createcohorts of students in the form of learning communities. Students are placed into classes ingroups with other engineering students and take one or more classes together. In some cases thestudents may also live together and participate in outside of class activities with other studentsand instructors. These approaches have shown benefits for retention and learning [2].Pedagogical approaches can also help attract and retain diverse students. One such approach thatinvolves students in meaningful experiences include community engaged learning, which hasalso been called service-learning, community-based learning and civically engaged learning.Community-engaged learning integrates work that meet the needs of an underserved segment ofsociety and/or
social science research covers many topics and has used critical race theories such as Community Cultural Wealth to describe the experiences of systemically marginalized students in engineering.Jeremi S London (Assistant Professor) Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech Chair of ASEE's CDEI during the Year of Impact on Racial Equity © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com WIP: ASEE Year of Impact on Racial Equity: P-12 Parents and Guardians EngagementIntroduction & ContextThis is the last of four WIP papers in a series on the ASEE Year of Impact on Racial Equity(YIRE) organized by the ASEE Commission
the top 1-2 most effective programs or actions to improve conditionsfor BIPOC students, staff, and faculty in recent years and why?”The form has only three questions and the first two are about the school itself and the contactperson. We plan to share the responses with the broader community via documentation on theCDEI website, and we plan to highlight the schools that respond in the CDEI booth at the annualconference, and possibly at other conference events.ConclusionThe work of all of the Year of Impact on Racial Equity pillars has had the express purpose ofcontinuing to keep racial equity front of mind and front of hand. We want to ensure that themomentum that was created in the Spring of 2020 with the murder of George Floyd does notwane
Session F2A1 A Survey of the Impact of Community-Based Computer Science Education on Undergraduate Students John D. Fernandez Computing and Mathematical Sciences Department Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi ABSTRACTThe engagement of computer science students in community activities is a challenge in all institutions ofhigher learning. This paper describes a paradigm for civic engagement through community-basedlearning used successfully by the author. With the
that focus on improving STEM education. Her areas of interest include broadening participation and building equity in STEM, engaging undergraduate students in broader impacts, and understanding math identities among pre-service teachers.Fethiye Ozis (Assistant Teaching Professor) Dr. Fethiye Ozis is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the civil and environmental engineering department at Carnegie Mellon University. Dr. Ozis holds a B.S. in environmental engineering from the Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Southern California. Dr. Ozis is a licensed Professional Engineer, Environmental, in Arizona. Before joining CMU, Dr. Ozis was a faculty member at
development within alarge community-engaged learning course, EPICS, at Purdue University.This paper expands current scholarship by identifying empathic growth trends among EPICSstudents, and by exploring factors that contribute to differences in empathic growth among thesestudents. We address one primary research question and four associated sub-questions:• How and to what extent does a community-engaged design course impact empathic development? ▪ How do different types of interactions between community partners and students play a role in empathic development? ▪ How does the design phase play a role in community partner interactions and empathic development? ▪ How does the mentor support empathic development? ▪ How do
role in the projects as well as the roleof the community partner. Following this the survey inquired about several skills or experiencesthe CEL projects may build. This list of skills was developed in consulting a number of sourcesincluding the UBC Centre for Community Engaged Learning (CCEL) [11] and the EngineersCanada Graduate Attributes [12]. Students are asked about challenges to their work and supportresources they have utilized, with this list being informed by CCEL. Finally, the survey asks howCOVID-19 has impacted their CEL activitiesThe survey asked about strategies students used when developing CEL projects. If the membershad not engaged in CEL projects, the survey questions focused on whether students wereinterested in pursuing CEL
better engage students in creatively solving real-worldproblems. Based on their learning preference questionnaires, students were placed in diverseteams of three to four with the intention of generating a sense of community and promotingcreative thinking. Each mini-project was comprised of both open-ended and well-defined non-trivial analytical questions that addressed contemporary energy-related challenges. Teams werealso expected to reflect on energy options for the future and interpret the United NationsSustainable Development Goals. To promote accountability and critical evaluation, teams peer-reviewed one another’s mini-projects. This study uses data from participant questionnaires (n = 77) to analyze the efficacy ofusing mini
