infrastructure such as research facility, research faculty and supportstaff, ensuring student participation and support, and engaging undergraduate students intofaculty research projects. We will discuss in detail the development of research infrastructure inSection 3, and describe how we involve students into faculty research projects in Section 4.Student participants of the geophysical research training program are generally recruited throughthe on-campus advertisements by the Talent-21 Program and personal invitations by researchfaculty involved with the research training program. Financial support for students to participatein our research training program is primarily provided by the TALENT-21 project. However,besides the TALENT-21 project, several
Fall. These cohorts engaged for 8 to10 weeks and were facilitated by faculty or professionals with advanced degrees and were keptsmall (3-5 students per group) to allow for the development of meaningful relationships betweenmentors and mentees.The groups were created and matched to a mentor based on topic preference, time zone, andavailability for meetings. Each group focused on a different topic. These topics were offered as aguideline for group discussions, but often added other topics based on the specific needs andchallenges of mentees. The topics have evolved over each cohort iteration. New topics have beenadded based on the recommendations of participants.The program included training for mentors, a kick-off meeting, a mid-program check
questions • Learners evaluate their explanations in light of alternative explanations, particularly reflecting scientific understanding • Learners communicate and justify their proposed explanations. Research also suggests that the quality of the teaching workforce is the single mostimportant factor in predicting student achievement.15 Robert Marzano has conducted anextensive review of the research studies involving factors that impact student achievement andconducted meta-analyses of those studies to determine the effect size of the factors on studentachievement16. He describes three types of factors that impact student achievement: school-level factors, student-level factors and teacher-level factors. What factors can SWEPT/RETs
intersectionality of multiple identity dimensions. Her research interests include diversity and inclusion in STEM, intersectionality, teamwork and communication skills, assessment, and identity construction. Her teaching philosophy focuses on student centered approaches such as culturally relevant pedagogy. Dr. Cross’ complimentary professional activities promote inclusive excellence through collaboration.Dr. Allyson Jo Barlow, University of Nevada Reno Ally Barlow graduated with her Doctoral Degree in Civil Engineering from Oregon State University, where she fused her technical background with her passion for education; her doctoral research focused on the exploration of student engagement from multiple methodological
education strategies as well as the technologies to support the 21st century classroom (online and face to face). He also has assisted both the campus as well as the local community in developing technology programs that highlight student skills development in ways that engage and attract individuals towards STEAM and STEM fields by showcasing how those skills impact the current project in real-world ways that people can understand and be involved in. As part of a university that is focused on supporting the 21st century student demographic he continues to innovate and research on how we can design new methods of learning to educate both our students and communities on how STEM and STEAM make up a large part of that
interestsand opportunities among the three partners, how the workshop was designed and why, somedetails about the workshop’s impact, and future work.Lesson: Be humble; assemble a team to cover the required expertise.The origins of this workshop effort trace back to an initiative in the College of Engineeringfocused on student mental health. Among the college’s projects under this initiative were trainingworkshops for various key audiences, including engineering faculty, advising staff, and graduatestudents (for their work as TAs). With workshop topics including such complex and sensitiveones as suicide, the college staff person who was charged with the mental health initiativerecognized the need to bring in expertise from the counseling center. The
understand the impact of these engagement activities. What is notcaptured in these results, but was clear from observing and simply being in the space alongsidethe students, is that these events formed the basis of establishing a community of students,engineers, and makers which the authors believe is essential to contributing to the field ofengineering, but more importantly, feeling connected on a human level.ConclusionsThis methodology and findings are unique and exciting to support not only how engineersunderstand sense of belonging in makerspaces; but also what actions can support sense ofbelonging for students, especially those from marginalized populations. This researchcompliments current research examining student sense of belonging, but
