©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Implementing Integrated Project-Based Learning Outcomes in a 21st Century Environmental Engineering CurriculumAbstractEngineering education research and accreditation criteria have for some time emphasized that toadequately prepare engineers to meet 21st century challenges, programs need to move toward anapproach that integrates professional knowledge, skills, and real-world experiences throughoutthe curriculum [1], [2], [3]. An integrated approach allows students to draw connections betweendifferent disciplinary content, develop professional skills through practice, and relate theiremerging engineering competencies to the problems and communities they care about [4], [5
Paper ID #36920Design Across the Curriculum: Improving Design Instruction in aMechanical Engineering Program.Dr. Sean Tolman, Utah Valley University Sean S. Tolman is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Program at Utah Valley Univer- sity in Orem, UT. He earned his BSME degree at Brigham Young University in 2002 and a MSME degree from the University of Utah in 2008 before returning toDr. Matthew J Jensen, Utah Valley University Dr. Matthew J. Jensen received his bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 2006. Matthew received his doctorate from Clemson University
AC 2007-1451: THE CLARKSON COMMON EXPERIENCE CURRICULUM:GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS BASED ON STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMESRobert Meyer, Clarkson University Robert Meyer is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Clarkson University. He received a B.A.(1970) in Electrical Engineering and Mathematics, M.E.E. (1970) and a Ph.D. (1974) in Electrical Engineering, all from Rice University. He has been employed by Texas Instruments, and Exxon, and since 1974, by Clarkson University. His research has been on applications of computing in communications network monitoring, including software design, development, and testing, and the application of distributed artificial intelligence to
of mathematics within aPage 13.1353.7Page 13.1353.8Page 13.1353.9Curriculum In-Action – Mathematics Knowledge GainsWe also investigated the extent to which the mathematics content aligned with the roboticscurriculum is conveyed in an implementation of the curriculum by observing it in a realclassroom. Overall, 20 students participated in the curriculum pilot implementation, 5 of whomwere female. Frequent absences meant that very few students attended every session, and both apre- and post-assessment were obtained from only 14 of the students. Most students worked inpairs with one robot and one computer terminal per pair, although a few students chose to workas individuals. Table 1 summarizes the results of the pre- and post-test. The results
representations within different device models arecompared, all of the exercises represented were directed assignments that were used toacknowledge the role of technology in CMOS logic and CMOS analog circuits. Theexercises also served as an example of the simulation factor in the integrated circuit designcycle, since they relate directly to ongoing MOS foundry runs.At MSU the MOS device course is a specialty course that is directed toward themicroelectronics option of the ECE (Electrical and Computer engineering) curriculum. Thetechniques and simulation algorithms described by this paper were developed in the fallsemester of 2003 and the next time that the course was deployed (due to enrollments) was thefall semester of 2007. The effect of having the
increase the stress on available waterresources, particularly in less developed countries. An introduction to hydrology remains animportant part of the general civil and environmental engineering curriculum. However, thechanges in the science of hydrology have not yet fully propagated into a changed approach toteaching this important subject. We present the results of a three-semester long study in whichwe introduced real world case studies into a large (70-90 students) civil engineeringundergraduate class to achieve this change. Over the past several semesters, students haveexpressed overwhelmingly positive thoughts on the course adjustments made, including the casesand other active learning elements utilized. We show and discuss evidence of the
Division. He has published numerous Page 11.437.1 articles on the active learning strategies of cooperative learning and structured controversy, knowledge representation and expert systems, and instructional uses of personal computers, and has written eight books including How to model it: Problem solving for the computer age, Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity, Strategies for energizing large classes: From small groups to learning communities, and Teamwork and project© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 energizing large classes: From small
