agreement withthe question and a 1 shows weak agreement with the question:Responses to these three survey questions strongly suggest that students regarded the websiteexperience as relevant to training in their discipline and preparation as professional engineers.Students also provided open-ended responses to the question: Please provide additionalcomments. Below are sample responses. Sample Comments Related to Academic Development Ethics is inescapable. By reading these three case studies and the curriculum, I have learnt a deeper side of ethics and what it is to be ethically right and articulating our own values. It was a great experience studying the case studies and putting my own view on it, and engaging in this activity had
inManagement,” was introduced into the curriculum as a result of the author’s recognition of theneed for students to develop their diversity management skills. Recognizing the need foradditional and advanced diversity education, the author is currently developing a dual levelcourse (senior and graduate level course) on diversity management, OLS 550, “ManagingDiversity”.Ideas for Engineering/Technology Faculty:Ideas on how consulting/training can be used to promote teaching- faculty can useconsulting/training to: ≠ Practice and develop presentation and classroom management skills ≠ Test new teaching techniques ≠ Update courses and develop new courses ≠ Extract practical application from theories and formulasConsulting and
2006-1141: DEVELOPING MODELS AND AN UNDERSTANDING OF THEIRLIMITATIONSRobert Throne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Robert D. Throne is currently an Associate Professor in the ECE department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He was in the EE department at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln for ten years prior to moving to Rose-Hulman. His interests are in control systems and the solution of inverse problems. Page 11.443.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Developing Models and Understanding Their LimitationsAbstract Students often do not appreciate the difference
Paper ID #22001Design, Development, and Testing of Load Cell AccelerometersDr. Dale H. Litwhiler, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus Dale H. Litwhiler is an Associate Professor at Penn State, Berks Campus in Reading, PA. He received his B.S. from Penn State University, M.S. from Syracuse University, and Ph.D. from Lehigh University all in electrical engineering. Prior to beginning his academic career, he worked with IBM Federal Systems and Lockheed Martin Commercial Space Systems as a hardware and software design engineer. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Design
Paper ID #11477Laboratory Development for Electrical Power / Machine Control CourseDr. Omonowo David Momoh, Indiana University Purdue University, Fort Wayne Omonowo (David) Momoh is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer, Electrical and Infor- mation Technology at Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne, Indiana. He received his PhD in Electrical Engineering from Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, Texas. He received the MSc and BSc in Electronics and Electrical Engineering from Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. He worked for SIEMENS Nigeria Limited as an Electrical Power Project
conducted beforeand after the lecture. The comparative results of the survey questionnaires indicate that theintegration of business development topic to the Project Management course has improvedstudents’ knowledge. Page 26.413.7 Even though technical and project related skills play important role during the start ofconstruction students’ careers, most construction executives emphasize the importance ofbusiness development skills in the long term. Due to limited contact hours businessdevelopment course is non-existent in the undergraduate curriculum
in another way, the ability to determine the appropriate use ofknowledge is just as important as employing the knowledge itself. The opportunity to introducea practical implementation of the Knowledge Landscape approach was the motivation forintroducing project-based learning at the University of Colorado. Page 11.441.6A PBL CourseThe development of a project-based learning course encompassing the concepts of knowledgelandscapes has moved through several iterations at the University of Colorado. Specifically,three previous small-scale PBL courses have set the stage for the current PBL structure andprovide the foundation for the curriculum
Paper ID #7624Designing, Developing and Implementing an Entrepreneurship ProgramDr. Monique Fuchs, Wentworth Institute of Technology Monique Fuchs is Associate Vice President, Innovation + Entrepreneurship for Wentworth Institute of Technology in Boston, where she oversees student development and the launch of an innovation and en- trepreneurship center. Dr. Fuchs has experience in the profit and non-profit sector, in international settings and in a variety of industries including Consulting Services, IT, Higher Education, Publishing, Engineer- ing, Biotechnology, and Architecture/Design. Dr. Fuchs is the author of
