. ENG6 is a required lower division course that teaches basic programmingconcepts to electrical, biomedical, mechanical, aeronautical, and civil engineering students.Because computer science and computer engineering students are not required to take thiscourse, most students have little familiarity with programming. Some are also not motivated tomaster programming concepts, since they view software design as being outside the corecompetencies required for their chosen disciplines. Increasing student engagement was anothermotivation for developing the new curriculum, including the creation of hardware-basedexercises and projects described in the sections below.The course utilizes MATLAB programming exercises and projects to teach engineering
Paper ID #22222Stephanie Lezotte, Rowan University Stephanie is a Ph.D. student studying postsecondary and higher education. She is interested in systems and structures that contribute to the oppression and symbolic violence of minoritized and underrepresented students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Revolutionizing Engineering DiversityAbstractThe Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) Department at Rowan University is currentlyparticipating in the National Science Foundation’s Revolutionizing Engineering and computerscience Departments (RED). RED is a program that seeks to improve the undergraduateengineering curriculum to graduate engineering and computer science students that
several papers on engineering education and the unique undergraduate curriculum at Rowan University, especially the Engineering Clinics. She has been involved in various outreach activities to recruit more women and minorities into engineering and is Program Chair Elect of the Women in Engineering Division of ASEE. She is the recipient of the 2011 New Jersey Section of ASCE Educator of the Year award as well as the 2013 Distinguished Engineering Award from the New Jersey Alliance for Action. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #26105Dr. Ralph Alan Dusseau P.E., Rowan University
AC 2011-182: EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES AND OUTCOMES FOR TECH-NOLOGICAL LITERACY PROGRAMS AT COLLEGE LEVELRobert J. Gustafson, Ohio State University Robert J. Gustafson, P.E., PhD Honda Professor for Engineering Education and Director of the Engineer- ing Education Innovation Center Professor of Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering College of Engineering The Ohio State University.John Krupczak, Hope College Professor of Engineering, Hope College, Holland, MI USAJames F. Young, Rice University, Electrical & Computer Engineering, Houston, TX James F. Young received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from the Massachusetts In- stitute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, in 1965 and 1966
Paper ID #10276Measurement and Automation: Experiential Learning OpportunityDr. John W. Dyer, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma John Dyer received a B.S. in Physiology from Oklahoma State University, and the B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Oklahoma. His main research interests are in instru- mentation, data acquisition, and signal processing of the acquired data. Dr. Dyer applies these interests largely in the area of aviation and navigation, though he has applied his work in areas such as Cardiac Electrophysiology research and gas-fracture
Paper ID #19098Investigating Teacher’s Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in aCAD-enabled Learning EnvironmentDr. Chandan Dasgupta, Department of Computer and Information Technology, Purdue University, WestLafayette Dr. Dasgupta is a Postdoctoral research fellow at Purdue University. He has a PhD in Learning Sci- ences from the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) and MS in Human-Computer Interaction from Georgia Tech. His dissertation work focused on scaffolding students’ productive disciplinary engage- ment in engineering design activities using suboptimal models. His research interests include the use of
responsibility of the authors and does notnecessarily represent the official views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC. & AmericanAssociation for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC. (1995). Project 2061.Benchmarks for Science Literacy A Tool for Curriculum Reform. [S.l.] : Distributed by ERICClearinghouse[2] Project Rhea Website, www.projectrhea.org[3] Haddad, Andrew W., and Mireille Boutin. "Rhea: a student-driven tool for enhancing theeducational experience." Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 26.1 (2010): 59-66.[4] M. Boutin and J. Lax, "Engaging graduate students through online lecture creation," 2015IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), El
contributing to several STEM K-12 outreach initiatives, and to the NSF-ADVANCE initiative at Michigan Technological University. Dr. Oliveira is a member of the IEEE Photonics Society, the IEEE Women in Engineering Society, and the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE).Ivan T. Lima Jr., Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Dakota State University Dr. Ivan T. Lima, Jr., received the B.Sc. degree in Electrical Engineering from the Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, Brazil, in 1995, the M.Sc. degree in Electrical Engineering from the State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil, in 1998, and the Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering in the field of photonics from the
