Paper ID #23248Initial Problem Scoping in K-2 Classrooms (Fundamental)Emily M. Haluschak, Purdue University, West Lafayette Emily M. Haluschak is an undergraduate student in Chemical Engineering working within INSPIRE In- stitute at Purdue University. She primarily focuses on data analysis for K-2 STEM integration while also editing STEM curriculum.Ms. Michelle L. Stevens, Lafayette School Corporation Michelle Stevens is a 1st grade teacher at Glen Acres Elementary School in Lafayette, Indiana. She became interested in the implementation of STEM integration in the early grades after teaching the 1st grade STEM
], rather than as a finalproduct [18], [19]. Social theories put greater emphasis on the purpose of writing as a means ofcommunication and on the social contexts and interactions that influence writing [20], [21]. Inparallel with research in these areas, Writing-Across-the-Curriculum (WAC) programs havebeen widely implemented in universities to support writing instruction across disciplines, andWriting-in-the-Discipline (WID) research and pedagogies have particularly worked to describeand develop specialized genres and practices within a discipline.As we work to improve writing instruction in engineering, three fundamental principles stand outfrom these literatures: i) writing is a complex and social process rather than just a product; ii)writing
Paper ID #21525Integrated Teaching Model: A Follow-Up with Fundamental AerodynamicsDr. Sidaard Gunasekaran, University of Dayton Sid is an Assistant Professor at the Mechanical and Aerospace Department at the University of Dayton. He got his MS and Ph.D. at the University of Dayton as well. During his doctoral studies, Sid developed a knack for teaching using modern pedagogical practices in mechanical and aerospace classes and engaged in diverse research in Low Reynolds number flows. Sid is an active participant in the Dayton/Cincinnati American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) section
technology first-year students. This impacted three major engineering technologyprograms (Audio Engineering Technology, Computer and Electronic Engineering Technology,and Electromechanical Engineering Technology), totaling 66 first-year students.We decided to use the classic definition of critical thinking from Scriven 1996 [2] for thepurpose of our project: "Critical thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively andskillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating informationgathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, orcommunication, as a guide to belief and action."Our motivation in introducing these troubleshooting exercises in the first-year fundamental
Paper ID #22325Effective Design-based Implementation Research Using Complex Systems Mod-eling (Fundamental)Roxanne A. Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology Roxanne Moore is currently a Research Engineer at Georgia Tech with appointments in the school of Mechanical Engineering and the Center for Education Integrating Mathematics, Science, and Computing (CEISMC). She is involved with engineering education innovations from K-12 up to the collegiate level. She received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2012.Dr. Michael Helms, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. Marion Usselman, Georgia Institute of Technology
stations. Our relationship with NASAcontinued in 2011, when two students and one faculty were accepted for ten-week summerinternships at Johnson Space Center and four students participated in solar panels research atour college. The success of this program and funding provided by several other grants helped us institute a Summer Undergraduate Research Program on our premises16 . The fundamental idea behind this program is that our students get to experience the entire research discovery process and the scientific method from A to Z, rather than acting as assistants for someone else’s research. We formed a team of three professors (one a Physics professor, one an Electrical Engineer, and me, a Mechanical Engineer) who review proposals
: All of the wolves survived the rugged winter. Although, the bitter cold and lack of food weakened many in the pack.Here, the author has simply used the wrong word. The word that the author wanted was however: All of the wolves survived the rugged winter. However, the bitter cold and lack of food weakened many in the pack.Because the word although is such an important and often used word in engineering and science, makingthe mistake given above seriously undercuts one’s credibility.c: Run-on sentence with however or thereforeSentences are the fundamental units of expression in scientific documents. Readers of professionalwriting expect authors to write in sentences. When a sentence runs on, readers often lose their place in
