nomeasurable differences in testing performances among the three classes, but a positivecorrelation was demonstrated between better homework or quiz grades and testing grades.Copies of example of quizzes and an example project are provided. The results from studentsurveys indicate fairly strong support for the quizzes over homework and the use of a websiteover a more tradition format for the course. However, almost 25% of the students prefer a moretradition course format of weekly homework and writing on the board. IntroductionThe ultimate skill to be learned in an undergraduate engineering curriculum is “problemsolving.” Since essentially all engineering (and science) classes are limited to a narrowdiscipline
similar and were different in a variety of areas including student engagement,development of student subgroups (cliques), camper behavior, responses to camp activities, andother topics. We will include qualitative feedback from the campers and from staffers about thecamps. We will close with a discussion of the benefits of the two types of camps and our plansfor the future. The paper will be co-authored by the faculty camp director, the staff membercamp assistant director, and will include comments from student camp staffers. IntroductionThis paper provides a comparison of two one-week long engineering summer day camps thatwere held in Summer 2008 by the College of Engineering at the University of Texas
engineering course.One of the challenges in early engineering education is getting students to move beyond plug-and-chug type solutions and frameworks to having them fully integrate new knowledge into anindependently organized thought process for bringing complex information to bear in appliedways. Students have a difficult time developing these skills from textbooks because the texts arenot interactive and because they often do not present information in more than one way (writtenverbal). Lectures can engage students in active learning techniques where students can applyinformation with guidance. However, the fast pace of some lecture materials will leave weakerstudents with little recourse other than to extensively rely on the textbook. Archived
AC 2009-1689: PEER REVIEW FROM A STUDENT PERSPECTIVETeresa Larkin, American University Teresa L. Larkin is an Associate Professor of Physics Education in the Department of Physics at American University. She also serves as Faculty Liaison to the Pre-engineering Program. Dr. Larkin received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Physics from South Dakota State University in Brookings, SD in 1982 and 1985, respectively. She received her Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction with special emphasis in Physics and Science Education from Kansas State University in Manhattan, KS in 1997. Dr. Larkin’s research interests primarily involve the assessment of student learning in introductory
the method, using class time for a variety of differenttypes of exercises. In addition, while the flip technique is described here for a face-to-facesetting, the potential exists for the technique to shape blended learning environments.Bibliography1. Heywood, J. (2005). Engineering Education: Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.2. National Research Council (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Page 14.1385.11 Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.3. Felder, J. M. & Brent, R. (2003). Learning by Doing. Chemical
2006-85: JUSTICE AND HUMILITY IN TECHNOLOGY DESIGNSteven VanderLeest, Calvin College Steven H. VanderLeest is a Professor of Engineering at Calvin College. He has an M.S.E.E. from Michigan Tech. U. (1992) and Ph.D. from the U of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1995). He received a “Who’s Who Among America’s Teachers” Award in 2004 and 2005 and was director of a FIPSE grant “Building IT Fluency into a Liberal Arts Core Curriculum.” His research includes responsible technology and software partitioned OS. Page 11.851.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Justice and
, material properties and element geometry, (4) Theglobal linear algebraic equations in which the shared nodes are joined, (5) Application of theloading and restraints in the global linear algebraic equation, and (6) Stress/strain calculation.The best way to teach and to demonstrate these 6 key fundamental concepts of the finite elementmethod is through simple examples.Since the FEM theory can be considered extremely complicated for undergraduate students, asimplified treatment was warranted for students to familiarize themselves with somefundamental concepts of FEM theory. The authors collaborated to develop a simplified andstraight forward approach to do this in three weeks. It took a long time and lots of work tosummarize these examples for
big data techniques and tools to investigate the role of so- cial media in engaging public and under-represented communities towards STEM education and informal learning.Dr. Aditya Johri, George Mason University Aditya Johri is Associate Professor in the department of Information Sciences & Technology. Dr. Johri studies the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) for learning and knowledge shar- ing, with a focus on cognition in informal environments. He also examine the role of ICT in supporting distributed work among globally dispersed workers and in furthering social development in emerging economies. He received the U.S. National Science Foundation’s Early Career Award in 2009. He is co
