living-learning community where students learned about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education and a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Faculty Integration of Social Justice Issues into Courses and Co-Curricular Activities for Engineering StudentsAbstractRecent attention has been drawn to historical inequalities in society that persist in some formtoday. Social justice concerns
embedded. Evidence of gendered and race-baseddiscrimination is particularly robust, indicating that women and faculty of color experience arange of overt and covert inequities throughout their professional careers when compared to menand white faculty respectively [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10] [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20].Covert inequities and microaggressions as they play out in 2020 in colleges and universities inthe U.S. are often very difficult to address because they are subtle, even invisible (especially tothe often well-intended perpetrator); other equities are still far from subtle. In STEM fields,gendered discrimination issues have often been described with the “leaky pipeline” metaphor:women leave STEM fields in greater
engineering that included four faculty from differentdisciplines, civil engineering, economics, education, and sociology. The authors addressed somefactors that contributed to the process of the research collaboration such as sharing knowledge,collective understanding, and facing with distant geographic locations.Overall, although there have been some discussions on the process of research collaboration andsome important aspects such as trust and power issues in engineering education literature, notonly there is a gap of empirical studies in this area but also it appears that research collaborationas an important area of research has not gained enough attention. The studies concerned withresearch collaboration in engineering education literature
co-author on an engineering textbook, Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, which is used worldwide in over 250 institutions. Dr. Bailey has served as the Principal Investigator (PI) on several externally funded efforts, most recently for the RIT NSF ADVANCE Institu- tional Transformation grant (2012-2019). The goal of this large-scale ($3.4M), multi-year university-level organizational transformation effort is to increase the representation and advancement of women STEM faculty. The project has resulted in impactful new programs, practices, and policies as well as a new dedicated unit within the Office of the Provost.Dr. Naveen Sharma, Rochester Institute of TechnologyLana Verschage, Rochester Institute of
Navy veterans based on system level technical expertise and leadership maturation developed during service,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference, 2016. New Orleans, LA.[31] V. Jovanovic, A. Dean, C. Considine, K. Arcaute, P. Katsioloudis, M. Tomovic, T. Stout, C. Schwalm, J. Michaeli, and Y. Shen, “Pilot programs for veterans transition to engineering fields,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference, 2016: New Orleans, LA.[32] Department of Veterans Affairs, The Post-9/11 G.I. Bill, Accessed on November 22, 2019 [Online], Available: http://www.gibill.va.gov/post-911/post-911-gi-bill-summary/, 201[33] K. Bullington Sibson, W. Nuckols, and D. Gregory, “Bicker, moan, or take out a loan: How veterans navigate the financial issues of degree
teaching practice in order to see sustainable change in engineering schools. This study examines the contrast between STEM education research on the positive impact of faculty on diversity and inclusion and some engineering faculty’s lack of actual involvement with these issues. We examine the faculty of an electrical and computer engineering (ECE) department at Purdue University using Fishbein and Ajzen’s reasoned action model for behavior to determine factors in the department that influence faculty’s intention to make change for diversity and inclusion. We conducted interviews with ECE faculty about diversity, inclusion and department culture, and then an inductive thematic analysis
have not been well represented within the ranks ofdoctoral degree holders or faculty in STEM disciplines despite the increased attention in recentyears to this concern. URM students lag considerably behind White and Asian students in degreecompletion and faculty appointments. One intervention widely touted as effective in promotingpositive outcomes is mentoring however URM students often lack access to mentoring and justas importantly mentors lack culturally responsive knowledge, skills and dispositions required tobe effective mentors to URM students. A qualitative study was conducted to better understandhow the knowledge, skills and dispositions of STEM faculty align with culturally responsivementoring. Three themes were constructed from the
made our designsuccessful, and where it may be brittle when used in new contexts [2]. Finally, we describe howwe will engage attendees in the CoNECD session.ContextWithin our Partnering Across Insider-views of RED (PaiRED) project, we are working todevelop an understanding of how power and privilege play out on leadership teams within NSF-sponsored Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (RED) projects. The RED program aims tosupport departments to make “significant sustainable changes necessary to overcome longstanding issues in their undergraduate programs and educate inclusive communities ofengineering and computer science students prepared to solve 21st-century challenges”(https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2017/nsf17501/nsf17501.htm).The RED
