/ [Accessed: March 14, 2019].[17] K. Brouwer, T. Cottam, C. LiVolsi and S Pratt, “Eye in the Sky – Drone Detection & Tracking System”, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://vsgc.odu.edu/acrpdesigncompetition/wp- content/uploads/sites/3/2018/11/Runway_First-Place_URI_Nassersharif_Bahram.pdf [Accessed: January 14, 2019].[18] B. Blumberg, A. Johnson, A. Norberg and E. Roads, “Twice Repurposed Crumb Rubber as a Jet Fuel Solidifier”, 2014. [Online]. Available http://vsgc.odu.edu/ACRPDesignCompetition/competitionwinners/2014/Environment%20-%20Firs t%20Place.pdf [Accessed: January 14, 2019].[19] S. Gildersleeve, S. Norris, B. Tortorici
the number of STEM graduates and increasing underrepresented populationsearning a STEM degree for two reasons: (a) State will experience the largest headcount growth ofhigh school graduates in the next ten years; over 87,000 more graduates by 2025 [8] and (b) in2011, US Census Bureau[9] reported Texas was one of five majority minority states. While theAERO program traditionally has over 90% of the undergraduate students entering from highschools in Texas, the current ethnic and gender diversity of the student population does not reflectthe ethnic makeup of the state.A recent initiative by Texas A&M University seeks to diversify the aerospace departmentorganically through an “aerospace skills” based approach to design in an effort to
tests. It is important to note that our intent is not to redesign this course to replace capstone projects;those projects are much more comprehensive and involve other topics including, but not limitedto aircraft structures and propulsion. The current course framework is listed, along with proposedCDIO inspired changes, in Table 1, and the syllabus (current and proposed CDIO based revision)is in Appendices A and B respectively. Table 1: Current Course Framework and Proposed CDIO Based Additions Existing course outline and topics Current Proposed CDIO inspired additions assignments/projects (project based) 1. Derivation of the
3 © American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 2019 ASEE 126th National Conferencethought processes on the white board, working out problems, using “Jeopardy” style games forreviewing the concepts, etc. The post-class work included graded homework problems tostrengthen the concepts.The Motivation Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) [55] was administered to thestudents of the intervention and control groups to measure the five dimensions (a) Self efficacy,(b) Intrinsic value, (c) Test anxiety, (d) Cognitive strategy use, and (e) Self-regulation. Students’perceptions of the flipped classroom were determined with a Flipped Classroom survey. Theseinstruments had a 5-point
majors (engineering, mathematics, chemistry, biology, computerscience, political science and English). The responding students included incoming freshmen,sophomores, juniors and seniors.Two assessment instruments will be used to establish the intellectual development mental modelsof the students. The first one (B-D scale) is a 16-item scale developed by Bateman and Donald[36]. Their instrument is a questionnaire that measures the stages of development in four broadercategories (dualism, multiplicity, relativism, and commitment) with four items for each stage. Thesecond instrument is the Learning Environment Preference (LEP) Instrument developed by Moore[37] to measure the development positions 2-5 (Intellectual Development). Positions 6-9
. 213-224, Feb. 2008.[2] P. Kunz, U. Frischknecht – Tobler, B. Bollmann – Zuberbuehler, and S. Groesser, “Factors influencing the adoption of systems thinking in primary and secondary schools in Switzerland,” Systems Research and Behavioral Science, vol. 34, pp. 78-93. Jan. 2017.[3] H. Shaked, C. Schechter, “Definitions and development of systems thinking,” in Systems Thinking for School Leaders, Cham: Springer, 2017, pp 9-22.[4] R.D. Arnold and J.P. Wade, “A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 44, pp. 669-678, 2015.[5] J.W. Forrester, Industrial Dynamics. Portland: Productivity Press, 1961.[6] B. Richmond, “Systems thinking/system dynamics: let’s just get on with it,” System
)they are interested, and 5) they feel cared about by the instructor and/or other students” [13].Marzano, Pickering and Heflebowen [14] noted that a pedagogical environment that elicits positiveresponses to questions: “a) How do I feel? b) Am I interested? c) Is it important? and d) Can I dothis?” may indicate an engaged student. Such an environment leads to self-efficacy which has beendefined by Bandura [15] as "how well one can execute courses of action required to deal withprospective situations". Academic achievement and self-efficacy have been empirically shown tobe related [16]-[20]. Successful learning enhances an individual’s self-efficacy [21]-[23].The objective of this work is to assess an innovative active learning environment. In
Paper ID #25717Open-Ended Modeling Problems in a Sophomore-Level Aerospace Mechan-ics of Materials CoursesDr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson is a postdoctoral research fellow at the University of Michigan. He received his Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2014, after which he served as a postdoctoral research fellow at the Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. Aaron also obtained a master’s degree from MIT in 2010 and a bachelor’s degree from the University of Michigan in 2008, both in aerospace engineering.Dr. Jessica E
is the test phase, wherestudents evaluate the structural integrity of their designs with a drop test from a height of sixstories.ResultsBefore the activity was introduced, students were asked to evaluate their perceptions of aerospaceengineering and gage their interest level. Students were asked some basic demographics questions(reported in Camp Background), if they plan to major in engineering, the problem they were most(a) Students interested in majoring in engineer-ing (b) Students interested in aerospace specifically Figure 1: Results of survey for students interested in engineering and aerospace engineering.interested in solving, and then to rank on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is not