curriculum development. She is passionate about hands-on engineering design for every student, at every age level.Dr. Janet Y. Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder Janet Y. Tsai is a researcher and instructor in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her research focuses on ways to encourage more students, especially women and those from nontraditional demographic groups, to pursue interests in the eld of engineering. Janet assists in recruitment and retention efforts locally, nationally, and internationally, hoping to broaden the image of engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second
mathematics learning community anchored by the UTA Student Chapter of the MAA (Mathematical Association of America), on which we have built strong support programs to ensure academic success and professional development for our SURGE scholars. • An institutional initiative to improve undergraduate retention and graduation rates, which overlaps well with the SURGE program in goals and plans. • A vibrant regional economy that provides ample opportunities to place our SURGE scholars in internships and permanent jobs. Many of our SURGE alumni work at major corporations in the region. They are great assets to our SURGE scholars for career mentoring and job placement.The MAA Student Chapter in the UTA
of Environmental Engineers and Scientist (AAEES), and registered as a Chartered Engineer (CEng) by the U.K. Engineering Council. He is recognized as a Diplomate of the American Academy of Sanitarians (D.AAS). His scholarship, teaching, service, and professional practice focus in the fields of environmental biotechnology and sustainable development where he specializes in promoting Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WaSH), food and nutrition security, energy efficiency, and poverty alleviation. Oerther’s awards for teaching include the best paper award from the Environmental Engineering Division of ASEE, as well as recognition from the NSPE, the AAEES, and the Association of Environmental Engineering and Science
different areas of knowledge, use of technology in learning, impact of using innovative learning environments and development of assessment tools. He has 91 articles in refereed journals and conferences, over 610 citations according to Scopus, 6 books, 14 book chapters, 142 national and international presentations in countries like Korea, Denmark, Hungary, Cuba, United States, Chile, Ecuador and Argentina and 29 international workshops in Mexico, Chile, Argentina and Italy. Genaro Zavala was appointed to the editorial board of the Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research journal of the American Physical Society for the period 2015 to 2018, vice president of the Latin American Physics Education Network
Paper ID #15594Analytic Framework for Students’ Cognitive Mistakes in Studying Electro-magnetic FieldsMs. Yu Gong, Purdue University, West Lafayette Yu Gong is a graduate student in the School of Engineering Education and School of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. Her researches focus on cognitive difficulties in engineering study, model-based inquiry learning, nanotechnology education, and global engineering education.Prof. N. Sanjay Rebello, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Sanjay Rebello is Professor of Physics and Astronomy and Professor of Curriculum and Instruction at Purdue University
. Cem Karacal and Hasan Sevim Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, School of Engineering, Edwardsville, IL 62026AbstractThis paper summarizes the experiences in designing, developing, and implementing a dual-diplomapartnership between a university in the USA and a university in Turkey. The development of theprogram of study that would meet the graduation requirements of both institutions was a challengeas most international institutions do not have as strong general education component as U.S.institutions do. The organizational and academic calendar differences of both institutions and theremedies developed to overcome these differences are presented in the paper. The hard and softvariables that have influenced student academic
during her freshman year she earned the basketball Rookie of the Year award for her conference. Page 26.112.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A Student-Led Approach to Promoting Teamwork in an Introductory Engineering PresentationAt the Polytechnic School of Engineering of New York University, formerly known asPolytechnic University, a first-year required course, Introduction to Engineering and Design, hasbeen a core part of the curriculum for many years. As part of this course, student teams areexpected to solve one of eight independent