the discourse within the research proposals shows what thegraduate students identify to be the values and impacts of their discipline, and how they envisiontheir future graduate work fitting into the ideals. Rather than seeking to “define” each discipline,this research provides insight into the trends in emphasis which different disciplines inengineering across the U.S. place on various indicators of merit or impact. Findings related to thedistribution of disciplinary values may provide engineering educators more insight on how tobest “match” student engineering ideologies with an appropriate discipline.I. IntroductionThe National Science Foundation (NSF) supports the annual Graduate Research FellowshipProgram (GRFP), which awards
fundamental to the quality of any curriculum. Current empirically-based education theory is essential to effective instruction and thus to the improvement of curricular quality. 4. A rational sequence. Educational activities should be carefully ordered in a developmental sequence to form a coherent curriculum based on the stated, intended outcomes of both the curriculum and its constituent courses.With these principles in mind, we describe the process by which a curricular framework for theMcBride Public Affairs minor for engineering students has been developed. As shown in Table1, this framework is the outcome of more than a year of activities involving all relevantconstituencies within the McBride community, including current
functional modelin the correct fashion. In the end, this will help those users to develop more completeideas for themselves and also to communicate those ideas to other designers andengineers as effectively and efficiently as possible.This experiment is one of several other experiments that will be performed in the pursuitof determining the total usefulness of the component functional templates. These otherexperiments will implement the templates in different settings and scenarios to includeother student levels and knowledge bases (both higher and lower from this experiment),and also industrial applications for practicing engineers. Some of these will attempt tomodel more complex systems than those considered here in order to engage the templatesat
these results might prompt new thinking about undergraduateengineering education and environmental work. We consider how our findings can informteaching and learning for effective early career practice and future leadership. We proposeleadership modules in environmental engineering curricula that focus on not only the urgentenvironmental problem space, but gender and racial equality in the people space surrounding it.1.0 IntroductionUnderstanding the school-to-work pathways of engineering students—intentions and plans priorto graduation, destinations and experiences after graduation—is a critical component ofintegrated, effective educational practice. Educational settings are not isolated entities in whichlearning communities intuit relevance
number ofstudent postings and the threaded nature of the discussion forum some students found itdifficult to interact with all the points raised and to sustain dialogue within a thread. Theseproblems with online dialogue have also been found in other studies. The instructionaltechnique described has been effective in allowing students to develop knowledge ofcontemporary issues and appreciate the impacts of engineering solutions.IntroductionIncreasingly, social controversy is becoming one of the basic ingredients of technologydevelopment1. Social debate about technologies used for energy production, transport,biotechnology and lifestyle are widespread. Within these contexts the engineering designprocess can be complex, multi-dimensional, ill
study concerning the engagement of studentsin engineering courses at Tuskegee University, which is a historically black college/university(HBCU). While student retention is a challenge in many STEM programs, it is a very criticalconcern in HBCUs. Lack of engagement of students in classrooms is identified as one of thecontributing factors to the high drop out rates in engineering programs. The study described inthis paper is a first step in an effort to introduce the brain-based learning techniques inengineering classrooms. The instructors of mechanical engineering courses are systematicallyintroducing pre-developed tools, referred to as “PROTOCOLs”, to deliver their course materialsin the classrooms. This paper presents the findings from the
, and operational procedures and industrialprocesses. The renewable/alternative energy programs address the design and installation ofsystems such as solar photovoltaic, solar thermal, wind turbine and biofuels. Each of theseprograms has nationally recognized certifying bodies. Each of these programs requires alaboratory for support of required student activities.A community college energy efficiency program addresses a building’s envelope. A course ofstudy including heat transfer, thermal barrier, air barrier, insulating materials and theirinstallation, performance ratings on windows and doors, weather files, and simulation softwareare but a few the topics included. As the design and operation of mechanical systems ofbuildings, heating, air
for their programare currently offered in the nation and particularly in the objectives, structure and impact.state of Texas, and to reflect on their core learning Purdue University Northwest has offered a Master ofobjectives, structure, demand, demographics, and impact. Science in Technology since 2008 [1]. The program hasThe trends identified were discussed in light of assembling sub-disciplines including Mechanical Engineeringa Master of Science in Engineering Technology (MSET) Technology as an option for students. In a study reviewingdegree with a concentration in Manufacturing and the strengths of the program, Zahraee and Latif [2] notedMechanical Engineering Technology (MMET) within the
