning tool for undergraduate students3. Foroudastan
.; and a B.Sc. in engineering physics and technology, July 1989, from University of Bucharest, Romania. He has taught the courses Power Electronics, Signals and Systems, Electric Circuit Analysis, Electronics I & II, Indus- trial Controls, Digital Electronics, Microcontrollers, Basic Electronics, Semiconductor Devices, Electric Power and Energy Conversion, College Algebra General Physics, Advanced Programmable Logic Con- trollers, Statistical Quality Control, Introduction to Engineering, and Engineering Design. He was a Teaching Assistant in Electronics I & II, a Lab Assistant in Engineering Physics and a tutor. He has Industrial Experience as a Technical Aid: NARTI-Springdale, Ark., Oct. 1995 - March 1996
students for the changingdesign processes they will encounter after graduation.17,18 Incorporating stakeholder interactioninto the design process can be challenging for students who do not typically encounter thesetasks during early engineering coursework. Prior research on student understanding and use ofstakeholder interaction during the design process has found that students do not always interactwith stakeholders successfully (as outlined in the design practice literature).19–21 Some of thedifficulties student encounter when attempting to interact with stakeholders causes them toneglect or dismiss stakeholder interaction during design.20,22 Thus, more research is needed todevelop pedagogy for teaching these complex processes.This study sought
effect on student learning. It was noted thatthe most common spaces used for design instruction were classrooms or laboratories – spacesvery different from studios that are used to explore the visual arts. Their review suggests thatmodeling engineering design workspaces on visual arts studios would have a positive impact onthe learning experience. The pedagogy used in architecture studios is presented as a model wherethe open format encourages frequent desk-reviews of the works in progress. This approachpromotes the instructor as a guide to an active learning process with the students gaining thegreatest understanding of things they taught themselves.Assessing design skills has been examined by Atman (et al.) with comparisons betweenfreshmen and
Army Chemical Corps, General Motors Research and Development Center, and the United States Air Force Academy. His research in- terests are in the area of conceptual design and engineering design education. Specifically, Dr. Nagel’s research activities include understanding customer needs, the use functional and process modeling to understand design problems, design for sustainability, and design for accessibility.Dr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University OLGA PIERRAKOS is an associate professor and founding faculty member of the James Madison Uni- versity Department of Engineering, which graduated its inaugural class in May 2012. At JMU, Dr. Pier- rakos is the Director of the Center for Innovation in Engineering
, we seek to better understand the effectsof these changes on the senior design students.In Fall 2020, senior design students completed an exit survey to assess their engineering designself-efficacy, or belief in their own ability to complete design tasks. Self-efficacy affects aperson’s behavior, and those with high self-efficacy will put forth increased effort, perseverance,and persistence to achieve their goals. Since experience affects engineering design self-efficacy,there was concern that students would not achieve the same level of self-efficacy with theadjusted projects. This study examines how COVID-19 has shaped the students’ capstoneexperience and their resulting self-confidence. The study found that engineering design self-efficacy
. Page 14.1052.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Serious Gaming for Aerospace Engineering Design: Exploring Learning Potential and Students' ReadinessIntroductionEngineering design involves generating original ideas and transforming them intoinnovations. This process of formulating ideas and expanding them is not done in avacuum. The ideas come from careful listening to customers’ needs and awareness ofcurrent technologies and understanding governing principles to identifying appropriateconceptual design alternatives. Developing this talent in engineering students involvesengaging them in various design challenges that are solved through collaboration withteam members. Project-based and challenge-based
notrequired to take the course, rather they chose to take it as an elective to accompany theireducational technology program courses. They were not required to participate in the researchportion of the course; however, all ten participants did sign IRB-approved consent forms toindicate their willingness to participate.Data Collection and AnalysisPre-/Post-test administration of the Engineering Design Self-Efficacy (EDSE) survey instrument(Carberry, Lee, & Ohland, 2010) serves as the primary data set. The EDSE was chosen for thisstudy because it is a validated instrument for measuring task-specific self-concepts, whichCarberry, Lee, and Ohland (2010) state are “any variable concerning the understanding anindividual has of him or herself for a