Paper ID #15181Improving a Flipped Electromechanical Energy Conversion CourseThomas E. McDermott, University of Pittsburgh Thomas E. McDermott is an Assistant Professor at the University of Pittsburgh, with over 30 years of industrial experience in consulting and software development. His research interests include electric power distribution systems, renewable energy, power electronics, electromagnetics, and circuit simulation. Tom is a registered professional engineer in Pennsylvania and an IEEE Fellow. He has a B. S. and M. Eng. in Electric Power from Rensselaer, and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Virginia
: • Lack of flexibility in accessing JMU licensed software; • Lack of a single unified operating system containing all of the software needed for students to accomplish their educational tasks; • The need for students to use multiple labs dependent upon course objectives; • The need of faculty to have access to a flexible computing environment for the purpose of developing Cloud Computing curriculum; • High cost of maintenance and upgrades of hardware and software in the labs across campus; • Space limitations in a growing university environment; • Flexibility in providing students access to frequently changing technology.2.3 Proposed SolutionTo address the efficiency and access issues of JMU’s
Paper ID #19316A Socio-cognitive Framework and Method for Studying Technology-mediatedProblem SolvingDarren K. Maczka, Virginia Tech Darren Maczka is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His background is in control systems engineering and information systems design and he received his B.S. in Computer Sys- tems Engineering from The University of Massachusetts at Amherst. He has several years of experience teaching and developing curricula in the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Virginia Tech.Dr. Jacob R. Grohs, Virginia Tech Jacob Grohs is an Assistant Professor in Engineering
engagement with the UNR and Northern Nevada STEM Education communities, he studied student motivation, active learning, and diversity; developed K-12 engineering education curriculum; and advocated for socioeconomically just access to STEM education. As a Ph.D. Candidate with the STRiDE Research Lab at Purdue University, Justin’s dissertation research focuses on the study of Intersectionality Theory and the intersectionality of socioeconomic inequality in engineering education, use of critical quantitative methodology and narrative inquiry to understand the complex stories of engineering students from traditionally minoritized backgrounds, and the pursuit of a socioeconomically just engineering education.Mr. Matthew
interpersonal communication, and the closer we can get a remote user to being therein their own body the more effective the technology will be.The last example, providing remote STEM experts a body for preparing the next generation forcareers in the sciences, is the context for this project. This project uses a Making based modelcalled ”Making as Micro-Manufacturing”, which was developed as a model for motivating STEMparticipation and providing a curriculum to teach both a STEM mindset and STEM skills 6,7 .In this model, high-variability low-volume products are manufactured for a specific, real-worldpurpose using practical engineering concerns. In the specific case chosen for this project,practice-based learning is implemented with high school students
understanding of both the design process and artifact inorder to address the following research questions: 1) At the end of a design project, to what extent and in what ways do individual elementary students of the same design team have shared understandings of their design solution? 2) To what extent are the similarities and differences in their individual understandings influenced by their interactions and the characteristics of the design challenge and learning environment?ContextData for this study come from a large, university-district partnership project to create andimplement curriculum units that integrate science and engineering through design challenges setin the students’ local communities. In this study, we
Engineers course since 2014 in traditional lecture, blended, and flipped formats, and has conducted research through prior NSF support on concept inventory and flipped classes. She has also been a member of the curriculum committee in the Civil, Environmental, and Sustainable Engineering degree program at ASU since 2016. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Oral Formative Assessment as a Means to Increasing Total Learning and Engagement in a University Engineering Classroom Kristen M. Ward, PhD, Lecturer in Engineering, Fulton Schools of Engineering Yingyan Lou, PhD, Associate Professor, School of Sustainable Engineering and
interests include electrokinetics, predominantly dielectrophoretic characterizations of cells, and the devel- opment of biomedical microdevices. Research within her Medical micro-Device Engineering Research Laboratory (M.D. – ERL) also inspires the development of Desktop Experiment Modules (DEMos) for use in chemical engineering classrooms or as outreach activities in area schools (see www.mderl.org). Adrienne is past Chair of ASEE’s Diversity Committee and past PIC I Chair; she has previously served on WIED, ChED, and NEE leadership teams and has contributed to over 40 ASEE conference proceedings articles.Dr. Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University Dr. Carpenter is Founding Dean of Engineering at Campbell University