potentially serious penaltiesfor such behavior and viewpoints. A very public graphic example of this is the Google echochamber case, where an employee was dismissed due to expressing viewpoints that did not alignwith company values [5]. Professional engineering bodies are increasing the obligations onmembers to report breaches to their code of ethical conduct and making it more difficult formembers to avoid disciplinary processes, for example Engineering New Zealand changed theircode so that “engineers must take action if they observe something of concern” and they mustreport if they “suspect another engineer has significantly breached the code” [6]. Therefore, it isin the best interests of all parties to address disruptive and disrespectful behavior
department faculty increase their understanding ofthe issues facing underrepresented minorities in doctoral programs, identify and remedydepartmental practices that may be hindering URM student success, and examine and improvetheir own mentoring practices. The theoretical framework of the model is the Kezar and Eckelmodel of change for colleges and universities, which proposes five core elements: supportivesenior administration, collaborative leadership, robust project design, faculty development, andvisible actions [7].At the heart of the project are the Fellows, usually tenured faculty members in participatingSTEM departments who share a strong interest in URM student success, with contributions alsobeing made by other departmental faculty members
: Mental and physical health barriersStudents described barriers related to mental health. Multiple respondents described theirmental health as a barrier to completing assignments. They specified that they found theirinteractions with faculty around their mental health as problematic. Another student talked aboutother health concerns that he had, and not wanting to ask for help. He did not tell anyone in CSEthat he was having problems until he was asked to leave the program. After describing his issues,he was reinstated. Students were not aware of what services were available to them or whatpolicies CSE programs around accommodations for students. I'm not trying to victimize myself, but as a foreign [student], we go through more
collectively develop viable research agendas that not only illuminate narrativessituated in the HBCU experience, but also engage those stakeholders in empoweringopportunities that promote their voices (p. 31)”.There have been some initiatives concerned with broadening participation of underrepresentedgroups. One such effort is the partnership between Vanderbilt University and Fisk University,the Fisk-Vanderbilt Masters-to-PhD Bridge Program (Stassun et al. 2010). Students accepted inthis program have access to additional coursework and/or research experience and instructionalopportunities at both institutions. They also interact with faculty and receive deliberate supportand mentorship. The program focuses on preparing students for Ph.D. studies
the South Dakota School of Mines & Technology. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Including Alice: Uncovering the Narrative of One Student’s Experience at the Intersection of International Student Status and Mental HealthAbstractBackground: Several known unknowns of inclusion, including international student and mentalhealth concerns, are rarely spoken about in diversity and inclusion topics. Faculty developmentresources for inclusion are limited, and narrating student experiences could help facultyempathize with and understand their students better. e share life stories of one minoritized student’s experience in engineering
within the working group itself,and helpful to think towards how we might do better and keep these dynamics in mind.Another issue that we had to consider (and with which we still contend) is how to reach outbeyond the scope of engineering educators, students, faculty, and administrators who are alreadyon-board or currently working in the field against injustice and systemic oppression towardsequity. How might we reach those who work in the realm of depoliticized and disengagedengineering, with no concern or interest in the #EngineersShowUp movement, or other suchcauses [8]? How might we engage in constructive conversations that bring people in, withoutturning them off or having them shut down? Or do we even concern ourselves with them
was conducted.The first town hall event featured a faculty panel, guest speaker, and round-table discussions on avariety of topics including LGBTQIA+ issues and veterans’ affairs. The keynote speaker was anengineering graduate of the university who held a high-ranking position with a well-known majoremployer. The second town hall, similar to the first, featured a faculty panel and round-tablediscussions. The keynote was delivered by two employees from the diversity and inclusion teamat a well-known major employer. The third event was rebranded as a Diversity and InclusionSummit. It was promoted to students, staff, and faculty as an intercultural learning experience andfeatured a land-acknowledgement address, student panel, and round-table
