Paper ID #29471The New Engineering Education in Chinabased on 207 new engineeringresearch and practice projectsDr. Jinlu Shen, Zhejiang University College of Public Affairs, Zhejiang UniversityDr. Tuoyu Li, Zhejiang University Li Tuo-yu, Research Assistant Institute of China’s Science, Technology and Education Policy, Zhejiang University College of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University Research Center on Science and Education Development Strategy, Zhejiang University AddressRoom 1205-3, Administration Building, Zijingang Campus, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province; 310058 P.R. China American
Directors of Engineering Without Borders - USA. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A New Framework for Student-Led Cocurricular Design ProjectsAbstractThis report describes an academic framework to introduce student-led extracurricular engineeringdesign projects to an undergraduate curriculum. Typically, student-led projects are limitedexclusively to the domain of extracurricular groups with only a few examples of universitiesassigning academic credit value to this work. Over the past four years, the Harvard School ofEngineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) has designed and implemented a structure in whichstudents who participate in the Harvard chapter’s Engineers Without Borders USA projects
nation’seconomy. The exponential growth of engineering education in India has affected the qualityof engineering graduates in terms of their employability. The National Board of Accreditation(NBA) accredits engineering programs using the Outcome-Based Education (OBE)framework. This framework has twelve graduate attributes of the ‘Washington Accord’aligned with program outcomes. This paper proposes a systems approach which consists ofinput, transformation and output towards achieving employable skills in engineers. Theprogram outcomes consisting of technical and professional skills are derived from thecompetencies required for the target roles in the industry and the graduates’ attributes.Keeping this in mind, a structured outcome-based curriculum was
qualitative process or list of best practices for setting upsimilar collaborations in diverse settings. The purpose of the specific collaboration betweenEngineering and Mathematics at our institution is to: 1. Investigate pre-existing faculty biases on why students found it difficult to transfer knowledge between different fields; 2. Develop a systematic approach to collaboration between the two departments that will lead to a better understanding of the difficulties faced by our students and thus to continuous improvement of both the Engineering and the Differential Equations courses; 3. Provide a “roadmap” that will enable other disciplines within VCU and other universities to develop similar collaborations between their
Paper ID #30631Process Control Design and Practice – A New Approach to Teaching Controlto Chemical EngineersDr. Thomas Andrew Meadowcroft, Rowan University I am a Chemical Engineer, receiving my Bachelors degree from the University of Toronto and my Masters and PhD from M.I.T. I was a M.I.T. Chemical Engineering Practice School Station Director for 2 years following graduation, then went to work in industry. I worked for Union Camp, International Paper, General Electric, Omnova, and Dover Chemical as a Process Engineer, Process Design Engineer, and Process Control Engineer for 25 years. I began teaching as an adjunct at the
Paper ID #29154A New Hands-On Laboratory Approach for Teaching Electromagnetic Con-ceptsto Engineering and Engineering Technology StudentsDr. Jay R Porter, Texas A&M University Jay R. Porter joined the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University in 1998 and is currently the Associate Dean for Engineering at Texas A&M University - Galve- ston. He received the BS degree in electrical engineering (1987), the MS degree in physics (1989), and the Ph.D. in electrical engineering (1993) from Texas A&M University. His areas of interest in research and education include
-Based Design: A Vehicle for Curriculum Integration,” International Journal of Engineering Education. 20(3), 433–439.Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.Zajonc, R. B. (2000). Feeling and thinking: Closing the debate over the independence of affect. In F. (Ed.), & J.P., Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 31–58). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current directions in psychological science, 10(6), 224-228.