Paper ID #27076Improving Student Writing Outcomes Through Dynamic Feedback, DesignOriented Projects and Curriculum ModificationMr. Matthew Willi Brand, University of California, Irvine Matthew Brand is a PhD student focusing on sediment transport and modeling coupled human-natural systems in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at the University of California, Irvine. Matthew’s work focuses on modeling the interactions between sediment transport and the natural and built environments in coastal estuaries. More specifically, this work investigates how hydromorphodynamic processes, regulations and habitat
Professor at the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering at the University of Windsor. He holds a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from the University of Michigan. His research interests include manufacturing systems automation, risk management, health care engineering, and informal engineering education. He is a member of IEEE, ASME, SME, and ASEE. His email address is zjpasek@uwindsor.ca. Page 25.807.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Integrating Student Projects Through the Use of Simulation Tools Across Logistics Engineering Curriculum
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, UK as well as a B.Ed. in Educational Measurement and Evaluation from Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, Thailand. Her area of expertise is computational mechanics. Page 15.1041.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Revision of the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum at Chulalongkorn University under New Regulations And Quality AssuranceAbstractThe new engineering education regulations in Thailand have profound impacts on the flexibilityof revision of the mechanical engineering curriculum since they emphasize on course contentsand demand a larger
Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC) at the Georgia Institute of Technology. His responsibil- ities include developing curriculum and providing professional development for teachers implementing robotics in their instruction through the NASA Electronic Professional Development Network.Mr. Jeffrey H Rosen, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. Marion Usselman, Georgia Institute of Technology Marion Usselman is a Principal Research Scientist and Associate Director for Federal Outreach and Re- search at the Georgia Institute of Technology’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC). She earned her Ph.D. in Biophysics from the Johns Hopkins University and has been with CEISMC since 1996
Session 3266 – ABET Issues and Capstone Design Design of Curriculum and Assessment of Student Learning for ME Courses Based on EC-2000 Jiunn-Chi Wu1, Pei-Fen Chang2, Yeong-Sh, Chen3, Shyi-Jeng Tsai1, Niann-I, A. Yu3 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering 2 Graduate Institute of Learning and Instruction, National Central University, Jhong-Li, Taiwan 3 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yuan-Ze University, Jhong-Li, Taiwan, ROCI. Introduction The ABET EC-2000 [1] has caused engineering
in improving student learning. As curriculum development takes place, theproposed process should attempt to employ technology-based teaching aids and strive tointroduce materials and exercises that will expand computing skills. Page 10.712.3 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationObjective 7: Culminate with a capstone experience.The model that we propose will provide students with experiences, throughout the program, thatrepresent the culmination of inquiry-based learning throughout all prior
Session 2325 Creative Thinking, Creative Problem-Solving, and Inventive Design in the Engineering Curriculum: A Review Jesse Pappas, Virginia Tech Eric Pappas, Virginia TechAbstract During the past decade, and especially over the last few years, engineeringeducators have been promoting, and implementing in their classrooms, an increasedemphasis on student creativity, problem-solving ability, and inventiveness. At a growingnumber of universities, student engineers are studying the creative process, developingadvanced thinking and problem-solving skills, and learning to design by
AC 2012-3280: DEVELOPING AN ENGINEERING CURRICULUM AT ADEVELOPING UNIVERSITY IN A DEVELOPING COUNTRYDr. Kurt M. DeGoede, Elizabethtown College Kurt DeGoede is Associate Professor of engineering and physics, Elizabethtown College. DeGoede is currently working on developing a collaborative study abroad program in West Africa built around a design course based in service engineering. Many of these projects include work with renewable energy systems. His research interests are in the areas of biomechanics and the modeling of dynamic systems. Current projects include collaborative work with faculty and students in occupational therapy and an orthopedic hand surgeon, developing clinical instruments for conducting therapy
