explicitly mentioning the concepts of diversity and flexibility.References1. J. Donaldson, A. Staropoli, M.-O. Ottenwaelter, Ch. Thune, A. I. Vroeijenstijn, European Pilot Projects for Evaluating Quality in Higher Education, 1994.2. R. K. Duggins, "The Audit and Assessment of Quality in Higher Education," Conf. of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Auckland, Dec. 1993.3. A. Filipkowski, "Engineering Education in Poland: Facing the United Europe", Proc. 3rd World Conf. on Engineering Education, vol. 1, pp. 41-51, Portsmouth, Sept. 1993.4. J. Filipiak, A. R. Pach, "Engineering Education in Poland," IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 58-64, Nov. 1992.5. M. M. H. Frederiks, D. F. Westerheijden, P. J. M
and I. M. Verner, "Fire-fighting mobile robotics and interdisciplinary design-comparative perspectives," IEEE Transactions on Education, 47(3), 369-376, Aug. 2004, doi: 10.1109/TE.2004.825547.2. T. Martin et al., "An Interdisciplinary Design Course for Pervasive Computing," IEEE Pervasive Computing, 11(1), 80-83, January-March 2012, doi: 10.1109/MPRV.2012.2.3. S. Ghanbari, “Learning across disciplines: A collective case study of two university programs that integrate the arts with STEM,” International Journal of Education & the Arts, 16(7), 2015, Retrieved March 2023 from http://www.ijea.org/v16n7/.4. T. Cotantino, N. Kellam, B. Cramond, and I. Crowder, “An Interdisciplinary Design Studio: How Can Art and
). Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Academic Press. 25. McCabe, B. Y., Ching, K. S., and Savio, R. (2000). “STRATEGY: A ConstructionSimulation Environment.” Proceedings of the ASCE Construction Congress VI, Orlando, FL, pp.115-120. 26. Messner, J. I., Yerrapathruni, S. C. M., Baratta, A. J., and Whisker V. E. (2003). “UsingVirtual Reality to Improve Construction Engineering Education.” Proceedings of the 2003American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 27. Mezirow, J. (1997). “Transformative Learning: Theory to Practice.” New Directions forAdult and Continuing Education, 74, pp. 5-12. 28. Nassar, K. (2002). “Simulation Gaming in Construction: ER, the Equipment Replacement
here are approved by the University of Illinois Urbana-ChampaignInstitutional Review Board under NHSR designation 23380. Capstone Innovations at Carle IllinoisCollege of Medicine are supported by The Henry Dale and Betty Smith Family.References[1] DianeR. Bridges, R. A. Davidson, P. Soule Odegard, I. V. Maki, and J. Tomkowiak, “Interprofessional collaboration: three best practice models of interprofessional education,” Medical Education Online, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 6035, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.3402/meo.v16i0.6035.[2] S. Chien, R. Bashir, R. M. Nerem, and R. Pettigrew, “Engineering as a new frontier for translational medicine,” Sci. Transl. Med., vol. 7, no. 281, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa4325.[3] K. Alder, Engineering the
2006-1370: ASSESSING STUDENT OUTCOMES OF NASA RESEARCH INTOUNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING EDUCATIONIsmail Orabi, University of New Haven ISMAIL I. ORABI, Professor of Mechanical Engineering at University of New Haven. He received his Ph.D. from Clarkson University, and his MS degree from the State University of New York and B.S. from Cairo Institute of Technology (now Helwan University), all in Mechanical Engineering. He has published over 25 technical articles in refereed journals and conference proceedings. His research interests include theoretical and computational investigation in the area of mechanical vibrations and dynamic systems and control. Professor Orabi has taught courses in
2003, American Society for Engineering Education7. Haque, M.E. and Karandikar, V. (2002). "A Study on Comfort and Safety in a Residential Housing Complex: A Neuro-Genetic Knowledge Model," Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Information Systems in Engineering and Construction (ISEC 2002), Cocoa Beach, Florida.8. Choudhury, I. and Haque, M.E. (2001). "A Study of Cross-cultural Training in International Construction Using General Linear Model Procedure and Artificial Neural Network Approach," proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Construction Project Management (3ICCPM) Conference, pp. 444-453, Singapore.9. Goldberg, D. E. (1989). “Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine
. ‘Overcoming the innovation execution gap: A process for enhancing the success of company innovation initiatives,’ Paper presented at the 2015 American Society for Engineering Management (ASEM) International Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN. 2015.20. Kline, W., W.D. Schindel, ‘Engineering Design, A Shift from a Process to Model-Based View,’ 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, October 18-21, 2017 Indianapolis, Indiana.21. Kline, W., W.D. Schindel, J. Tranquillo, A. Bernal, and C. Hixson, ‘Development of a Design Canvas with Application to First-Year and Capstone Design Courses,’ ASEE Annual Conference, Columbus, June 2017.22. Simoni, M., E. Andrijcic, W. Kline, and A. Bernal, ‘Helping Undergraduate Students of any
