theoreticalformula is used to determine rotational inertia of a single rigid component of regular geometry.13,14 The drawbacks of this technique include need to break apart the turbine to measure its internalgeometry and inability to correctly evaluate turbines with irregular or complex geometry. By 182comparison, the advantage of dynamic dynamometry is accurate assessment of turbine rotationalinertia with no knowledge of the turbine’s internal structure.We explain in this paper how dynamic dynamometry techniques can be taught in the context offour unique mechanical engineering classes: Dynamics, Numerical Methods, Thermodynamics,and Experimental Methods. Along the way, we weave together all the steps of the
excitement, what the author might describe asthat itch a young person gets when seeing something a bit beyond their current capability, butthey are eager to achieve.OutcomesAs a qualitative means of assessing the outcomes of the service-learning program, the studentswho participated in the program were asked to write reflections in answer to three prompts. Thefirst prompt asked the tutors to “reflect on your own math skills and problem-solvingapproaches. Reflect on the techniques that were successful to teach/tutor math.”One participant, who I will focus on and call L., starts by noting, “over the past few tutoring sessions, I’ve worked with a wonderful middle school student who needs assistance with her algebra class. I’ve helped her relearn
thecurriculum, research has shown that students’ understandings of engineering culture and theirrole within it play a significant role in determining their persistence [2].While the importance of students’ developing identities is well understood and documented inthe aggregate (see for example the findings of the Project to Assess Climate in Engineering),more recent studies have noted the lack of understanding of how actual student experiencesrelate to their developing identities [4]. Newer studies are therefore turning toward students’experiences and developing richer understandings of engineering students’ identities based onthe input of students themselves [5-7]. A gap in the research remains, however, regarding theother side of this interaction
Paper ID #20188Measuring Changes in High School Science Teacher Practice: Results of aMaterials Science-focused Professional Development ProgramDr. Alison K. Polasik, The Ohio State University Alison K Polasik received a B.S.E. degree in Materials Science and Engineering from Arizona State Uni- versity in 2002, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from The Ohio State University in 2005 and 2014, respec- tively. She is an assistant professor of practice in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at OSU. Dr. Polasik’s research interests include modeling of microstructure-property relationships in metals, assessment of
. Two workshops were designed as part of the out-of-classinterventions developed through the IDEAL project. In these workshops, students interacted withprofessional engineers working in the healthcare field. Each workshop was presented to a differentstudent audience: Workshop 1 targeted students who had previously expressed interest in the topicof healthcare engineering where as the students who attended Workshop 2 had some or no previousinterest in that field. The workshops, although gender inclusive, were focused on especiallyinspiring female engineers. Surveys were designed and administered at the end of each workshop.Data was collected and analyzed to assess the impact of the proposed workshops on studentmotivation and retention in
study returning graduate students in engineering master’s programs.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton (2003) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Edu- cation from Purdue University (2008). Her research focuses on strategies for design innovations through divergent and convergent thinking as well as through deep needs and community assessments using design ethnography, and translating those strategies to design tools and education. She teaches design and en- trepreneurship courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels, focusing on front-end design processes.Ms
to share a singletransmitter to send messages to multiple users. In the collaborative mode, the students are taskedwith maximizing the minimum rate per user over the whole group, while in the competitive modethey are tasked with maximizing their individual rate while possibly jamming their peers. Thepaper presents results of a survey assessing student opinions of the relative benefits ofcollaboration and competition in this exercise. While the results depend heavily on studentself-reporting, the data suggest that there is value in both the competitive and collaborativeelements of this exercise, with some caveats.IntroductionActive learning has been shown to improve student engagement, academic achievement, andfulfillment of learning outcomes
Lecturing from Premade Visuals Lecturing with Demonstration of Phenomena Socratic Lecture Teacher-focused Instruction Working Out Problems Individualized Instruction Multimedia Assessment Administrative Task Small Group Work / Discussion Student-focused Instruction Deskwork Student Presentation Student-Teacher Dialogue Instructor Rhetorical