Paper ID #22315The Write Background Makes a Difference: What Research and WritingSkills can Predict about Capstone Project SuccessDr. Kris Jaeger-Helton, Northeastern University Professor Beverly Kris Jaeger-Helton, Ph.D. is on the full-time faculty in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Northeastern University (NU) teaching Simulation Modeling and Analysis, Facilities Planning, and Human-Machine Systems. She is Director of the Galante Engineering Busi- ness Program as well as the Coordinator of Senior Capstone Design in Industrial Engineering at NU. Dr. Jaeger-Helton has also been an active member of
Paper ID #23960Critical Thinking, Design Practices, and Assessment in a Fundamentals ofEngineering CourseDr. Ryan Munden, Fairfield University Dr. Ryan Munden is Associate Dean of Engineering at Fairfield University. He received his PhD in Applied Physics from Yale University and a BS in Physics from Stetson University. His areas of inter- est include semiconductor nanowires, nanotechnology education, first-year engineering initiatives, and engineering service, outreach, and education.Ms. Marcia Arambulo Rodriguez, Fairfield University Marcia Arambulo Rodriguez is the Assistant Dean of the School of Engineering at
pedagogy and academic performanceand how to address them, remains to be answered by educators. Among these issues, one of themost recurrent is the perception shared by many instructors on the differences in the basicengineering competencies between domestic and international students, which is the focus of thisstudy. Previous studies have shown that talking and working in groups with their domesticcounterparts is recognized to be the most important factor in perceptions of communicationcompetency [3].Competencies in Fundamentals of Engineering (FE)Accreditation of engineering degrees assures that the contents of the degree meets national andinternational standards of the profession for which the degree prepares its graduates [4], andacademic
Paper ID #23389Teacher Implementation of Structured Engineering Notebooks in Engineer-ing Design-based STEM Integration Units (Fundamental)Hillary Elizabeth Merzdorf, Purdue University, West LafayetteAmanda C. Johnston, Purdue University, West LafayetteDr. Kerrie A. Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Douglas is an Assistant Professor in the Purdue School of Engineering Education. Her research is focused on improving methods of assessment in large learning environments to foster high-quality learning opportunities. Additionally, she studies techniques to validate findings from machine-generated educational data.Prof
Paper ID #23386A Teacher’s Use of Engineering Language in an Engineering Design-basedSTEM Integration Unit (Fundamental)Emilie A. Siverling, Purdue University, West Lafayette Emilie A. Siverling is a Ph.D. Candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received a B.S. in Materials Science and Engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and an M.S.Ed. in Science Education from Purdue University, and she is a former high school chemistry and physics teacher. Her research interests are in K-12 STEM integration, primarily using engineering design to support secondary science curricula and instruction.Prof
Paper ID #23336Critical Analysis of the Validity of the Fundamentals of Engineering Mechan-ical ExamDr. Alex C. Szatmary, King’s College Alex Szatmary teaches mechanical engineering in a new program at King’s College, Wilkes-Barre. In his technical research, he uses mathematical models to study how cells get to places in the body. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Critical analysis of the validity of the Fundamentals of Engineering Mechanical ExamAbstractThe purpose of the Fundamentals of Engineering Exam (FE) is primarily to ensure that Engineersin
Paper ID #22301Argumentation in K-12 Engineering Education: A Review of the Literature(Fundamental)Dr. Amy Wilson-Lopez, Utah State University Amy Wilson-Lopez is an associate professor at Utah State University who studies culturally responsive engineering and literacy-infused engineering with linguistically diverse students.Ms. Christina Marie Sias, Utah State University Christina Sias is a PhD. student at Utah State UniversityAshley R. StrongJared W. Garlick, Utah State University Jared Garlick is a Graduate Student in the Secondary Education Master’s of Education (MEd) program through the Emma Eccles Jones College
Paper ID #23432Engineering Design Professional Development as a Mechanism for ChangingScience Teachers’ Beliefs (Fundamental)Prof. Tamara J. Moore, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tamara J. Moore, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education and Director of STEM Integration in the INSPIRE Institute at Purdue University. Dr. Moore’s research is centered on the integration of STEM concepts in K-12 and postsecondary classrooms in order to help students make connections among the STEM disciplines and achieve deep understanding. Her work focuses on defining STEM integration and investigating its