in the undergraduate curriculum through twoclasses: Mathematical Methods in Mechanical Engineering, and Heat Transfer. In the mathmethods class, numerical algorithms are introduced. In heat transfer class, students arerequired to develop a computer program to model two-dimensional heat conduction. Parallelcomputing concepts are introduced. As a result of this teaching effort, the summer interns of2002 and 2003 at ORNL are able to extend the heat transfer computing project to conductparallel computation for three-dimensional heat conduction.The RAMS student research projects cover a wide range of leading edge computationalscience and engineering applications involving chemistry, computer science, engineering anddecision making. As an evidence
AC 2011-2080: ENGAGING STUDENTS IN STEM EDUCATION THROUGHA VIRTUAL LEARNING LABStephanie Elizabeth August, Loyola Marymount University Stephanie August is an Associate Professor and Director of Graduate Studies in the Department of Elec- trical Engineering and Computer Science at Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles. She teaches courses in artificial intelligence, database management systems, and software engineering. Her research interests include cognitive science applications of artificial intelligence including interdisciplinary new media applications, natural language understanding, argumentation, and analogical reasoning. She has several publications in these areas. Dr. August is actively involved in the
design courses, with a strong focus on creating and enabling multidisciplinary educational experiences.Sarvagya Vaish, Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. David W. Rosen, Georgia Institute of Technology Page 24.478.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Enabling Institute-wide Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design ExperiencesAbstractThe final culminating Capstone Design course provides students the opportunity to work in teams and apply theirknowledge to design, build and test prototypes for solving real-world
Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Temple University specializing in electrical machines and power systems, multimedia tutoring, and control and optimization of dynamic systems. He has been the principle investigator of a project for the development of an intelligent tutoring shell that allows instructors create their own web-based tutoring system. His current research focuses on security of cyber-physical systems based on multiagent framework with applications to the power grid, and the integration of an intelligent virtual laboratory environment in curriculum. He is an associate editor of Dynamics of Continuous, Discrete and Impulsive Systems: Series B, and is a member of IEEE, ASEE, and Sigma Xi
AC 2010-906: SOFTWARE ENGINEERING: WHERE DO CURRICULA STANDTODAY?Susan Conry, Clarkson University Page 15.1071.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Software Engineering: Where Do Curricula Stand Today? ABSTRACTDespite the fact that it has been over a decade since the first university in the United Statesoffered a bachelor’s degree in software engineering, opinions still differ as to whether thesoftware engineering discipline is a distinct engineering discipline or whether it is more properlyregarded as a sub-discipline of computer science. Software engineering curricula and anidentifiable body of knowledge for the
% 225,000 Table 1. Predictions of Job Growth Issued by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Spring 2004.In 1997-99, the Working Group on Software Engineering Education and Training (WGSEET)developed the Guidelines for Software Engineering Education1, which subsequently became thede facto source for undergraduate software engineering curriculum models for the next severalyears. The Guidelines have recently been supplanted by Computing Curricula-SoftwareEngineering (CCSE) 20046, a more comprehensive joint project of the IEEE Computer Societyand the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), the primary computing professionalsocieties in the United States. The CCSE contains SEEK (Software Engineering EducationKnowledge), which specifies what knowledge
students. But if an alternative definition is considered,such as “computer solution of engineering problems,” the subject becomes much moreappropriate for an ET curriculum.In recent years, the personal computer has become as ubiquitous as the television. Today’sstudents are completely at ease using a computer for everything from researching a term paper tosynching data from their PDA to creating CAD drawings. Using the computer to solveengineering problems is not just an easy concept for today’s students to grasp; it’s anexpectation.Concurrent with the rise of the personal computer, and its unprecedented computing power, isthe proliferation of software tools available for solving engineering problems. Today, there arenumerous commercial packages