effect of flux using a Van de Graaff gen-erator. This approach is in essence similar to the approach taken in 11 , where the authors advocatefor introducing simple engineering problems during calculus lectures to motivate the students. AMathematics Applications Inventory (MAI) test, such as the one developed at Cornell University 12 ,may be used in assessing the success of our effort at the freshman level.CONCLUDING REMARKSWe have described the process that our team is using to demonstrate the relevance of mathematicsin ECE education as part of the NSF RED award to our department. We are at the early stagesof this process and this paper is intended to simply provide an illustration of how the foundationthread is being implemented. Our efforts so
interdisciplinarynature of the Grand Challenges and identify which challenges they want to focus their efforts onin their future in the GCSP. Students use digital portfolios throughout the course to reflect ontheir experience for each grand challenge theme area and their overall course experience, inorder to relate their coursework to their interests and future plans. To prepare the students fortheir future in GCSP, students complete planning assignments which require them to meetfaculty and develop a plan to complete the GCSP requirements.The impact of this course on first year GCSP students’ awareness of the Grand Challenges, theirinterests, and their confidence that they will complete the GCSP was assessed. A custom surveyinstrument was designed to measure
a positive effect. However,at this time, it is too early to determine with certainty the causality of this result. In the future wewill design surveys that allow quantitative measure of satisfaction of the project sponsor. Wealso plan to conduct a study to document students’ perceptions on the impact of the projectexperience in their academic and professional careers. We also intend to design pre-test andpost-test that permits us to measure the level of knowledge reached by each group and to developsurveys as an instrument of course assessment. These tools can demonstrate possible differencesin the impact of this course on students with different profiles.AcknowledgementsWe would like to acknowledge the Department of Engineering Sciences
on molecular cooperativity in drug targeting, bio-sensing, and cell sig- naling. Current projects align along three main themes: local drug delivery, endothelial dysfunction in diabetes, and cooperative DNA diagnostics. Recent awards include the Jeanette Wilkins Award for the best basic science paper at the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Dr. Caplan teaches several classes including Biotransport Phenomena, Biomedical Product Design and Development II (alpha prototyping of a blood glucose meter), and co-teaches Biomedical Capstone De- sign. Dr. Caplan also conducts educational research to assess the effectiveness of interactive learning strategies in large classes (˜150 students).Miss Courtney Michelle DuBoisMs
Visual Arts students emphasized the collaboration between the engineering and visual designdisciplines. As the engineering students presented a technical breakdown of the umbrella andhow it worked, the design students explained how that knowledge, and other outside sourcesinspired their clever ideas for brand names, logos, and designs.XI. Assessment and Conclusion:The Engineering Team did not maintain a time log for the project, but a safe estimate would be acombined 300 hours spent researching, building, and testing the umbrella. This project was open-ended with no clear-cut solution, mirroring the same type of problem that professional engineersare faced with every day.The assessment of the project success was viewed from two perspectives. The
courses that build uponthe themes introduced in the first course to understand the linkage of scientific principles to createand evaluate proposed sustainable solutions.InstrumentWe assessed the students’ environmental knowledge and environmental attitudes using a twelve-question knowledge survey and a seven-question attitude survey focused on the environmentalsubjects integrated into the introductory environmental science course. Since the target populationwas within the same age group between 20 and 22 years of age, the differentiating demographicfactors taken into account include the students’ academic field of study, ethnicity, and gender. Theenvironmental knowledge and attitudes surveys follow the nationwide 2000 NationalEnvironmental
Paper ID #15194Gender-Specific Effects of a Summer Research Program on STEM ResearchSelf-EfficacyDr. Jennifer B. Listman, New York University Dr. Jennifer Listman is the Assistant Director, Program Development and Evaluation, Center for K12 STEM Education, New York University Polytechnic School of Engineering. As the Center’s resident re- search scientist, she conducts and publishes assessments and outcomes evaluations of Center programs for stewardship, research, and development purposes. Dr. Listman received her B.A. in Biology from the University of Pennsylvania in 1991 and her PhD in Anthropological Genetics from New