Page 12.631.9has been selected to represent the university at regional, national and international businesscompetitions for the 2006/2007 academic year. Most recently, the team won third place at theIdea to Product UT Austin International Competition for the presentation of their firefightersafety product. The product has generated sufficient interest that the University is helping theteam pursue a patent.Future WorkThe Electronics and Telecommunications Programs at Texas A&M University are currentlypursuing the full realization of the Engineering Entrepreneurship Educational Initiative. Onceimplemented, this initiative will bring a real-world, integrated entrepreneurial experience toundergraduate education that includes: exposure to real
Paper ID #9947The Innovation Competencies - Implications for Educating the Engineer ofthe FutureProf. William A. Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Bill Kline is Dean of Innovation and Engagement and Professor of Engineering Management at Rose- Hulman. He joined Rose-Hulman in 2001 and his teaching and professional interests include systems engineering, design, quality, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Prior to joining Rose-Hulman, his industry experience includes roles as cofounder and Chief Operating Officer at Montronix and development manager at Kennametal. Bill is a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Illinois
andlearning new methodologies, such as Q methodology, engineering education researchers will beable to answer new questions, elicit new insights, and expand their skillsets.References[1] J. W. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2014.[2] S. R. Brown, “A primer on Q methodology,” Operant Subj., vol. 16, no. 3/4, pp. 91–138, 1993.[3] W. Stephenson, The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1953.[4] I. Newman and S. Ramlo, “Using Q methodology and Q factor analysis in mixed methods research,” in SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, 2nd
Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and Co-Director of the NSF I/UCRC Center for e- Design, a multi-university industry cooperative research center. Richard has been teaching and engaging in research in engineering design education for over fifteen years. Dr. Goff is the recipient of several teaching and outreach awards. His passion is creating engaging learning environments by bringing useful research results and industry practices into the classroom as well as using design research results to inform engineering practice.Debarati Basu, Virginia Tech Page 24.1000.1
AC 2010-2101: ENHANCEMENT OF INTERNET BASED LAYERMANUFACTURING FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATIONTzu-Liang Tseng, University of Texas, El PasoRyan Wicker, UTEP Dr. Wicker is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering, appointed 1994, Ph.D. from Stanford University. Dr. Wicker holds the endowed Mr. and Mrs. MacIntosh Murchison Chair I in Engineering and is the Director of the W.M. Keck Center for 3D Innovation (a premier layered manufacturing Center with 21 layered manufacturing technologies and facilities for advanced manufacturing, reverse engineering, materials analysis and testing, experimental fluid mechanics, and tissue engineering--including scaffold fabrication, polymer synthesis and cell culture
evidence needed to motivate adoption at other institutions.The projects are organized into five groups: three that encompass standard phases ofundergraduate engineering, one that includes full four-year curriculum projects, and one thatbuilds faculty capacity to develop and teach using integrative activities. The projects address Page 22.725.8different parts of the undergraduate engineering education to systematically develop students’innovative capacities and entrepreneurial mindset. The outcomes of the projects are aligned withthe ABET professional outcomes c, d, f, g, h, i, and j, providing meaningful ways to addressthose aspects of EC 2000
. Mayled et al., “Coaching and feedback in a faculty professional development program that integrates the entrepreneurial mindset and pedagogical best practices into capstone design courses,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2019, doi: 10.18260/1-2--32513.[6] S. Zappe, K. Hochstedt, E. Kisenwether, and A. Shartrand, “Teaching to innovate: Beliefs and perceptions of instructors who teach entrepreneurship to engineering students,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 45–62, 2013.[7] F. M. Connelly and D. J. Clandinin, “Stories of Experience and Narrative Inquiry,” Educational Researcher, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 2–14, Jun. 1990, doi: 10.3102