skills to create engineered designs. 0.590 I innately know how engineered systems work, like machines, electronics, or 0.749 structures. I have experience working with a variety of fabrication tools and equipment. 0.725 I have a history of tinkering on personal design projects. 0.645 I can understand and utilize technical drawings and/or other design schematics. 0.686 I know what tools and equipment may be useful in creating a particular 0.752 engineering design. Math and Science I have a solid foundational knowledge of fundamental science principles, e.g., 0.712 Newton's Laws, that I can utilize when solving engineering problems. I feel confident in my ability to
thinking, students learn the concept of systems-level design and development, takingthe stated need from the end-user or customer and developing design requirements, documenting Page 25.717.4them, and developing design solutions to meet the need. They must understand the total life-cycle of a proposed design and understand the methods for deciding which solution isappropriate for the given criteria. A recent study by the National Research Council cited that theaerospace industry believes the essence of being a good systems engineer “depends on applyingall knowledge, including functional and domain knowledge, along with the tools, at the rightplaces
Paper ID #29838The implementation of dynamic learning in a project-based introductoryengineering courseMr. Johnathon Garcia, New Mexico Institute of Mining & Technology Johnathon Garcia is a graduate student in the Mechanical Engineering Department at New Mexico Insti- tute of Mining and Technology, seeking an MS in Mechanical Engineering with an emphasis in Mecha- tronic Systems. His research covers multiple fields including compact data acquisition systems, robotics, Machine Learning, and vibrational systems. He has conducted research under Dr. O’Malley with coop- eration with Sandia National Laboratories on designing
classes dealing with various aspects of design, perhaps in a semester longdesign project, in interdisciplinary and mechanically related departments can also benefitfrom the use of the templates due to the generality of the approach that focuses onmaking component templates that are readily familiar to these specific design areas. Figure 1: Conveyor Template2.2 Component Functional TemplatesIt has already been shown that students struggle with the concept of abstract functionalmodeling15. Surveys given to various levels of Missouri S&T engineering studentscurrently utilizing functional modeling identified a serious lack of understanding of thetechnique. Instructors also noted lower than expected performance by the
AC 2007-3028: ENGINEERING DESIGN AND COMMUNICATIONS: SUCCESSESAND FAILURES OF AN EVOLVING FIRST-YEAR COURSEJanice Miller-Young, Mount Royal College JANICE MILLER-YOUNG is a P.Eng. with a background in mechanical engineering and a PhD in biomechanics. She has worked in the oil industry, has consulted for sports equipment companies and academics on biomechanics research, and has been teaching engineering design for three years. She also incorporates writing-across-the curriculum and inquiry-based learning concepts in more traditional courses such as statics and dynamics.Sean Maw, Mount Royal College Sean Maw has a PhD in Neuroscience (University of Alberta) and a BASc/MASc in Systems
. McManus, Northeastern University Hugh McManus is an Associate Teaching Professor at Northeastern University. He uses active and simulation-based learning techniques to teach complex and context-dependent subjects such as process improvement, and co-supervises the Industrial Engineering senior capstone projects. He also develops, teaches and applies advanced methods in lean process improvement, systems engineering and preliminary design, and composite materials and structures. His current interest is understanding how continuous im- provement methods can be applied to a wide variety of problems, including healthcare, business agility, and engineering education. c American Society for
short, and engineering educators need valid ways tomonitor effective teamwork in order to provide appropriate guidance to help their teams to besuccessful. Guidance by educators is also beneficial to many students who have little knowledgeor experience with a successful project team, or how to understand and improve their team’sdynamics in a relatively short period of time.For these reasons, we needed a method to determine the validity and reliability of the TuckmanTeam Development Questionnaire, which we used to measure individual team members’perceptions of their team’s dynamics at a specific milestone in the design project [3].Differences in perceptions of team development can lead to conflicts among members thatundermine effective teamwork