Other/Multi-Racial 6.3 White 71.4 Missing 3.5 Age of student 18-24 88.9 25+ 11.1Measures. The dependent variable – Feeling of Connectedness to Others on Campus due toTechnology – assesses students’ level of agreement about connectedness. For example, studentswere asked, “To what extent do you agree with the statement: Technology makes me feel moreconnected to other students?” Each item was placed on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0(don’t know) to 5 (strongly agree). The overall dependent variable is a composite scale that wascomputed by averaging three items related to students’ feelings of connected to others
Engineering LearningCommunity (GELC) at Clemson University provides academic support for these first-yearengineering students. One component of the program is a two credit-hour learning strategiescourse in the students’ first semester that focuses on building skills around becoming an effectivelearner and STEM student, with a special emphasis on developing competence in the students’three core, cohorted courses: introductory engineering, general chemistry, and the first semesterof an extended, year-long calculus course that includes review of precalculus concepts. Thecourse is divided into three modules in order to enhance students’ self-regulatory behaviors,learning skills and strategies, and habits of mind. Student learning is assessed through a
of Reading Assignments in Environmental Engineering Education for Effective Learning and Greater Student Engagement in an Era of Innovative Pedagogy and Emerging Technologies1.0 IntroductionSince the dawn of education, educators have been looking for ways to make teachingeffective and it has been a never-ending pursuit. Engineering education is no exception tothis. There have been numerous pedagogical advances such as focusing on students' learningstyles, teaching aids, in-class assessments, and use of more hands-on activities and multi-media, which made education more effective. Most engineering majors, some more thanothers, have dedicated laboratories for hands-on learning of specific
Indices,” Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 419–480, 2013.[3] K. Krippendorff, “Reliability in Content Analysis.,” Hum. Commun. Res., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 411– 433, 2004.[4] J. Carletta, “Squibs and Discussions Assessing Agreement on Classification Tasks: The Kappa Statistic,” Comput. Linguist., 1993.[5] C. G. P. Berdanier and N. M. Buswell, “Data Visualization for Time-Resolved Real-Time Engineering Writing Processes” 125th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. 2018.[6] K. L.Gwet, Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Raters, Fourth Edi. 2010.[7] W. A. Scott, “Reliability of Content Analysis: The
continuous improvement and overall projectassessment. An additional report by the evaluator will be completed at the conclusion of theworkshop series.5. OutcomesThe first workshop produced two distinct outcomes. On the one hand, the attendees generatedmany useful ideas around the nature of Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering Education.These are the content outcomes summarized in the next subsection. Another outcome was theformative assessment conducted at the conclusion of the workshop and the insights therebygained.5.1 Content OutcomesThe interactive sessions generated many good ideas that the community should consider toadvance MRE education, including: • There is no clear boundary between Mechatronics and Robotics. This applies in many
years experience in satellite based earth science research. He has been teaching first year engineering for the past nineteen years, with emphasis on 3-D computer aided design, computer programming, and project design and documentation.Prof. Fabian Hadipriono Tan P.E., Ohio State University Fabian Hadipriono Tan has worked in the areas of construction of infrastructures and buildings, failure assessment of buildings and bridges, construction accident investigations, forensic engineering, ancient buildings, ancient bridges, and the ancient history of science and engineering for over 40 years. The tools he uses include fault tree analysis, fuzzy logic, artificial intelligence, and virtual reality.Dr. Adrian Hadipriono Tan
-by-step exercises, study material, and self-tests (ILE –Instruction and Assessment). The estimated effort for completion the MOOC is between 8 and12 hours. The MOOC was only available for the students of the cohort of 2016-2017.Like the diagnostic test, participation to the MOOC is voluntary and not required to enroll inthe transfer program. Students who wanted to participate in the MOOC were asked to fill insome demographic questions and the reason why they enrolled in the MOOC (Learnerbackground and intentions). Although MOOC participation was non-compulsory and non-binding, there was a pass/fail mark after having completed this course, which was 70%.4.3 AnalysesThe first part of the analysis focused on the diagnostic test by comparing the
spanning three decades of research. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(5):1128-1145. doi:10.1037/a0015978.2. Milliken FJ, Martins LL. Searching for common threads : Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Acad Manag Rev. 2016;21(2):402-433.3. Stahl GK, Maznevski ML, Voigt A, Jonsen K. Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta- analysis of research on multicultural work groups. J Int Bus Stud. 2010;41(4):690-709. doi:10.1057/jibs.2009.85.4. Glutting JJ, Youngstrom EA, Watkins MW. ADHD and college students: Exploratory and confirmatory factor structures with student and parent data. Psychol Assess. 2005;17(1):44-55. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.17.1.44.5. Dupaul GJ, Weyandt LL