education programs, capital improvements, scholarships, sponsorship ofevents and activities, internships and co-op programs, as well as mentoring and placement ofgraduates. They serve to advise with curriculum development, assess achievement of programoutcomes, and aid with strategic planning. They include members from large engineeringorganizations, other academic institutions, local companies, alumni, prominent leaders, as well asentrepreneurs. The IAB interaction with engineering programs is usually a successfulpartnership based on these factors. The members and member organizations of IABs also benefitfrom this partnership. They typically are allowed to identify and recruit the top-graduatingstudents, shape the future workforce to meet the
interested, please contact the first author via email.The first author is also particularly interested in creating activities that specifically teachcollaboration skills such as active listening, giving peer feedback, or assigning tasks on teams.These skills are especially relevant to engineers today but represent a significant challenge toteach well. If you are interested in developing an effective and tested curriculum in this area,please also contact the author.Finally, we wish to thank Brent Fales for his effort in creating half of these activities. Brenttaught a parallel section to the one in this study. Without his help, this study would not havebeen possible.References1. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T
to the classroom. More specifically, in our previousconference paper to ASEE last year, we presented the development of a research transfer modelfor translating state-of-the-art fluid mechanics and biofluids research into the engineeringeducation of students from the high school level to freshmen engineers. The model wasimplemented through a series of presentations and hands-on exercises. This previous effortshowed much promise as a model for transferring engineering research to the high school and Page 12.1548.2freshmen levels. By applying the lessons we learned, our current goal is to expand this research transfer to a larger pool
Fellowship. She is currently pursuing her Ph.D. in ECE at Northwestern University.Bugrahan Yalvac, Northwestern University BUGRAHAN YALVAC is a postdoctoral fellow in assessment studies for the VaNTH ERC at Northwestern University. He holds B.S. degrees in Physics and Physics Education and an M.S. degree in Science Education from METU, Ankara. For his Ph.D. studies at Penn State, he majored in Curriculum and Instruction and minored in Science, Technology, and Society (STS).Alan Sahakian, Northwestern University ALAN V. SAHAKIAN earned the Ph.D. in ECE at the University of Wisconsin - Madison in 1984. Since then he has been at Northwestern University where he is currently Professor of BME and
courses for engineeringstudents and an intuitive approach to infinity with hands-on exercises for K-12 students. Inreference 8, the co-authors developed materials on topics from number theory, essential to thefield of data security and suitable for K-12 students, as well as for remedial or preparatorycourses for engineering freshmen.This paper represents the third part in this continuing project of developing methods forimproving the teaching and learning of mathematical concepts for engineering students. Itpresents an interesting context in which to teach simple matrix algebra, developing practicalapplications that can be used for both K-12 and college level algebra courses. The mainapplication demonstrated in this paper is the design of a
- sponsible for supporting curricular assessment and developing instructional support programs for faculty in the College of Engineering. In her research role, Dr. Zappe is interested in the integration of creativity into the engineering curriculum, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Dr. Zappe holds a doctorate in edu- cational psychology specializing in applied testing and measurement. Her measurement interests include the development of instruments to measure the engineering professional skills and using qualitative data to enhance the response process validity of tests and instruments.Dr. Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University, University Park
) IntroductionAt the ASEE Inaugural International Forum in 2012, many authors called for internationalcollaboration in curriculum and laboratory innovations, and also in faculty development1 citingthe need for balancing demands and capacities between the developed and developing countries,and showing that information and instructional technologies had risen to levels that enabled thesecollaboration opportunities. Even on a local and daily level, there is no doubt that we all livewithin social networks, even within the microcosm of instructors and students, and the age-oldquestion had always been about which practice, between competition and collaboration, worksthe best (whatever “best” means) for any individual or group? In his book “Collaborate!”,Sanker2