belonging, sociocultural senseof belonging, authentic-self, problem behavior, and perceived institutional support) and theinfluence of students’ interpersonal interactions with different groups of people (e.g., faculty,peers, and staff) on those constructs [1].New Questions: Have we Conceptualized Sense of Belonging as a Theoretical Construct?New questions have arisen while situating our research in the broader literature related to senseof belonging. Definitions and conceptual structures of sense of belonging are sporadic andinconsistent across the belongingness literature in engineering education. The questions (i.e.,have we conceptualized sense of belonging as a theoretical construct?) were supported by acumulative argument in higher education
, WA.Dweck, Carol S.. (2008) Mindset: The New Psychology Of Success. New York : Ballantine Books.Edwards, T., Catling, J.C., & Parry, E. (2016) Identifying predictors of resilience in students. Psychology Teaching Review,Vol 22, No. 1, p-26-34.Estrada, Aaron, & Schlemer, L. T. (2015) Taxonomy of faculty assumptions about students. Presentation and Paper FIEAnnual Meeting, El Paso, TX, October 2015.Fernando, D.M. & Hebert, B.B., (2011) Resiliency and recovery: Lessons from the Asian Tsunami and Hurricane Katrina.Journal of Multicultural counseling and development Vol 39 2-13Galvan, D, Dong, J. Schlemer, L., & Allen, E.(2020) Lessons Learned: Teaching and Learning Academy Workshop topromote Asset-based mindset among STEM faculty
Civil engineering where they create structures as a team that will survive a shake table test. The organizers for the LWE preLUsion meet with the faculty running the modules and get a demonstration and walk-through of the activity ahead of time. This allows for feedback on the goals of the program to be fully exchanged with the presenting faculty and students. Each year, new modules have been introduced, and mentor and student feedback helps faculty decide if they are offered again the following year. Following the lab activity, the women have a lunch with the Dean, who welcomes them to engineering at Lehigh. Following lunch, a Lean-In exercise is the third bonding event for the women, and usually the most profound
…’That's a whole other issue I guess, where we go into the invisible disabilities aspect of it.” Thispattern of a lack of believability due to invisibility perpetuates marginalization of this population.While faculty and universities are becoming more supportive of students with disabilities [16],[26], progress is slow and more work needs to be done to intentionally include individuals withnon-apparent disabilities. In this study, participants described the majority of their experienceswhen requesting accommodations through faculty to be largely negative in context. Thesefindings again highlight the complexities in the intersectionality of an individual’s studentidentity, their disability identity, and the ways they are allowed to navigate the
. 6. ResultsA thematic analysis was conducted on the data collected between February and December 2018 –a period of eleven months. First, based on the coded transcripts, Figure 1 shows the summary ofthe frequency for each construct over the duration of continuous data collection. In this figure, thedominance of Anticipatory Cognition, Academic Self Efficacy, Stereotype Threat and Identity issignificant. While Anticipatory Cognition and Academic Self Efficacy appear to show decliningtrends over time, it is evident that the issues of Identity and Stereotype Threat barely changed. Thedecline in Future Anticipation and New Information are correlated with the marginal changes intheir Anticipatory Cognition or their academic awareness
investigates narrative inquiry of faculty who use their agency to engage in broadening participation in engineering activities. Cynthia received her B.S. in Biological Systems Engineering from Kansas State University and will receive her M.S. in Management Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech in 2019.Taylor Lightner, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education Taylor Lightner is a 2nd year Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She received her B.S. in Industrial Engineering at Clemson University. She currently participates in the Disaster Re- silience and Risk Management Program and New Horizon Scholars. Her current research interest includes broadening participation, interdisciplinary
you can house students on campus for free (be sure to consult university counsel regarding hosting minors on campus) • Time intensive; need dedicated staff and a student committee • Great opportunity to work with campus partners (faculty and/or alumni panels, family sessions with Admissions & Financial Aid/Scholarships, etc.) • Consideration needed to recruit and select students from a variety of backgrounds and make sure your program reaches them where they are.Lessons LearnedWe have experienced both logistical and technical challenges with our overnightprograms. There have been issues with the materials and software we use for thecomputing and engineering design competitions