3rd ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998[7] J. Jones, Integrated Logistics Support Handbook 3rd ed., New York, NY: McGraw Hill, 2006[8] “Can project management be defined? Program Management Institute [Online] Available: https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/project-management-defined-concept- 1950[9] National Research Council, Building a better NASA workforce: Meeting the workforce needs for the national vision for space exploration, The National Academies Press, Washing, DC, 2007.[10] S. A. H. McMullen, M. J. McMullen, K. L. Witcher, and B. D. Fiske, “Exploring current and projected skills and knowledge areas to meet U.S. commercial space industry needs,” in Proc of the AIAA SPACE
Paper ID #26422UAS Aerospace Projects as a Catalyst for Interdisciplinary EngineeringDr. Michael C. Hatfield, University of Alaska, Fairbanks Michael C. Hatfield is an assistant professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, and Associate Director for Science & Education, Alaska Center for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration. He earned a B.S. in electrical engineering from Ohio Northern University; an M.S. in electrical engineering from California State University Fresno, and a Ph.D. in Electrical/Aeronautical Engineering from the University of Alaska
) internally wetted, (b) externally wetted, and (c) porous tipFor commercially developed thrusters or those specifically designed for flight purposes, a largenumber of emitter tips in as small an area as possible is desirable to maximize thrust density. Inthese cases, microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) manufacturing techniques are beingemployed in general, with emitter tip densities up to 1600/cm2 [9]. However, it is possible toconstruct a fully functional electrospray thruster using much larger emitters that do not requireMEMS manufacturing. One of the simpler methods is to use standard blunt tip syringe needles asinternally wetted emitters.The emitted particles accelerate through small holes in the
theapproach segment. Participants A, C, and D show continuously decreased theta activity overtime. Participant B shows a relatively stable and elevated theta over time which may indicate ahigher degree ofskill or experience,even thanparticipant A.Participant Eshowed very hightheta power inenroute indicating arelatively highdegree ofdrowsiness. It mightbe that, becauseParticipant E did nothold an instrumentrating, they weresomewhatoverwhelmed by thecircuit and weremore relaxed duringthe more familiarenroute phase. Figure 4. Normalized powers in all EEG frequency bands obtained from one flight session forConversely, during each participant.the approach phase,a very low theta power was observed, indicating relatively greater alertness than the
the feasibility of electric flight with commercial aircraft. Another project isworking with Collins Aerospace and applying ADS-B technology to other aircraft such asUnmanned Aerial Systems (UASs). Both projects are examples of students working with industryexperts and working on projects that are forward thinking and engaging students to think aboutproblems that they may need to address once they have graduated from Iowa StateUniversity.AssessmentAssessment of Project Based Learning (PBL) can often be challenging. As we also use a flippedclassroom, the learning is shifted more to the students and requires a different set of assessmenttools than the more typical homework, quizzes, and tests. To accommodate the fact each project isdifferent and
Process Industries, 57, 114-119. Retrievedfrom http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423018300962.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2018.08.014[7] Brigette, H., & Peter, P. (2006). The checklist—a tool for error management and performanceimprovement. Journal of Critical Care, 231-235.[8] Federal Aviation Administration. (2018, December 20). Electronic Code of FederalRegulations. Washington DC, United States. Available: https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=1&SID=aa8fea6ef04319b68102c105dd9437f2&ty=HTML&h=L&mc=true&n=pt14.1.3&r=PART[9] Mrusek, B. M., Kiernan, K. W., & Clark, P. J. (2018). UAS Maintenance: A CriticalComponent in Maintaining Airworthiness. International Journal of Aviation
Paper ID #25143Student-Led Aerospace Design Team ExperiencesDr. Michael C. Hatfield, University of Alaska, Fairbanks Michael C. Hatfield is an assistant professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, and Associate Director for Science & Education, Alaska Center for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration. He earned a B.S. in electrical engineering from Ohio Northern University; an M.S. in electrical engineering from California State University Fresno, and a Ph.D. in Electrical/Aeronautical Engineering from the University of Alaska Fairbanks.Dawson Lewandoski
Paper ID #27764Student Activities, Research and Development in High-Power Rocket Propul-sion and Systems EngineeringMr. James CookMr. Maxim G. StrehleJonathan William Schaefer , Saint Louis Rocket Propulsion Lab Jonathan Schaefer is a third year student studying aerospace engineering at Saint Louis University. He is currently the structures co-lead within Rocket Propulsion Lab were he has fabricated and assembled the structural components of their teams rockets. As a first year co-lead his team’s rocket placed 5th in their division. Growing up in Dubuque, Iowa he has been continually drawn to outer space and the methods