is given in Tables 1and 2, respectively.Under the mentorship of engineering and education professors, the graduate students and postdoctoralresearchers developed the robotics-aided lessons and other supporting activities and conducted allinstructional activities during the PD. In advance of the PD, a three-week schedule was developed toimplement the entire program. The program included combination of fundamental educational theories andconcepts, robotics fundamentals, and robotics-aided math and science lessons. The project team facilitatedthe PD through different instructional modes and methods such as lectures, hands-on activities, groupdiscussions, projects, co-generation dialogues, assignments, brainstorming sessions, competitions
Paper ID #21117High-Fidelity Digitized Assessment of Heat Transfer Fundamentals using aTiered Delivery StrategyDr. Tian Tian, University of Central Florida Tian Tian is an Associate Lecturer of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Central Florida, which she joined in 2013. She has been frequently teaching undergraduate lecture and laboratory components of Heat Transfer, Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics. Her educational research interests focus on project-based learning, online learning, and the digitization of STEM assessments. She received the Teaching Incentive Award, Excellence in Undergraduate
Paper ID #22344Interests and Needs of Secondary Science Educators Regarding ProfessionalDevelopment on Engineering Standards (Fundamental)Sarah E. Lopez, Utah State University Sarah Lopez is a graduate student at Utah State University, pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education and a Masters in Electrical Engineering. She graduated from Oklahoma Christian University in 2016 with degrees in Computer Engineering and Math Education. Her research interests include spatial ability, robotics education, and the signal processing of biometric data, such as EEG, in engineering education research.Dr. Wade H. Goodridge, Utah State
Paper ID #21875Effect of Scaffolding in the Assessment of Engineering Practices for MiddleSchool Students (Fundamental)Debra Brockway, Educational Testing Service Ms. Brockway is a Senior Research Associate at Educational Testing Service (ETS) in Princeton, NJ, where she leads and contributes to projects exploring innovative approaches to assessment and integrating the STEM subjects.Mr. Kofi James c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Effect of Scaffolding in the Assessment of Engineering Practices for Middle School Students (Fundamental)Introduction
Paper ID #22348The State of Engineering Integration in K-12 Science Standards: Five YearsAfter NGSS (Fundamental)Sarah E. Lopez, Utah State University Sarah Lopez is a graduate student at Utah State University, pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education and a Masters in Electrical Engineering. She graduated from Oklahoma Christian University in 2016 with degrees in Computer Engineering and Math Education. Her research interests include spatial ability, robotics education, and the signal processing of biometric data, such as EEG, in engineering education research.Dr. Wade H. Goodridge, Utah State University Wade Goodridge
systems that interact with humans and the world Shute and her colleaguesrefer to CT as the conceptual foundation for solving problems efficiently and effectively. Whensolving complex problems, CT helps with understanding complex phenomenon throughcombining the critical thinking skills and the fundamental concepts of computer science likeabstraction, decomposition and algorithm [7], [9], [11]. Therefore, engaging students in CTthrough the context of engineering education can promote problem-solving skills, and may helpstudents find innovative solutions and make good decisions [7].Wing [11] argues that CT is a core ability for reading, writing and math and should be added toanalytical ability of children. Some have studied computational thinking in
Paper ID #21694Developing Engineering Proficiency and Self-Efficacy Through a Middle SchoolEngineering Course (Fundamental)Dr. Jessica D. Gale, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Jessica Gale is a Research Scientist II at Georgia Tech’s Center for education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on and often connects a range of topics within STEM/STEAM education including, engineering and STEM integration at the elementary and mid- dle grades levels, project-based learning across STEM disciplines, college and career readiness, design- based implementation research, and STEM student
secondaryeducation research that frontloading students with learning disabilities aids in the learning process[7, 8, 9]. While literature of frontloading in post-secondary education is deficient, it ishypothesized that by combining these methods, frontloading and active learning, the resultinghybrid will become a more beneficial teaching method for students with learning disabilities.A preliminary study was conducted in Fundamentals of Engineering (MCET 101) to determine ifactive learning is more effective when students with learning disabilities are first front-loaded withinformation. Fundamentals of Engineering is a core course in the Manufacturing and MechanicalEngineering Technology program at the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT). To