and earned her MS and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Duke University. Her research interests are focused on engineering education, curriculum and laboratory development, and applications of statistical signal processing.Dr. Wayne T. Padgett, Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyProf. Kathleen E. Wage, George Mason UniversityProf. John R. Buck, University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth Page 23.402.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013Developing Interactive Teaching Strategies for Electrical Engineering FacultyOverviewThe goal of this project is to develop a model
, allowing us to monitor student growth and evaluate the effectiveness ofthese teaching and learning devices for populations with different exposures to experimentaltreatments. Here we detail the development and implementation of the Professional DevelopmentSurvey for Engineering Undergraduates (PDS). The PDS reliably measures the students’conscientiousness, perceived intellect, learning goal orientation, performance goal orientation,subject matter attitude, professional development attitude, and attitude toward the field ofchemical engineering.Introduction Previously1,2, we introduced an approach to integrate a hierarchical mental growth model intoan undergraduate engineering curriculum, described teaching and learning strategies to supportthat
ofresearch, product development and technical education (Dooley, 1994). Universities arerequired to be more entrepreneurial and focused on innovation in order to adapt to thechanging needs of society (Trevor, 1994; Etzkowitz, 2001). In doing so, universities Page 9.453.1 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationhave adopted curriculums to support the development of entrepreneurial skills inengineering education (Jacoby, 2003).One way of developing entrepreneurial skills in students is to expose them to
Session 2464 Process Development for an Undergraduate Microchip Fabrication Facility† Christopher T. Timmons, David T. Gray, and Robert W. Hendricks Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityAbstractWe have built a microchip fabrication facility for teaching the elements of semiconductorprocessing to a multidisciplinary group of approximately 500 students per year from all areas ofengineering, science, and even the humanities. In order to meet our pedagogical objectives ofintroducing microchip fabrication to introductory students, we have developed a
Session 2606 “Developing an Inter-School Internet Design/Build Class" David L. Batie, Ph.D., Eric Connell, Ph.D. East Carolina University / University of OklahomaAbstractAt a time when the design and construction industries are aware of the increasing use of theDesign/Build project delivery strategy, there is little attention to its implementation in architecturalor construction management programs as a classroom experiment. East Carolina UniversityDepartment of Construction Management and the University of Oklahoma Department ofArchitecture began
Educating Future Software Professionals on Outsourced Software Development Kevin A. Gary, Gerald C. Gannod, Harry Koehnemann, M.Brian Blake Division of Computing Studies / Computer Science Department Arizona State University East / Georgetown University Mesa, AZ 85212 / Washington, D.C. 20057 {kgary|hek|gannod}@asu.edu / mb7@georgetown.edu1. IntroductionSoftware Development is undergoing a not-so-quiet outsourcing revolution. IT tasks, fromdocumentation to customer support to testing, have moved offshore. Development was considereduntouchable, in the realm of highly-skilled tasks that require development staffs to be
framework for conceptualization and reflection.Development and Implementation of SpireCAI provides the information architecture for Spire and works with academic units to designspecific features based on the unit’s requests. For example, other academic units are currentlyimplementing Spire primarily by integrating it into the curriculum; if students earn certain gradesin specific courses, they “level up” behind the scenes and students don’t necessarily interactdirectly with the platform. Michigan Engineering, however, wanted a different approach sostudents could also incorporate the skills they were gaining from co-curricular activities as wellas from courses, and the CAI software developers worked to address this need.Spire is still in development
their professional career. The fundamentals and theory of project Fall 2010 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, October 15-16, 2010, Villanova Universitymanagement is discussed in class, which can be applied in the lab sessions and in future projectwork. Some lecture sessions are reserved to explain the limitless opportunities available forengineers at Lehigh University. Programs such as Integrated Product Development (IPD),supporting entrepreneurship, and working with Fortune 500 companies in the Co-Op program,are only some things that make a Lehigh engineering education unique. Many lectures focus onthe programs of the engineering departments. Representatives from the seven departmentsprovide information on topics such as curriculum, salary