Paper ID #38118WIP: Impact of Role-Playing Simulation for a Design forManufacturing CourseAllen R. White (Associate Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com WIP: Impact of Role-Playing Simulation for a Design for Manufacturing Course Allen R. White and Jay P. McCormack Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Terre Haute, IndianaAbstractRole-playing has been used in psychology, history, nursing, language instruction, andother areas to increase student engagement and improve learning outcomes. Here itis
computers and smaller slate hand-held devices (e.g., Tablet PCs, iPads, HPSlate 500s), a form of instructional technology, and their impact on innovative thinking skillshave been relatively unexamined. Previous studies provide a framework to examine how instructor-led use of slate enabledtechnology might impact students’ innovative thinking skills6. Structured use of instructionaltechnology is when the instructor has embedded specific strategies into their lectures or teachingsuch as short lectures following by practice sessions using similar forms of technology7,collaboration sessions within the lecture format where students communicate with one anotherusing similar forms of technology8, case studies8, or use of software within the course8
by the commonvalues of academic success, civic engagement, intellectual curiosity, and the pursuit of lifelonglearning.Students from all cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds interested in a RC community mustcomplete an additional step in their application to University Housing. Application to participatein a RC community does not guarantee admission. Students must submit (1) a resume outliningpast work experience, volunteer and extra-curricular activities, and (2) an essay explaining theirinterest and commitment to the RC program. Academic record is not a consideration in theresident selections process, so there is no bias toward students with the highest academicpotential. The ERC admission process also does not specifically focus on at
purpose of this work-in-progress is to describe the The Art of Telling Your Story course andits impact on our students’ self-concept clarity. We see this as a first step towards developing acourse that will help students see themselves as engineers who create value for others, or, thosewho are entrepreneurially minded.Our Signature SDL CourseGiven the above body of research literature, we postulated that engineering students, most ofwhom are emerging adults and actively engaged in exploring their multiple identities, couldbenefit from an opportunity to remember, explore the meaning of, and tell the stories of keyevents in their lives to a supportive audience of peers and teachers. This was the inspirationbehind our creating of the new third-year
feelings of usefulness (Bean et al., 2014;Dorfman, 2009; Haines & Popovich, 2014; Skeff et al., 2007). The Benefits of Being a Mentor conceptual framework (Ragins & Scandura, 1999)proved to be a useful tool for organizing and communicating ideas about the benefits mentorsshared on participating in the IMPACT program. The themes connected well with three of thefactors included in the conceptual framework: rewarding experience, improved job performance,and generativity. All of the mentors experienced the advantage of engaging in a rewardingexperience, which provided a sense of fulfillment in retirement, as well as an opportunity toinfluence the next generation of engineering professors. Improved job experience was capturedin the ways
provide students an opportunity to improve in a variety of areas,including multidisciplinary teamwork, communication and global perspective, by working onvirtual teams to design assistive technology for disabled clients in a pre-capstone experience.We believe our approach is different when compared to other design programs forunderprivileged clients because of our use of virtual teams and our collaboration between twosmall engineering programs at liberal arts institutions. Page 24.873.2Engineers in industry routinely work on teams where members are at different geographiclocations that meet and collaborate electronically. These virtual team members
us understand which, if any, antecedents and impacts areunique to engineers. The small body of literature addressing engineers’ happiness, specifically,presents opportunities for further empirical studies, especially on engineers in the workplace (asopposed to students studying engineering), in different fields of engineering, and among differentdemographic groups of engineers. Finally, further research could be done to define anddistinguish between terms such as “happiness,” “engagement,” “satisfaction,” and “experience”in the engineering field, as well as more broadly. References[1] El-Sharkawy, S. A., Nafea, M. S., & Hassan, E. E. D. H. (2023). HRM and organizational learning in knowledge
