engineers must attain. Therefore, as students initiallyenter into an engineering discipline based purely on topical interest or skill (e.g., are good inmath and science), they may begin to internalize the values and practices of that discipline. Forthis reason, affinity identities may be useful in exploring the initiation and early developmentalstages of students’ professional identities in contexts such as high school education.Partaking and actively engaging in disciplinary discourse also serves as a powerful tool forenacting a disciplinary identity and communicating affinity [30, 41, 42]. As students advancethroughout their undergraduate career and the ASCE BOK, they begin to learn about the varietyof topics valued by the civil engineering
approaches are becoming more widespread in useacross engineering programs and curricula, it is particularly important to understand the impactthat such approaches have on students’ motivation. As part of a larger mixed methods study, thispaper focuses on the critical element of team facilitation. Specifically, we examine how studentsperceive the role of facilitators and how these perceptions influence student motivation.Grounded in the MUSIC Model of Academic Motivation, we present findings from interviewsconducted with first-year engineering students at two different research sites. State U1participants are engaged in a well-established PBL-based course. State U2 participants areengaged in a course that uses a project-based approach to integrate
three separate universities on asingle campus in the Fall 2024 semester. It is a team-based, project-based course that is co-taught bya faculty member from engineering, from health science, and from psychology. This course is uniquein its ability to challenge and broaden the students’ perspectives by integrating all three disciplinesinto one unified design framework. The overarching goal of the course was to explicitly address twoincreasingly important issues in undergraduate engineering education: 1) understanding the impact ofengineering on society and enabling a balance between design requirements and societal wellness, and2) communicating effectively with constituents and stakeholders across diverse disciplines andbackgrounds.Development of
education and a culture of entrepreneurship within engineeringeducation and university involvement in technology commercialization both lead to moreopportunities for doctoral students in engineering to be entrepreneurial during their studies. Thispaper explores the experience of two doctoral engineering students who co-founded a companybased, in part, on their research. The case for entrepreneurship within engineering education andthe trends in university technology commercialization have been developed in the literature andprovide the perspective for examining the experiences of these two students. University assets,community connections, an NCIIA E-team grant, courses and competitions were all connected insupport of entrepreneurship education and
to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors. 3. an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference 4. an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts. 5. an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership
education, and the workforce; how data is used from assessments to inform decision- making; and the application of assessment or evaluation methods to solve educational problems.Dr. Stephanie Marie Kusano, University of Michigan Stephanie Kusano is an assessment and evaluation postdoctoral research associate at the Center for Re- search on Learning and Teaching at University of Michigan. She has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education, M.S. in Biomedical Engineering, and B.S. in Mechanical Engineering, all from Virginia Tech. Her re- search interests include engaged learning and high impact practices, assessment, and design education. Her teaching experience has primarily been with first-year engineering.Ms. Xingya Xu, George Mason
seekto not only provide students with the skills that support interdisciplinary collaboration, but alsothose that help students develop professional identities that incorporate interdisciplinary work.As students engage with others in an interdisciplinary research education community, they learnand negotiate professional norms, idealized images of professions, and the professionalrecognition of significant others [11][12][13] that impact their abilities to see themselves asinterdisciplinary scholars. These negotiations can help their sense of belonging within aninterdisciplinary professional community [14][15]. That said, because of the disciplinary natureof universities, interdisciplinary students are likely to have a clearer picture of how to
Three Rivers Community College.Dr. Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington Elizabeth Litzler, Ph.D., is the director of the University of Washington Center for Evaluation and Re- search for STEM Equity (UW CERSE) and an affiliate assistant professor of sociology. She has been at UW working on STEM Equity issues for more than 19 years. Dr. Litzler is a member of ASEE, 2020-2021 chair of the ASEE Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and a former board member of the Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN). Her research interests include the educational cli- mate for students, faculty, and staff in science and engineering, assets based approaches to STEM equity, and gender and race