manual for new participants at the recycling center. Themanual provided a basic curriculum, a process, and a test for skills. Participants could not get afree computer without showing progress in these skills and attending a minimum number ofsessions. Several of the “graduates” of the program have obtained employment because of theskills they developed in the program.Most of the computers and monitors given to the recycling project came from local businesses.Workshop participants were taught to evaluate the donated computers for function andcompatibility with current software. If a unit could not be refurbished, parts such as circuitboards were removed for reuse or sale. Most of the recycled computers are given to workshopparticipants, parochial
available and can be interfaced with most microcontrollers without many extracomponents. TV remote controls using RC5 standard code can be used with such modules. Thepresent paper discusses the controlling of a robot using a computer through typical T.V. remotecontrol protocol, which transmits different data for different keys that are in the RC5 codestandard. One prominent application of this type of robot is for short distance control in areaswhere human entry is restricted.IntroductionControlling a robot with typical TV remote control is an invaluable tool in teaching manyconcepts in the design, fabrication, and control logic of an electromechanical system.Preliminary Infrared pulses from computer using the Infrared remote control RC5 protocol
Scientific and Engineering Computing Table 2. Application Domain Areas of Other ABET-accredited schools.3.2.1 Domain Track Criteria The Clarkson University curriculum at http://www.clarkson.edu/ece/handbook/software.htmldoes not list a specific application domain; however, each major is required to take severalelectrical and computer engineering courses, enough to count as a domain area. Page 11.1325.5 Florida Tech’s SE program at http://www.fit.edu/catalog/documents/2006_2007catalog.pdfdoes not list a specific application domain track. It therefore appears that the two-term seniorproject is involved in determining the domain area, or
computing curricula in a varietyof ways. Authors have written about integrating software testing throughout their curriculum andusing software development methods such as Extreme Programming2, 3, 4. Papers have beenwritten on how some software engineering techniques, such as pair programming, can helpincrease retention, particularly of female students7, 8.This paper suggests that other software engineering practices can be used to help increase thesuccess rates in lower division courses, which should translate into increased retention rates. Inparticular, use of detailed work plans and periodically monitored time logs and version controlcheck-ins is examined. The underlying assumption is that students need to be encouraged to startprograms early
. Only after all of them are verified and satisfied, should a physical suspensionsystem then be manufactured in a CAM environment.Two avenues exist to bridge design and manufacturing via VP curriculum development. The firstalternative would be an independent course in Computational Multibody Dynamics (CMD) orApplied Multibody Dynamics to fill the gap between design and manufacturing. The otherintegrates VP directly into a CAD/CAM course and treats VP as an independent section afterdiscussion of assembly modeling and before geometric dimension & tolerance (GD&T) andcomputer numerical control (CNC) programming. The first way will provide much deeper andbroader discussion of the principles of CMD and related software applications and also
Bringing Cellular Phone Software Industry Practices To The Software Development Classroom David A. Umphress, James H. Cross II, Larry A. Barowski Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering Auburn University, Alabama USA 368490. AbstractUniversity computer science and software engineering curricula are oriented to conventionalhardware platforms. This presents an obstacle to teaching students how to develop software formobile devices. Industry certification practices provide an insight into what is important inteaching software development for a particular class of mobile devices, cellular phones.Adapting such practices to classroom use can
) and aerospace engineersdesign aircraft, incorporating numerous embedded computers (e.g., 1280 in the Boeing 777).Finally, it is common practice for engineers to use computers to diagnose system problems.Hence, it seems obvious that engineers are required to either understand how they use computers(hardware and software) as part of their day-to-day operation, or be able to understand andinteract with the people who do. This is also true for the software engineers who must work withother engineers, and therefore they need to understand their application domain. Therefore,having software engineering as part of the college of engineering, will flourish this culture fromthe very beginning. This culture can thrive through curriculum development and