Paper ID #23849It Takes All Kinds: Incorporating Diversity Education in the EngineeringClassroomDr. Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University Elif Miskioglu is currently an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at Bucknell University. She graduated from Ohio State University in 2015 with a PhD in Chemical Engineering, and is interested in student learning in engineering. In particular, her work focuses on various aspects of students’ develop- ment from novice to expert, including development of engineering intuition, as well as critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication skills. c
Session 2432 Pre-College Engineering Education and Standards for Technological Literacy Constantine Anagnostopoulos Chair, Pre-college Education Coordinating Committee IEEE Educational Activities Board Douglas Gorham Project Manager, Pre-college Education IEEE Educational Activities Pam B. Newberry Associate Director, Technology for All Americans Project International Technology Education Association
and Financial Issues, vol.6, (1), pp. 57–62, 2016. .[2] R. B. Hill, "New perspectives: Technology teacher education and engineering design,"Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, vol. 43, (3), pp. 45, 2006. .[3] K. Porayska-Pomsta, "AI as a methodology for supporting educational praxis and teachermetacognition," International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 26, pp. 679–700,2016. .[4] K. Yelamarthi et al, "Exploring the Potential of Generative AI in Shaping EngineeringEducation: Opportunities and Challenges," Journal of Engineering Education Transformations,vol. 37, (Special Issue 2), 2024. .[5] R. Sokhibov and A. Azamjonov, "The step towards future targeted spruce pedagogythrough AI based models," in 2024
Paper ID #42758Understanding Persistence in Engineering Education through a ComprehensiveSurvey ToolDr. Brian Dick, Vancouver Island University Brian Dick is a Professor and Department Chair at Vancouver Island University. He believes strongly in enabling access to education, and creating conditions for students to develop as global citizens. He led work to create the Common First-Year Engineering Curriculum in British Columbia, enabling expansion of engineering education pathways throughout the province. His international work with partners in Vietnam, Taiwan, Korea, and Kenya, has facilitated unique intercultural
could assist in recommending policies, reviewing publications, resolvingissues internally, and might also be a referral point for parents. If this committee of this Page 10.1309.9 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationtype is established, I encourage the college or school of Engineering to seek faculty orstaff representation.References1. Howe, Neil and Strauss, William. (2000) Millennials Rising. New York: Vintage Books, 2000. pp. 4- 12.2. Ibid., pp. 123-142.3. Clark, Elizabeth M. (2004
Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationminor impact on the overall performance of the student. These designations are assigned by agroup of faculty who teach the course.Table 2: The relationship between the courses in the curriculum and ABETrequirements Courses ABET Outcomes Criterion 3 Criterion 8 General Education Requirements a b c d e f g h i j k l m n oHumanities and Social Science electives (12 credits) H HEnglish language courses (6 credits) HMath and science courses and labs (27 credits) H
-generation student veterans, womenveterans, and leadership.First-Generation Student VeteransA paper will be presented at the inaugural Collaborative Network for Engineering andComputing Diversity (CoNECD - pronounced “Connected”) Conference.16 The next step in theanalysis it to adopt an intersectional lens to examine the research question “To what extent areFGSVEs’ educational experiences shaped by their first-generation, military, and engineeringidentities?” This journal article is targeted for submission to the International Journal ofEngineering Education.Preliminary Interview Findings on First-Generation Student VeteransFrom: C. Mobley, C. E. Brawner, J. B. Main, S. M. Lord, and M. M. Camacho, “Exploring theExperiences of First-Generation
Exposition”, Atlanta, June 2013.[6] S. R. Haynes, L. Spence, and L. Lenze, “Scenario-based Assessment of Learning Experiences”, 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 1 – 8, October 2009.[7] R. M. Crespo, J. Najjar, M. Derntl, D. Leony, S. Neumann, P. Oberhuemer, M. Totschnig, B. Simon, I. Gutierres, and C. D. Kloos, “Aligning Assessment with Learning Outcomes, in Outcome-based Education”, IEEE Education Engineering Conference (EDUCON), pp. 1239 – 1246, April 2010.[8] G. Hassoun, “Towards Improving the Engineering Education Continuum”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Technology, Communication and Education, Mishref, Kuwait, 2008.[9] B. Taylor, “Cheating Lessons, Part 3”, The Chronicle of Higher Education, August