explore the validity of these claims, or to suggestthat teams developed considering MBTI personality types are superior. Rather, the MBTImethod is used here due to its acceptance in design engineering teaming, and, in the future,new algorithms for team selection can be employed instead of MBTI.The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) 13 is a psychometric assessment – a series ofquestions – that aims to enable users to better understand themselves by establishing certainpersonality traits within individuals. Based on the Jungian model of personality types,completion of the MBTI assessment results in the selection of one of two opposing traits, ofwhich there are four in total, leading to sixteen (24) possible outcomes represented by a four-letter
Paper ID #19974The Impact of Professional Communications Training on Teamwork and Lead-ership Skills for Engineering Capstone TeamsDr. Todd W. Polk, University of Texas, Dallas Dr. Todd Polk is a Senior Lecturer in the Bioengineering Department at the University of Texas at Dallas. He has a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from Texas A&M University. He received his Master of Science and Doctoral degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of Texas at Dallas. Todd has over 25 years of industry experience in design, test, applications, sales and management. After joining UT Dallas in 2013
, expeditions 2, 3 and 4 instead took place on the same weekend and additionalinstructors were brought on so that students could be divided into two separate groups for traveland design activities.To demonstrate to students that an engineering science mindset can be applied to understandproblem domains in which they are initially unfamiliar, an introductory lesson introducedclothing layering systems, clothing fabric selection, and backcountry sleeping systems throughthe framework of heat transfer. By considering the role of conduction, convection, radiation andevaporative cooling, students were able to understand the concept behind the common sayingthat ‘cotton kills’ in the wilderness. Throughout the program students are encouraged to
. Our intent here is not to include all aspects of the discussion at theforum, but rather concentrate on those points in which some consensus was reached by allparticipants. These conclusions give us a “minimum specification” for how to better integrateSE as part of a design component in our integrated curriculum. The main conclusions from theforum (in summary form): Page 12.1270.7 • It is not practical or needed to achieve a comprehensive understanding of SE at the undergraduate level; it is sufficient to expose students to the concepts, language, and minimum toolset.Given the constraints with most undergraduate engineering
Paper ID #9064Creativity in Green Roof Design: Digital Consensual Assessment Outcomesfrom a High School Engineering CampDr. Jennifer Buelin-Biesecker, North Carolina State UniversityDr. Cameron Denson, North Carolina State University Page 24.339.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Creativity in Green Roof Design: Digital Consensual Assessment Outcomes from a High School Engineering CampAbstractThe field of technology and engineering education has identified creativity as essential to itsmission
. Erin Susan Araj, Santa Clara University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Comparison of Paper vs. Electronic (Portfolio) Notebooks for Engineering Design Projects Abstract An engineer’s notebook has long been regarded as a critical feature in the engineering design process to capture the collection of information and design thinking not only for the author’s use, but also the use of others. As technology progresses, the use of a hardbound book for this recording of thoughts and reporting technical information has been extended to electronic formats. This paper details a comparison between engineer’s notebooks recorded on paper using bound notebooks and those done
Paper ID #26007The Logic of Decision Making in Engineering Design: An Examination of De-sign Theories From A Logical Point of ViewDr. Soheil Fatehiboroujeni, Indiana-Purdue University Soheil FatehiBoroujeni received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, Merced in 2018. As a postdoctoral researcher at Purdue University, School of Engineering Education, Soheil is working on a multi-institutional project characterizing governance processes related to change in engineering education, and pursuing other research interests in epistemology and design, among other philosophical topics in engineering
course instructor and/or the TA could build the device, but we decided to usethe well-established capstone design program hoping that this project provides educationalbenefits not only the students in the vibration class, but also the design team.Using the developed apparatus, free and forced vibrations were demonstrated with the motiondata measured in the encoder. The student survey confirmed that the device demo helped thestudents better understand the physical vibration phenomena. The list of materials andcomponents are provided in Appendix.AcknowledgementsThis educational research is sponsored by the Department of Mechanical Engineering at TheUniversity of Texas at Dallas. The author thanks the students (Paul Williams, Christian Schafer