Session 1653 Using Learning Community Course Links to Bring Meaning to the First-Year Engineering Curriculum Patricia C. Harms, Steven K. Mickelson, Thomas J. Brumm Iowa State UniversityAbstractThe Iowa State University Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering (ABE) hascreated a successful learning community for incoming ABE students. In this paper, we providean overview of our learning community structure and describe the collaboration between thedepartments of ABE and English that has fostered a cross-disciplinary initiative that includesstudents
AC 2011-510: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH TO CURRICULUMDEVELOPMENT FOR ENGINEERING GRADUATES WHO ARE SOCIALLYAND ENVIRONMENTALLY JUSTCaroline Baillie, University of Western Australia Chair in Engineering Education Faculty of Engineering, Computing and Maths University of Western Australia Page 22.71.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 A multidisciplinary approach to curriculum development for engineering graduates who are socially and environmentally justIntroductionThe traditional approach to teaching engineering problem solving, where students are limited tofinding
undergraduate chemical engineering curriculum. Thus,instructional materials are being developed for a sequence of four core chemicalengineering undergraduate courses. Typically, these courses are taken prior to thestudent enrolling in the senior design course (or courses). The four core coursesthat are targeted are: 1) fluid flow operations; 2) heat transfer operations; 3) masstransfer operations; and 4) reactor design. The first three of these courses aretypically grouped as the ‘unit operations’ courses and are taught at the sophomoreand junior levels. The last course may be taken prior to the senior year designcourses, or during the first semester of the senior year simultaneously with thefirst course in the design sequence.Process
. Delatte is a registered professional engineer in the States of Ohio and Alabama and in the Commonwealth of Virginia.Prof. Joshua Gisemba Bagaka’s, Cleveland State University Dr. Joshua Gisemba Bagaka’s is a professor of educational research design and statistics in the Depart- ment of Curriculum and Foundations in the College of Education and Human Services at Cleveland State University. He received his Bachelor of Education degree in Mathematics Education from the Univer- sity of Nairobi, a Master’s of Science in Probabilities and Statistics and a Ph.D. in Educational Research Design and Statistics both from Michigan State University. His research interests are in the utilization of hierarchical linear models in
graduate student working on his Master’s in Electrical and Computer Engineering at San Francisco State University (SFSU). He also holds a BS in Computer Engineering from SFSU.Hyeon Soo Jung, San Francisco State University Hyeon Soo Jung is currently pursuing a Master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering at San Francisco State University. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering and a Bachelor of Science degree in Systems Management Engineering from Sung Kyun Kwan University. With a passion for robotics and automation, Hyeon Soo’s research interests lie in the realm of control systems for robotics or related fields. He is dedicated to exploring innovative approaches to enhance the efficiency and
Paper ID #32762What Strategies do Diverse Women in Engineering Use to Cope withSituational Hidden Curriculum?Dr. Victoria Beth Sellers, University of Florida Dr. Victoria Sellers is a postdoctoral research associate in the Department of Engineering Education at the University of Florida. Her current research is focused on determining how engineering students respond to hidden curriculum. Victoria has previously served as an editorial assistant to the Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, as well as the communications intern for the Journal of Engineering Education. Victoria received a PhD in
Session 1793K-12 Summer Engineering Outreach Programs – Curriculum Comparisons Between Ages, Minorities, and Genders. Andrew L. Gerhart Lawrence Technological University, Southfield, MI 48075AbstractEnsuring that the level of the material presented/used for a K-12 program is not too easy or tooadvanced can be a challenge to the instructor. Also ensuring that the material will be of interestto a variety of students (i.e., minorities, females, etc.) can be a challenge. LawrenceTechnological University has two outreach programs each summer. One program, called
Paper ID #6995Team-Based Learning and Screencasts in the Undergraduate Thermal-FluidSciences CurriculumDr. Georg Pingen, Union University Georg Pingen is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Department at Union University in Jackson, TN. He teaches courses across the Mechanical Engineering curriculum with a focus on thermal-fluid- sciences. His research interests are in the areas of computational fluid dynamics, topology optimization, and engineering education. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Colorado in aerospace engineer- ing sciences