perception is prevalent among engineering professionals(Faulkner, 2007). When mapped onto a space such as a classroom or professor’s office hours orstudent group project meeting, the techno-social dualism may cause conversations and discourseto center around technical issues instead of social issues such as ethics, diversity/inclusion, andmental health as an engineering student. These forms of discourse lead to what Cech (2014) callsthe culture of disengagement, where she finds that engineering students are less concerned withpublic welfare issues as they get socialized to the profession. This is not to say that the culturalscript of primarily centering discourse around technical issues in engineering spaces dictates thekinds of conversations that
preparation and the conducting of evidence-based interventions in school environments.Dr. Kenneth Reid, University of Indianapolis Kenneth Reid is the Associate Dean and Director of the R.B. Annis School of Engineering at the Uni- versity of Indianapolis and an affiliate Associate Professor in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is active in engineering within K-12, serving on the TSA Board of Directors. He and his coauthors were awarded the William Elgin Wickenden award for 2014, recognizing the best paper in the Journal of Engineering Education. He was awarded an IEEE-USA Professional Achievement Award in 2013 for designing the nation’s first BS degree in Engineering Education. He was named NETI Faculty Fellow
transition for Black students in engineering and that they do not have continuity at thegraduate level with regards to identifying counterspaces. This leaves students to have to identifynew spaces in real time while adjusting to the new demands of graduate school. Additionally,there is a salient theme of mental health and wellness being an area of concern for Black studentsin engineering. While counterspaces provide avenues for Black students to express their wellnessconcerns there is an opportunity for institutions to rise to the call as well. These issues will befurther explored in future work of the larger study.References[1] B. L. Yoder, "Engineering by the Numbers," American Society for Engineering Education, pp. 11-47, 2018.[2] C.D.H. Ash
curriculum in first‐ and second‐year courses may help assuage some of the concerns expressed by some faculty of upper‐level courses. Fall 2019 was the first semester collecting data for Material and Energy Balances. We did get a high rate of participation for all sets of reflection questions, although we are only beginning to analyze the data. Spring 2020 is the first semester implementing these topics in Thermodynamic Process Analysis. As a result, the data has not been compiled yet and it is not possible to determine an analysis approach in advance.Weber and Atadero. 2020 Annual CoNECD Conference. 18
Development(BOLD) Center. The Engineering GoldShirt Program is one of the programs supported by theBOLD Center.Through developing a relationship with Iliana, she shared of herself and was very engaged insocial and political issues and often participated in forms of resistance including protests foranimal rights, civil rights, and LGBTQ rights. In my opinion, my knowledge of her activism andmy relationship with her cultivated a unique lens into her experience in studying engineering atUniversity of Colorado Boulder as a Latina, first-generation, low-income woman.Background on the Engineering GoldShirt ProgramThe Engineering GoldShirt Program is modeled after the athletic redshirt program, which manycollege athletic programs use to develop first-year
Be, Inc. CRYSTAL R. EMERY Producer | Director | Author | Activist crystalremery.com Crystal Emery is known for producing narratives aimed at creating a more equitable society. She is the Founder and CEO of URU The Right To Be, Inc., a nonprofit content production company that addresses issues at the intersection of humanities, arts, and sciences. Emery is a member of the Producers Guild of America and New York Women in Film and Television, and was selected in 2019 as an AAAS IF/THEN Ambassador. She has designed and produced several groundbreaking Virtual Reality Learning Experi- ences. Emery has been hailed as ”inspiring” by the Los Angeles Times and as a ”leader in science and tech- nology” in the Good
should not be a consideration.When interviewing Melvin after he completed the first of seven units in the course and begun thesecond unit, he is more concerned and conflicted about:having such a mixed group of students in terms of freshman versus senior […] the range is waybigger, the maturity level, and the prior experience [...] That's not to say that I do not respect thevarious cultures and ethnicities of my students. But, as I said, to me this should not be an issuethat changes the educational experience of students.He believes that the new setting, higher number of students, and the mixed group of freshmen toseniors has made it challenging “to create a safe space where students feel secure to outwardlypersonalize their thoughts and ideas
Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the American Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Exten- sion Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engi- neering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and