include the ability to • apply an interdisciplinary set of technical, leadership and other professional skills to address important challenges facing society • practice engineering with a holistic understanding of how engineers engage with stakeholders and impact society • have a critical awareness of their personal attitudes, behaviors and values and the ways in which these align with their professional aspirationsEarly thoughts on our vision for this program are described in [6]. Examples of our sociotechnicalcurricular approach have been published for courses including circuits, An Integrated Approach toEnergy, and Materials Science [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13].Minnesota State University, Mankato (MSU)Students earn a
. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Impact of Differently Worded Reflection Prompts on Engineering Students’ Metacognitive StrategiesAbstractNew engineering educators are often unaware that students struggle to reach a deep level ofmetacognitive processing when reflecting on their thinking/learning strategies. To designreflections that successfully engage students in valuable levels of metacognitive processing,instructors need to recognize their goals for their students and align reflection prompt wordchoice to these goals. This study used differently worded reflection prompts to engage studentsin thinking about their weekly performance
technical knowledgeas well as the broad set of professional skills needed to succeed in today’s global economy.Efficient, high impact approaches are needed to create efficiencies in the curriculum.Experiential learning is one approach that allows students to develop disciplinary andprofessional skills and can help students transition into professional practice more effectively.Community-engaged learning is a form of experiential education that brings the added benefitsof impact to the broader community. Community-engaged learning, also called service-learning,integrates work within an underserved area of society with academic content. Needs within thelocal or global community are addressed by learning and applying academic content within acourse or
andcolleagues [15] conducted a systematic review on nudging, finding 156 empirical studies. Ofthese studies, a mere 4% were related to education, and even less to STEM education. Basedon the limited STEM literature on nudging, studies have employed a few nudge strategies toimprove the students’ app engagement. Some examples include reminders (e.g., refocusingstudents’ attention; [16]), informational nudge (e.g.,[17]), and social comparison nudge (e.g.,providing peers’ behavior information; [18]).This study explores the impact of nudging interventions (reminder and social comparisonnudge) on students’ app engagement in an educational application. We will be using theCourseMIRROR (Mobile In-situ Reflections and Review with Optimized Rubrics)application
Powered by www.slayte.comBringing it down from the ivory tower: Translating Engineering- for-Community-Development (ECD) graduate student researchinto community engagement and undergraduate student learningAbstractThe goal of this paper is to show how graduate engineering students working on Engineering-for-Community-Development (ECD) projects and theses 1) acquire socio-technical educationthat prepares them to critically engage with community development (formation); 2) propose totranslate their academic scholarship into formats and language that lead to effective engagementand appropriation by the communities they want to serve (translation); and, from this translation,3) extend their scholarship into curricular opportunities for undergraduate
a Fortune 500 company, a non-profit, or a startup. Because each team has highlyvariable work they are engaged in, students typically have low awareness of the projects beingdone by other students.BackgroundDue to COVID, in person gatherings were severely restricted during the 2020-2021 school year.This had a significant impact on how design teams worked together and eliminated our ability tohold an in-person design show. The design show traditionally serves as a forum for students todemonstrate the work they have completed throughout the year to reviewers and the public;however, by its nature it involves significant in-person interaction. Because this was not possibleduring the 2020-2021 school year, we needed to rethink how students could
Conceptual Site ModelsAbstractIn environmental engineering site remediation projects, community perception of environmentaland health risks can influence a project’s scope and design. Therefore, community engagement iscritical to shaping an engineer’s definition of an environmental problem. However, lower-levelundergraduate engineering curricula rarely address the incorporation of community input intoenvironmental engineering problem definition, as environmental engineering coursework tendsto utilize pre-defined problems to develop and assess technical knowledge and skills. Upper-level courses that do include community participation in environmental engineering design tendto be reflective, having students evaluate the social impact of a pre-defined