educational videos in their learning process? o Anticipated Result: We anticipate that qualitative analysis of student reflections and interviews will reveal predominantly positive perceptions regarding the effectiveness of creating and engaging with peer-generated content, highlighting benefits such as enhanced understanding, improved communication skills, and a deeper sense of contribution to their learning community.Future WorkThis work-in-progress research coincides with the growing body of literature on student-centeredlearning and engineering retention strategies. While collaborative learning is an establishedpedagogical approach, this study dives into the impact of a specific
that have been traditionally forgotten by academia but will have a high impact in the students professional careers, such as regulatory issues, aspects of technical writing, ethics, and interactions with other professionals among others (Elder et al. 1996).At the end of the Guest Lecture Program the students at the Wilkes-Barre Campus were asked toanonymously respond to a survey regarding the program and the videoconferencing media thatwas used to transmit the lectures with their responses analyzed in this paper.RESULTSAll the students indicated a preference for the lectures that had a high technical content andconcentrated in medical equipment rather than the lectures that focused on interpersonal
Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationprinciples of research and communications are made explicit, and students are engaged inreflecting on their own learning. As the students discuss, write about, reflect upon, and presenttheir research, they learn how to communicate clearly. RCS activities enhance learningoutcomes through intensive practice of communications. Figure 1 shows the interactiverelationship among the interdisciplinary staff and undergraduates along with the connection of allparticipants to the engineering faculty members. Studio Communication Faculty Engineering Faculty
Prediction, Neuromorphic Computing Systems and its applications. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Effect of Active Learning on Students' Performance in Remote ECE Classes with Lab SectionsAbstractTo mitigate the spread of COVID-19, universities transition to remote instructions. However, thisnew mode of instruction introduced challenges to instructors and students regarding lecturedelivery methods and class interactivity. Research conducted before the pandemic showed thatactive learning efficiently increases student learning, engagement, and interest in the topics beingtaught. Thus, it seems that active
behavior of the learner andbetter known as the “affection domain”. There are several levels of competency in this domainincluding, stimulating the students’ interest in a certain area, students’ response and attitude tothis stimulus, and development and implementation of a systematic approach to learning. Thesecond part is the ability to engage in lifelong learning which, according to Bloom’s taxonomy ofeducational objectives10-12, falls under the “cognitive domain”. The mastery of this part isgoverned by several actions that, in general, focus on the students’ ability to explore andgenerate new ideas, demonstrate comprehension, arrive at solutions, and, finally, judge thefeasibility and value of these solutions or new ideas.Based on the above, we
Technology) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Role of diverse teams and socio-cultural aspects on student learning in freshman design courseI. IntroductionThe 10-Year Plan (2022 – 2032) on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion at Georgia Institute of Tech-nology1 is focused on three mutually supporting pillars of change: (i) Creating an equitable andinclusive community (ii) Recruiting, retaining, and developing a diverse community of students,faculty, and staff and (iii) Supporting innovative and inclusive scholarship and teaching. Inclu-sive teaching practices ensure all students have opportunities to learn
education had on our development andlearning. Recently our research team of early-career engineering educators responsible forteaching first-year engineering students began to explore the topic of grades and gradingpractices in educational research, and as we explored a critical question emerged: As educators and researchers continue to engage in critical research and progressive conversations about the purpose and impact of grades and the way that educational structures and systems can innovate to reduce the negative byproducts and stigmas surrounding grades — how often in research and in these conversations are we meaningfully engaging with the most directly impacted stakeholders of grades and grading practices