Ecuadorrebuilding homes from bamboo in low-income communities after a disastrous earthquake in 2016.Assessment of program activities led to improvements in both the professional development andentrepreneurial training aspects of the project. After the first summer, bi-weekly professionaldevelopment seminars became weekly seminars to give students more time as a cohort and to incorporatesome equipment training. Changes in the Crimson Startup course include: adding a half-day orientation todescribe the program, assigning a coach to every team, requiring weekly office hours between teams andcoaches, and clarification of the business model. In focus group discussions and on questionnaires,students indicated that the renewable resource focus is a very
have evolved into a Rapid Assembly and Designchallenge. In the future, students will propose projects in the first week of the semester and theproposal will be accepted based on feasibility and support that the course can provide. As theRAD projects continue to develop, the first-year program hopes to prepare students for project-based courses in their second year.Survey and ResultsA voluntary survey was sent to students in the entrepreneurial venture pilot course. Responseswere collected over three semesters: fall 2016, spring 2017, and fall 2017. Survey questionsincluded 15 Likert style statements to assess student perception of their project, the course, andthe learned skills [10]. Response rate was low, n = 17, but aggregate responses are
in the Society of Women Engineers, a SeniorMember of IEEE, a member of ASME, and ASEE.ELAINE M COONEY is a professor and program director for Electrical Engineering Technology in the PurdueSchool of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI. She is a Senior IDEAL Scholar with ABET, which affords her topresent program assessment workshops around the world with other Senior IDEAL Scholars. She has been anAAC&U Indiana LEAP Faculty Fellow focusing on tuning of engineering technology curriculum and assessment ofstudent work, and continues to provide leadership to the ET community in Indiana and nationally.LIZA RUSSELL is a Junior pursuing a Bachelor’s of Science in Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University. Shebegan working under Dr. Lucietto in
data from either course, approval for theproject was granted to the instructors through the University’s Institutional Review Board (IRB).Pre-implementation AssessmentTowards the beginning of each course, both instructors provided their students with a brieforientation to blending learning through a short video entitled “Blended learning & FlippedClassrooms” (Osmosis, 2017). While there is an abundance of videos available online thatdemonstrate these approaches, this video was selected based on its quality and clarity.Following the orientation, the instructors used a questionnaire to assess the students’ opinionsregarding the use of the blended learning approach and how it might impact their learning. Thefollowing represent a
various categories have adequately explained the different game based learning systems in existencetill date highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each of the classes. The gaming applicationthat stood out amongst all that was reviewed are the InCTF and GenCyber application. Theseapplications are self-explanatory as they involved walkthroughs which made it easier for the learner tograsp the basics of cybersecurity before proceeding to carry out the assessment test. Also, theassessment test was very interactive with of the involvement of the attacker and defender. Thisinteractive medium of learning enables the learner(s) to adequately understand what is required in theworld of cybersecurity with the test carried out in a virtual and
factors in online collaboration and their relationship tosomething—not necessarily their actual ability. [5] The teamwork satisfaction. The Quarterly Review oftiming of this survey employment at the end of the fall Distance Education, 10(2). pp195-206. Information Agesemester is a very stressful time for first year engineering Publishing, Inc.students, and they may have a very low overall self- [3] Anderson, C. B., Lee, H. Y., Byars-Winston, A.,efficacy. Baldwin, C. D., Cameron, C., and Chang, S. (2016). Assessment of Scientific Communication Self-efficacy,4. Future Work
produce notable gains in these areas.3 The implementations ofHypatia and Galileo were done with these expected outcomes in mind, particularly persistence. Itis recognized that first-to-second year attrition in engineering programs is most severe, and thatintervention at the freshman level is paramount to increasing persistence to graduation inengineering degree programs.9-11 Thus, freshman living-learning communities for engineeringstudents seem to offer a very viable means to improve retention in engineering, especially atinstitutions that require, or strongly encourage, on-campus residence for freshman students. Assessment of the Hypatia and Galileo living-learning communities includes longitudinaltracking of cumulative grade point