for Engineering Education, 2021 It’s All About Engagement: Infusing the Mobile Studio Approach Throughout the Electrical Engineering CurriculumAbstractAn ongoing trend in electrical engineering programs is the adoption of mobile studio pedagogy,which champions small, portable, low-cost hardware/software systems in support ofstudent-centric educational activities. Engineering education literature on mobile studio usage hasfocused on the implementation of a mobile studio platform either in a single isolated course orseveral courses within a sequence. This work proposes infusing a hands-on mobile studioapproach throughout the electrical engineering curriculum, providing cohesive experientiallearning for students throughout
ups; ≠ knowledge and skills in the fundamentals of engineering practice; ≠ knowledge of selected professional-level skills commensurate with students’ future field and/or area of specialization; ≠ a strong oral and written communication skills; ≠ a focus on design issues involving life–cycle economics, environmental impact, sustainable development maintainability, applicable standards and ad hoc concerns; ≠ an awareness of business practices in the Region and elsewhere; ≠ an understanding of nontechnical forces that affect engineering decision-making; ≠ a perception of social, ethical, and political responsibilities; ≠ an awareness of the evolution of human civilization in general, with an emphasis on
. This paper explores the development ofprofessional and leadership skills in the context of a service learning project and its impact onfirst-year women enrolled in engineering.Professional SkillsA survey of professionals, academics, and students found that engineering education failed todevelop the skills and attributes of engineers desired by industry1. Many engineering programsoffer a strong emphasis on technical competence but poor training in non-technical attributes.Thus, engineering students often graduate weak in essential skills such as communication, Page 25.878.2management, leadership, decision-making, and teamwork1,5. Instead, these
rate, therefore identifying the factors which have an impact on their suc-cess can play a large role in properly supporting these students. Although a significant amount ofresearch has been conducted in identifying these factors for the Latinx community, more researchneeds to be done for black and LGBTQ+ students. Some of the factors that have been found tohave a direct impact on student success include: • Number of credits earned by the student before transferring [12], [14], [29]: The more credits a student can transfer, the more likely they are to persist. • GPA at the community college (CC): Much literature discusses the impact known as “transfer shock” where students have a sudden and temporary drop in grades upon
identified ranged widely: paper usage oncampus printers, power usage in classrooms, disposal of food wasted from the universitycafeteria, and so on. Students proposed their solutions to a variety of audiences, such as campusadministration, physical plant staff, students, alumni, and community members. This helpedstudents see that their technical work had real world constituencies that should be addressed. Inaddition, students were able to use campus resources and expertise in their projects, connectingwith offices such as facilities and campus management, with whom they would not normallyhave contact. Students presented the final projects to the campus at large in a public postersession, thereby allowing them to see how their work impacted the
Paper ID #26823Deep Observation: Geo-spatial Mapping as a Strategy for Site Engagementand Problem DesignDr. Jessie Marshall Zarazaga, SMU Lyle School of Engineering Jessie Zarazaga teaches GIS and Sustainability and Development in the Lyle School of Engineering at SMU. Working across the boundaries of urbanism, landscape mapping, infrastructure design and public engagement, Zarazaga explores ways to connect culture and community to place. Using GIS and partici- patory community mapping, she explores the impact of civil and environmental choices on the design of the sustainable city. Trained in architecture and urban design
confidence about pursuing computing careers? 3) What impact does it have on students to interact with the development community of an HFOSS project?A key difference in the method of this paper is that it focuses on reflective writing of thestudents. Earlier work relied on structured surveys with Likert scale items and someopportunity for student comment on selected topics. The approach for this investigationwas to collect student thinking without the prompting on particular aspects of expectedlearning and see what topics emerged naturally from the students’ reflections.In the sections that follow, each of the courses is summarized including an overview of thecourse, description of the student project, summary of results of student
Computer Science (p. 26.756.1-26.756.20). ASEE Conferences. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.24093Camargo, E., Wood, A., & Layne, M. (2015). The Impact of Work/Life Balance Policies on Faculty Careers (p. 26.1550.1-26.1550.10). ASEE Conferences. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.24887Castillo, K., Cabrera-Rios, M., Persans, M., & DeYoe, H. (2016). Engaging Minority Students in Sustainable Bioenergy and Water Quality through an Education and Research Network. ASEE Conferences. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.26966Cech, E. (2015). LGBT Professionals’ Workplace Experiences in STEM-Related Federal Agencies (p. 26.1094.1-26.1094.10). ASEE Conferences. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.24431Celis, S., & Huang-Saad, A