‘drop-outs’ in theseprograms which is attributed to the self-motivated students getting involved on their own accord aswell as because of clearly communicating the nature of research and the expectations and timelines.Also, students during their decision-making process of committing to the project got a chance to talkto their senior students who had completed the program successfully, and hence were able tobecome comfortable and confident to a certain extent beforehand.To conclude, based on the positive feedback and experiences of the undergraduate students thatcompleted various types of research programs, it can be said that undergraduate research forengineering technology students is definitely a beneficial and high-impact learning
American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Paper ID #11420Ms. XUESHU CHEN, University of Texas at Austin Xueshu Chen is a doctoral student in information studies at UT Austin. Her research interests primarily include broadening participation of underrepresented groups in STEM fields and the adoption of Informa- tion and Communication Technology (ICT) in educational practice. Xueshu also holds a Master’s degree from the LBJ School of Public Affairs, focusing on post-secondary education policy development and program evaluation. Address: 1616 Guadalupe St, School of Information, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78701
significantly enhancestudents' grasp of sustainability concepts, underscoring the need for educational methods thatactively engage students in learning. The transformation of engineering education to incorporatesustainability presents both challenges and opportunities. Jamieson & Lohmann (2009) articulatethe importance of fostering a culture of innovation within engineering education to preparestudents for a globalized society. This culture must prioritize sustainability as a core component ofthe curriculum to develop engineers capable of addressing the complex challenges of our times. Bielefeldt & Canney (2016) offer a longitudinal perspective on the evolution of engineeringstudents' attitudes towards social responsibility, a key component
Copyright 2020, American Society for Engineering Education 2Students receiving aid may be able to work less and instead spend time engaging with other people andexperience outside the classroom, potentially leading to higher course grades and higher rates of persistence anddegree completion” [1]. In addition to looking at the impact of financial awards in low-income, academicallytalented, students of color, research shows that “academic and social behaviors such as course performance,participation in extracurricular activities, and community service all function as potential mechanisms forincreasing college graduation rates”. Although GPA is also useful to evaluate success, it is better to
literature points to aspects of the student’s social environment, such as feelings ofconnectedness, a sense of belonging, social self-efficacy, and social support, influencingstudents’ reported mental health measures in addition to lasting academic impacts. It is stillunclear, however, to the extent which of these concepts are present in current surveys used toassess graduate student mental health. The research question guiding this study is, Whatunderlying factors are important when looking at the mental health of science, engineering, andmathematics graduate students?This study will look specifically at the Healthy Minds Study (HMS), conducted by the HealthyMinds Network (HMN): Research on Adolescent and Young Adult Mental Health group, to tryand
reasoning and justifications, rather than simply right/wronganswers. Our work to improve freshman engineer’s interrogation of topics in engineering ethics isbased on the logic that game-based learning can provide a means to engage students actively ininterrogating the complexities of ethical decision making in specific engineering scenarios. Gameplay can align with engineering course learning objectives as well as enhance student knowledge,behaviors, and dispositions as students reflect on their own decision making and that of their peers[9]. We describe three games that we designed to assist in the development of students’ ethicalawareness and reasoning in hopes of highlighting the concepts that guide our approach toinnovative engineering
A Systematized Literature Review of Scholarship on Ethical Development and Perspective-taking in Engineering Students Brooks M. Leftwich* Purdue University bleftwic@purdue.eduAbstractThis report is a systematized literature review of published journal articles about frameworks,models, theories, and approaches that support one’s ethical development with a focus onperspective-taking as an integral part of that experience. Ethical development is essential toengineering students because the decisions they make – whether good or bad, right, or wrong –impact individuals, communities, the environment, and even the world
through enabling academically talented and financially needy studentsto transfer from two-year community colleges or four-year universities to TAMU to obtainbaccalaureate degrees in engineering or computer science. The goal was accomplished throughscholarship funding and engagement of ETS students in a complementary focused learningcommunity that included academic and social components to improve the students’ educationalopportunities and retention. Two focal points of this project were (1) linking and leveraging theTexas A&M University System (TAMUS) Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation(LSAMP) program’s community college partnerships and (2) complementing the TAMUSLSAMP and TAMU College of Engineering (COE) recruitment and