infrastructure at the Coast Guard’s Telecommunication and Information Systems Command. William is currently the director of rowing at the Coast Guard Academy and has been lucky enough to be allowed to help in the development of the Cyber Systems Major at the Academy and to teach the first offering of the Cyber Ethics course. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Curriculum Development for Cyber Ethics with a Focus on Law EnforcementAbstractThe goal of this paper is to share the methodology and results of the United States Coast GuardAcademy’s approach to developing a Cyber Ethics course for its Cyber Systems major with anadditional focus on Law
Education, 2020 Ethics in Undergraduate Construction Curricula: A Two-Stage Exploratory Sequential Approach to Developing and Piloting the HETC SurveyAbstractConstruction and construction related engineering programs (construction engineering and civilengineering) must provide ethics education to students for accreditation; however, there arelimited resources for instructors who teach ethics in these degree programs. This exploratorytwo-stage sequential research study utilizes three of Eash’s five curriculum components (content,modes of transaction, and evaluation) as the conceptual framework to understand the teaching ofethics in construction programs by developing and piloting a survey instrument
become more common. NMiTE, a new institution ofhigher education in the UK with a focus on engineering and the first new university in thecountry in more than 40 years, adopted a similar approach. At NMiTE during the 2018-19academic year, participants were part of a “Design Cohort,” which “comprised a group ofschool-leavers and graduates and helped to co-design and co-create NMITE’s way of learningand shaping the learner experience. These 25 enterprising individuals came from across the UKand international locations to take part in this unique opportunity.” [11] However, unlike atFulbright, the design year at NMiTE was structured in such a way that participants remained atthe institution for shorter periods of time.The primary goals of the co
-based efforts described in the literature thatrelate thematically to the emphasis areas in this curriculum, (4) assessment methods that haveappeared useful when applied to such projects, and (5) suitable categories of starter projects forthis new curriculum, including those that can be prototyped prior to the Fall 2020/2021 onset ofthe initial junior/senior-level design sequences.I. IntroductionA. Motivation and GoalA new Kansas State University (KSU) undergraduate Biomedical Engineering (BME) degreeprogram was approved by the Kansas Board of Regents in June 2016 [1]–[3], and the firstincoming cadre of freshman joined this program in Fall 2018. This program, partially spurred bydemand from prospective students and their families, (a
intention of the study is togauge the effectiveness of various motivational strategies and teaching approaches and toidentify specific areas where faculty should focus their classroom efforts. Upon completion of atraditional 3-credit, 15 weeks, face-to-face engineering technology course; students completed a19 question survey where they evaluated the success of various learning opportunities that wereincorporated into that particular course. All survey participants had the same professor whoprovided each of the six courses included in the study with the same types of learningopportunities. The data was compiled to identify if students consistently identify specificmotivational strategies or teaching methods as effective techniques for learning new
Paper ID #28821Development and Insights from the Measure of Framing AgencyDr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and associate professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information and Learning Sciences program and in the Chemical and Biological Engineer- ing Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revo- lutionizing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of Education
Paper ID #29084WIP - Integration of Voice Technology into First-Year EngineeringCurriculumDr. Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Jaskirat Sodhi is interested in first-year engineering curriculum design and recruitment, retention and success of engineering students. He is the coordinator of ENGR101, an application-oriented course for engineering students placed in pre-calculus courses. He has also developed and co-teaches the Fundamen- tals of Engineering Design course that includes a wide spectra of activities to teach general engineering students the basics of engineering design using a hands-on
new curriculum [5]. This paper will look at howstudents experienced the attainment of their first co-op placement. The research question for thisphase of the program development is: “How do BELL program student engineers experience theattainment of their first co-op placement?” In the data collection section below, the studentexperiences and inputs have been collected and analyzed. Improvements have been put in placeand ideas are available to draw on for future iterations.II. Model DescriptionThis new co-op centric educational model is an adaptation of two emerging world-leadingengineering educational models, as recognized by a 2018 MIT report [6], Charles SturtUniversity (Australia) and Iron Range Engineering (Minnesota). Adapted from