c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Leader Development Model (LDM) through Self and Peer Assessment across the CurriculumAbstractLeadership development and assessment impact the engineering program curriculum at TheCitadel, resulting in embedded indicators and teamed learning activities mapped across all fouryears of the undergraduate curriculum. The institution-specific leadership model developed atThe Citadel prepares students for leadership through teamed challenges and projects, positioningthe engineering program to provide robust learning experiences for students.Reinforced in multiple senior-level capstone design courses and a sophomore-level, engineering-specific communications course
softwareruns on Windows-based computers. In the second course, Embedded Software Systems, thestudent experience is extended with a focus on product and system development using the Cprogramming language.Finally, while these two courses truly focus on the development of software and interfacing,microcontrollers are used elsewhere in the curriculum. For example, the course project inInstrumentation requires that the students use a Microchip14 PIC24 series device to develop a“smart sensor”. By this time, they have completed at least their first class in microcontrollersand the C programming language and are expected to extend their current knowledge to a newplatform and development environment. The idea is to help build the students’ confidence intheir
(documentaries,newspapers, videos), and computer-aided instruction. Certain teaching strategies are moreeffective at teaching to specific learning domains, and certain teaching strategies aremore appropriate for students who are at a higher developmental level8. Thus, facultymust choose the teaching strategy based upon the learning domain that is being addressedand the developmental level the students are at. The type of teaching strategy chosen willinfluence the administrative structure of the course (schedule, resources, credits awarded)and the organization of the curriculum. Different techniques are more appropriate if thelearning domain is cognitive vs. affective, for example. Figure 6 shows a number oftechniques that are appropriate for these
performance. It is particularly responsive to manyof the difficulties related to establishing an effective communications curriculum. First, it offersengineering faculty a common understanding of communication. Second, through focusing onthose elements shared by all communicative performances – genre, context, identity, and purpose– it enables faculty to adapt their instructional approach in ways that acknowledge the diversityof possible performances while maintaining coherence. Third, it allows faculty to employ auseful methodology, discourse analysis, for doing assessment as educational research. This paperpresents communication as performance, offers discourse analysis as a methodology forresearching those performances, and suggests how
., Uhomoibhi J. (eds) Interactive Collaborative Learning. ICL 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 544. Springer, ChamGary, K. (2015). Project-Based Learning. Computer, 48(9), 98-100.Giralt, F., Herrero, J., Grau, F. X., Alabart, J. R., & Medir, M. (2000). Two way integration of engineering education through a design project. Journal of Engineering Education, (April), 219.Hassan, S. (2013). Concepts of vertical and horizontal integration as an approach to integrated curriculum. Education in Medicine Journal, 5, 5.Heer, R. (2012). A model of learning objectives. Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching, Iowa State University.Knight, D. W., Carlson, L. E., & Sullivan, J. J. (2007). Improving Engineering
undergraduate research,commonly obtained during the discovery stage of research [7] - [10]. Undergraduate research hasalso been shown to affect student interest in graduate school [5], [9], [11] - [13]. When studentsconduct research, they gain a better understanding of their preferred disciplines and whether ornot they have an interest in pursuing graduate school [5], [7], [12], [14].The need for increased student retention and success in STEM fields is driven by the need forSTEM employees in industry. NSF’s Science and Engineering Indicators 2016 report [15] showsthat the greatest disparities in representation between men and women occur in engineering,computer science, and the physical sciences. This same report shows that underrepresentedpopulations
project-based curriculum to more fully Page 26.751.3engage first-year students.Project Descriptions The projects in spring 2013 were selected by the engineering Graduate Teaching Assistants(GTAs), who work within the first-year program. Each GTA represents one of the engineeringdisciplines within the Watson School: Mechanical, Electrical, Computer, Systems Science andIndustrial, and Biomedical engineering departments. Each GTA submitted three ideas andpresented them to the Engineering Design Division faculty, who made the final decisions. Theengineering faculty then wrote a brief summary of each project for the students. Each GTAserves as an