Leadership Program supported by the grant united both pilot leadershipprograms into a single, experiential platform grounded in the Social Change Model forLeadership Development (SCM) theoretical framework. This framework develops leadersthrough a process that results in social change through values-based reflection and action at threelevels: 1) individual (consciousness of self, congruence, commitment); 2) group (collaboration,common purpose, controversy with civility); 3) and community (citizenship) (Komives et al.2017). Students voluntarily engage in the Hornet Leadership Program from their freshman tosenior year by participating in one or more of the four different leadership experiences shown inFigure 1. The leadership learning experiences
tools in educational research.Farzad Shafiei Dizaji (Lecturer Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Impact of COVID-19 on Applied Mathematics Courses for Engineering Students Gianluca Guadagni Deepyaman Maiti Farzad Shafiei DizajiThis is a Work in ProgressIntroductionThis study investigates the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Applied Mathematics (APMA) coursesin the Engineering School at our institution. We investigate which subset of students may have beenimpacted more by the change/disruption in our instruction methods due to the pandemic, and then
learning due to the pandemic required significant changes in both thedelivery and assessment of course materials.Before the pandemic, we gave surveys twice during the semester to obtain detailed feedback onthe course, including suggestions for potential changes. For the last two years, due to thepandemic, we gave three surveys. The surveys were enlightening and helped us to adjust ourexpectations. The data in Table 1 demonstrate the impact of the pandemic on learning for 2020(n=124) and 2021 (n=122). Most students were living at home during the fall 2020 semester andwere in their school dorms/apartments during the fall 2021 semester. Table 1 – Survey results on impact of pandemic
knowledge to people-oriented challenges in global settings; theseprograms have many names but are known as, Community Engaged Learning, Global ServiceLearning (GSL) [5] or Engineering for Community Development (ECD) [6].The student and community impacts of these types of programs have been widely assessed asprojects have seen success through incorporation of principles such as ethics, social justice, localexpertise and resources, and building trusting relationships with shared goals [7]. There has beenextensive analysis on the use of ECD to develop global sociotechnical competency skills andpositive student learning outcomes [8], [9].However, historically, well-intentioned university-forged relationships with partner communitiesand resultant
Paper ID #37506The Community College Pathway: A Study of Women inSTEMRoberta Rincon Dr. Roberta Rincon is the Associate Director of Research with the Society of Women Engineers, where she oversees the organization’s research activities around issues impacting girls and women from elementary through college and into the engineering workforce. Before joining SWE, Roberta was a Senior Research and Policy Analyst at The University of Texas System, where she focused on student success and faculty awards programs across nine academic institutions. Roberta received her B.S. in Civil Engineering from The University of
theimplementation.This paper describes the integration efforts, the data sources, and results from two differentsemesters: Spring 2021 and Fall 2021. Our preliminary results suggest that the intervention hasan impact on engineering identity development and broadens students' understanding of whatchemical engineering is. The findings of this study will help to reveal effective principles ofindustrial engagement for the evolving field of chemical engineering. The results can help otherinstitutions to build and maintain industry-faculty relationships that assist in the professionalformation of engineers.IntroductionWith the broadening of the chemical engineering field, the gap between academia and practicalunderstanding of the industry has increased [1-3]. This
of EWB-USA, the largest community-engaged engineering education organization inthe United States, but has since evolved into an independent non-profit which works with anumber of partners in addition to EWB-USA. It has 15 permanent staff across three officesthroughout the portions of the country where it focuses on implementing projects. The team iscurrently coordinating approximately 75 active projects and partnering with over 40 student orprofessional chapters of EWB-USA. EWB Guatemala's programs primarily focus on civilinfrastructure design and construction within their areas of expertise in water supply, bridge, andschool building projects. These projects engage a wide set of stakeholders and seek to balancethe interests of multiple