: New Modules and Long-Term TrendsAbstractComputational methods have become increasingly used in both academia and industry. At theUniversity of Illinois Urbana Champaign, the Department of Materials Science and Engineering(MSE), as part of a university-funded educational innovation program, has integratedcomputation throughout its undergraduate courses since 2014. Within this curriculum, studentsare asked to solve practical problems related to their coursework using computational tools in allrequired courses and some electives. Partly in response to feedback from students, we haveexpanded our current curriculum to include more computational modules. A computationalmodule was added to the freshman Introduction to Materials Science and
determine if theapplied approach in circuits is a broadly beneficial practice or only a stylistic preference of thisparticular instructor.References [1] S.A. Zekavat, K. Hungwe, and S. Sorby. An optimized approach for teaching the interdisciplinary course electrical engineering for non majors. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, OR, 2005. [2] Hooman Rashtian and Jun Ouyang. A New Application-Oriented Electronic Circuits Course for non-Electrical Engineering Students Using Arduino and NI VirtualBench. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2017. doi: 10.18260/1-2–27490. [3] Kenneth Van Treuren. Encouraging Students to See the Role of Service Courses in Their Major. In ASEE Annual Conference and
engineering curriculum atUniversity of Illinois at Chicago since Fall 2018. In particular, "electrification" of studentprojects and learning outcomes has been front and center in the department's latest strategicplanning. Leveraging recent literature and faculty expertise, an increasingly deeper integration ofArduino has since taken place, while attempting to maintain the core of team-based mechanicaldesign using morphological methods. The focus of this paper is to identify the challenges andpitfalls in such an endeavor by reflecting on the process of change over three semesters ofimplementation, including the deployment of both top-down and bottom-up approaches. Inparticular, this paper will examine course content development, teaching staff
the field ofBME where advancements are often made at the interface of materials, electrical, mechanical,and medical knowledge. Moreover, today’s biomedical engineers must be capable problem-solvers who are comfortable working in multidisciplinary teams within the design process.Traditional educational approaches, which leverage standard lecture-style dissemination of siloedinformation with limited hands-on project and design experience, are not sufficiently preparingour graduates for success in the interdisciplinary, project-focused world [1]. At UVM,foundational technical content is currently taught across the departments of MechanicalEngineering, Civil Engineering, and Electrical Engineering. In the new curriculum, these topicswill be
soldering, automated data acquisition, statistical process control, concurrent engineering and 0201 and 01005 component process development. His published management work includes: Concurrent Education: A Learning Approach to Serve Electronic Product Manufacturing and, ...Like Holding the Wolf by the Ears... the Key to Regain- ing Electronic Production Market Share: Breaking Free of the Division of Labor Manufacturing Model in High Cost Global Regions c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Concurrent Education – A New Post-Secondary Educational Model that Provides “Learning for Earning” as well as “Learning for Learning” in Rapidly Evolving Industries such as High
activities. Sketchtivity has a long history of enhancingstudent sketching capabilities through both the direct training and game-based design aspects. [4]The foundation for Mechanix and Sketchtivity is based in Language to Describe Drawing,Display, and Editing in Sketch Recognition (LADDER) [2], a generic sketching programminglanguage, with a goal to build a sketch recognition system that allows sketchers to draw naturallywithout having to learn a new set of stylized symbols.This study explores the engagement levels (qualitative approach) for deployment of theseproducts in an engineering freshman-level applied mechanics lab course. The Mechanixdeployment is contrasted with a previous use in a Project Lead the Way (PLTW) high schoolclassroom. [5] The
. Problems encountered by professionalsin the engineering industry are typically described as ill-structured [1], wicked [2], [3], ill-defined[4], complex [5], or workplace [1] problems. Although the terms used vary, they have similarmeanings; they describe problems that have no right and wrong solutions, are not easily defined,have no clear rules, and typically require iteration to develop a final solution. Engineering classroom problems, are defined as being typically given by the courseinstructor in a well-documented, well-defined written form, and having a single, “correct” solution[3]. Workplace problems, however, typically include only smaller amounts of informationregarding how to approach the problem, often with vague or conflicting