Paper ID #21549A Deep Learning Graphical User Interface Application on MATLABDr. Aditya Akundi, University of Texas, El Paso Aditya Akundi is currently affiliated to Industrial Manufacturing and Systems Engineering department, and Research Institute for Manufacturing and Engineering Systems at University of Texas, ElPaso. He earned a Bachelor of Technology in Electronics and Communication Engineering from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, India. He earned a Master of Science in Electrical and Computer En- gineering at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP). Intrigued by Systems Engineering , he earned a Ph.D
sectionswould rotate. This method allowed three class sections to be taught concurrently. This also mosteffectively used the three specialized classrooms that were needed. A technology classroom wasneeded for the computer tools topics. A drafting classroom was needed for the drawing topicsand a laboratory classroom was needed for the design topics. It was decided to change to oneinstructor per section due to the changes in the curriculum for the Bachelor of Science degree inElectro-Mechanical Engineering Technology (EMET), an objective of the faculty to make arelevant introduction to engineering technology, and the blending the engineering technologystudent into the same program,.. It was necessary to adjust both the engineering topics and
Table 2 indicate the stage of the study when the courses should be taken.The curriculum of Biomedical Engineering, particularly at the stages A and B, combines trainingin mathematics and physics with training in engineering, mainly in electronics, measurementtechniques and computer engineering. It guarantees general education, with emphasis onhypothesis formulation and testing, as well as on computational approaches to data acquisition,analysis and interpretation.The curriculum requirements are formulated using the concept of subject classes. For each subjectclass the minimum number of credit hours is specified. In some subject classes compulsorycourses are also required
Session 1450 Education at the Seams: Preliminary Evaluation of Teaching Integration as a Key to Education in Information Technology Joseph J. Ekstrom, Barry Lunt, C. Richard Helps Brigham Young UniversityAbstractInformation Technology (IT) is widely considered to be an integrative discipline. Manyfour-year IT programs accept programming, networking, web systems, databases andhuman-computer interaction as core topics in IT. Active discussion continues as to thebest way to teach and sequence these topics. We have proposed and begun to implementa curriculum that reflects a
students in the Structural Analysisand Design courses has been consistently high (94%+). Analysis of student exit interview resultsindicate that integration of class/labs, extensive use of computers, and assignment of realengineering problems, are the main reasons for student success.Engineering Technology Bachelor of Science ProgramThis program covers the design of structures, bridges, buildings, towers, and offshore platformsand in general what is called civil structures. However, the program is not civil engineeringbecause that field is considered broader. All aspects related to structural design are part of theprogram, including soil mechanics, foundation design, and GIS-GPS surveying. The TechnologyAccreditation Commission of the Associated
as arequired course for the MET curriculum. The main emphases of the course are placed on bothteaching the students the basic theory, as well as, to use a commercially available FEA package.The course objectives have been established as follows:• To understand the purposes and uses of the finite element analysis in industry.• To learn the basic concepts and procedures associated with finite element analysis.• To gain hands-on experience with a commercially available finite element analysis package.• Apply the techniques and skills taught to related problems in follow-on courses.This paper describes the changes and results of the Applied Finite Element Analysis courseoffered by the Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Technology
am working as a Lecturer in the department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville since 2016. I graduated from Texas A&M University-Kingsville with a Master’s in Mechanical Engineering in 2016. I am currently pursing PhD in Engineering as a part time student while working as a lecturer.Dr. David Hicks, Texas A&M University - Kingsville David Hicks is an Associate Professor in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. Before joining TAMU-K he served as Associate Professor and De- partment Head at Aalborg University in Esbjerg, Denmark. He has also held positions in research labs in the U.S. as well as Europe
process is presented.For example, Vasilius integrates a large number of independent sensors such as stereoscopicvision to incorporate short-range reaction as well as long-range planning. In addition, the GRVuses two computers in a decentralized control scheme.Secondly, the paper reports the performance of Vasilius, relating theoretical predictions to actualbehavior. Performance measures include object avoidance, lane following, waypoint accuracy,follow-the-leader, ramp climbing, turn reaction time, battery life, stop reaction time, behavior indead-ends and traps, pothole avoidance, and safety. Finally, the paper discusses current on-goingresearch topics with Vasilius, including the incorporation of Kalman Filtering, mapping, andlearning. The