training of mathematics teachers that is at the core of this problem. Since enrollment at UIC, Janet had dedicated her studies and research efforts on Mathematics Socialization and identity amongst pre-service elementary teachers, an effort at understanding the reasons for lack of interest in the subject with a view to proffer solution and engender/motivate interest amongst this group that will eventually reflect in their classroom practices. She is currently a Graduate Assistant with UIC Engage, a commu- nity focused project that provides help for less-privileged students from K-8 in mathematics, reading and writing. She continues to work as a substitute teacher occasionally to keep abreast with current practices
indicator.Training for volunteers and facilitators is also underway. This training will consist of a series ofshort videos developed by STEM content creator, Jay Flores. Jay Flores was selected, because heis a social media influencer with experience in K-12 programming, so he brings a uniqueperspective on how to better reach and communicate with kids in a motivational manner. Thetraining will go over important topics like how to create a welcoming and fun introductoryperiod while students are logging in or arriving to an event, how to maintain progress of projectand help students falling behind, how to manage student questions, and how to engage studentswith a language they can understand. The possibility of making this training a certification is alsobeing
). Her research interests focus on school leadership, professional development and learning in STEM, equity for women and racial minorities, and leadership for community engagement. She holds a PhD from the University of Georgia in Educational Administration and Policy.Dr. Eric J. Fitzsimmons, Kansas State University Dr. Eric Fitzsimmons is an assistant professor in the civil engineering department at Kansas State Uni- versity and licensed professional engineering in the State of Kansas. Dr. Fitzsimmons is a graduate of the American Society of Civil Engineers Excellence in Civil Engineering Education (ExCEED) program. HE teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in transportation engineering.Dr. Jeff Zacharakis, Kansas
and testing of thesurvey. We also report on our methods of analysis and results, looking at differences between thetreatment groups as well as the moderating effect of student demographics.IntroductionFor decades, engineers and policymakers have expressed concern that too few students enter theengineering pipeline. This has led to many efforts to engage students in engineering in afterschool programs, summer programs, and more recently, in school curricula. The expectation isthat, by engaging students in engineering, more will become aware of it as a possible careeroption, and some students will find a special affinity to engineering and pursue it. The hope oftenexpressed is that such interventions will particularly increase the supply of new
- ing Environments, How Do We Know What Students are Learning?, and instructional methods in ele- mentary and middle school mathematics and science. He has authored books on curriculum design and teaching children about scientific inquiry. Current research interests focus on creating environments for ”good talk” in elementary and middle school classrooms, and also on advancing the use of knowledge building pedagogy in higher education. His most recent article (2013) is entitled ”Tasks and Talk: The Relationship Between Teachers’ Goals and Student Discourse,” in Social Studies Research and Practice.Dr. Rebecca Mazur, Collaborative for Educational ServicesProf. Beth McGinnis-Cavanaugh, Springfield Technical Community College
B.S. and M.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering and her Ph.D. in Engineering from the University of Arkansas. Dr. Gattis’ research areas include student recruitment, retention and diversity, as well as professional development of middle school teachers. This professional development enables teachers to more effectively teach math and science through development of engineering and math hands-on activities. As Associate Dean, Dr. Gattis man- ages an endowment that provides over $1-million in funding for undergraduates to engage in research and to study abroad.Dr. Micah Hale, University of Arkansas Dr. Hale is an Associate Professor at the University of Arkansas. His research interests include concrete materials
retain more STEMmajors [1].One of the key reasons that students cite for leaving STEM is the perception of an unwelcomingclimate, especially by those who are members of underrepresented groups [1]. Campus andclassroom climate is essential for student retention and also for learning. The way in whichstudents experience their campus environment impacts both learning and developmentaloutcomes [2, 3]. Environments in which students are subjected to harassment or discriminationhinder student learning, and both minority and majority students are negatively impacted by thefailure to create an inclusive environment for minority students [4-8]. Further, there iscompelling evidence that diversity among students and faculty is crucially important to