poor to excellent, as shown in Figure 1. 10 Very Poor Fair Good Very Excellent Poor Good My instructor’s contribution to this course My instructor’s contribution to my learningFigure 1: Example of current SET format and structure.However, an AOE question might be reformatted to be structured as in Figure 2, in which theresponse is only positive, negative, or neutral, but requires an explanation for the reason thecontribution is considered as such. This structure is fundamentally different from the approachcurrently used, which asks students to add general comments after
discussion each student was given the National Society of Professional Engineers(NSPE) Code of Ethics for Engineers. Each student group was then asked to discuss and brieflypresent on one of the six fundamental canons. An out of class assignment was for the studentsto research the code of ethics for a professional society within their engineering discipline (e.g.,ASCE, ASME, IEEE, IISE) and determine how they compare to the NSPE Code of Ethics forEngineers.To prepare students to write the essays required for the Ethics Module, a handout on what is con-sidered scholarly writing is disseminated and discussed. The handout includes information onpublications, authors, and articles. The instructors discuss aspects such as audience, publishers,reading
writing to computer software. Engineering professors expect that engineering students learnstructural fundamentals in addition to learning to use CAD software; in the same way, studentsmust learn structural fundamentals of language in addition to learning to use grammar checks.Agency and Effective WritingThe next significant correlation was between faculty who felt that they were effective writers andthe amount of agency they offered students in the writing assignments in their courses. Facultywho identified as effective writers did not indicate they offered opportunities for agentive writing[Q13 and Q8, p=0.015, Corr -0.498]. The meaning of this correlation is difficult to ascertain, asagency was a difficult factor to capture in focus groups
administer and appraise effective teaching and learning, and the content knowledge includesbasic concepts, theoretical basis, and the fundamentals aligned with classroom environment [8].Having experienced the TPACK framework, teachers can understand and assess appropriaterequirements for technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge to teach a particular lesson,which can make them well-prepared and effective, especially in a technology-enhancededucational environment. Research shows that TPACK framework can promote effectivepedagogy [4,5,9]. Thus, it is clear that for teachers to make effective use of the TPACK framework,they require the knowledge of the disciplinary content as well as an understanding of technology’srole in effective
Paper ID #23387Teacher Engineering Talk About Problem Scoping in a Middle School Engi-neering Design-based STEM Integration Unit (Fundamental)Amanda C. Johnston, Purdue University, West Lafayette Amanda Johnston is a graduate student in engineering education at Purdue University.Mr. Murat Akarsu, Purdue University, West Lafayette Murat Akarsu is a fifth-year Ph.D. student in the Mathematics Education interested in pre-service teachers’ understanding of mathematics and geometry and STEM integration. Prior to arriving at Purdue Univer- sity, he earned a master’s degree in the department of mathematics at the University of
Paper ID #23250Equity in Collaboration: My Ideas Matter, Too! K-12 Students’ Negotiationof Social Status in Collaborative Engineering Teams (Fundamental Research)Mrs. Kayla R. Maxey, Purdue University, West Lafayette Kayla is a doctoral student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research interest includes the influence of informal engineering learning experiences on diverse students’ attitudes, beliefs, and perceptions of engineering, and the relationship between students’ interests and the practices and cultures of engineering. Her current work at the FACE lab is on teaching strategies for K
called from the Arduino code as needed. TheArduino IDE’s editor page is used to write the Arduino program called a “sketch.” The Arduinoenvironment transforms the sketch into a C++ program through pre-processing that slightlymodifies the sketch, e.g., by adding automatically generated function prototypes. Following thepre-processing, the resulting code is compiled using a C/C++ compiler (avr-g++). The Arduinoenvironment supports various C/C++ programming constructs that work with avr-g++. See Ref.[12] for additional details on the Arduino build process. Figure 1: VEX educational robotics kit3. Curriculum DevelopmentThe curriculum of the program was designed following careful deliberations among the projectteam members