Developing Methods for Assessing (Diverse) Lifelong Learning Skills Shaina Slonim Dr. Richard Puerzer Hofstra University Fall 2006introduction Hofstra Engineering is ABET accredited. The main purpose of accreditation is to ensure thedepartment is meeting certain objectives or outcomes, which will help students to be successful engineerswhen they graduate. “Engineering education prepares students to affect the world of tomorrow, thusengineering education researchers must explore what the engineer of tomorrow will
, Satisfaction (ARCS) model of motivation to design an Internet-of-Thingsthemed curriculum for CS students in grades 9-12. The ARCS framework is used as aconceptual framework to unpack high school students’ motivational influences inengineering/computer science project-based learning via a series of focus groups. Using theinsights obtained from First and Second cycle coding based qualitative analysis, IoT-basedCS curricular modules that align with Grades 9-12 Computer Science Teachers Association(CSTA) standards were developed. The curricular design centered around creating learner-focused scaffolding in project-based learning environments, improving the relevance of theclassroom content with the real-world context that students have experiences in or
AC 2007-1341: INTEGRATING A MACHINE SHOP CLASS INTO THEMECHANICAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUM: EXPERIENTIAL ANDINDUCTIVE LEARNINGDavid Malicky, University of San Diego David M. Malicky is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of San Diego. His teaching interests are in design, manufacturing, and solid mechanics. His research interests include biomechanics and engineering education. He received a B.S. from Cornell University and a Ph.D. from the University of Michigan in Mechanical Engineering and an M.S. in Counseling Psychology from the University of Kansas.James Kohl, University of San Diego James G. Kohl is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the
Engineering Body ofKnowledge (SEBoK)2; and (2) a Graduate Reference Curriculum in Systems Engineering(GRCSE)3.Version 1.0 of GRCSE was published in December 2012. It was developed by an internationalauthor team with an explicit aim to provide a solid foundation for improving the consistency andrelevance of SE education around the world; of graduate education in particular. This paperdiscusses the efforts of the authors to make GRCSE a truly international product. Individualsections of this paper discuss the international participation in GRCSE development, a survey ofinternational SE programs, international educational models for SE education, and how thesefactors influenced the design of GRCSE. The paper concludes with the current state and
diverse student populations, as prior work has shown that low self-efficacyis often a contributor to attrition [5, 6].Within an undergraduate curriculum at a small, teaching-focused institution in the southeast, anintegrated student outcome thread focused on development of civil engineering design skills wasadopted and mapped by faculty across a series of 16 departmental courses. The design outcomethread encompasses instructional material from courses in 1) Introduction to Civil andEnvironmental Engineering, 2) Dynamics, 3) Geomatics Lab, 4) Highway Engineering, 5)Mechanics of Materials, 6) Hydrology and Hydraulics, 7) Asphalt and Concrete Laboratory, 8)Measurements, Analysis and Modeling of Civil Engineering Systems, 9) Reinforced ConcreteDesign
. While studies have shown that consistent mentoring is the most effective approach, it isnot always practical in the context of large classes or programs with a large number of students.Finally, there is also a growing need for engineers to have stronger communication skills andprofessional development skills. Mentoring programs can address this need, as mentoringprovides opportunities for mentors and mentees to develop non-technical abilities such astechnical writing and personal communication skills. However, few higher-education coursesintegrate mentoring, of any form, into the class curriculum. As such, students who do not make aconcerted effort to seek out mentoring may never receive its benefits.Project ObjectivesIn the following paper
courses to insertethical case studies. Because of this, ethics remains, in many cases, confined to external coursesor to senior design.What constitutes an ethical issue in engineering is typically defined loosely, by looking atprofessional codes of ethics and concomitant case studies. This paper presents an alternativeapproach based on an ethical framework developed at James Madison University as a part of anethics across the curriculum effort. The framework was used as a basis for work at an NSF-sponsored workshop on the future of STEM education by a small group of researchers. Duringthe workshop, the group focused on application of the framework to biology. After theworkshop, they re-visioned the outcome to apply to engineering and computer