marginalized students in engineering. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com WIP: ASEE Year of Impact on Racial Equity: 90 Day Equity ChallengeAbstractThis is the second of four WIP papers in a series on the ASEE Year of Impact on Racial Equity(YIRE). The major tenets of this initiative can be described by three pillars. The pillars arefocused on engaging engineering and engineering technology students, faculty andadministrators in colleges of engineering and engineering technology, and P-12 parents andguardians. This paper focuses on the first of these three groups.The Engineering Design Teams Pillar is home to the 90-day Equity
diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning to understand engineering students’ identity development.Andrew Katz (Assistant Professor)Adam Maltese (Martha Lea and Bill Armstrong Chair for TeacherEducation) Professor in Science Education at Indiana University. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Collateral Damage: Investigating the Impacts of COVID on STEM Professionals with Caregiving ResponsibilitiesAbstractNumerous reports have showcased the negative impacts of the pandemic on women in theworkforce—especially those in STEM and with caregiving responsibilities—and the ways inwhich COVID-19 has
Engineering (PACE). She also manages program evaluations that provide actionable strategies to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM fields. This includes evaluation of NSF ADVANCE, S-STEM, INCLUDES, and IUSE projects, and climate studies of students, faculty, and staff. Her social science research covers many topics and has used critical race theories such as Community Cultural Wealth to describe the experiences of systemically marginalized students in engineering. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com WIP: ASEE Year of Impact on Racial Equity: Impetus & VisionAbstractThis is the first of four WIP
www.slayte.com Engagement in Practice: The University of Maryland’s Get Out and Learn (GOAL) Engineering Kit InitiativeUndergraduate engineering education often reinforces an arbitrary sociotechnical divide thatattempts to isolate technical skills from their embedded social environments (Cech & Sherick,2015). Engineering curriculum focuses primarily on developing technical skills, often withoutconsideration of the social (e.g., cultural, political, economic) contexts within these technologies,skills, or training are situated. Service-learning opportunities for engineering students and facultyrepresent one opportunity set for bridging social and technical knowledge and skills. Furthermore,service-learning courses can
Paper ID #37930‘Socially Distanced Community Engagement’ –Teaching GISSite-Analysis during COVIDJessie Zarazaga (Sustainability & Development Program Director)Cindy Hua Hello! I am a Ph.D. student in Applied Science for Engineering at Southern Methodist University. My research interests center on how community-based STEM can impact learning patterns and interest in STEM careers. I am equally interested in how such learning can also become a tool for student voice. During my time as a Human Rights Fellow, I created a STEM education program, STEM+Z: Investigating an Undead Apocalypse, using aspects of popular
with some students who would rather not be there.”Another founder of the team said, “I like the opportunity to reach out to the community anddesign something to make an impact. This club gives me an opportunity to get hands onexperience in design and manufacturing before I would have in classes and gain experience” asan underclassman. “Delivering the products, in the face of all the [COVID-related] challengeswe faced, has been very rewarding.”A junior electrical engineering student appreciated the “eye opening” (problem finding) aspect ofthe team’s mission. “I've enjoyed getting experience working on real-world engineeringproblems, as well as finding projects from the surrounding community.”As an all-volunteer team, they clearly take pride in
from the project clients on their experience and theuse of the final design project reports. Based on preliminary student and stakeholder feedback,our community engagement efforts are having a positive impact on both groups.Conclusions and Next StepsMuch like the work of Dulaski, we found that students received multiple benefits from acapstone experience that engages them with real community stakeholders. These benefits includedeveloping engineering skills that are transferrable to real-world engineering problems andenhanced skills in oral communications by delivering presentations to stakeholders [5]. Studentswere also able to practice professional written communication skills while writing emails,proposals and reports for their clients. We
ofproject interest and previous experience with prototyping and manufacturing skills, such asComputer Aided Design (CAD), programing, 3D printing, electronics, and machining. Faculty areinstructed to form teams by diversifying the majors and skills of students on each team. Studentsalso engage in a short communications style workshop during the first week of the semester toinitiate discussion around team communication. Students do not receive pre-assigned roles orrequired training on the types of team roles prior or during team development, so selection of teamroles occurs naturally over the duration of the semester.Data CollectionThe majority of data for this research has been collected from first-year projects course sections inthe form of course