, improving accessibility and creating novel methods that encourage new learning opportunities and foster vibrant learning communities.Prof. Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Karin Jensen, Ph.D. is a Teaching Assistant Professor in bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Her research interests include student mental health and wellness, engineering stu- dent career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research. She was awarded a CAREER award from the National Science Foundation for her research on undergraduate mental health in engineering programs. Before joining UIUC she completed a post-doctoral fellowship at Sanofi Oncology in
. Munana, and M. Bordie, “Loneliness and Social Isolation in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan: An International Survey,” San Francisco, 2018.[20] E. A. Cech, “Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?,” Sci. Technol. Hum. Values, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 42–72, 2014.[21] D. Snowden and M. Boone, “Leader’s Framework for Decision Making - Harvard Business Review,” Harv. Bus. Rev., 2007.[22] D. Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux, 2011.[23] B. V Koen, Discussion of the Method: Conducting the Engineer’s Approach to Problem Solving. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.[24] B. Davis, Inventions of Teaching: A Genealogy. New York: Routledge, 2009.[25] G. W
modules. Halfwaythrough the quarter though, we learned half of the resources would have to be purchased. Thus,we modified our curriculum on a weekly basis, drawing on knowledge from each other andinspiration from those around us. As we designed around this problem, we communicated to theseminar participants that we would decide together what topics to cover and the kinds ofactivities we wanted to engage in during the seminar.Iteration. As designers, engineers, and educators, our approach to the design of the seminar wasiterative. We created and respected opportunities to listen, observe, and respond based on howstudents were taking notes. For example, one week we designed a tactile note taking activityafter being inspired by Dr. Bennett’s
affordable upper limb prosthetics.Dr. Philip J. Parker P.E., University of Wisconsin, Platteville Philip Parker, Ph.D., P.E., is Associate Dean for New Initiatives at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville. He is co-author of the textbook ”Introduction to Infrastructure” published in 2012 by Wiley. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Learner and Equity-Centered Approach to MakerspacesAbstractThe growth of makerspaces is a trend that has been decades in the making. Engineers are mosteffective when, in addition to technical knowledge in their field, they understand the capabilitiesof processes such as milling, welding, and 3D printing. Makerspaces enhance engineeringeducation by
gearedtowards increasing retention of inclusive curriculum reform. This paper will demonstrate thebenefits of teaching pavement rehabilitation concepts from a global perspective and exhibit howthat approach provided a technical basis for an inclusive learning experience.Course Summary The Pavement Management System course offered was an elective course dedicated tosenior-year, undergraduate students as well as graduate students (i.e., Masters and Doctoralstudents) in Civil Engineering; whose academic interests lie within the field of transportationengineering. The PMS class consisted of 17 full-time, undergraduate students and 9 graduatestudents; two of which were part time. Two of the graduate students were Doctoral students and7 were Master of
administrators)retreat to kick-off the upcoming academic year. The present members reviewed the process todate in crafting a new curriculum after receiving mixed feedback from students, faculty,neighboring industry and other stakeholders. Making note of the program requirements mandatedby the university and by ABET, the attendees identified key topics that were to be covered ineach course. This analysis was organized by topics (thermal fluids, solid mechanics, dynamicsand controls) and activity emphases (design, experimental and computational). It was thendetermined that research was to be conducted regarding mechanical engineering curriculumreform in order to construct a more ideal solution. This began with administrators and facultyseparating tasks
Paper ID #29210Two Approaches to Concept Maps in Undergraduate Fluid MechanicsDr. Julie Mendez, Indiana University-Purdue University Columbus Julie Mendez is a Clinical Assistant Professor in the Division of Mechanical Engineering at Indiana University-Purdue University Columbus. Her interests include active learning, online course develop- ment, and standards-based grading.Dr. Jessica Lofton, University of Evansville Dr. Lofton is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Evansville. She is the Director for the OPTIONS in Engineering summer camps for middle school and high school girls
globalization, new organizationalconfigurations, and new technologies of communication, design, and production. More researchis needed to document images that are often discounted by students and even faculty, i.e.,portrayals of engineering practice that emphasize its non-technical and non-calculative sides,including work processes and dynamics that involve social and cultural dimensions [3-4].The aim of this work-in-progress paper is to introduce an exploratory project that will testinnovative approaches to data collection and analysis for rapidly generating new knowledgeabout engineering practice. Traditionally, engineering practices have been studied usingindividual interviews or in-depth ethnographic field research, the latter requiring researchers