integrated way throughout theengineering curriculum that prepares students for true multidisciplinary system, model-basedengineering prevalent in industry. The mechanical engineering curriculum is well suited for thisimplementation, as it is a broad engineering discipline. Furthermore, practical implementationcan be achieved because many mechanical engineering programs are separate departments withsome level of autonomy.Currently, the top two drivers in industry for improving the development processes are shorterproduct-development cycles and increased customer demand for higher performance. Asengineering systems are becoming ever more multidisciplinary and complex, undergraduateengineering curriculum must evolve in order to continue to meet these
the field will assist in defining the major for potential employers as well as current andpotential students across universities.There are many models available to guide engineering disciplines as they reshape their curricula.Morsi et al. [6] used concept mapping for curriculum development, specifically Electrical andComputer Engineering curricula. Models to evaluate the development and design ofinterdisciplinary curricula through the integration of learning modules gave students a real-worldapplication for learning outcomes [7]. There have been great strides in evaluating the curriculumof the Agricultural and Bio-based engineering programs, referred to in this work as BAengineering, as noted in recent works [2], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Lohani
activities and represent their chapter with pride. Whenstudents are allowed to travel at no personal expense there tends to be less motivation forfull participation in the activities.Relationship to the Engineering Curriculum, Profession and Departmental OutcomesHaving a successful student professional society provides many benefits to the departmentand student including: 1) exposure to the practice of engineering and the types of workand contributions they may make as an engineer, 2) creating contacts for summer and post-graduation employment, 3) providing avenues to learn about and exercise socialresponsibility, 4) exposure to the importance of life-long learning and licensure, 5)development of teamwork, communication, and leadership skills, and 6
Session 3232 Use of Senior Mini-Project for Electrical and Computer Engineering Curriculum Assessment Gary Dempsey, Brian Huggins, and Winfred Anakwa Bradley University, Department of Electrical & Computer EngineeringAbstractAlthough many mechanisms exist for engineering course assessments such as teacher/courseevaluations, homework and test results, and student office visits, developing new mechanisms forcurriculum assessment can be difficult to implement and analyze. This paper discusses the six-weekmini-project for senior students in the Electrical and Computer Engineering
Science. She serves as faculty supervisor for the Discovery initiative and is program co-director for the Igniting Youth Curiosity in STEM Program. Dawn was a 2017 Early Career Teaching Award recipient at U of T and was named the 2016 Wighton Fellow for excellence in development and teaching of laboratory-based courses in Canadian UG engineering programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018IBBME Discovery: Biomedical engineering-based iterative learning in a high school STEM curriculum (Evaluation)Davenport Huyer, L.1, Callaghan, N.I.1, Smieja, D.1*, Saab, R.1*, Effat, A. 1, Kilkenny, D.M.1Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto.*These
of a university professor and a graduate student mentor. Developed through a grantfunded by the NASA Curriculum Improvements Partnership Award for the Integration ofResearch (CIPAIR) program, the summer internship program integrates research with curriculumimprovements by providing the framework for students to use their research experiences todevelop instructional materials to improve the engineering curriculum. The paper highlights theresults of the research done by the mechanical engineering student group who helped develop anovel haptic apparatus and associated curriculum for teaching upper division mechanicalengineering laboratory courses in control systems, mechatronics, and haptics. Over the ten-weekprogram the group made significant
engagement with coding and robotics, and early childhood preservice teacher learning.Lynne M Pachnowski (Professor, Math Education)Brad Maguth (Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Think Tank to Shark Tank: Engineer to Entrepreneur https://uakron.edu/education/think-tank/Grade Level: middle school studentsTime Frame: 10 modules each is an hour to 75 minutesA week-long summer camp to engage middle-level learners (gr. 6-9) in engineering and entrepreneurshipinspired our development of this problem-based learning curriculum, Think Tank to Shark Tank: Engineer toEntrepreneur. In the curriculum