192 An Evolving Model for Delivering Engineering Education to a Distant Location Kenneth W. Santarelli California State University, Fresno/Antelope Valley Engineering ProgramAbstractA unique approach has evolved for providing ABET accredited undergraduate engineering educationfor the residents of the Greater Antelope Valley and adjacent regions in the high desert of California.Industries in the high desert have expressed a strong desire to train engineers locally. This desirestems from the unique attributes of the high desert which make attracting and retaining
), American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), and American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). He is a certified Professional Traffic Operations Engineer (PTOE) and Road Safety Professional (RSP I). © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work in Progress - Strategies for Stimulating Engineering Relevance in Statics EducationAbstractMost engineering students take statics as their first engineering science course. A weakunderstanding of this subject can cause significant learning impediments in subsequent classes.Students see statics as an extension of physics rather than an introductory
Paper ID #33311A Human-Centric Engineering Education Model Inspired from ModernManufacturing ProcessesDr. Y. Curtis Wang, California State University, Los Angeles Y. Curtis Wang is with the Electrical and Computer Engineering department at California State University, Los Angeles.Prof. Jim Kuo, California State University, Los Angeles Jim Kuo is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at California State Uni- versity, Los Angeles.Dr. He Shen, California State University, Los Angeles He Shen is currently with Department of Mechanical Engineering at California State University, Los Angeles. His
passage of time between their military service and theirengineering studies.Pathways from High School to Engineering EducationDrawing on all of our data, we are developing a model of the pathways followed by these SVEsfrom high school to engineering education. A paper on this topic was presented at the 2019 SEFIConference [23]. We are continuing this analysis in more depth for a journal publication where amanuscript is in preparation. We are targeting the International Journal of EngineeringEducation (IJEE) or the new journal, Studies in Engineering Education.From: J. B. Main, S. M. Lord, C. Mobley, C. E. Brawner, M. Camacho, and C. Pantoja, “Militaryveterans’ pathways from high school to postsecondary engineering education,” European Societyfor
. Page 6.759.7 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationReferences1. Shetty, D and Kolk, R., “Mechatronics System Design” 1998, International Thompson Publications, Brooks Cole Division, Boston, Mass.2. Landers, R.G. and Ulsoy, A.G., 1995, "A Supervisory Machining Control Example," Recent Advances in Mechatronics, ICRAM ‘95, Turkey.3. Marx, E., and Vorburger, T.V., 1990, “Direct and Inverse Problems for Scattered by Rough Surfaces,” Applied Optics, Vol. 29, No. 25, pp. 3613-3626.4. Shetty, D., and Neault, H., 1993, “Method and Apparatus for Surface Roughness Measurement Using Laser
school level math app,” Gamification: Concepts, Methodologies,Tools, and Applications, 2-4, pp. 970-982.Libre, N.A., “Instructional videos for the SecPro App”, (Mar18, 2016)Mouza, C., Barrett-Greenly, T. (2015). “Bridging the app gap: An examination of a professionaldevelopment initiative on mobile learning in urban schools,” Computers and Education, 88, pp.1-14.Oglesby, D. B., Carney, E.R., Prissovsky, M., Crites, D. (1998). “Statics On-Line: A ProjectReview”, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Seattle, WAPhilpot, T.A., (2000). "MDSolids: Software to Bridge the Gap Between Lectures and Homeworkin Mechanics of Materials," International Journal of Engineering Education, 16(4)Philpot, T.A., Hall, R., (2006). “Animated Instructional Software for
., & Hammond, T. A. (2024, June), Emotionally Intelligent Machines in Education: Harnessing Generative AI for Authentic Human-Machine Synergy in the Classroom Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2—47236 [6] Anakok, I., & Chew, K. J., & Matusovich, H. M., & Katz, A. (2024, June), Paradigm Shift? Preliminary Findings of Engineering Faculty Members’ Mental Models of Assessment in the Era of Generative AI Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--47829 Proceedings of the 2025 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of
], field trip recordings for future use in civilengineering education [18], entrepreneurial related 360-videos for management and productionengineering [7], and alternative approaches of conducting field laboratories for trafficengineering courses [19]. Other than the implementation of Jones et al. [19] the authors of thispaper did not find an example of using 360-videos to prepare engineering students for fieldlaboratories.In general, virtual reality implementations are built upon the following pedagogical foundations[20], [21]: (i) direct instruction, (ii) experiential learning, (iii) discovery learning, (iv) situatedcognition, and (v) constructivism. Of the above pedagogical foundations, experiential learning isoften encountered in the